Protocols of Zion. The Protocols of the Elders of Zion: The Incredible Truth

Protocols of the Elders of Zion: A Worldwide Conspiracy. 1922 S.A. Nilus.

S. A. Nilus
Name: Protocols of the Elders of Zion: A Worldwide Conspiracy.
Genre: Historical document
Publisher: "Press", Berlin
Year of publication: 1922
Language: Russian
Format: PDF
Quality: good
Number of pages: 125

Annotation:

This publication reproduces the text of the famous “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” as they were first published in Russia by Sergei Aleksandrovich Nilus. The book is intended for those who are not indifferent to the question of the secret and obvious world domination of the Jewish system, and its penetration into the political, financial, cultural, and religious layers of world society.

CONTENT

Preface
Consecutive publications of “Protolov” in Russia and abroad.
The Jewish program in its implementation.
Conclusion.
Authenticity of the Zion Protocols. (Translation from French). Preface by the translator.
On the authenticity of the Protocol.
Ahad-Ham and Zionism.
Authenticity.
Asher Gintsberg.

Sources of Ahad-Khamism and its application to life.
Translator's note.

Protocols of the Elders of Zion (according to the text by S. A. N i l u s a.)
POLITICAL, FINANCIAL, CULTURAL AND RELIGIOUS FACTORS IN THE BIRTH OF THE JEWISH SUPER-NATION
Kiev resident Asher Ginsberg

Asher Ginzberg was born in Skvir, Kyiv province, on August 5, 1856. His parents belonged to the Russian Hasidic sect and raised him according to the rules and rituals of this sect. From the Jewish Encyclopedia and other sources we know that Ginsberg studied the Talmud at a local cheder (Jewish school). In 1868, the Ginzberg family moved to Gopisgitsa. At the age of seventeen, he married the granddaughter of Menachem Mendel, the famous rabbi from Lubovitz.

In 1878, he visited Odessa, where everything he saw made a very big impression on him. He decided to devote several years to traveling and studying various sciences. He studied Latin, mathematics, history and geography especially assiduously. During the period from 1882 to 1884 he visited Vienna, Berlin, Breslau; I studied French, German, English, Russian philosophers and, especially with special zeal, great thinkers - Jews. In Vienna he met Karl Netter, the founder of the World Israel Union. Here he is in highest degree became interested in the plans of the Union of Jewish Colonization.

In 1884, Ginsberg returned to Russia and came to Odessa again. This city was then the center of the Hovevei-Zion alliance, which means “Friends of Zion.” The organization was led by its chairman, Leo Pinsker. Very interested in it, Ginsberg became a member of the union and soon became Pinsker’s right hand and one of the most active leaders of the movement.

The Jewish Question in Odessa

In 1886, he finally settled in Odessa and from then on devoted all his energy to resolving the Jewish question.

In 1889, the founder of the Jewish newspaper “Chamelitz”, Alexander Tsederbaum, came to Odessa. He met Ginsberg, appreciated him and realized that he could be an outstanding writer writing in Hebrew: so he invited him to collaborate in his publication. Asher Ginzbere wrote an article entitled “Lo Zo Haderehe” (“This is not the right way”), which was published in Hamelitz and created a sensation among Jews. It was signed with the name "Ahad-Hame".

Ginsberg in his article proved the failure of the methods used by Hovevei Zion and other organizations to resolve the Jewish problem. In his opinion, their main drawback was the absence of the communist spirit and the preference given to the idea of ​​individualism. Ginsberg argued that this means could not contribute to the revival and strengthening of Jewish nationalism, without which the idea of ​​​​Judaism could not exist.

Secret society "Bne Moishe"

Soon after, Asher Giitsbere founded the secret society Bne Moishe (Sons of Moses). Most of his theories were expressed in the statutes of this society.
Their main apartment was in Odessa, in the Gintsberg house, on Yamskaya Street. The society's statutes were printed in 1890.

The Book of Protocols is a translation from the Hebrew language. This opinion is confirmed by experts who studied the book. Even more compelling evidence is the testimony of people who lived in Odessa in 1890 and saw this document, written in Hebrew, in the hands of Jewish residents of Odessa, and even held it in their hands.

Since 1905, the details of the organization have become more known. wide circles, due to the expansion of the recruitment of new members. Among the original members of the society are the following names: Ben Avigdor, Zalman Epstein, Levin Epstein, Yakov Eisenstadt. The latter was entrusted with the task of recruiting new members among Russian Jews; he chose candidates whom he considered capable of entering into society and honestly fulfilling its demands. For members of the Bne Moishe society, Gintsberg wrote a summary of his theories, which has now become known as the “Protocols”. The same word - "Protocols" - was used by Weishaupt, the head of Illuminism.

Jewish Super-Nation born in Russia, Galicia and Odessa

Secretly, quietly, but quickly, the Bne Moishe society began to develop. IN large quantities cities of Russia, Romania, Galicia and Poland, the Bne Moishe society founded Lodges called “Lishkot”. Their ramifications spread further, reaching Paris, Berlin, England, Warsaw and Palestine. In 1897, after the Basel Congress, the Bne Moshe society was allegedly dissolved and closed, giving way to another organization known as Bne Zion, which received legal existence from the Russian government. (!) This new organization was founded in Moscow by Mr. Usyshkin, a student of Asher Ginzberg.

To the basic position, which asserted that the Jewish Nation really exists, was grafted the doctrine that the Jewish nation is a Super-Nation, a people chosen by God, exalted extremely high “above all other nations, not by political power, but by its spiritual strength” (Asher Ginsberg, “Reassessment of Values”). This nation will rule over others. And this nation is Israel, which, among other nations, is truly the highest type of humanity.

