Change yourself out of love. How we are deceived: slavery and modern man Man is a slave to his own

A slave who is satisfied with his position is doubly a slave, because not only his body is in slavery, but also his soul. (E. Burke)

Man is a slave because freedom is difficult and slavery is easy. (N. Berdyaev)

Slavery can degrade people to the point of loving it. (L. Vauvenargues)

Slaves always manage to have their own slave. (Ethel Lilian Voynich)

He who fears others is a slave, although he does not notice it. (Antisthenes)

Slaves and tyrants fear each other. (E. Beauchaine)

The only way to make a people virtuous is to give them freedom; slavery gives rise to all vices, true freedom purifies the soul. (P. Buast)

Only the slave restores the fallen crown. (D. Gibran)

Voluntary slaves produce more tyrants than tyrants produce slaves. (O. Mirabeau)

Violence created the first slaves, cowardice perpetuated them. (J.J. Rousseau)

There is no slavery more shameful than voluntary slavery. (Seneca)

And as long as people feel like they are only a part, not noticing the whole, they will give themselves into complete slavery.

Anyone who is not afraid to look death in the face cannot be a slave. He who is afraid cannot be a warrior. (Olga Brileva)

The slave owner is himself a slave, worse than the helots! (Ivan Efremov)

Is this really our miserable destiny: To be slaves to our lustful bodies? After all, not a single one living in the world has yet. He was unable to quench his desires. (Omar Khayyam)

The government spits on us, don’t talk about politics and religion - all this is enemy propaganda! Wars, disasters, murders - all this horror! The media puts on a sad face, characterizing this as a great human tragedy, but we know that the media does not pursue the goal of destroying the evil of the world - no! Her task is to convince us to accept this evil, to adapt to living in it! The authorities want us to be passive observers! They left us no chance, except for a rare, absolutely symbolic general vote - choose the doll on the left or the doll on the right! (Author unknown)

Anyone who can be made a slave is not worth freedom. (Maria Semyonova)

Slavery is the greatest of all misfortunes. (Marcus Tullius Cicero)

It is disgusting to be under the yoke - even in the name of freedom. (Karl Marx)

A people who enslaves another people forges their own chains. (Karl Marx)

...There is nothing more terrible, more humiliating, than to be the slave of a slave. (Karl Marx)

Animals have that noble peculiarity that a lion never, out of cowardice, becomes the slave of another lion, and a horse never becomes the slave of another horse. (Michel de Montaigne)

In truth, prostitution is another form of slavery. Based on unhappiness, need, addiction to alcohol or drugs. A woman's dependence on a man. (Janusz Leon Wisniewski, Małgorzata Domagalik)

There is no slavery more hopeless than the slavery of those slaves who consider themselves free from shackles. (Johann Wolfgang von Goethe)

Almost all people are slaves, and this is explained by the same reason that the Spartans explained the humiliation of the Persians: they are unable to pronounce the word “no”... (Nicholas Chamfort)

The slave dreams not of freedom, but of his own slaves. (Boris Krutier)

In a totalitarian state, an all-powerful cohort of political bosses and an army of administrators subordinate to them will rule over a population consisting of slaves who do not need to be forced, because they love their slavery. (Aldous Huxley)

So, comrades, how does our life work? Let's face it. Poverty, overwork, untimely death - this is our lot. We are born, we receive just enough food so as not to die of hunger, and the draft animals are also exhausted with work until all the juices are squeezed out of them, and when we are no longer good for anything, we are killed with monstrous cruelty. There is no animal in England that would not say goodbye to leisure and joy of life as soon as it turns one year old. There is no animal in England that has not been enslaved. (George Orwell.)

Only a person who has overcome the slave within himself will know freedom. (Henry Miller)

This means that all the knowledge that scientists with respectable diplomas and impressive titles gave him, like priceless treasures, was just a prison. He humbly thanked him every time they extended his leash a little, which remained a leash. We can live without a leash. (Bernard Werber)

Power over oneself is the most supreme authority, enslavement to one’s passions is the most terrible slavery. (Lucius Annaeus Seneca)

- This is how freedom dies - to thunderous applause... (Padmé Amidala, Star Wars)

Anyone who can be happy alone is a real person. If your happiness depends on others, then you are a slave, you are not free, you are in bondage. (Chandra Mohan Rajneesh)

You see, as soon as slavery is legalized somewhere, the lower rungs of the social ladder become terribly slippery... It's worth starting to measure human life money, and it turns out that this price is capable of decreasing penny by penny until there is nothing left at all. (Robin Hobb)

