The type of idle talk (Judushka Golovlev) is an artistic discovery of M. E. Saltykov-Shchedrin. Before this, in Russian literature, in Gogol and Dostoevsky, there were images vaguely reminiscent of Judas, but these are only light hints. Neither before nor after Saltykov-Shchedrin was anyone able to portray the image of a windbag with such force and accusatory clarity. Judushka Golovlev is a one-of-a-kind type, a brilliant find of the author.
Saltykov-Shchedrin, when creating his novel, set himself the task of showing the mechanism of family destruction. The soul of this process was, without any doubt, Porfishka the bloodsucker. It goes without saying that special attention the author devoted the development of this particular image, which is interesting, among other things, because it is constantly changing, right up to the last pages, and the reader can never be sure what exactly he will turn out to be this image in the next chapter. We see the portrait of Judas “in dynamics.” Seeing for the first time the unsympathetic “frank child”, sucking up to his mother, eavesdropping, and ear-splitting, the reader can hardly imagine the disgusting, shudder-inducing creature who commits suicide at the end of the book. The image changes beyond recognition. Only the name remains unchanged. Just as Porfiry becomes Judushka from the first pages of the novel, so Judushka dies. There is something surprisingly mean in this name, which so truly expresses the inner essence of this character.
One of the main features of Judas (not counting, of course, idle talk) is hypocrisy, a striking contradiction between well-intentioned reasoning and dirty aspirations. All attempts of Porfiry Golovlev to snatch a larger piece, to keep an extra penny, all his murders (there is no other way to describe his policy towards his relatives), in short, everything he does is accompanied by prayers and pious speeches. Remembering Christ through every word, Judas sends her son Petenka to certain death, harasses her niece Anninka, and sends her own newborn baby to an orphanage.
But it’s not only with such “godly” speeches that Judas harasses his household. He has two more favorite topics: family and farming. On this, in fact, the scope of his outpourings is limited due to complete ignorance and reluctance to see anything lying outside the boundaries of his small world. However, these everyday conversations, which Mama Arina Petrovna is not averse to telling, in the mouth of Judas turn into endless moral teachings. He simply tyrannizes the entire family, bringing everyone to complete exhaustion. Of course, all these flattering, sugary speeches do not deceive anyone. Since childhood, Porfishka’s mother has not trusted him: he overacts. Hypocrisy combined with ignorance does not know how to mislead.
There are several powerful scenes in “The Golovlev Gentlemen” that make the reader almost physically feel the state of oppression from the enveloping speeches of Judas. For example, his conversation with his brother Pavel, who was lying dying. The unfortunate dying man is suffocating from the presence of Judas, and he, supposedly not noticing these tossing, “like a relative” makes fun of his brother. The victims of Judas never feel so defenseless as in the moments when his idle talk is expressed in “harmless” banter that has no end. The same tension is felt in that part of the novel where Anninka, almost exhausted, tries to escape from her uncle’s house.
The longer the story goes on, the more more people falls under the yoke of Judas' tyranny. He harasses everyone who comes into his field of vision, while remaining invulnerable. And yet even his armor has cracks. So, he is very afraid of Arina Petrovna’s curse. She reserves this weapon of hers as a last resort against her blood-drinking son. Alas, when she actually curses Porfiry, it does not have the effect on him that he himself feared. Another weakness of Judas is the fear of Evprakseyushka’s departure, that is, the fear of breaking the established way of life once and for all. However, Evprakseyushka can only threaten to leave, but she herself remains in place. Gradually, this fear of the owner Golovlev is dulled.
The whole way of life of Judas is pouring from empty to empty. He counts non-existent income, imagines some incredible situations and solves them himself. Gradually, when there is no one alive left around who could be eaten, Judas begins to harass those who appear to him in his imagination. He takes revenge on everyone indiscriminately, no one knows why: he reproaches his dead mother, fines men, robs peasants. This happens all the same with false affection ingrained into the soul. But is it possible to say “soul” about the inner essence of Judas? Saltykov-Shchedrin does not speak of the essence of Porfishka the Bloodsucker as anything other than ashes.
