Story by M.A. Sholokhov’s “The Fate of Man” was written in the 1950s. The genre of this work is transitional. A small volume and an episode as a plot basis are characteristic of the story. But at the same time, the scale of the conflict in which the hero becomes a participant turns a short story about an incident that happened with “two orphaned people” into a story about a “Russian man ... of unbending will” who withstood a “military hurricane of unprecedented force.”
The humanistic idea is already stated in the title of the work. The author focused on the character and fate of the one who was able to remain human under inhuman conditions and preserve a soul capable of love and compassion. The war in the story is not only described through the eyes of an eyewitness and participant, but is also shown as the destruction of life itself (the image of an insulted, ruined childhood).
The events in “The Fate of Man” take place “in the first post-war spring on the Upper Don.” The narrator, trying to get to the village of Bukanovskaya, remains on the pier for two hours waiting for his companions. There he meets a “strange” couple - “a tall, stooped man” and “ little boy“Judging by his height, he’s about five or six years old, no more.” From the words of the “random interlocutor” it turns out that he is a former “truck driver”, a participant in the war. From the very beginning, the boy’s father makes him want to “ask where he is going with the child, what need is driving him into such a muddle.” When the narrator “looked at him” more closely, he begins to feel “something uneasy” from the man’s eyes, “as if sprinkled with ashes, filled with such an inescapable mortal melancholy that it is difficult to look into them.”
There is something unusual about this hero, attracting attention, causing surprise even in the narrator, who went through almost the entire war. This explains the narrator’s special interest (“...I have completely turned into a rumor”) in the confession of “a native of the Voronezh province” Andrei Sokolov.
The narration of the hero's life uses the form of a tale. Sokolov tells his biography himself. His story is a journey from one suffering to another. The hero survived civil war, the only one of the entire family who survived the famine of 1922 (“Rodney... not a single soul”). But life went on. Information from the site Bigreferat.ru / site The hero gets a wife (“Quiet, cheerful, obsequious and smart...”), children (“First a little son was born, a year later two more girls...”), a house (“In ten years we saved a little some money and before the war they built a little house for themselves...").
Life seemed to be getting better, but the war ruins everything. “On the third day” Andrei Sokolov leaves home, accompanied by his “orphaned” children and his wife, sobbing from the premonition of eternal separation. At first, her tears are perceived by Sokolov as harbingers own death(“Why are you burying me alive ahead of time?!”), and only three years later he finds out what “then a woman’s heart told her” the terrible truth about herself. She and her daughters were killed by a direct bomb hit on their home, “awkwardly” built “near an aircraft factory.”
For four years, the hero had to experience all the hardships of the war. He was ᴘẚʜᴇn twice, the third time, severely shell-shocked, he was captured, where death awaited him at every step. The hero was miraculously not shot by “six machine gunners” who noticed a Russian soldier in the field: “... a corporal... older” decided that it was better to send the prisoner “to work for... the Reich.” Then he was detained for attempting to escape, beaten, poisoned with dogs (“Naked, covered in blood, and brought to the camp. I spent a month in a punishment cell for escaping, but still alive... I remained alive”).
For the “bitter words” that “four cubic meters of production is a lot, ... but one cubic meter through the eyes is enough for the grave of each of us,” Lagerführer Müller wants to shoot Sokolova. But even here the hero is saved by the will to live.
In 1944, Andrei Sokolov turns out to be a driver for a “German engineer.” Escape from captivity does not complete his series of trials. For a short time, joy “glimmered” in life when a son was found, who over the past years became an artillery officer. But Anatoly dies on the last day of the war, “and something broke” in his father’s soul. His existence lost its meaning.
However, six months pass, and life is reborn. The hero takes “as his children” the little orphan Vanyushka, whom he accidentally met “near the tea shop.” His heart, hardened by grief, “moves away,” his soul becomes joyful, “light and somehow bright.” The hero has a desire for the future.