Better freedom in hell than slavery in heaven. (Anatole France)

People are rushing about, trying not to be late for work, many are chattering on their mobile phones as they go, gradually drawing their sleep-deprived brains into the morning bustle of the city. ( Cell phones Currently, in addition to everything else, they also serve as an additional alarm clock. If the first one wakes you up for work, then the second one tells you that it has already begun.) Sometimes my imagination completes the slightly hunched figures with bales on their backs, turning them into serf slaves, daily paying their masters taxes in the form of their own health, feelings and emotions. The stupidest and most terrible thing about this is that they do all this of their own free will, in the absence of any enslaving serfdom. (Sergey Minaev)

Slavery is a prison of the soul. (Publius)

Habit also reconciles with slavery. (Pythagoras of Samos)

People themselves hold on to their slave share. (Lucius Annaeus Seneca)

It is wonderful to die - it is shameful to be a slave. (Publius Sirus)

Emancipation from slavery is a law of nations. (Justinian I)

God did not create slavery, but gave man freedom. (John Chrysostom)

Slavery degrades a person to the point that he begins to love his chains. (Luc de Clapier de Vauvenargues)

The greatest slavery is to consider yourself free without having freedom. (Johann Wolfgang von Goethe)

There is nothing more slavish than luxury and bliss, and nothing more royal than labor. (Alexander the Great)

Woe to the people if slavery could not humiliate them; such a people were created to be slaves. (Peter Yakovlevich Chaadaev)

Power over oneself is the highest power; Enslavement to one's passions is the most terrible slavery. (Lucius Annaeus Seneca)

You serve me slavishly, and then complain that I am not interested in you: who would be interested in a slave? (George Bernard Shaw)

Every man born into slavery is born into slavery; nothing could be truer than this. In chains, slaves lose everything, even the desire to be freed from them. (Jean-Jacques Rousseau)

Debt is the beginning of slavery, even worse than slavery, because the creditor is more inexorable than the slave owner: he owns not only your body, but also your dignity and can, on occasion, inflict grave insults on him. (Victor Marie Hugo)

Since people began to live together, freedom disappeared and slavery arose, for every law, limiting and narrowing the rights of one in favor of all, thereby encroaches on the freedom of an individual. (Raffaello Giovagnoli)

Servants who do not have a master do not become free people because of this - lackeyness is in their soul. (Heine Heinrich)

To become a free man,... You need to squeeze the slave out of yourself drop by drop. (Chekhov Anton Pavlovich)

He who by nature belongs not to himself, but to another, and at the same time is still a man, is a slave. (Aristotle)

The dream of slaves: a market where you can buy yourself a master. (Stanislav Jerzy Lec)

6. Man’s slavery to himself and the seduction of individualism

The last truth about the slavery of man is that man is a slave to himself. He falls into slavery to the object world, but this is slavery to his own exteriorizations. Man is enslaved to various kinds of idols, but these are idols created by him. A person is always a slave to what is, as it were, outside him, what is alienated from him, but the source of slavery is internal. The struggle between freedom and slavery plays out in the external, objectified, exteriorized world. But from an existential point of view, this is an internal spiritual struggle. This follows from the fact that man is a microcosm. In the universal, contained in the individual, there is a struggle between freedom and slavery, and this struggle is projected in the objective world. Man’s slavery lies not only in the fact that an external force enslaves him, but even deeper, in the fact that he agrees to be a slave, that he slavishly accepts the action of the force that enslaves him. Slavery is characterized as social status people in the objective world. So, for example, in a totalitarian state all people are slaves. But this is not the final truth of the phenomenology of slavery. It has already been said that slavery is, first of all, a structure of consciousness and a certain kind of objective structure of consciousness. “Consciousness” determines “being,” and only in a secondary process does “consciousness” fall into slavery to “being.” Slave society is a product of human internal slavery. A person lives in the grip of an illusion that is so strong that it appears to be normal consciousness. This illusion is expressed in the ordinary consciousness that man is in slavery to external force, while he is in slavery to himself. The illusion of consciousness is different from the one exposed by Marx and Freud. A person slavishly determines his attitude towards the “not-I”, first of all, because he slavishly determines his attitude towards the “I”. This does not at all entail that slave social philosophy, according to which a person must endure external social slavery and only free himself internally. This is a completely false understanding of the relationship between “internal” and “external”. Internal liberation certainly requires external liberation, the destruction of slavish dependence on social tyranny. A free person cannot tolerate social slavery, but he remains free in spirit even if he is unable to defeat external, social slavery. This is a struggle that can be very difficult and lengthy. Freedom presupposes overcoming resistance.

