Andrey Malakhov revealed the true reasons for leaving Channel One. A year later, it became known why Malakhov was kicked out of Channel One Andrey Malakhov: “What can you say goodbye to our viewers? "

Why Malakhov was fired from Channel One is a question that has been heard in the public for several weeks. For a long time there was no worthy answer to this question. But just recently, all the dots were connected, and the whole truth came out.

Andrey and his successes at First

It should be canceled that famous TV presenter He gave Channel One a significant part of his life. The man worked there since 1992, and managed to gain wide popularity, and most importantly, the love of millions of people.

His show “Let Them Talk” has existed for about 10 years, during which it was able to reach the top, winning high ratings. So why Malakhov was fired remained a mystery to many. Moreover, the TV channel and Andrey himself did not comment on this for a long time.

Malakhov was fired from Channel One: reasons

Recently appeared in the media new information, why Malakhov was fired. As the BBC reported, the man is leaving for VGTRK due to his conflict with the management of the former. Lately it was decided to slightly change the format of the program known to everyone. Instead of discussing social and everyday problems, take up politics. But the guy didn’t like this decision. He wanted to create the program plan himself, and not receive clear decrees. He got a little bored with the role of presenter and wanted something more.

Another reason why Malakhov was fired was the return of Natalya Nikonova. As many people know, the woman previously worked on the show, but left, becoming the producer of the program in Russia. Her next debut at the first seriously hit a man who does not intend to tolerate such antics. How can a competitor come calmly from another channel and set his own rules? The girl definitely came to shake up the socio-political bloc, especially since the presidential elections are approaching, which she still has plans for.

Before they had time to finally confirm the information for what reason the first channel fired Malakhov, they began to look for a replacement in his place. The “feeding trough” was empty for long. At the audition they saw Dmitry Borisov and Dmitry Shepelev, the latter received the role of presenter.

Why Malakhov was fired from the channel became serious news, which the TV presenter himself finally commented on in one of the newspapers. The man said that he had always been just a pawn in the hands of his superiors, who constantly expressed their demands.

“I have always been subservient. A human soldier who follows orders,” Malakhov spoke after a long silence. He stated that he wanted career growth, wants to open his own program, as many of his colleagues have done.

We must not forget about money. When wondering why Malakhov was fired from the first, it should be understood that his competitors offered him a higher salary, and this has always been a weighty argument. Moreover, the future father seriously needs additional funds.

Exclusive: why Ernst threw Maslyakov out of Channel One after Malakhov, what does the accusation of corruption have to do with it, and where to buy the sensational remedy for treating joints.

Let us remember that a scandal recently erupted around the dismissal of Malakhov. Ernst simply removed him from Channel One because he mentioned medical corruption in the episode. The episode, which never aired, was about how doctors cripple people with diseased joints, hiding the truth from them! And about the drug from the Research Institute of Rheumatology named after. V.A. Nasonova, which can save millions of lives, while being distributed at a symbolic price!

Before the noise had time to subside, the scandal took a new turn: the media became aware of Maslyakov’s dismissal from Channel One. It is not surprising that the roots of Maslyakov’s dismissal also stem from the story of the pharmacy mafia and joint remedy. Our independent correspondents met with Maslyakov to find out what exactly happened on Channel One.

Correspondent: “Alexander Vasilyevich, could you remind our readers of the story of Andrei Malakhov’s dismissal? What happened on your first channel?”

: I'll tell you how it happened. Just make sure you don't fall off your chair.

Andrey made a program about disabled people who suffered from diseased joints because they were treated with expensive but ineffective means. Andrey told the world about the existence of an affordable remedy that treats arthritis, arthrosis, rheumatism and other diseases ONCE and FOR ALL.

Ernst was furious that Andrei did not agree with him on the topic of the program. As punishment, Kostya not only did not air the program, he fired Andrei, throwing him out into the street like a puppy.

They tried to “silence” this story on Channel One, but thanks to Andrei’s supporters, the truth broke through on the Internet and spread throughout it. I myself did not previously know the reason for Andrei’s dismissal, I read it on the Internet, and then met Andrei in person, and he confirmed all this.

Then I realized the scale of the corruption of the first channel! Previously, I did not pay attention to the fact that even in our humorous program they make adjustments to the text about pharmacies and doctors. Now the terrible truth has been revealed to me.