These are the thoughts and theories with which, since 1889, the minds of Eastern Judaism have been fed, and which have been propagated by the Eastern Zionist Lodges. They contain the teaching of Ahad-Hamism, which has achieved outstanding success in the thirty-five years that have elapsed since its inception in Odessa.

"Significance" of Russian, Romanian and Galician Jews

When, in 1903, Hertzl's efforts and negotiations to purchase Palestine finally led to complete failure, the popularity and importance of this man among the Jews began to decline. At the same time, Ahad-Ham, on the contrary, thanks to the millions of K. Vysotsky and J. Schiff, was almost sure that his plans were beginning to come true.
At the 11th Zionist Congress, held in Vienna in 1913, Ahad Ham and his supporters achieved the adoption of the program of "practical" Zionism - the Eastern Jews of "Bne-Zion" and declared themselves ready to help implement the plans outlined in the "Protocols". Max Nordau and other former leaders of "political" Zionism have lost all their importance and influence.

Ahad-Ham and his creatures took control of Zionism and determined its future course. The Jews of B'nai B'rith, whom Ahad Ham called "assimilated" Jews, were forced to take second roles and give up their place to Eastern Jews, Russian, Romanian and Galician, who went through the "school" of Asher Gintsberg.

ZIONIST MOVEMENT AND MODERN TIME

“The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” are intended to be a reference book for every statesman who wants, not only in words, but in deeds, to serve his state and his people. A. Rogovich.

Nilus S.A. published three editions of the “Protocols”: the first in 1905 under the title “The Great in the Small and the Coming Antichrist Near”, the second revised edition in 1911 under the title “There is Near at the Doors”, and the third edition, completed by printing in the printing house of the Holy Trinity Sergius Lavra at the beginning of 1917, just before the start of the revolution.

Nilus managed to bring his book, still in manuscript, to the attention of the Moscow Governor-General, Grand Duke Sergius Alexandrovich, the Grand Duke instructed him to convey two words in response: “it’s too late.” Soon after this, namely on February 4, 1905, the Grand Duke, approaching the Kremlin Nikolsky Gate, was killed by a bomb thrown at his carriage.

In 1905, Nilus came to the conclusion that it was inevitable that Jews would come to power in the near future (in the twenties of this century). At the beginning of 1917, no sooner had the edition of the book gone on sale than the entire main warehouse of the publication at the printing house of the Sergius Lavra and all partial warehouses in the capital's bookstores, by order of Kerensky, were confiscated and destroyed. Some surviving copies were sold secretly, with great caution, as book rarities at a price that was extremely high at that time, up to 600 rubles.

Fierce persecution broke out on the part of Jews, who tried to prove the falsity of the “Protocols”.

Zionist movement

The origin of the Protocols is closely connected with the so-called Zionist movement, which in the 90s of the last century was founded and led by Dr. Theodor Herzl, who published a book entitled “The Jewish State” in 1896. Herzl saw the task of resolving the Jewish question as the opportunity to acquire in Palestine, and in extreme cases in Argentina, territory for the founding of an independent Zion State, in which Jews from all countries who were hostile to the idea of ​​assimilation with other nationalities could settle. Herzl at one time showed tireless activity in efforts to obtain such permission, petitioning the Turkish Sultan and the German Emperor Wilhelm II, during the latter’s visit to Palestine.

But this trend met the most decisive rebuff from the extreme party, led by a Russian Jew from Odessa, Asher Ginzberg, who acted as an ardent opponent of Herzl: he saw the only and necessary solution to the Jewish question in the preparation by Jewry of a world revolutionary coup in all countries of the Jewish dispersion and primarily in Russia, the Autocratic, Tsarist system of which undoubtedly was the main obstacle to the implementation of Jewish world dominion. The struggle between these two currents took place at the Zionist congress convened in Basel in 1897; Asher Ginsberg's party prevailed at this congress, for which Ginsberg drew up a program, parts of which form the content of the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion.”

The Jewish program in its implementation

One of the few major English newspapers that remained faithful to the Christian-national banner, the Morning Post, publishing a study of the “causes of world unrest” and analyzing the “Protocols of Zion”, ends the article published in the issue of October 27, 1921 in the following words: “In any case, one thing is certain that the “Protocols” can serve as a good practical guide, setting forth the ways in which great Empires have been and may continue to be destroyed."

Destinations of 1897

The invincibility of Masonic-Jewish power. (Protocol No. 1); Central Office of the Sages (Protocol No. 15); Economic war - the basis of Jewish predominance (Protocol No. 2); Ostentatious administration and "secret advisers (Protocol No. 2); Adaptability to politics (Protocol No. 2); Parliamentary talking shops, pamphlets (Protocol No. 3); Degeneration of the goyim (Protocol No. 3); Hunger and the right of capital (Protocol No. 3); Freedom and faith (Protocol No. 4); Religion of the future. (Protocol No. 14); Who will be entrusted with responsible positions in the government, (Protocol No. 8); (Protocol No. 10); King of the Jews, or Patriarch Pope. (Protocol No. 15); The mysticism of power. (Protocol No. 15); Papal Court; American, Chinese and Japanese guns are employees of the Masonic board. (Protocol No. 7).

Russian patriots and Zionism

If it is undoubtedly wrong to say that everyone is Bolshevik. - Jews and that all Jews are Bolsheviks, it is nevertheless indisputable that the highest Bolshevik government and all people's commissars of all levels are replenished in the majority by Jews and, moreover, in the majority and not less than 75%.