Egocentrism is the original sin of man, a violation of the true relationship between “I” and his other, God, the world with people, between the individual and the universe. Egocentrism is an illusory, perverted universalism. It gives a false perspective on the world and on every reality in the world, there is a loss of the ability to truly perceive realities. The egocentric is in the power of objectification, which he wants to turn into an instrument of self-affirmation, and this is the most dependent creature, in eternal slavery. The greatest secret is hidden here human existence. Man is a slave of the external world around him, because he is a slave of himself, of his egocentrism. A person slavishly submits to external slavery emanating from an object, precisely because he egocentrically asserts himself. Egocentric people are usually conformists. He who is a slave to himself loses himself. Slavery is the opposite of personality, but egocentrism is the disintegration of personality. Man's slavery to himself is not only slavery to his lower, animal nature. This is a gross form of egocentrism. A person can also be a slave to his sublime nature, and this is much more important and troubling. A person is a slave to his refined “I”, which is very far removed from the “I” of the animal, he is a slave to his higher ideas, higher feelings, your talents. A person may not notice at all, may not be aware that he is turning the highest values ​​into an instrument of egocentric self-affirmation. Fanaticism is precisely this kind of egocentric self-affirmation. Books on the spiritual life tell us that humility can turn into the greatest pride. There is nothing more hopeless than the pride of the humble. The type of Pharisee is a type of person whose devotion to the law of goodness and purity, to a sublime idea has turned into egocentric self-affirmation and complacency. Even holiness can turn into a form of egocentrism and self-assertion and become false holiness. Exalted ideal egocentrism is always idolatry and a false attitude towards ideas, replacing the attitude towards the living God. All forms of egocentrism, from the lowest to the most sublime, always mean slavery of man, slavery of man to himself, and through this slavery of the surrounding world. The egocentric is a being enslaved and enslaving. There is an enslaving dialectic of ideas in human existence; this is an existential dialectic, not a logical one. There is nothing scarier than a man, obsessed with false ideas and self-affirming on the basis of these ideas, is a tyrant of himself and other people. This tyranny of ideas can become the basis of state and social order. Religious, national, social ideas can play such a role as enslavers, equally reactionary and revolutionary ideas. In a strange way, ideas come to the service of egocentric instincts, and egocentric instincts are given to the service of ideas that trample a person. And slavery, internal and external, always triumphs. The egocentric always falls into the power of objectification. An egocentric person who views the world as his means is always thrown into the outside world and depends on it. But most often, man’s slavery to himself takes the form of the seduction of individualism.

Individualism is a complex phenomenon that cannot be simply assessed. Individualism can have both positive and negative meaning. Individualism is often called personalism due to terminological inaccuracy. A person is called an individualist by character or because he is independent, original, free in his judgments, does not mix with environment and rises above it, or because he is isolated in himself, incapable of communication, despises people, self-centered. But in the strict sense of the word, individualism comes from the word “individual”, not “person”. Affirmation of the supreme value of the individual, protection of his freedom and right to realize life's opportunities, his desire for completeness is not individualism. Enough has been said about the difference between the individual and the personality. Ibsen’s “Peer Gynt” reveals the brilliant existential dialectic of individualism. Ibsen poses the problem of what does it mean to be oneself, to be true to oneself? Peer Gynt wanted to be himself, to be an original individual, and he completely lost and ruined his personality. He was precisely a slave to himself. The aestheticizing individualism of the cultural elite, which is revealed in the modern novel, is the disintegration of personality, the disintegration of the integral personality into broken states and the slavery of man to these broken states. Personality is internal integrity and unity, mastery of oneself, victory over slavery. The disintegration of personality is a disintegration into separate self-affirming intellectual, emotional, sensual elements. The human heart center is decomposing. Only the spiritual principle maintains the unity of mental life and creates personality. A person falls into the most diverse forms of slavery, when he can oppose the enslaving force only torn elements, and not to a whole personality. The internal source of human slavery is associated with the autonomy of the torn parts of a person, with the loss of the internal center. A person torn into pieces easily succumbs to the affect of fear, and fear is what most of all keeps a person in slavery. Fear is overcome by a holistic, centralized personality, an intense experience of the dignity of the individual; it cannot be overcome by the intellectual, emotional, sensual elements of a person. Personality is a whole, but the objectified world opposing it is partial. But only an integral personality, an image of a higher being, can recognize oneself as a whole, opposing the objectified world on all sides. Man’s slavery to himself, which makes him a slave to the “not-I,” always means tornness and fragmentation. Any obsession, whether with a low passion or a high idea, means the loss of a person’s spiritual center. The old atomistic theory of mental life, which derives the unity of the mental process from a special kind of mental chemistry, is false. The unity of the mental process is relative and easily overturned. The active spiritual principle synthesizes and leads to unity of the soul process. This is the development of personality. Of central importance is not the idea of ​​the soul, but the idea of ​​a whole person, embracing the spiritual, mental and physical principles. A tense vital process can destroy the personality. The will to power is dangerous not only for those at whom it is directed, but also for the subject of this will itself; it acts destructively and enslaves the person who has allowed himself to be possessed by the will to power. For Nietzsche, truth is created by a vital process, the will to power. But this is the most anti-personalistic point of view. The will to power makes it impossible to know the truth. Truth does not provide any services to those striving for power, that is, for enslavement. In the will to power, centrifugal forces act in man, and the inability to control oneself and resist the power of the objective world is revealed. Slavery to oneself and slavery to the objective world are one and the same slavery. The desire for dominance, for power, for success, for glory, for the enjoyment of life is always slavery, a slave attitude towards oneself and a slave attitude towards the world, which has become an object of desire and lust. The lust for power is a slave instinct.