Andrei Sokolov’s story evokes not only “heavy sadness,” but also admiration for the “unbending will” of the Russian man.
Based on the above, we come to the conclusion that the story shows the will and character of the Russian person. He overcomes deadly danger, deep internal crises caused by the family of relatives and friends, always maintaining presence of mind (“The lieutenant colonel came up to me and quietly said: “Take courage, father! Your son... was killed today...” I swayed, but stood on my feet”), dignity and pride , open kind heart.
The finale of the work is addressed to the future, “towards the eternal affirmation of the living in life,” personified by Vanyusha’s “little hand” waving from afar. Summing up the test of Russian character in the wars and troubles of the 20th century, the author anticipates “great achievements”, a new spring in the life of Russia.
Page 1 from 1
Retelling of I. A. Bunin’s story “The Gentleman from San Francisco” - Chapter Four
What did the gentleman from San Francisco feel and think on this so significant evening for him? He, like anyone who has experienced a rollercoaster, only really wanted to eat, dreamed with pleasure about the first spoon of soup, about the first sip of wine, and performed the usual toilet routine even in some excitement, which left no time for feelings and thoughts. Having shaved, washed, properly inserted a few teeth, he, standing in front of the mirrors, moistened and tidied up with brushes in a silver frame the remnants of pearl hair around his dark-yellow skull, pulled a creamy silk tights over his strong old body with a waist that was getting fuller from increased nutrition, and on his dry legs with flat feet - black silk socks and ballroom shoes, squatting, he tidied up his black trousers, pulled up high with silk braces, and a snow-white shirt with his chest bulging out, tucked the cufflinks into the shiny cuffs and began to struggle with catching the neck cufflink under the hard collar....
The idea of the “Superman” in A. S. Pushkin’s tragedy “Mozart and Salieri” and F. M. Dostoevsky’s novel “Crime and Punishment”
Essays on literature: The idea of the “Superman” in A. S. Pushkin’s tragedy “Mozart and Salieri” and F. M. Dostoevsky’s novel “Crime and Punishment” Constant appeals to A. S. Pushkin are one of the most important features of F. M.’s entire work . Dostoevsky. “Everything good I have, I owe it all to him,” Dostoevsky admitted. He was the first who truly deeply understood Pushkin’s work and penetrated into the world of his ideas. After Dostoevsky’s speech at the opening of the monument to Pushkin in Moscow, many disputes about the poet became simply unnecessary....
Analysis of I. Bunin’s story “Unurgent Spring” Bunin I. A
Analysis of I. Bunin’s story “Unurgent Spring” The theme of Russia was raised by Bunin in his works more than once. But stories written after 1917 differ significantly from earlier ones. Bunin, with his political conservatism, could not accept October Revolution. For him, it was all over with great Russia after this event. In many of his post-revolutionary works, Bunin raises the question of future fate Russia, reflects on the changes that have occurred in it. One such story is “Unurgent Spring.” It is narrated on behalf of the author. Bunin himself expresses his thoughts and analyzes events. The work begins with the narrator going to the village to take a break from the “nasty” Moscow. And right at the beginning of the story the author shows surrounding reality: “in the squares there is a rabble of the lowest rabble, at the stations there are again buffets and halls of different classes, but all of these are still sheds, completely hopelessly dirty.” A dark and gloomy picture of what is happening immediately appears before the reader. By portraying all this, Bunin wants to say that the changes that took place in Russia did not lead to the better, did not produce the promised results, but on the contrary, led to negative consequences. The writer shows this using the example of train passengers: “A big, self-confident, fair-haired man was sitting opposite me. At first he smoked and kept spitting on the floor, then he took out a bottle of milk and began to drink in long sips, breaking away only so as not to choke. And having finished drinking, he also leaned back, leaned against the wall and also began to snore, and the stench that floated from him literally began to drive me crazy”; “And in the entryway there was an acquaintance whom I had not seen for four years, a former professor, a former rich man. I barely recognized him: quite an old man and something like a wanderer to holy places. He had not shaved for a hundred years, his gray hair lay on his shoulders, in a travel bag in one hand, another on the floor at his feet.” ...