Therefore, many Russian patriots, even those of the advanced trend, are absolutely right when they claim that Russia is perishing under the yoke of Jewish rule and Jewish terror.
The irritation against Jewry, which is brewing in the depths of modern Russia and which will violently erupt in the Russia of the future, seems so inevitable to the Jews, who are well aware of everything that is happening in all corners of the world, that they often, sometimes even unconsciously, strain their efforts to strengthen modern Jewish -Bolshevik rule, arguing that it would take softer forms and seeing this as the only opportunity to prevent a backlash with its inevitable pogroms and exterminations.

Many Arab and Muslim governments have taken a position in support of the authenticity of the Protocols and political leaders. In some countries, the study of the Protocols is included in school curriculum.

Over the course of its existence, the Protocols have been reprinted in millions of copies and have been translated into many languages ​​of the world. The circumstances surrounding the creation of the Protocols have been fictionalized Umberto Eco in the bestseller " Prague cemetery"(2010).

Authorship and origin

Origin of documents different people and in different publications it was indicated differently, often different interpretations contradicted each other.

There are a number of versions about the origin of the protocols. Proponents of the protocol authenticity theory do not give an exact answer to this question. So Sergei Nilus tells three versions of how he received the protocols, differing from each other with different guesses about their possible origin. Nikolay Markov claims, without citing sources, that “the original manuscript of the Protocols was seized in 1897 during the Zionist Congress in Switzerland from the portfolio of the Zionist leader Theodor Herzl", and the "seizure" was carried out by an agent of the Russian secret police.

Some proponents of the authenticity of protocols (for example Yuri Begunov And Oleg Platonov) rely on a document (note) written in 1927 living in Yugoslavia emigrant Philip Petrovich Stepanov, former prosecutor of the Moscow Synodal Office, chamberlain And actual state councilor

In 1895, my neighbor on the estate Tula province retired major Alexey Nikolaevich Sukhotin gave me a handwritten copy of the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion.” He told me that a lady he knew (he didn’t name her), who lived in Paris, found them with her friend (I think he was Jewish), and, before leaving Paris, secretly translated them from him, and brought this translation, in one copy, to Russia and gave this copy to him - Sukhotin.

I first printed it in one hundred copies on hectograph, but this publication turned out to be difficult to read and I decided to print it in some printing house, without indicating the time, city and printing house; Arkady Ippolitovich Kellepovsky, who was then an official of special assignments under Grand Duke Sergei Alexandrovich; he gave them to the Provincial Printing House to print; it was in 1897. S. A. Nilus reprinted these protocols in full in his work, with his comments.

Currently, this document is kept in the archives of the Holy Trinity Monastery ( Jordanville , USA) There is no factual confirmation of Stepanov’s words; the publications he mentioned have not been discovered to date. Stepanov's statement is considered one of the important documents in the history of the protocols by both authenticity supporters and critics.

Scientists and researchers also do not adhere to consensus about the time of appearance of the protocols. Thus, Norman Cohn dates their compilation between 1897 and 1899 in France in French by Russian agents. Cesare J. De Michelis believes that they were created in Russian between April 1902 and August 1903. Michael Hagemeister says that the witnesses Sliozberg and Tikhomirov, who claimed that the protocols existed in handwritten form and were even in circulation in Russia at the turn of the century, are trustworthy, but he himself concludes that the question is “by whom, when and for what purpose was this text created - remains open."

In studies devoted to this problem, the name most often cited as the author is Matvey Golovinsky- a journalist who lived in Paris and collaborated with Russian intelligence. It is believed that it was Golovinsky who compiled the “Protocols”, working under the direction of a police official Rachkovsky. The version of Golovinsky’s authorship was initially based on the testimony of a Polish-French writer Katarzyny Rzewuska-Radziwiłł and the American Henrietta Herblat. This version was criticized both by supporters of the authenticity of the “Protocols” (for example, General Nechvolodov), and by those who were confident in their falsification - in particular, Burtsev and Nikolaevsky. Burtsev pointed out that Golovinsky left Paris much earlier than, according to the version of Radziwill and Herblat, he worked on the creation of the Protocols.

Publications, events and research

For the first time in the general press the existence of the protocols was mentioned Mikhail Menshikov in the article “Conspiracy Against Humanity”, published in No. 9372 of the newspaper “ New time» (St. Petersburg) 7 (20) April 1902. Menshikov wrote that a certain secular lady suggested that he familiarize himself with the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion.” He doubted the authenticity of the “Protocols” and called their distributors “people with elevated brain temperatures.”

Later, the “Protocols” were published several times, including abroad. The “Protocols” became one of the tools of anti-Jewish propaganda; they were used for these purposes by anti-Semites in different countries, sometimes they are remembered even now.

The fact that the “Protocols” are a fake was suggested by a number of researchers, and in 1921 falsification was confirmed by the found primary source. In an article dated May 8, 1920, “ Times published an article about the Protocols, describing them as an authentic document and calling for an investigation into the "Jewish conspiracy." However, later August 18 1921 « Times” published an editorial in which it said that the “Protocols” are plagiarism little-known pamphlet middle 19th century directed against Napoleon III. The pamphlet was called "Dialogue in Hell between Montesquieu And Machiavelli", its author was a French lawyer and satirist Maurice Joly. Immediately after printing 1864 the pamphlet was banned in France. The text of the Protocols mainly uses Machiavelli's remarks from the Dialogue, although there are also borrowings from Montesquieu's remarks. The textual similarities are so great that the fact of plagiarism is completely obvious. Subsequently, some researchers have suggested that the "Protocols" were possibly fabricated from the "Dialogue" in the early 90s XIX, in France and were originally written in French. It is interesting to note that according to Umberto Eco Maurice Joly's pamphlet, in turn, contains plagiarism from novels Eugene Xu“Secrets of one people” (about the Jesuits) and “Parisian secrets”. Moreover, the Masonic program, which Su attributed to the Jesuits, was in turn invented by Dumas.