One of human illusions there is confidence that individualism is the opposition of the individual person and his freedom to the surrounding world, which always seeks to rape him. In reality, individualism is objectification and is associated with the exteriorization of human existence. It is very hidden and not immediately visible. The individual is part of society, part of the race, part of the world. Individualism is the isolation of a part from the whole or the revolt of a part against the whole. But to be a part of any whole, even if it rebels against this whole, means to already be exteriorized. Only in the world of objectification, that is, in the world of alienation, impersonality and determinism, does that relationship of part and whole exist that is found in individualism. The individualist isolates himself and asserts himself in relation to the universe; he perceives the universe exclusively as violence against him. In a certain sense, individualism is the reverse side of collectivism. The refined individualism of modern times, which, however, became very old, individualism coming from Petrarch and the Renaissance, was an escape from the world and society to oneself, to one’s own soul, into lyrics, poetry, music. The mental life of a person was greatly enriched, but processes of personality dissociation were also being prepared. Personalism means something completely different. Personality includes the universe, but this inclusion of the universe occurs not in terms of objectivity, but in terms of subjectivity, i.e. existentiality. The personality recognizes itself as rooted in the kingdom of freedom, that is, in the kingdom of the spirit, and from there it draws its strength for struggle and activity. This is what it means to be an individual, to be free. The individualist, in essence, is rooted in the objectified world, social and natural, and with this rootedness he wants to isolate himself and oppose himself to the world to which he belongs. An individualist is, in essence, a socialized person, but he experiences this socialization as violence, suffers from it, isolates himself and powerlessly rebels. This is the paradox of individualism. For example, false individualism is found in a liberal social order. In this system, which was in fact a capitalist system, the individual was crushed by the play of economic forces and interests, he was crushed himself and crushed others. Personalism has a communitarian tendency and wants to establish fraternal relations between people. Individualism is in social life establishes wolf relations between people. It's great that the greats creative people in essence they have never been individualists. They were lonely and unrecognized, in acute conflict with the environment, with established collective opinions and judgments. But they were always aware of their calling to serve; they had a universal mission. There is nothing more false than the consciousness of one's gift, one's genius, as a privilege and as a justification for individualistic isolation. There are two different types loneliness - loneliness creative personality, experiencing the conflict of internal universalism with objectified universalism, and the loneliness of the individualist, who opposes this objectified universalism, to which he, in essence, belongs, with his emptiness and powerlessness. There is the loneliness of inner fullness and the loneliness of inner emptiness. There is the loneliness of heroism and the loneliness of defeat, loneliness as strength and loneliness as powerlessness. Loneliness, which finds only passive aesthetic consolation, usually belongs to the second type. Leo Tolstoy felt very lonely, lonely even among his followers, but he belonged to the first type. All prophetic loneliness belongs to the first type. It is striking that the loneliness and alienation characteristic of the individualist usually lead to submission to false communities. An individualist very easily becomes a conformist and submits to an alien world, to which he cannot oppose anything. Examples of this are given in revolutions and counter-revolutions, in totalitarian states. The individualist is a slave to himself, he is seduced by slavery to his own “I”, and therefore he cannot resist the slavery that comes from the “not-I”. Personality is liberation from both the slavery of the “I” and the slavery of the “not-I”. A person is always a slave of the “not-I” through the “I”, through the state in which the “I” is. The enslaving force of the object world can make a person a martyr, but cannot make him a conformist. Conformism, which is a form of slavery, always takes advantage of one or another temptations and instincts of a person, one or another enslavement to one’s own “I”.