The end of Judas is quite unexpected. It would seem, how can a selfish person who walks over corpses, a hoarder, who has ruined his entire family for his own profit, commit suicide? And yet, Judas apparently begins to realize his guilt. Saltykov-Shchedrin makes it clear that although the awareness of emptiness and uselessness has come, resurrection and purification are no longer possible, as well as further existence.
Judushka Golovlev is truly an “eternal type”, firmly entrenched in Russian literature. His name has already become a household name. You may not have read the novel, but you will know this name. It is not used often, but is still occasionally heard in speech. Of course, Judas is a literary exaggeration, a collection of various vices for the edification of posterity. These vices, first of all, are hypocrisy, empty talk, and worthlessness. Judas is the personification of a personality who is directly heading towards self-destruction and does not realize this until last moment. No matter how exaggerated this character is, his flaws are human, non-fictional. That is why the type of windbag is eternal.
What does Judushka Golovlev do? eternal type"? (based on the novel by M. E. Saltykov-Shchedrin “The Golovlev Lords.”) The type of idle talk (Judushka Golovlev) is an artistic discovery of M. E. Saltykov-Shchedrin. Before this, in Russian literature, in Gogol, Dostoevsky, there are images that vaguely resemble Judas, but these are only light hints. Neither before nor after Saltykov-Shchedrin, no one was able to portray the image of a windbag with such accusatory clarity. Having seen for the first time an unsympathetic “frank child” sucking up to his mother, eavesdropping, gossiping, the reader can hardly imagine that disgusting, shudder-inducing creature who ends up with yourself at the end of the book.
The image changes beyond recognition. Only the name remains unchanged. Just as Porfiry becomes Judushka from the first pages of the novel, so Judushka dies. One of the main features of Judas (not counting, of course, idle talk) is hypocrisy, a striking contradiction between well-intentioned reasoning and dirty aspirations. All attempts of Porfiry Golovlev to snatch a larger piece for himself, to keep an extra penny, all his murders (there is no other way to call his policy in relation to relatives), in short, everything he does is accompanied by prayers and pious speeches.
Remembering Christ through every word, Judas sends her son Petenka to certain death, harasses her niece Ashshnka, and sends her own newborn baby to an orphanage. But it’s not only with such “godly” speeches that Judas harasses his household.
He has two more favorite topics: family and farming. On this, in fact, the scope of his outpourings is limited due to complete ignorance and reluctance to see anything lying outside the boundaries of his small world. However, these everyday conversations, which Mama Arina Petrovna is not averse to telling, in the mouth of Judas turn into endless moral teachings. He simply tyrannizes the entire family, bringing it to complete exhaustion. Of course, all these flattering, sugary speeches do not deceive anyone. Mother has not trusted Porfishka since childhood: he overacts too much.
Hypocrisy combined with ignorance does not know how to mislead. There are several powerful scenes in “The Golovlev Gentlemen” that make the reader almost physically feel the state of oppression from the enveloping speeches of Judas. For example, his conversation with his brother Pavel, who was lying dying. The unfortunate dying man is suffocated by the presence of Judas, and he, supposedly not noticing these throwings, makes fun of his brother “in a kindred way.” The victims of Judas never feel as defenseless as in the moments when his idle talk is expressed in “harmless” banter, which is not end.
The same tension is felt in that part of the novel where Anninka, almost exhausted, tries to escape from her uncle’s house. The longer the story goes on, the more people fall under the yoke of Judas’ tyranny. He harasses everyone who comes into his field of vision, while remaining invulnerable. And yet, even in his armor there are cracks. So, he is very afraid of Arina Petrovna’s curse.