Professor of the Russian-American Educational and Scientific Center for Biblical and Judaic Studies Russian State Humanitarian University, Doctor of Philology Leonid Katsis noted that “There was a whole series of similar mystical-conspiracy texts that borrowed ideas, pieces, and so on from each other.” And therefore there is simply no point in talking about authenticity or authorship. He pointed out that the statement of supporters of the authenticity of the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” that the decision of the court in Bern, which established their inauthenticity, was allegedly overturned by a higher court does not correspond to reality. He claims that only 1 out of 11 clauses was repealed - the ban on their distribution.

Ban in Russia

In Russia, in January 2006, members of the Public Chamber and human rights activists called for amendments to the legislation that would create a list of extremist literature prohibited for distribution in Russia, which would include the “Protocols”, but the Protocols were included in this list much later. By the decision of the Leninsky District Court of the city of Orenburg dated July 26, 2010, the brochure “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” was included in Federal list of extremist materials under number 1496.

Protocol topics

Twenty-four protocols were published, containing instructions for establishing complete control over the world. They describe various methods of deception " goyim nations" The main topics of the protocols are shown in the table:

Comparison of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion with Dialogue in Hell between Montesquieu and Machiavelli

The first publication that shed light on plagiarism was a series of articles in the newspaper The Times , published by Irish journalist Philip Graves, who proved the Protocols were a hoax. Sections 1 - 19 of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion correspond to Dialogues 1 - 17 of Maurice Joly. For example:

Modern supporters of the authenticity of the Protocols

Texts and videos containing arguments are popular in anti-Semitic circles Yu. K. Begunova on the origin of the Protocols. Begunov is trying to create an evidence base to confirm the authenticity of the “Protocols” and the existence of a worldwide conspiracy. Literary historian A. I. Reitblat believes that Begunov’s article “Secret Forces in the History of Russia,” dedicated to the circumstances of the creation and publication of the “Protocols,” has no scientific value.

Notes

1. Investigation P. A. Stolypina, 1905 - see Burtsev Proven forgery
2. * Publication of the article The truth about “The Protocols”: a literary forgery in Times, 1921
3. Berne court (English) Russian , 1934-1935
4. (English) United States Congress, Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Protocols of the Elders of Zion: a fabricated “historic” document. A report prepared by the Subcommittee to Investigate the Administration of the Internal Security Act and Other Internal Security Laws (Washington, U.S. Govt. Printing Office, 1964)
5. Islamic Antisemitism in Historical Perspective
6. (English)
7. Markov N. E. The history of the Jewish assault on Russia. Harbin, 1937
8. Begunov Yuri. Secret forces in the history of Russia: Collection of articles and documents. 2nd ed. St. Petersburg, 1996. P. 77
9. Platonov Oleg. Russia's crown of thorns. The mystery of the Zion Protocols. M., 1999. pp. 198-199.
10. Michael Hagemeister. IN SEARCH OF EVIDENCE ABOUT THE ORIGIN OF THE PROTOCOLS OF THE ELDERDS OF ZION: AN EDITION DISAPPEARED FROM THE LENIN LIBRARY. nlobooks.ru. Archived from the original on June 23, 2012. Retrieved January 23, 2012.
11. Norman Cohn. Blessing on Genocide, Chapter II. vehi.net. Archived from the original on February 4, 2012. Retrieved January 23, 2012.
12. , With. 98-102
13. L'origine des Protocoles des sages de Sion
14. , With. 104
15. , With. 7
16. Sergey Nilus. “The coming Antichrist and the kingdom of the devil on earth are near.” Ch. X
17. G. Butmi. Accusatory speeches. Enemies of the human race. Dedicated to the Union of the Russian People. Fourth, revised and expanded edition. St. Petersburg, 1907.
18. Max Wallace, The American Axis St. Martin's Press, 2003
19. Umberto Eco Six walks in literary forests. - St. Petersburg: Symposium, 2003
20. The Protocols of the Elders of Zion: Between History and Fiction.
21. Nikolaevskii to Vera Cohn, August 30, 1964, Boris I. Nikolaevsky Collection, Series 11, Box 20, Folder 24, Hoover Institution, Stanford University.
22. (German) Norman Cohn. “Die Protokolle der Weisen von Zion” Der Mythos der jüdischen Weltverschwörung. - Elster Verlag, 1998. ISBN 3-89151-261-9, page 236
23. http://lib.aldebaran.ru/author/burcev_vladimir/burcev_vladimir_protokoly_sionskih_mudrecov/burcev_vladimir_protokoly_sionskih_mudrecov__1.html Introductory article “From the author”
24. The mystery of the anti-Semitic “Protocols”
25. The Public Chamber will create a list of prohibited literature
26. Charny S. Anti-Semitic books will go to embassies. Jewish News Agency (05/13/2011). Archived
27. The Foreign Ministry of the Russian Federation is sending antisemitic books all over the world (English). CFCA (29-05-2011). Archived from the original on October 16, 2012. Retrieved September 28, 2012.
28. RUSSIA (English). state.gov. Archived from the original on October 16, 2012. Retrieved September 28, 2012.
29. Balashova Yu. Orthodoxy, autocracy, anti-Semitism // Novaya Gazeta. - M., May 16, 2011. - V. 51.
30. Y. K. Begunov “THE CASE OF BERN “THE ELDERDS OF ZION””
31. “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” - history and modernity. Conversation with Professor Yuri Begunov on the website of the newspaper “Orthodox Rus'”
32. Reitblat A. I. Nilus and the Protocols of the Elders of Zion // UFO. - M., 2006. - V. 78.