Channel One is COMPLETELY corrupted by the pharmacy mafia, which profits from Russian pensioners. They advertise on the first channel for remedies for joint pain, which are expensive, but in the end they only bring temporary relief and do not cure! And the worst thing is that our doctors know that a remedy from a NEW GENERATION has already been invented and tested, which really HELPS SICK JOINTS. But no one listens to them, advertising for the product is not broadcast, and the product itself is on the shelves of pharmacies!

Correspondent: “Alexander Vasilyevich, is your departure also connected with this story?”

: Not just connected, this story was the reason. I didn’t leave the first channel, I was “left” from there, as they say. Fired.

After a conversation with Andrei Malakhov, I was terribly indignant at this situation, and tried to push into the new issue of KVN several very caustic jokes about pharmaceutical products for joints, which the first channel advertises with all its might. So to speak, so that people at least think a little about who they believe and what they accept.

But they didn’t let me do this “sabotage.” Ernst immediately summoned me to his place and forced me to write a statement “of my own free will.”

He said that neither I nor Andrey understand what business means, and there is no place for people like that on Channel One. And the fact that in the country everyone after 40 begins to experience pain in the lower back, arms, legs, swelling, cramps, people suffer, it’s hard for them to walk and bend over - this doesn’t bother him. It is necessary to keep the channel afloat and pay employees salaries, and the main income of the channel is precisely the advertising of pharmaceutical, useless joint products.

Correspondent: “But judging by the loud headlines in the newspapers, the story didn’t end there?”

: Do you mean accusing me of corruption? Yes, this is really happening. Two days after my dismissal, I received a summons from the investigator, which stated that charges of corruption were being brought against me. This is irony!

Ernst, of course, brought the accusation. The reason was that I spoke out on social networks in support of Andrei Malakhov, and gave a link to an article by rheumatologist Viktor Sedelnikov, who describes a new, REALLY WORKING drug for joints, released by the Research Institute of Rheumatology.

Ernst tried to turn things around so that the Research Institute of Rheumatology gave me a bribe so that I would advertise their medicine. Fortunately, the investigators are not devoid of common sense, and no criminal case was initiated.

Therefore, now I can safely speak out about the arbitrariness of the pharmacy mafia on Channel One, and I ask you to provide part of the interview with rheumatologist Viktor Sedelnikov, cut from that same ill-fated program by Andrei Malakhov.


Viktor Sedelnikov, senior rheumatologist, Research Institute of Rheumatology named after. Nasonova, Moscow:

“In most cases, patients with joint diseases are offered treatment with chondoprotectors and other drugs that, with the best results, can slow down the development of a particular disease, nothing more. In some cases, people are treated with injections or surgery. As a result, the person does not feel pain and believes that everything is fine, while a cancerous tumor may already be growing in the body. And operations on joints very often end in disability or other serious complications. They are indicated only in the most extreme cases.

It is precisely because of the low efficiency classical approach to treatment, the minds of specialists have always been occupied with the development of a drug that can truly treat diseased joints and restore people to health. At the V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, we have created the first medicine of its kind that can truly restore joints.

The fact is that the Research Institute of Rheumatology is not involved in commercial activities. The research institute distributes it for a purely symbolic price, as part of a special program.

“ARTRAID cream” is a unique drug that so far has no analogues both abroad and in Russia.

On this moment"ARTRAID" has undergone clinical trials and has shown extremely high rates of effectiveness. It helps even in advanced and severe cases, restoring cartilage tissue and returning joints to a healthy state. The medicine is unique in its characteristics. No other drug can effectively restore diseased joints, returning a person to a completely healthy state.

For clarity, we at the Research Institute of Rheumatology have compiled a table comparing ARTRAID cream with popular pharmaceutical products for joints.

ARTRAID™ Famous gels and tablets for joints and back
Target: return the joints to a healthy state ( permanent solution to the problem) Temporary pain relief, masking the disease ( the buyer needs them constantly)
Price: only 990 rubles for a promotion from the manufacturer 1225-9325 rub/month
Action: Eliminates pain, swelling and inflammation
Stops the destruction process
Restores
damaged cartilage bone surface
Gels: temporary anesthetic effect on the area of ​​application
Tablets: temporary pain relief
Additional effects: º Protects joints
º cartilage tissue of the musculoskeletal system
º Increases joint mobility, increases permissible physical activity
Negative effect:
hide the course of the disease
Side effects, harm to the body, contraindications None º Disorders of the digestive system, central nervous system, circulatory system.
Impaired functioning of the kidneys, liver and intestinal tract. Allergic reactions may occur
Principle of operation: They relieve pain by stopping inflammation and stopping the progression of the disease. Restore cartilage tissue and bone surface, protect joints Temporarily relieves pain due to the content of anesthetic substances in the composition
Place in the sales ranking in Europe for the 4th quarter of 2016: 1 (+53) not available on the market
Guarantee: In Russia there is a 365 day (1 year) warranty from the manufacturer: declared result or refund Absent