Jung sets two psychological type– interverted, facing inwards, and exterverted, facing outwards. This distinction is relative and conditional, like all classifications. In fact, the same person can have both interverted and extroverted. But now I am interested in another question. To what extent can intervertedness mean egocentrism, and extrovertedness mean alienation and exteriorization? Perverted, i.e., having lost personality, intervertedness is egocentrism, and perverted extrovertedness is alienation and exteriorization. But interversion in itself can mean going deeper into oneself, into what is revealed in the depths spiritual world, how extroversion can mean creative activity aimed at the world and people. Extroversion can also mean throwing human existence outward and means objectification. This objectification is created by a certain orientation of the subject. It is remarkable that human slavery can equally be the result of the fact that a person is exclusively absorbed in his “I” and is focused on his states, not noticing the world and people, and the fact that a person is thrown exclusively outside, into the objectivity of the world and loses consciousness of his “I” . Both are the result of a gap between the subjective and the objective. The “objective” either completely absorbs and enslaves human subjectivity, or causes repulsion and disgust, isolating and enclosing human subjectivity. But such alienation, the exteriorization of the object in relation to the subject, is what I call objectification. Absorbed exclusively by its “I,” the subject is a slave, just as the slave is a subject thrown entirely into the object. In both cases, the personality is decomposing or has not yet been formed. In the primary stages of civilization, the ejection of the subject into the object predominates, in social group, on Wednesday, in the clan, at the heights of civilizations, the subject’s preoccupation with his “I” prevails. But at the heights of civilization there is also a return to the primitive horde. A free personality is a rare flower of world life. The vast majority of people do not consist of personalities; the personality of this majority is either still in potency or is already decaying. Individualism does not mean at all that the personality rises, or it means this only due to the imprecise use of words. Individualism is a naturalistic philosophy, while personalism is a philosophy of spirit. Liberation of a person from slavery to the world, from enslavement by external forces, is liberation from slavery to himself, to the enslaving forces of his “I”, i.e. from egocentrism. A person must at once be spiritually interverted, internalized and extroverted, reaching out to the world and people in creative activity.

This text is an introductory fragment. From the book On Slavery and Human Freedom author Berdyaev Nikolay

3. Nature and freedom. Cosmic seduction and slavery of man to nature The very fact of the existence of man’s slavery to being and to God can raise doubts and objections. But everyone agrees that there is human slavery to nature. Victory over slavery to nature,

From the book Socrates author Nersesyants Vladik Sumbatovich

4. Society and freedom. Social seduction and slavery of man to society Of all forms of human slavery highest value has the slavery of man to society. Man is a being socialized over many millennia of civilization. And sociological

From the book Cartesian Reflections author Husserl Edmund

5. Civilization and freedom. Man's slavery to civilization and the seduction of cultural values ​​Man is in slavery not only to nature and society, but also to civilization. I now use the word “civilization” in the common sense, which connects it with the process

From the book Fiery Feat. part I author Uranov Nikolay Alexandrovich

b) The seduction of war and the slavery of man to war The state, in its will to power and in its expansion, creates wars. War is the fate of the state. And the history of state societies is filled with wars. The history of mankind is to a large extent the history of wars, and it

From the book Philosophy as a way of life author Guzman Delia Steinberg

c) The seduction and slavery of nationalism. People and nation The seduction and slavery of nationalism is a deeper form of slavery than ethical slavery. Of all the “superpersonal” values, a person most easily agrees to subordinate to himself the values ​​of the national, he is the easiest

From the author's book

d) Seduction and slavery of aristocracy. The double image of aristocracy There is a special seduction of aristocracy, the sweetness of belonging to the aristocratic stratum. Aristocratism is a very complex phenomenon and requires a complex assessment. The very word aristocracy means