Protocol texts

• Publication of the protocols of S. Nilus, printed in the printing house of the Holy Trinity Sergius Lavra in 1911
• Yakov Krotov. The text of the “Protocols” in the library of Yakov Krotov
• Maurice Joly. Dialogue aux enfers entre Machiavel et Montesquieu (original text of Maurice Joly's pamphlet) in Project Gutenberg Library
• Scan of the 1922 Berlin edition in PDF at archive.org

Literature

• Vladimir Burtsev. "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion". Proven forgery Paris, (city)
• Norman Cohn. Blessing for Genocide: The Myth of the Worldwide Jewish Conspiracy and the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. , Per. from English S. S. Bychkova, Moscow, Progress, 1990.

Blessing on genocide

“...The sharp opposite of the Aryan is the Jew... The black-haired Jewish youth waits for hours with satanic joy in the eyes of unsuspecting Aryan girls, whom he will disgrace with his blood and in this way rob the nation.” Sitting in Landsberg prison, an ugly, nervous man dictated long, rhetorical commandments to his comrades in the unsuccessful putsch, calling for them to save Europe and the nation from destruction. These revelations were recorded by two of his cellmates: a native of Egypt, Rudolf Hess, and a dark, Jewish-looking Frenchman, Emile Maurice - two examples of the “true Aryan breed.”

The author of Mein Kampf has been thinking about “the culprits of our troubles” for 20 years. This ardent fighter for the purity of the race drew his ideological “capital” from the pages of a book that he learned by heart. Its title is “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.” This “document” opened the eyes of the future “Führer of the German nation” to the secret mechanics of the world and became for him a real manifesto of the “brown revolution”. From there he carefully rewrote the plans of the Jewish conspiracy, which threatened to give the whole world to the “little people.”

A person who opens the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” learns from them that the Jewish elite intended to use cunning and deceit to destroy the high-born nobility. That the Jews want to replace the old order with decadent democracy. What are their plans to seize (or maybe they have already seized?) all the gold in the world, all the banks and the media. That they introduce new disgusting doctrines into the unstable minds of people - Marxism, Darwinism and Nietzscheanism - and destroy traditional values, which man has adhered to for many centuries. What capitalism, communism and liberalism are different shapes systematic disintegration of society by Jews. That the Jews, having finally taken possession of the world, will install a king from the line of David to rule and rule over all nations, and they will remain subordinate to him. What lies ahead of us? Pax Judaica (“Peace in the Jewish Way”)! In this beautiful world, only ghettos will be open to Aryans...

This thin book became a compilation of the most common prejudices against Jews - a kind of “anthology of anti-Semitic ideas.” Later they were washed in blood - and cursed. It seemed that, along with the reciters of those slogans and covenants, this book itself should have disappeared from people’s memory. But she is alive, her ideas are still tempting. In the countries of the Arab world, “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” was republished about fifty times (this book was especially liked by the Hero of the Soviet Union Gamal Abdel Nasser). In America, more than 30 publications have been published in just 10 years (since 1990). While reading these “Protocols,” any nationalists are complacently reconciled - from Hitler fans to radicals from the Nation of Islam. Their hatred is directed at a common enemy. “Protocols”, like a tuning fork, tune the rage of the crowd, directing its energy to a “just cause”...

...It was 1921. Three years remained before he wrote the book “My Struggle” as a prisoner at Landsberg Prison. But by that time it had already become clear that the notorious “Protocols” were nothing more than a fake. The correspondent of the London newspaper "The Times" in Istanbul, Mr. Philip Graves, managed to establish that most of the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" is... plagiarism. He was able to find the original book, which everyone had already forgotten about by that time.

As it turned out, in 1864, when France was ruled by Emperor Napoleon III, a pamphlet was published entitled “Dialogue in Hell between Machiavelli and Montesquieu, or the Politics of Machiavelli in the 19th Century.” Behind this pompous name was hidden a caustic satire. Its author, as a distraction, turned into an unknown stenographer who recorded the confessions of two famous political scientists of the past, sent to hell for reforging, ridiculed, giving free rein to hyperbole and fantasies, the politics of the “new Napoleon.” His anonymity could not protect him from the police. We don’t know whether lawyer Maurice Joly (1829–1878) ended up in hell (although how he could have found his way there), but nevertheless he received 15 months in a French prison “for his libel.” The police confiscated most of the “Dialogues” and destroyed them...

Over the course of three days, from August 16 to 18, 1921, Mr. Graves published a series of sensational articles in the pages of his newspaper in which he exposed the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” as a long-standing fake. He convincingly proved that this was a case of plagiarism, while the long-standing fiction was interpreted by the compilers of the “Protocols” as an immutable fact. They managed to squeeze almost 40% of the text stolen from Joly into their opus.