She reserves this weapon of hers as a last resort against her blood-drinking son. Alas, when she really is. curses Porfiry, this does not have the effect on him that he himself feared. Another weakness of Judas is the fear of Evprakseyushka’s departure, that is, the fear of breaking the established way of life once and for all. However, Evprakseyushka can only threaten to leave, but she herself remains in place. Gradually, this fear of the owner Golovlev is dulled. The whole way of life of Judas is pouring from empty to empty.
He counts non-existent income, imagines some incredible situations and solves them himself. Gradually, when there is no one alive around who could be eaten, Judas begins to harass those who appear to him in his imagination. He takes revenge on everyone indiscriminately, for no one knows why: he reproaches his dead mother, fines men, robs peasants. This all happens with the same false affection ingrained into the soul.
But is it possible to say “soul” about the inner essence of Judas? Saltykov-Shchedrin does not speak of the essence of Porfishka the Bloodsucker as anything other than ashes. Judushka Golovlev is truly an “eternal type.” His name has already become a household name. Judas is the personification of a person who is directly heading towards self-destruction and does not realize this until the very last moment.
What will we do with the received material:
If this material was useful to you, you can save it to your page on social networks:
| Tweet |
More abstracts, coursework, and dissertations on this topic:
“Family Thought” at the Golovlev estate (based on the novel “The Golovlev Gentlemen” by M. E. Saltykov-Shchedrin)
The old one is gradually crumbling political system, and with him many families. But this is social aspect novel. If we abstract from those... There are so many vices in each of the members of this family that their disunity... This prudence turns into insensibility and despotism. The author says that all his life the word “family” has never left...
The image of a landscape in M. E. Saltykov-Shchedrin’s novel “The Golovlev Gentlemen”
Showing this, Saltykov relies on the visual and expressive capabilities of archetypal symbolism. Stepan Vladimirych, who has lost his last connections, plunges into the dawnless darkness.. The archetypal images used by Saltykov are directly related to ideas about death and chaos..
Saltykov-Shchedrin's novel "The Golovlevs"
The writer depicted the story of the moral vulgarization and extinction of the Golavlev family of landowners. It is collective artistically, in.. The words bal-demon, monster, bastard, scoundrel, scoundrel were common in this.. For example, her reaction to the death of her daughter Saltykov-Shchedrin shows a feeling of dissatisfaction, primarily because..
"That which is below corresponds to that which is above; and that which is above corresponds to that which is below, to accomplish the wonders of the one thing."
On the website read: "Vladislav Lebedko"
Images of commoners in the novel by I.S. Turgenev's "Fathers and Sons" and in the novel by N.G. Chernyshevsky "What to do?"
It should be noted that one of them comes from a noble family - this is Rakhmetov, who, for the sake of his principles, sells the inheritance he received and completely.. His closeness to the people is also emphasized by Nikitushka’s nickname Lemovowed.. To which the nihilist replies: Well, if he deserves contempt. Evgeniy considers Russian people dark, limited...
The genre and ideological originality of the novel by N.G. Chernyshevsky "What to do?"
Often the author, like a prompter, bursts into the narrative and stubbornly demands a report from his readers, saying, do they understand everything? And he himself is malicious... The author and his heroes speak in an absurd, clumsy and unintelligible language. The main characters behave unnaturally, but they, like dolls, are obedient to the will of the author, who can force them to do...
How N. G. Chernyshevsky answers the question posed in the title of the novel “What to do?”
At the end of the fifties, literature included “ special person"Rakhmetov and the “new people” described by N. G. Chernyshevsky. Who are they and where are they from? V.. It seems to me that these were the first sprouts of the Russian intelligentsia. It is for.. The pioneer of its practical implementation is Vera Pavlovna, who opens a sewing workshop and..
Rakhmetov is the “special” hero of the novel “What is to be done?” Chernyshevsky
They love work, are passionately devoted to science, their moral ideals high. These people build their relationships on mutual trust and respect. They don’t know.. There are very few people like him who are not satisfied with either science or family.. He went through the school of political education with the commoner student Kirsanov.