From the author's book

f) The seduction of the bourgeoisie. Slavery to property and money There is seduction and slavery of aristocracy. But there is even more seduction and slavery of the bourgeoisie. Bourgeoisness is not only social category associated with the class structure of society, but also

From the author's book

a) Seduction and slavery of the revolution. The double image of revolution Revolution is an eternal phenomenon in the destinies of human societies. Revolutions have happened at all times, they have happened in ancient world. IN ancient Egypt there have been many revolutions, and only from a great distance does it seem whole and

From the author's book

b) The seduction and slavery of collectivism. The temptation of utopias. The dual image of socialism Man, in his helplessness and abandonment, naturally seeks salvation in groups. A person agrees to give up his personality so that his life can be more prosperous, he is looking for

From the author's book

a) Seduction and erotic slavery. Gender, personality and freedom Erotic seduction is the most common seduction, and slavery to sex is one of the deepest sources of human slavery. Physiological sexual need rarely occurs in humans

From the author's book

b) Seduction and aesthetic slavery. Beauty, art and nature Aesthetic seduction and slavery, reminiscent of magic, does not capture too broad masses of humanity; it is found mainly among the cultural elite. There are people who live under the spell of beauty

From the author's book

2. Seduction and slavery of history. Dual understanding of the end of history. Active-creative eschatologism The greatest temptation and slavery of man is connected with history. The massiveness of history and the apparent grandeur of the processes taking place in history are incredibly impressive

From the author's book

“KNOW YOURSELF” The author of this saying, inscribed on the temple of Apollo in Delphi, was traditionally considered to be the Spartan Chilon, one of the seven Greek sages. The Delphic temple enjoyed enormous authority among all the Hellenes. It was believed that through the mouth of the Delphic

From the author's book

§ 45. Transcendental ego and the perception of oneself as a psychophysical person reduced to one’s own sphere Ours final thoughts, like all the previous ones, we carried them out in the installation of transcendental reduction, i.e. I, the reflective one, carried them out as

From the author's book

KNOW YOURSELF 1. We already know that psychic energy exists. We already feel that in mastering this energy all our happiness and future lie. We often talk about psychic energy; it has already become part of our everyday life. We already know when there is a lot or little of it in us. We even

From the author's book

Bring peace into yourself The pledge of our inner world- is to weaken your shortcomings with the power of your own strengths, reduce your negative aspects and leave room for positive, but still hidden, aspects. This is peace with yourself and with others. This is peace born from

While searching for various patterns, I came across a very interesting chain of reasoning. This happened somehow by accident, so to speak on its own, in a conversation with my best friend. And this chain of reasoning concerned our “Capitalist society”. A society based on private property.

So, I will give a number of formulations from Wikipedia so that it is clear on what further logical reasoning will be based.

Term 1. Slavery.
Slavery is historically a system of society where a person (slave) is the property of another person (master, slave owner, master) or the state. First, prisoners, criminals and debtors were taken as slaves, and later civilians who were forced to work for their master.

Term 2. Feudalism.
Feudalism (from Latin feudum - flax, feudal land tenure) is a socio-political structure characterized by the presence of two social classes - feudal lords (landowners) and commoners (peasants), occupying a subordinate position in relation to the feudal lords; feudal lords are bound to each other by a specific type of legal obligation known as the feudal ladder. The basis of feudalism is feudal ownership of land.

Term 3. Capitalism.
Capitalism is an economic system of production and distribution based on private property, universal legal equality and free enterprise. The main criterion for making economic decisions is the desire to increase capital and make a profit.

And so... I'll begin...
As we are told in various smart textbooks, educational institutions, the media and other places... as well as our “smart” politicians, everything happened like this:
First there was slavery, then it was replaced by a more developed structure, Feudalism, and then feudalism, when it reached its peak, evolved into capitalism. And here comes the question...

But what really changed during these transitions? What distinguishes slavery, feudalism and capitalism, and what has developed over all these thousands of years? These are the questions I will try to answer.

As can be seen from the definition of the term “Slavery”, the resulting model is as follows:
There is a slave owner and a slave. The slave owner has absolute power over the slave. Also, the slave owner forces the slave to work for himself and bring profit through slave labor, however, in order for the slave to work for a long time and bring a lot of profit, the slave owner had to take care of him: feed him, provide medical care and so on. The slave, in turn, out of some fear, became the property of the slave owner and was obliged to give his life for the sake of the owner. And all that is good, however, with an increase in the number of slaves, it was difficult to monitor them; epidemics of plague and other things could cause enormous damage to slave owners. Also, slave owners had to take care of their guards, and the guards also came from slaves, and sometimes the guards raised uprisings and killed their own masters. So slave owners had the following problems with slaves:
1. Providing housing.
2. Providing food and water.
3. Providing protection.
4. Providing medical assistance.
5. Possible riots.