F. A. Abramov was born and raised in the Arkhangelsk region, in the most beautiful region of Russia. And therefore nature played an important role in the life and work of the writer. Thus, in his story “What Horses Cry About,” F. A. Abramov raises one of the most serious problems in the interaction between man and the environment - environmental. From the very first lines of the work we find ourselves “into the world of fragrant herbs, dragonflies and butterflies and, of course, into the world of horses.” It was they who gave the meadow unique beauty, enlivened him with their snorting, snoring....
Aphorism and paradox in Shukshin's stories
Shukshin is not interested in any manifestations of characters and not in any ways of depicting them. A detailed and even description of the feelings and actions of the heroes is alien to him. His favorite type of representation is an aphorism, a daring and elegant paradox. Therefore, he takes certain aspects of human characters that he finds necessary to emphasize, as if at a “segment” of their most intense manifestation and boldly highlights them with contrasting sides, bypassing all intermediate links....
Mikhail Aleksandrovich Sholokhov wrote the work “The Fate of Man” in 1956. It is, in fact, a summary of the story that the writer heard at the front. This is the first story that deeply touches on the problem of soldiers who were captured by the German occupiers. In short, this story tells about human sorrows, losses and at the same time hope for another life, faith in man. In this article we will look at brief analysis"The Fate of Man" by Sholokhov.
The main character of the story
The plot of the story and its main topic structured like a confession. The main character's name is Andrei Sokolov, he is a simple hard worker who worked on a collective farm in pre-war times. Sokolov's life is calm and measured, he feeds his family and lives like many others. But everything changes dramatically, because the fascists attack.
Everyone at that time considers it his duty to go to the front to protect native land from the aggressor, Andrei Sokolov is no exception. During the analysis of “The Fate of Man,” it becomes clear that Sholokhov does not want to present Sokolov as a hero to readers and elevate him to some special status. However, his example is an opportunity to show what is happening in the soul of all Russian people; the life of the main character is the fate of the people. Sholokhov tries to evoke in the reader a sense of pride in the courage, endurance and willpower that were shown in Hard times war.
Characteristics of Andrey Sokolov
It is impossible to analyze the story “The Fate of a Man” by Sholokhov without characterizing the main character. Following Sokolov's story, we notice words that convey notes of true Russian character. There are a lot of proverbs in his speech. Although Andrey is not highly literate, because he is a simple worker, and his expressions often contain simple or incorrect figures of speech, this is not the main thing.
The characterization of Andrei Sokolov shows that he a real man, he loves his family. Sholokhov portrays his main character in all colors, because you can read how he, a simple soldier, felt the full weight of wartime, you can also learn about how he was in German captivity. A lot happened in Sokolov’s fate: he encountered betrayal and cowardice, soldier’s friendship and like-mindedness. Sokolov even had to commit murder. This was during captivity, when a captured soldier was going to betray his commander by handing him over to the Germans. Next came an acquaintance with the doctor. He was also captured, but showed unprecedented courage and human compassion.
conclusions
In order to make an accurate analysis of the story “The Fate of Man” by Sholokhov, we recommend that you definitely read this work, at least its summary. Of course, it seems that the events that occurred in the life of Andrei Sokolov, whose description you could read above, are not special and it is difficult to call his actions feats. But this was Sholokhov’s idea.
Yes, the main character received several minor injuries and did what many did at that time, but in the episodes of Sokolov’s life it is clearly visible how courage, willpower, pride, love for his country and other outstanding qualities were manifested. And this is a feat, what everyone must do - go through everything, remain human, live on and work for the benefit of others. This was evident in Andrei Sokolov’s characterization.