Mr. Graves' aimed shot, meanwhile, hit the milk. Joly's "Dialogue" remained a forgotten pamphlet, and the "Protocols" have been disturbing the minds of people for a whole century, turning their despair and vague protests into a clear, enduring hatred of the Jews...

At the beginning of the 19th century, Emperor Napoleon I equalized Jews civil rights with other European populations. Many Jews leave the ghetto, some of them quickly become rich. The name of the Rothschild bankers becomes a household name. They came to the forefront of history at the very end Napoleonic wars. In 1811–1816, almost half of all subsidies allocated by England to its continental allies passed through their hands. Their wealth aroused envy and irritation. The upstarts and nouveau riche were also greeted with hostility by representatives of the upper classes, especially those from the old, well-born nobility, who were quickly losing influence on the policies of bourgeois governments.

Jews, on the pages of liberal publications, persistently defended civil liberties, which they knew how to use with such dexterity. In the eyes of a well-intentioned society, they could not help but appear as the most dangerous troublemakers and revolutionaries. “Protect the monarchs from the indignation of the mob, and the country from the dominance of the Jews” - conservative thinkers came to this conclusion, observing with horror the decline of contemporary morals. The conclusion was made. The time has come to collect facts and prepare an indictment against “the spirit of Jewry, which broke out beyond the walls of the ghetto and vulgarized the life and culture of European peoples.”

1862 - an anonymous article was published on the pages of the Munich magazine “Historisch-politische Blaetter”. It talked about how Jews allegedly grouped behind the scenes of political life, creating “pseudo-Masonic” lodges in order to manipulate from there nationalist movements in Italian and German countries. This was said at the beginning of that decade, which blew up the usual order in Italy and Germany and united many small principalities and lands into single states. Crisis, collapse of the old... Who is to blame? Jews.

1868 - German journalist Hermann Goedsche (1815–1878), hiding under the pseudonym “Sir John Ratcliffe,” published the novel “Biarritz.” It caused a sensation in society (its name, by the way, was reminiscent of the famous French resort where Napoleon III, hated by the Prussians, loved to relax). One of the chapters of this novel, stretching over 40 pages, is entitled “In the Jewish Cemetery in Prague.” It describes a secret night meeting that took place among the graves and crypts. 12 figures dressed in white robes surrounded the tomb of the famous rabbi. These were messengers from each tribe of Israel. Undisturbed by anyone, they began to discuss how to subjugate the entire Christian world to their power. These “secret rulers of the world” organize such a gathering once every 100 years. Peoples are only pawns in their game: they exterminate Christians, pitting them against each other in fratricidal wars, and then appropriate the wealth collected by others...

Sir Ratcliffe, alias Herr Goedsche, carefully described the strategy of the Jews. Firstly, many of them are baptized, trying to merge with Christians so that it is easier to carry out their policies among them. Each such cross is a spy, each one is worse than a hundred Russian Cossacks. Secondly, they seek to subjugate exchanges, banks, etc. Cash flows can be compared to the blood vessels of the state. Jews cling to them and, like vampires, drink them without a trace. Thirdly, Jewish bankers obligingly provide loans to aristocrats, entangling them like spiders in their networks, in order to subsequently ruin and destroy them. Fourthly, they persistently seek to weaken the forces of any power, seeking the separation of church and state. Fifthly, they support troublemakers everywhere, they dream of revolutions and take an active part in each. In the end, sixthly, they subjugate all the newspapers so that ignorant people can judge what is happening only in the way that pleases the Jews...

Such was Gedsche's fantasy. It is easy to see that his ideas - with some amendments - still serve modern anti-Semites. The cartridges cast by the Prussian writer still hit the target. Newspapers? Jewish truth! Finance? Jewish money!

Biarritz became a bestseller. The chapter about the secret Jewish evening in the Prague churchyard was especially popular. Finally, someone dared to openly say what had been whispered about for so long both in the closets of the poor and in the palaces of aristocrats! It was rumored that “Sir Ratcliffe” was Jewish himself and knew what he was writing about. Soon the mentioned chapter began to be published as a separate brochure. It has been translated into many European languages. It entered the “treasury” of world anti-Semitic literature.

1886 - Parisian publicist Edouard Drumont publishes the book “Jewish France”. In a short time, 100,000 copies were sold. In subsequent years, it was reprinted 200 times! At the end of the 19th century, only 100,000 Jews lived in France (out of a population of almost 38 million), but Drumont was sure that this was too many. In those years, he published the anti-Semitic newspaper Svobodnoe Slovo. Its circulation grew to 300,000 copies in the mid-1890s. It was from the pages of this newspaper that accusations fell against the officer of the French general staff, Alfred Dreyfus, a Jew by nationality.

1894 - the trial of the “German spy” Dreyfus began. On trumped-up charges, he was sentenced to life in hard labor, but was pardoned in 1899 because otherwise American representatives refused to go to the 1900 Paris World Exhibition. It was necessary to choose between profit and integrity. In 1906, Dreyfus - by the way, an unpleasant person in himself: an upstart, a braggart, a spendthrift - was rehabilitated.

The “Protocols of the Elders of Zion”, which arose on this wave, as established today, were concocted by immigrants from Russia. Pyotr Ivanovich Rachkovsky (1853–1911) had a direct hand in them. In St. Petersburg he was considered a leading figure in falsifications and a brilliant master of ideological propaganda. 1882 - Rachkovsky headed the Paris bureau of the Tsarist secret police. In those years, a large colony of Russian revolutionaries lived in the French capital - emigrants of the “minus of the first wave”. Rachkovsky followed their activities with attention. His extensive connections helped him. In particular, he was well acquainted with the chief of police of Paris and, on occasion, visited the salon of his wife Juliette.