And not surprisingly, feudalism solved some of these problems. As you can see, slavery simply changed the form of ownership, or rather, it expanded it, and uneducated people still could not guess that slavery had not gone away. It’s just that during the transition to feudalism, the slave owner did not have to provide housing to the slaves, they built it themselves, on his territory, and the slave owner also did not have to provide food and water, because people grew (hunted) themselves, generally obtained food for food, and then taxes appeared. And taxes are the cream that the slave owner took from his slaves. Net profit so to speak. But feudalism solved only 2 out of 5 problems.

And the feudal lords began to think. How to solve all these problems? And a brilliant thought came: “Why not force the slaves to do everything themselves, and so that they themselves want to work and make a profit and not under pressure.” And this idea came to life in the form of capitalism. In capitalism, a certain “capital” controls everyone, but the cream is skimmed by the same slave owners (they haven’t changed at all), and all the scraps from their table are accepted with great gratitude by the so-called middle class.

What problems does capitalism solve?
Solves the housing problem. The slave must now purchase housing for himself, and not have someone give it to him.

Solves the problem with food and water. If you work, you will have a livelihood, if you don’t, you won’t.
Solves the security problem. Slaves protect themselves from each other, and not someone centralized. All armies consist of hired slaves who are ready to give their lives for “capital”. This is akin to faith in God, only now “capital” is the universal god.
Solves the problem of medical care. The slaves themselves are ready to treat other slaves for “capital”, or rather to profit from their illnesses. Because the more serious the illness, the more cream the slave owner will receive and the more scraps will fall from his table.

Solves the problem with riots. Slaves are so busy getting food, housing, medical care, protection and other things that there is simply no time left for riots.
And most importantly, it solves the problem of the labor of slave owners; now, in order to skim the cream, you don’t have to do anything at all. The cream is served on its own.

This is why capitalism is considered an ideal step in evolution. He solved all the problems of the slave owners, now they can only skim the cream and kick the bullshit, and the anthill itself works without their participation.

But it is important to understand that the same slave owners and the same slaves still remain. And I and the majority of those who read this article are also slaves, it is we who eat other people’s scraps. We are the ones who put the cream on the table of the slave owners. And it’s a shame that the majority of people don’t understand this. Few people understand that he is just a pawn or an ant who will be crushed. But everyone almost unanimously screams that capitalism is a damn force, it is the best system for distributing resources. Class. The best. When all the best goes to the slave owner and those who got this best are only scraps from his table. Is this the best in your opinion?

Although, I don’t want to prove anything to anyone. Thus, we see what is hidden behind the screen of capitalism. We can change this, and not only can we, but we need to change this to a different model of resource distribution. So that everyone gets what they deserve, and not scraps.

Why modern man slave? Tell us what fate and character mean?

Modern man is a slave to his work in modern meaning words. Women protest against this most of all, because if the husband is a slave to his work, then the wife, among other things, is the slave of her husband. That is, a doubly slave. Why?

In our development, we have long overcome the slave system, but we have not been able to renounce the past. We carry it in our souls we feel we try to get rid of it, but since it is a feeling, it determines our life. We know that we are not slaves, but we feel like slaves. Therefore, we behave like slaves until our patience runs out. Then we begin to fight against our own enslavement and demand equality. After all, a slave does not feel equal to others. As a result of this struggle, complete zero is achieved, because the material struggle cannot give spiritual freedom.

A characteristic feature of a slave is the desire to prove that he is better than he is. A slave is a machine that wants to prove that it is a person, but this fails because the machine stronger than man. In the service of the master, the slave is a good tool - a shovel, in the service of the master - an even better tool - a machine, in the service of the master - an excellent tool - a computer. To work on a computer and to earn big money, nothing more is required than a person having brains and the ability to press the keys with his finger. Working on a computer is a wonderful thing, but if a computer scientist becomes dependent on the computer, this is already an escape from reality. This means that the person feels lack of other human skills. He can use computer, but doesn't know how to do anything with his own hands and this shame is hidden from others.