Great Patriotic War even after many decades remains the greatest blow for the whole world. What a tragedy this is for the combatant. Soviet people, who lost the most people in this bloody fight! The lives of many (both military and civilian) were ruined. Sholokhov's story “The Fate of Man” truthfully depicts these sufferings, not of an individual person, but of the entire people who stood up to defend their Motherland.
The story “The Fate of a Man” is based on real events: M.A. Sholokhov met a man who told him his tragic biography. This story was almost a ready-made plot, but did not immediately turn into literary work. The writer nurtured his idea for 10 years, but put it on paper in just a few days. And dedicated it to E. Levitskaya, who helped him print main novel his life "Quiet Don".
The story was published in the Pravda newspaper on the eve of the new year, 1957. And soon it was read on All-Union Radio and heard throughout the country. Listeners and readers were shocked by the power and truthfulness of this work, and it gained well-deserved popularity. In literary terms, this book opened up for writers new way reveal the theme of war through the fate of a little man.
The essence of the story
The author accidentally meets the main character Andrei Sokolov and his son Vanyushka. During the forced delay at the crossing, the men started talking, and a casual acquaintance told the writer his story. This is what he told him.
Before the war, Andrei lived like everyone else: wife, children, household, work. But then thunder struck, and the hero went to the front, where he served as a driver. One fateful day, Sokolov’s car came under fire and he was shell-shocked. So he was captured.
A group of prisoners was brought to the church for the night, many incidents happened that night: the shooting of a believer who could not desecrate the church (they didn’t even let him out “until the wind”), and with him several people who accidentally fell under machine gun fire, help from a doctor to Sokolov and others wounded. Also, the main character had to strangle another prisoner, since he turned out to be a traitor and was going to hand over the commissioner. Even during the next transfer to the concentration camp, Andrei tried to escape, but was caught by dogs, who stripped him of his last clothes and bit him so much that “the skin and meat flew into shreds.”
Then the concentration camp: inhuman work, almost starvation, beatings, humiliation - that’s what Sokolov had to endure. “They need four cubic meters of production, but for the grave of each of us, one cubic meter through the eyes is enough!” - Andrei said imprudently. And for this he appeared before Lagerführer Müller. They wanted to shoot the main character, but he overcame his fear, bravely drank three glasses of schnapps to his death, for which he earned respect, a loaf of bread and a piece of lard.
Towards the end of hostilities, Sokolov was appointed driver. And finally, an opportunity arose to escape, and even together with the engineer whom the hero was driving. Before the joy of salvation had time to subside, grief arrived: he learned about the death of his family (a shell hit the house), and all this time he lived only in the hope of a meeting. One son survived. Anatoly also defended his homeland, and Sokolov and he simultaneously approached Berlin from different directions. But right on the day of victory, the last hope was killed. Andrey was left all alone.
Subjects
The main theme of the story is a man at war. These tragic events are an indicator personal qualities: in extreme situations, those character traits that are usually hidden are revealed, it is clear who is who in reality. Before the war, Andrei Sokolov was not particularly different; he was like everyone else. But in battle, having survived captivity and constant danger to life, he proved himself. His truly heroic qualities were revealed: patriotism, courage, perseverance, will. On the other hand, a prisoner like Sokolov, probably also no different in ordinary peaceful life, was going to betray his commissioner in order to curry favor with the enemy. Thus, the theme is reflected in the work moral choice.
Also M.A. Sholokhov touches on the topic of willpower. The war took away from the main character not only his health and strength, but also his entire family. He has no home, how can he continue to live, what to do next, how to find meaning? This question has interested hundreds of thousands of people who have experienced similar losses. And for Sokolov, caring for the boy Vanyushka, who was also left without a home and family, became a new meaning. And for his sake, for the sake of the future of his country, you need to live on. Here is the disclosure of the theme of the search for the meaning of life - its real man finds love and hope for the future.