Pechorin as a type of extra person in the novel
His tragedy lies in the fact that despite his abilities, the hero cannot find a place for himself in life; he has no goal. And his forces are on... Pechorin does not have such an opportunity. He squanders his rich spiritual powers... And Pechorin sets out on wanderings. Lermontov shows the reader only some episodes of his life, when his character...
Human types in I. L. Goncharov’s novel “Oblomov”
Sometimes he is spiritual in his own way: “The thought walked like a free bird across the face, fluttered in the folds of the forehead, then completely disappeared.” And what.. So, for example, he describes Ilya Ilyich’s robe: “like an obedient slave submits.. Despite the difference V social status, they are akin to each other. Both grew up on the same soil, both experienced...
Apr 13 2015
The type of idle talk (Judushka Golovlev) is an artistic discovery of M. E. Saltykov-Shchedrin. Before this, in Russian literature, in Gogol and Dostoevsky, there were images vaguely reminiscent of Judas, but these are only light hints. Neither before nor after Saltykov-Shchedrin was anyone able to portray a windbag with such force and accusatory clarity. Judushka Golovlev is a one-of-a-kind type, a brilliant find of the author. Saltykov-Shchedrin, creating his own, set himself the task of showing the mechanism of family destruction. The soul of this process was, without any doubt, Porfishka the bloodsucker.
It goes without saying that I paid special attention to the development of this particular one, which is interesting, among other things, because it is constantly changing, right up to the last pages, and the reader can never be sure what exactly this image will turn out to be in the next chapter. We see the portrait of Judas “in dynamics.” Seeing for the first time the unsympathetic “frank child”, sucking up to his mother, eavesdropping, and ear-splitting, the reader can hardly imagine the disgusting, shudder-inducing creature who commits suicide at the end of the book. The image changes beyond recognition. Only the name remains unchanged.
Just as Porfiry becomes Judushka from the first pages of the novel, so Judushka dies. There is something surprisingly mean in this name, which so truly expresses the inner essence of this character. One of the main features of Judas (not counting, of course, idle talk) is hypocrisy, a striking contradiction between well-intentioned reasoning and dirty aspirations. All of Porfiry Golovlev’s attempts to snatch a larger piece for himself, to hold on to an extra penny, all of his murders (there is no other way to describe his policy towards his relatives), in short, everything he does is accompanied by prayers and pious speeches. Remembering Christ through every word, Judas sends her son Petenka to certain death, harasses her niece Anninka, and sends her own newborn baby to an orphanage. But it’s not only with such “godly” speeches that Judas harasses his household.
He has two more favorite topics: family and farming. On this, in fact, the scope of his outpourings is limited due to complete ignorance and reluctance to see anything lying outside the boundaries of his small world. However, these everyday conversations, which Mama Arina Petrovna is not averse to telling, in the mouth of Judas turn into endless moral teachings. He simply tyrannizes the entire family, bringing everyone to complete exhaustion. Of course, all these flattering, sugary speeches do not deceive anyone.
Since childhood, Porfishka’s mother has not trusted him: he overacts. Hypocrisy combined with ignorance does not know how to mislead. There are several powerful scenes in “The Golovlev Gentlemen” that make the reader almost physically feel the state of oppression from the enveloping speeches of Judas. For example, his conversation with his brother Pavel, who was lying dying.
The unfortunate dying man is suffocating from the presence of Judas, and he, supposedly not noticing these tossing, “like a relative” makes fun of his brother. The victims of Judas never feel so defenseless as in the moments when his idle talk is expressed in “harmless” banter that has no end. The same tension is felt in that part of the novel where Anninka, almost exhausted, tries to escape from her uncle’s house.
The longer the story goes on, the more people fall under the yoke of Judas’ tyranny. He harasses everyone who comes into his field of vision, while remaining invulnerable. And yet even his armor has cracks.