By the end of the 19th century, about 5 million Jews lived in Tsarist Russia. Most of them were forced to huddle “beyond the Pale of Settlement” - in poor towns and towns in Ukraine and Belarus. Some of the Jews became rich by becoming money changers or merchants. This caused resentment and envy: “Who multiplied the poor?” Jews? Of course, not only them, and not primarily them. And yet, it was the Jews - “not the worst people in Russia” (the words of N.S. Leskov) - who became the object of persecution provoked from above. These infidels, who were also unpopular in other countries, could easily be blamed for all the troubles. Already in 1881–1882, the first pogroms began to break out in the south of Russia.

Historians suggest that in high government spheres it was decided to entrust Mr. Rachkovsky's art to instigate an anti-Jewish campaign. There could be several undoubted benefits from this. These are the motives that could have guided the people who began fabricating the “Protocols.”

In the Russian Empire there was growing revolutionary movement. It was necessary to discredit him. Why not present the young people who went to the revolution as collaborators with “international Jewry”? This will cause everyone to dislike them.
Jews, especially wealthy ones, must be forced to emigrate from Russia. This will give an advantage to their Russian competitors.

We need to improve Russia's international prestige. Pogroms - a relic of the Middle Ages - can only be justified by the fact that the Jews were preparing a conspiracy against the government and even “against all governments in the world.”
In the end, the international situation was also convenient. France was split by the struggle between supporters and opponents of Dreyfus. At the same time, in August 1897, the First Zionist Congress took place in Basel. In this “kahal” of Jews gathered from all over the world, it was easy to see a prototype of the secret gathering of the tribes of Israel...

1891, June 6 - P. Rachkovsky informed his boss in St. Petersburg that the pogroms in Russia were causing disapproving responses in the French press. Therefore, the head of the foreign agents of the police department in Paris proposed, by launching a skillful campaign of slander and discredit, to nip in the bud any sympathy for the Jews and to whitewash any measures taken against them.

The authorities hesitated for a long time. Work began only in 1894. The main sources were a pamphlet by Maurice Joly and a chapter about a meeting in a Prague cemetery from Hermann Goedsche's novel Biarritz. Rachkovsky probably learned about Joly’s pamphlet in Madame Adam’s salon. The style of presentation and some of the ideas seemed very interesting, especially since the first version of the “Protocols” was compiled in French. Russian aristocrat Catherine Radziwill saw their manuscript, read it, as she admitted many years later, and noted how strange and unnatural the French language in which they were supposedly written sounded. 1897 - the text was ready. “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” was translated into Russian.

The decisive moment has arrived. How to present them to the public so that they do not recognize a fake? The slightest mistake and a major scandal will occur!

Historians have quite accurately traced the fate of the manuscript on its way from the manufacturers to the reader. The first link in this chain was Yuliana Dmitrievna Glinka (1844–1918). The daughter of the Russian envoy in Lisbon, the maid of honor of the Empress, an admirer of Blavatsky, she loved to visit Juliette Adam's salon in Paris and, perhaps, was an employee of Rachkovsky. So she admitted that under very unusual circumstances she came into possession of a strange manuscript...

Once she had a chance to pay a visit to a Jewish friend named Shapiro. It was already late. Suddenly a manuscript written in French caught her eye. The curious lady leafed through it and, realizing that she was dealing with something highly secret, began immediately translating it into Russian. She never left Shapiro's house that night, spending time with pen, ink and paper. By the next morning, this hardworking lady was able to translate the entire treatise she liked, which had been recklessly abandoned by her hospitable host. She eventually left Shapiro's house, smuggling away (in a reticule? corset? pantaloons?) the manuscript of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Obviously, these events took place on the longest night of the year - the volume of the brochure (more than 80 pages) suggests such an idea - and in the hands of Mrs. Glinka was the largest reticule in the world (we will keep silent about other versions).

Returning to Russia, the lady shared her booty with retired major Alexei Nikolaevich Sukhotin, who lived nearby. She convinced that the manuscript was “obtained from the secret repositories of the main Zion chancellery.” Sukhotin immediately handed it to his neighbor on the estate, government official Philip Petrovich Stepanov. “He said that a lady he knew (he did not name her for me), who lived in Paris, found them with her friend (Jewish, it seems) and, before leaving Paris, secretly translated them from him and brought this translation, in one copy, to Russia and transferred this copy,” Stepanov later recalled.

The official, who did not suspect the trick, was the first distributor of this manuscript. He entitled it “The Enslavement of the World by the Jews” and printed 100 copies on a hectograph. Prominent dignitaries, ministers and even members of the Romanov dynasty - Grand Duke Sergei Alexandrovich, the emperor's uncle, and his wife Elizaveta Feodorovna, the empress's sister, were honored with reading these leaflets. Many of those who read the manuscript suspected the intrigues of the security department and hastened to stay away from the scandalous pamphlet. But Grand Duke Sergei Alexandrovich and his wife were convinced of the authenticity of the revelations given. The uncle introduced his nephew, Emperor Nicholas II, and his wife Alexandra Fedorovna to the “Enslavement of the World.” At first, the king was amazed by what he read: “What depth of thought!” But, having learned from his ministers what the origin of this manuscript was, he was horrified. In his diary, he wrote that he decided to refuse any support for this work: “You cannot defend a pure cause with dirty methods.”