Issues
- The problem of choice occupies an important place in the story. Every person faces a choice every day. But not everyone has to choose on pain of death, knowing that your fate depends on this decision. So, Andrei had to decide: to betray or remain faithful to the oath, to bend under the blows of the enemy or to fight. Sokolov was able to remain a worthy person and citizen because he determined his priorities, guided by honor and morality, and not by the instinct of self-preservation, fear or meanness.
- The whole fate of the hero, in his life trials, reflects the problem of defenselessness common man in the face of war. Little depends on him; circumstances are falling on him, from which he is trying to get out at least alive. And if Andrei was able to save himself, then his family was not. And he feels guilty about it, even though he isn't.
- The problem of cowardice is realized in the work through minor characters. The image of a traitor who, for the sake of immediate gain, is ready to sacrifice the life of a fellow soldier, becomes a counterbalance to the image of a brave and strong in spirit Sokolova. And there were such people in the war, says the author, but there were fewer of them, that’s the only reason we won.
- The tragedy of war. Numerous losses were suffered not only by the military units, but also civilians who could not defend themselves in any way.
- Andrey Sokolov – a common person, one of many who had to leave a peaceful existence in order to defend their homeland. He exchanges a simple and happy life for the dangers of war, without even imagining how he can remain on the sidelines. In extreme circumstances, he maintains spiritual nobility, shows willpower and perseverance. Under the blows of fate, he managed not to break. And find a new meaning in life, which reveals his kindness and responsiveness, because he sheltered an orphan.
- Vanyushka is a lonely boy who has to spend the night wherever he can. His mother was killed during the evacuation, his father at the front. Tattered, dusty, covered in watermelon juice - this is how he appeared before Sokolov. And Andrei could not leave the child, introduced himself as his father, giving a chance for further normal life both for myself and for him.
Characteristics of the main characters
What is the meaning of the work?
One of the main ideas of the story is the need to take into account the lessons of the war. The example of Andrei Sokolov shows not what war can do to a person, but what it can do to all of humanity. Prisoners tortured in concentration camps, orphaned children, destroyed families, scorched fields - this should never be repeated, and therefore should not be forgotten.
No less important is the idea that in any, even the most terrible situation, one must remain human and not become like an animal that, out of fear, acts only on the basis of instincts. Survival is the main thing for anyone, but if this comes at the cost of betraying oneself, one’s comrades, one’s Motherland, then the surviving soldier is no longer a person, he is not worthy of this title. Sokolov did not betray his ideals, did not break, although he went through something that is difficult for a modern reader to even imagine.
Genre
The story is short literary genre, revealing one storyline and several images of heroes. “The Fate of Man” refers specifically to him.
However, if you look closely at the composition of the work, you can clarify general definition, because this is a story within a story. First, the story is narrated by the author, who, by the will of fate, met and talked with his character. Andrei Sokolov himself describes his difficult life; the first-person narration allows readers to better understand the hero’s feelings and understand him. The author's remarks are introduced to characterize the hero from the outside (“eyes, as if sprinkled with ashes,” “I didn’t see a single tear in his seemingly dead, extinct eyes... only his large, limply lowered hands trembled slightly, his chin trembled, his hard lips trembled”) and show how deeply this strong man suffers.
What values does Sholokhov promote?
The main value for the author (and for readers) is peace. Peace between states, peace in society, peace in the human soul. The war destroyed the happy life of Andrei Sokolov, as well as many people. The echo of the war still does not subside, so its lessons must not be forgotten (although often in Lately this event is overrated political purposes, far from the ideals of humanism).
Also, the writer does not forget about eternal values personality: nobility, courage, will, desire to help. The time of knights and noble dignity has long passed, but true nobility does not depend on origin, it is in the soul, expressed in its ability to show mercy and empathy, even if the world around it is collapsing. This story is a great lesson in courage and morality for modern readers.