With the triumphant march of computers, the number of people who understand computers, but do not want to work on them, is growing. If they are forced to use a computer due to the nature of their work, after some time they become allergic to the computer. Why? This is a human protest against the final transformation into a machine. A man discovers that people have ceased to be people, panics and begins to protest against turning himself into a machine. He becomes allergic to the computer because the protest remains unrealized.

A computer fanatic is capable of inventing miracles, but it soon turns out that someone has invented an anti-miracle - a computer virus that has destroyed his work. Why does such purposeful hostility, or anger, arise? Because someone got tired of being a machine, and he began to destroy the machine that turned him into a slave. He wants to be human. Like most people with material views, he strives to destroy what destroys him. He wants freedom. By destroying material things, man hopes to gain spiritual freedom. By destroying his family, he hopes to free himself from his own problems, including his enslavement.

A slave at his low level of development must do a certain amount of work to develop. Work develops a person. And the higher the level of development, the more care you need to make sure there is time. And if you have the opportunity, but everything around you hangs and sticks out somehow, and you walk by every day, you increase your stress. Every time you pass by, you get irritated, angry because of what you see - something is wrong everywhere. Stress kills comfort. And there is no comfort. And when we cry, there are possibilities, but there is no intelligence.

We all have all these stresses that I mentioned. From compression and suppression, they all add up to the next severe stage of guilt, which is called depression.

How many of you don't have depression? I didn't ask who is depressed?Remember: if you see, hear, feel, read, learn, no matter from what information, about something that exists in the world, then you all have it. And we need to take care that what someone else has, I don’t grow bigger. This is itdaily work with yourself. Take care to keep stress low.

If you realized and acknowledged the presence of underlying stresses, then there was a need to release them, and you did not feel that someone was forcing you to do this. Therefore, the increasingly complex knowledge about stress contained in my books was perceived by you as something completely natural, and you began to release these stresses because you realized how much this eased the burden of life. Perhaps you yourself have come to the idea that stress has its own language. After all, language is a means of self-expression, and expression is the outward conclusion, or release, of accumulated energy.

Talkingwith another person, I give him the necessary information about what is needed to me, and in the end it gives what to me necessary, be it material or intangible. Consciously or unknowingly, I accept it. By talking to stress, I give it freedom, and it gives me freedom, that is, something that is impossible to do without. Now I I gratefully accept what they give me. In the meantime, I have already given everything on my part, and therefore I gratefully accept what they give me. I made him happy, he made me happy, and I don’t have the question: “Why should I start first?” - because I firmly know that my life begins with myself, and therefore it is natural that I myself should take on what I have to do in life.

Knowing the language of stress is more important than knowing any foreign language, because HIS OWN LIFE SPEAKS TO A PERSON IN THE LANGUAGE OF STRESS.

Many people ask: “Does this kind of thinking really help all people?” “It helps,” I answer, “if they are people. But if they - good people who wish only good and do not give up their opinions, it does not help.” The most difficult thing for a person is to abandon outdated, outdated ideas, but such refusal is the key to happiness.

After all, stress is like a wave, all energy is a wave. A wave with a small amplitude will fit into the normal corridor. Then this is - normal life. Everything is everywhere. And if we do not take care of ourselves, but run around worrying about others, then we imperceptibly increase the amplitude of the wave more and more, and it will no longer fit into the corridor of the norm, will not fit in me, in my (like a ball) shell. Stress will not fit inside, but will jump out like a hedgehog's needle. Such energies that are larger than me and do not fit inside me are called character traits that command me. As long as I take care of myself and all these stresses are placed within me, I manage them. And if I didn’t take care of myself and they grew into a character trait, then these character traits are a lot of stress, they command me, have power over me.

We are used to saying: such is fate. Sorry, that's an excuse. Life doesn't expect excuses from us. Life says: “If in a past life you did what you did, and did not correct, at least two minutes before death, your mistakes (you did not admit them and did not correct them), then you came into this life with a destiny created by you. This is a certain amount of stress that you need to live through in order to learn, in order to correct your mistake, which says: man, when you collect energy in yourself, you are not behaving like a human being.”

And there is such a thing as character. This is also our justification: I have such a character. But I have a different character. What will you do, fight? That is, our characters should destroy each other? Who are we then? We are people, we look from the outside and give the energy contained within us the opportunity to kill each other. Is this humane? Are we happy when another is killed? No, we are happy because we have proven that we are better. In fact, we are not better, we are stronger.