The fact is that the Research Institute of Rheumatology is not engaged in commercial activities. The research institute distributes it for a purely symbolic price, as part of a special program. Despite my high position, I have no influence on commercial pharmacy chains. All I can do is recommend the drug. I wholeheartedly recommend ARTRAID to everyone. Actually, the entire scientific community understands what a colossal breakthrough in the field of joint treatment has been made. To my deep regret, pharmacy chains did not react, so ARTRAID never appeared on pharmacy shelves. I think the secret is that it is more profitable for pharmacies to sell temporary relief rather than a panacea.”

What should people do if pharmacies do not sell the drug?

We found a way out of the situation - the research institute’s specialists created a special website on their own where you can leave an application for “ARTRAID”. All you need to do is simply leave your name and contact information. After this, you will be contacted to confirm a convenient delivery time. We tried to make everything as simple as possible so that everyone could get their medicine, even if they had never ordered anything online before.


: I think the question is settled. Pharmacies offer outdated and dangerous drugs, while hiding from people the truth about the new drug, which is distributed at the expense of the budget. Draw your own conclusions. This is your health and only you are responsible for it. Goodbye!


There was a conflict with the management of Channel One. The disagreements turned out to be so significant that the TV presenter filed an application and decided to change the channel.

While viewers were wondering why the producers removed Andrei Malakhov from Channel 1, the media, citing anonymous sources, published several versions:

  1. Conflicts within the team.
  2. Decline in TV ratings.
  3. The discrepancy between the views of Malakhov and Natalya Nikonova (producer) on the topic of the program.
  4. The producers' reluctance to grant the presenter maternity leave (the showman's wife is about to give birth).

On the First, they filmed an episode of the show about the departure of the star presenter. The media reported that there are a couple of candidates for Malakhov’s place - Borisov and Shepelev. As a result, the issue about Malakhov was hosted by Dmitry Borisov.

It’s no secret that working effectively and making a quality product for broadcast in conditions of intra-team hostility and discontent is problematic.

The presenter himself noted that a lot has changed over the course of several years. He was not pleased with the change in the location of the program’s filming (previously, episodes of the show were filmed at the Ostankino television center) and he was tired of following management’s commands, without being able to influence the theme and the filming process.

Film crew of the program “Let Them Talk”

Discontent reached its peak by mid-summer 2017. Although at the beginning of the summer, in an interview with GQ, the presenter stated that the reason could only be a proposal to do something completely absurd and immoral on air to increase ratings.

Malakhov was fired - the main reasons

The TV presenter himself denied the theory about the insufficient amount of the fee and said that if this were the only issue, he would have left Channel 1 several years ago.

Theoretically, the reason for the decline in ratings could be a sharp shift in topics towards politics. The “Let Them Talk” program is an analogue of the popular American show for housewives (“The Jerry Springer Show”). Considering such an audience, it is not surprising that the departure from social and everyday themes did not create a sensation.

Malakhov VS Nikonova

One of the most plausible reasons for the presenter’s departure from the channel is the conflict between Malakhov and the new producer of Channel One, Natalya Nikonova.

During the pre-election race, Mrs. Nikonova began broadcasting “Let Them Talk” programs with explicitly political themes. Malakhov did not agree with this decision and expressed his dissatisfaction, but the channel’s management refused to meet the showman and give him the opportunity to choose topics for the programs himself.

Malakhov is no longer the host of the “Let Them Talk” program

Speaking about the real reasons for leaving, the presenter noted that he had long become popular with the audience and over the years of work he was tired of blindly following instructions at a time when less experienced and well-known presenters get the opportunity to work on their own projects.

For creative person With such colossal experience in hosting television programs behind him, such an attitude from the management is a serious reason to think about leaving for a place where his initiative and experience will be appreciated and his opinions will be listened to.