Interesting? Save it on your wall!
Russian writers have always paid great attention to the problem of human moral choice. In extreme situations, a person shows his true qualities and makes a certain choice. This confirms the right to be called a Human.
Main character Sholokhov's story “The Fate of a Man” is a simple Russian man. He had a hard time in his youth; he took part in the civil war, then started a family, built his life, tried to make his family and children happy. The war forced him to give up his hopes today. The need to defend their homeland with arms in hand was perceived by Andrei Sokolov as something self-evident. The main character makes his choice and goes to defend the country. He simply had no other way. Andrey stoically endures all the troubles that befall him. The words can be said about his position: “That’s why you’re a man, that’s why you’re a soldier, to endure everything, to endure everything, if need calls for it.” There can be no impossible tasks for a warrior. IN difficult situations a willingness to die in the name of a high goal is manifested. Andrei Sokolov had to bring the shells, despite the fact that the path was very dangerous. Andrey's moral choice is to agree to complete the task. “My comrades may be dying there, but I’ll be sick here”; “What a conversation!”; “I have to rush through and that’s it!” The risky trip turned out to be the reason that Andrei was captured. Any fighter in war is internally prepared for the fact that death can await him at any moment. Andrey is no exception. However, internal reconciliation with possible death has nothing to do with the situation of captivity.
In captivity, a person can easily lose his dignity. Someone is thinking about how to save their life. The episode in the church, when Andrei Sokolov kills the traitor Kryzhnev, is of great importance. Here again the problem of the moral choice of the protagonist appears. The death of a traitor is the key to the salvation of other people. The laws of war are inexorable, and Andrei understands this very well. However, after the murder, he still worries about what he did. And he reassures himself that the traitor does not deserve a different fate.
The conditions of captivity, and especially fascist captivity, are the most severe test that a person can face. The moral choice in such conditions is the opportunity to preserve one’s honor, not to act against one’s conscience, and to endure all the hardships and adversities with steadfastness. Andrey succeeds. It will be difficult for him to remember what he had to endure. However, now these memories have become a part of his life: “It’s hard for me, brother, to remember, and even harder to talk about what I experienced in captivity. As you remember the inhuman torment that you had to endure there in Germany, as you remember all the friends and comrades who died and were tortured there in the camps - the heart no longer in chest, and in the throat it beats, and it becomes difficult to breathe,” these words of the main character perfectly show his attitude towards the past, which hides the hardships and torments of fascist captivity. However, even in these words one can feel the strength of character that distinguishes Andrei Sokolov.
The episode when Andrei refuses to drink German weapons to the victory again shows us an example of a person’s moral choice. The Russian prisoner of war had absolutely nothing to lose. He had already prepared for death; execution seemed inevitable to him. However, the very idea that one could drink to an enemy victory was unthinkable for Sokolov. Here he again passed the test with honor. A mortally hungry man refuses food, because he does not want to bring joy to the fascists: “I wanted to show them, damned, that although I am disappearing from hunger, I am not going to choke on their handouts, that I have my own, Russian dignity and pride and that they didn’t turn me into a beast, no matter how hard they tried.”
Even the Nazis appreciated the fortitude and dignity of the prisoner. Andrei was saved from imminent death and even received a loaf of bread and a piece of lard as a “gift”. And again we can say that Sholokhov’s hero is a highly moral person, because he shares the pitiful crumbs of food with his comrades, despite the fact that he is practically dying of hunger. Andrei's moral choice is to decide to escape from captivity, to bring his German major with documents. Not everyone can decide to do this either. Sokolov has enough strength not to think about the immediate preservation of his life.
However, captivity was far from the last test in Andrei’s life. The death of his wife, daughters and, as the final chord of the war, the death of his eldest son, an officer, are terrible trials. But even after this, Andrei finds the strength to take a noble step - to give the warmth of his heart to a little street boy. Andrey is ready to work for the good of the Motherland, ready to raise his adopted child. This also reveals the spiritual greatness of the main character of Sholokhov’s story “The Fate of a Man.”