So, he is very afraid of Arina Petrovna’s curse. She reserves this weapon of hers as a last resort against her blood-drinking son. Alas, when she copyright
Need a cheat sheet? Then save - » What makes Judushka Golovlev an “eternal type”? (based on M. E. Saltykov-Shchedrin’s novel “The Golovlevs.”). Literary essays!The type of idle talk (Judushka Golovlev) is an artistic discovery of M. E. Saltykov-Shchedrin. Before this, in Russian literature, in Gogol, Dostoevsky, there are images that vaguely resemble Judas, but these are only light hints. Neither before nor after Saltykov-Shchedrin was anyone able to portray the image of a windbag with such accusatory clarity.
Having seen for the first time an unsympathetic “frank child”, sucking up to his mother, eavesdropping, gossiping, the reader can hardly imagine that disgusting, shudder-inducing creature,
Who commits suicide at the end of the book. The image changes beyond recognition. Only the name remains unchanged. Just as Porfiry becomes Judushka from the first pages of the novel, so Judushka dies.
One of the main features of Judas (not counting, of course, idle talk) is hypocrisy, a striking contradiction between well-intentioned reasoning and dirty aspirations. All of Porfiry Golovlev’s attempts to snatch a larger piece for himself, to hold on to an extra penny, all of his murders (there’s no other way to call his policy towards his relatives), in short, everything he does is accompanied by prayers and pious speeches. Remembering through
Every word of Christ, Judas sends her son Petenka to certain death, harasses her niece Anninka, sends her own newborn baby to an orphanage.
But it’s not only with such “godly” speeches that Judas harasses his household. He has two more favorite topics: family and farming. On this, in fact, the scope of his outpourings is limited due to complete ignorance and reluctance to see anything lying outside the boundaries of his small world. However, these everyday conversations, which Mama Arina Petrovna is not averse to telling, in the mouth of Judas turn into endless moral teachings. He simply tyrannizes the entire family, bringing it to complete exhaustion. Of course, all these flattering, sugary speeches are not fooling anyone. Since childhood, Porfishka’s mother has not trusted him: he overacts. Hypocrisy combined with ignorance does not know how to mislead.
There are several powerful scenes in “The Golovlev Gentlemen” that make the reader almost physically feel the state of oppression from the enveloping speeches of Judas. For example, his conversation with his brother Pavel, who was lying dying. The unfortunate dying man is suffocating from the presence of Judas, and he, supposedly not noticing these throwings, “like a relative” makes fun of his brother. The victims of Judas never feel so defenseless as in the moments when his idle talk is expressed in “harmless” banter that has no end. The same tension is felt in that part of the novel where Anninka, almost exhausted, tries to escape from her uncle’s house.
The longer the story goes on, the more people fall under the yoke of Judas’ tyranny. He harasses everyone who comes into his field of vision, while remaining invulnerable. And yet even his armor has cracks. So, he is very afraid of Arina Petrovna’s curse. She reserves this weapon of hers as a last resort against her blood-drinking son. Alas, when she actually curses Porfiry, it does not have the effect on him that he himself feared. Another weakness of Judas is the fear of Evprakseyushka’s departure, that is, the fear of breaking the established way of life once and for all. However, Evprakseyushka can only threaten to leave, but she herself remains in place. Gradually, this fear of the owner Golovlev is dulled.
The whole way of life of Judas is pouring from empty to empty. He counts non-existent income, imagines some incredible situations and solves them himself. Gradually, when there is no one alive left around who could be eaten, Judas begins to harass those who appear to him in his imagination. He takes revenge on everyone indiscriminately, no one knows why: he reproaches his dead mother, fines men, robs peasants. This all happens with the same false affection ingrained into the soul. But is it possible to say “soul” about the inner essence of Judas? Saltykov-Shchedrin does not speak of the essence of Porfishka the Bloodsucker as anything other than ashes.
Judushka Golovlev is truly an “eternal type.” His name has already become a household name. Judas is the personification of a person who is directly heading towards self-destruction and does not realize this until the very last moment.