This is not the first case on television when producers do not take into account the presenters, do not try to compromise and lose talented channel employees. It is unknown what the change in the host of “Let Them Talk” will mean for the program’s ratings.

The change in the theme of the show caused dissatisfaction not only with Malakhov, but also with some other team members. Producer Natalya Nikonova previously worked on the “Live Broadcast” program on Russia 1 channel, and the ratings of this program, due to its seriousness and obvious political bias, were significantly lower than those of “Let Them Talk.”

Andrey works as a presenter of the “Live Broadcast” program on the Rossiya channel.

There was no open conflict, but the whole team was perplexed and tense, turning a popular talk show into a clone " Live broadcast"Nobody wanted to.

There were even rumors that it had become the real reason leaving not only Malakhov. There was an assumption in the press that the presenter would take 1 part of the team with him to the Russia channel. An anonymous source denied this information, saying that there have been no statements of resignation from anyone from the team working on the “Let Them Talk” program.

Family is the most important thing

The showman's wife Natalya Shkuleva, who holds the position of publisher and brand director of Elle magazine in the Russian Federation, is in a position and soon a new addition to the TV presenter's family is expected. In this regard, the real reason for Malakhov’s departure from the channel, according to Elle, was the refusal of the show’s producer, Natalya Nikonova, to grant the TV presenter leave to help his wife care for the baby.

Moreover, it became known that Mrs. Nikonova refused the presenter legal right(Labor Code of the Russian Federation, Art. 256) take maternity leave in a rather rude manner, stating that working on the show is not kindergarten and Malakhov must decide who he is first of all - a nanny or a TV presenter.

The showman was dissatisfied with this attitude of management and cynicism towards him. Considering long years his work on First, his experience and popularity among the audience, the producers could have been more loyal and polite.

A quarter of a century is no joke

The talented TV presenter began working on Channel One about 25 years ago, and since 2001 he was approved as the host of the show “Big Wash,” which was later renamed “5 Evenings,” and then became the well-known program “Let Them Talk.”

The presenter himself said that over many years of cooperation, everyone was so accustomed to him always being on Channel One that since December 2016 they even forgot to renew the contract with him, although Malakhov continued to work and host the show.

The “Let Them Talk” program is hosted by Dmitry Borisov

Considering how many years Malakhov hosted the show on Channel One and how many fans he acquired during this time, we can safely say that viewers will watch his programs on any channel.

Finally, all the i's are dotted - Andrei Malakhov officially left Channel One. “I was always subordinate. A human soldier, following orders. But I wanted independence. I looked at my colleagues: they became producers of their programs, they began to make decisions themselves. And suddenly the understanding came: life goes on, and you need to grow, get out of the tight confines.” , Malakhov explained in an interview with Woman`s Day.

ON THIS TOPIC

And in his address to the country’s chief television doctor, Elena Malysheva, published in StarHit, he was a little more specific: “We need to develop, you, as the producer of your own program, understand this better than others. And if at the same time I pushed you to new topic broadcast called “The first manifestations of male menopause” is also not bad.”

Now for people far from the television kitchen, it’s worth explaining what Malakhov meant. The fact is that Natalya Nikonova returned to Channel One as a producer. She returned and developed vigorous activity, seizing the reins of the “Let Them Talk” program. Employees of Channel One reported that Nikonova’s task is to “shake up the socio-political block of broadcasts.” These changes were not to the liking of the star TV presenter.

The changes, it must be said, were revolutionary. Firstly, Andrei, as they say, was deprived of the opportunity to formulate the editorial plan of the Let Them Talk program. He was assigned only the role of a presenter, to whom questions are written to the heroes and into whose ear monitor the director gives the commands “Let them fight,” “Don’t approach the heroine, let her scream,” “Approach the experts in the hall.” Malakhov was not satisfied with the “talking head” function in any way.

The second change concerns the subject matter of his program. If previously “Let Them Talk” touched on the social and everyday sphere, then Nikonova decided to make the program political talk show, which would talk about America, Syria, Ukraine and other news-producing countries. The new format has already been tested - the first episode of “Let Them Talk” with a new host was dedicated to Mikheil Saakashvili. Malakhov, of course, is not at all interested in politics.

Finally, competitors from “Russia” are said to have offered Andrey almost twice as much salary. And the “best presenter in the country,” as Malakhov was introduced to the “Live Broadcast” team, now really needs money for diapers, rattles and strollers - at the end of the year he will become a dad.