- New!
The Great Patriotic War passed through the destinies of millions Soviet people, leaving behind a difficult memory: pain, anger, suffering, fear. During the war years, many lost their dearest and closest people, many experienced severe hardships. Rethinking the military...
In M. A. Sholokhov’s story “The Fate of a Man,” the reader is presented with not just a story, but truly the fate of a person who embodies the typical features of the national Russian character. Andrei Sokolov, a modest worker, father of a family, lived and...
About the beauty of the soul Soviet man says in M. Sholokhov's story "SCh", in which the hero managed to rise above his personal tragic fate and with life, in the name of life, to overcome death. Andrey Sokolov talks about his life, which was full...
Dictionaries interpret fate in different meanings. The most common are the following: 1. In philosophy, mythology - the incomprehensible predetermination of events and actions. 2. In everyday usage: fate, share, coincidence of circumstances, life path....
PROBLEMS OF SHOLOKHOV'S STORY. The story “The Fate of Man” was written in 1956. It is based on real case. The story was immediately noticed and received many critical and reader responses. The writer dared to taboo topic: Russian man in captivity. Should I forgive it or accept it? Some wrote about the “rehabilitation” of prisoners, others saw lies in the story.
The story is structured in the form of a confession. The fate of Andrei Sokolov before the war was quite typical. Work, family. Sokolov is a builder, a man of a peaceful profession. The war ruins Sokolov’s life, as well as the life of the entire country. A person becomes one of the fighters, one part of the army. At the first moment, Sokolov almost dissolves in the general mass, and Sokolov later remembers this temporary retreat from humanity from the very beginning. acute pain. For the hero, the whole war, the whole path of humiliation, trials, camps, is a struggle between the human in man and the inhuman machine that man faces.
The camp for Sokolov is a test of human dignity. There he kills a man for the first time, not a German, but a Russian, with the words: “What kind of guy is he?” This is a test of the loss of “one’s own.” The attempt to escape is unsuccessful, since it is impossible to escape from the power of the machine in this way. The climax of the story is the scene in the commandant's room. Sokolov behaves defiantly, like a person for whom the highest good is death. And strength human spirit wins. Sokolov remains alive. After this, another test that Sokolov withstands: without betraying the honor of a Russian soldier in the commandant’s office, he does not lose his dignity in front of his comrades. “How are we going to share the food?” - my bunk neighbor asks, and his voice is trembling. “Equal share for everyone,” I tell him. We waited for dawn. Bread and lard were cut with a harsh thread. Everyone got a piece of bread the size of a matchbox, every crumb was taken into account, well, and lard, you know, just to anoint your lips. However, they shared without offense.”
After escaping, Andrei Sokolov ends up not in a camp, but in a rifle unit. And here is another test - the news of the death of his wife Irina and daughters. And on May 9, Victory Day, Sokolov loses his son, and the greatest thing fate gives him is to see his dead son before burying him in a foreign land.
And yet Sokolov (according to Sholokhov’s idea, a person must preserve the human in himself, despite any trials) behaves this way.
On the first post-war year Andrei Sokolov returns to a peaceful profession and accidentally meets a little boy Vanya. The hero of the story has a goal, a person appears for whom life is worth living. And Vanya is drawn to Sokolov and finds a father in him. This is how Sholokhov introduces the theme of human renewal after the war.
In 1942, Sholokhov wrote the story “The Science of Hatred” - about the great hatred of peaceful Soviet people for the war, for the Nazis, “for all that they caused to their homeland,” and at the same time - about great love to the homeland, to the people, which is kept in the hearts of soldiers. The main ideas of this story were developed in the story “The Fate of a Man,” where Sholokhov shows the beauty of the soul and the strength of character of the Russian man.