What makes Judushka Golovlev an “eternal type”?(based on the novel by M. E. Saltykov-Shchedrin “The Golovlev Gentlemen.”)
Type of empty words (Judushka Golovlev) - artistic discovery of M. E. Saltykov-Shchedrin. Before this, in Russian literature, in Gogol, Dostoevsky, there are images that vaguely resemble Judas, but these are only light hints. Neither before nor after Saltykov-Shchedrin was anyone able to portray the image of a windbag with such accusatory clarity.
Seeing for the first time an unsympathetic “frank child”, sucking up to his mother, eavesdropping, and gossiping, the reader can hardly imagine the disgusting, shudder-inducing creature who commits suicide at the end of the book. The image changes beyond recognition. Only the name remains unchanged. Just as Porfiry becomes Judushka from the first pages of the novel, so Judushka dies.
One of the main features of Judas (not counting, of course, idle talk) is hypocrisy, a striking contradiction between well-intentioned reasoning and dirty aspirations. All of Porfiry Golovlev’s attempts to snatch a larger piece for himself, to hold on to an extra penny, all of his murders (there’s no other way to call his policy towards his relatives), in short, everything he does is accompanied by prayers and pious speeches. Remembering Christ through every word, Judas sends her son Petenka to certain death, harasses her niece Ashshnka, and sends her own newborn baby to an orphanage.
But it’s not only with such “godly” speeches that Judas harasses his household. He has two more favorite topics: family and farming. On this, in fact, the scope of his outpourings is limited due to complete ignorance and reluctance to see anything lying outside the boundaries of his small world. However, these everyday conversations, which Mama Arina Petrovna is not averse to telling, in the mouth of Judas turn into endless moral teachings. He simply tyrannizes the entire family, bringing it to complete exhaustion. Of course, all these flattering, sugary speeches are not fooling anyone. Since childhood, Porfishka’s mother has not trusted him: he overacts too much. Hypocrisy combined with ignorance does not know how to mislead.
There are several powerful scenes in “The Golovlev Gentlemen” that make the reader almost physically feel the state of oppression from the enveloping speeches of Judas. For example, his conversation with his brother Pavel, who was lying dying. The unfortunate dying man is suffocating from the presence of Judas, and he, supposedly not noticing these throwings, “like a relative” makes fun of his brother. The victims of Judas never feel so defenseless as in the moments when his idle talk is expressed in “harmless” banter that has no end. The same tension is felt in that part of the novel where Anninka, almost exhausted, tries to escape from her uncle’s house.
The longer the story goes on, the more people fall under the yoke of Judas’ tyranny. He harasses everyone who comes into his field of vision, while remaining invulnerable. And yet even his armor has cracks. So, he is very afraid of Arina Petrovna’s curse. She reserves this weapon of hers as a last resort against her blood-drinking son. Alas, when she really is. curses Porfiry, this does not have the effect on him that he himself feared. Another weakness of Judas is the fear of Evprakseyushka’s departure, that is, the fear of breaking the established way of life once and for all. However, Evprakseyushka can only threaten to leave, but she herself remains in place. Gradually, this fear of the owner Golovlev is dulled.
The whole way of life of Judas is pouring from empty to empty. He counts non-existent income, imagines some incredible situations and solves them himself. Gradually, when there is no one alive left around who could be eaten, Judas begins to harass those who appear to him in his imagination. He takes revenge on everyone indiscriminately, no one knows why: he reproaches his dead mother, fines men, robs peasants. This all happens with the same false affection ingrained into the soul. But is it possible to say “soul” about the inner essence of Judas? Saltykov-Shchedrin does not speak of the essence of Porfishka the Bloodsucker as anything other than ashes.
Judushka Golovlev is truly an “eternal type.” His name has already become a household name. Judas is the personification of a person who is directly heading towards self-destruction and does not realize this until the very last moment.