A copy of the manuscript also fell into the hands of Pavel Krushevan, editor-publisher of the Znamya newspaper, one of the leaders of the Black Hundred, organizer of the pogrom in Chisinau, where 45 Jews were killed. Krushevant immediately considered the “protocols of the sages” to be an authentic document and in 1903 published them in the pages of his newspaper under the title “Program for the Conquest of the World by the Jews.” The publication stretched from August 28 to September 7 and aroused great interest. The final point in the history of this fake was put in 1905 by the writer Sergei Nilus (1861–1929). A wealthy landowner of the Oryol province, he lived for a long time in Biarritz with his mistress, but suddenly received the most unpleasant news from his manager: “I’m ruined, it turns out!” The news shocked him. His whole life went differently now. He turned into an eternal wanderer, wandering from one monastery to another and everywhere finding conspiracies against God.

On all the objects around him, he looked for the terrible stars of David. And the “Protocols” amazed him to such an extent (“This is a document!”) that he released them as an appendix to his novel “Big in Small and as a Close Political Possibility.” Nilus was preparing to present this luxuriously published book to Nicholas II. His wife, Elena Alexandrovna Ozerova, was the queen's maid of honor. She easily obtained permission to reprint the brochure.

Most of those who read this work believed everything written in it. Only some intellectuals protested. Thus, Maxim Gorky sharply criticized the “Protocols”.
After the October revolution, comrades Ulyanov-Blank, Zinoviev-Radomyslsky, Kamenev-Rozenfeld, Sverdlov, Trotsky-Bronstein came to power in Russia. The Russian Empress died, one might say, with the “Protocols” in her hands, as befitted a victim of a Jewish conspiracy: in the Ipatiev house, where she spent last days, she had only three books - the Bible, the first volume of “War and Peace” and Nilus’s story with “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion”. And the heirs of the Russians old surnames, intellectuals, military men, and engineers fled to the West, taking away in their suitcases and reticules a brochure in which, long before the revolution, everything that was about to happen in the country was accurately predicted. Rescued from the Russian Revolution, the Protocols began a truly triumphant march throughout all European countries. First of all, they returned to where they were born - to France. But the Protocols found particularly fertile ground in Germany.

1918 - revolution broke out in Germany. Returning home, German soldiers and officers did not recognize their country - it was sliding into chaos, becoming a toy in the hands of fanatical agitators and rebellious soldiers. Under the pressure of the Entente's superior forces, Germany, devastated by the war, capitulated. After such a disaster, it was impossible not to think about who was to blame for what was happening. But who is the culprit of all the troubles that have befallen the country? This thought repeatedly beat in the inflamed brain of the most famous German outcast of the 20th century - Adolf Hitler. The same thoughts were beating in the minds of many of his fellow citizens.

Alfred Hugenberg, an ardent German nationalist, one of the founders of the Pan-German League, the owner of many German newspapers and publishing houses (where were the Jews looking?), established vigorous activity in replicating the “Protocols”. In the immediate post-war years, hundreds of thousands of copies of the Protocols were sold in Germany. This brochure has become a reference book for builders. Lines from the Protocols of the Elders of Zion resonated across hundreds of pages of Mein Kampf.

The Protocols were also very popular among the winners. Their first English version appeared in 1920. It was distributed by the Moscow correspondent of the Morning Post, Victor Marsden. He had lived through terrible times in Russia and was now sure that all the worst things in this world came from the Jews. However, the majority of residents of Great Britain - a country where Benjamin Disraeli was Prime Minister for almost 10 years - were skeptical about this publication: “If the fruit of a meeting of the most prominent Jews of the whole world, who absorbed all the wisdom accumulated by generations of their ancestors, is this modest book, then it’s time to doubt the wisdom and intelligence of the Jewish race.”

The brochure also found an influential admirer in America - automobile magnate Henry Ford. 1920 - He published “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” in the pages of his newspaper, the Dearborn Independent. Inspired by them, Henry Ford even published his own opus dedicated to the same topic. "International Jewry". In it, he accused the Jews of all sorts of crimes, for example, that, corrupting the souls of ordinary American workers, they came up with such vicious entertainment as cinematography and jazz. However, in 1927, the fighter against Zion threw out the white flag and took back his accusations, because they harmed the reputation of the company. He even had to publicly apologize. Ford insisted that “it was only out of naivety” that he believed in the authenticity of these “Protocols.”

The entire circulation of his own book was loaded onto three trucks, taken to a faraway place and burned. Naive Ford! The genie was already out of the bottle. In Europe, his book enjoyed wild success, although the author, turning to the courts, demanded an immediate ban on its reprint. These days, Ford's International Jewry is reprinted as regularly as Ford cars are produced.

The Protocols of the Elders of Zion successfully survived the Second World War and the defeat of the Nazis, denazification and prosecutions for pro-fascist views, although they also bear, albeit indirectly, blame for the Holocaust. What do historians say about this? “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion are largely responsible for the genocidal policies of the Nazis,” says Norman Cohn, author of A Blessing for Genocide. His other colleagues are more lenient.

“The Protocols only indirectly justified anti-Semitic actions, but did not incite them,” says Michael Berger, professor of Jewish history at the University of Munich. “The whole fault of the Protocols lies not in the fact that they called for some open anti-Semitic speeches, but in the fact that they sowed distrust of Jews and convinced them to deny them help and sympathy,” notes US historian Richard S. Levi.

The 20th century has disappeared over the horizon, and yet new packs of “Protocols” appear on trays. Their poisonous revelations are still taken for granted. Their admirers, as before, see in every Jew a “mysterious machine” for the destruction of European and Asian peoples, set in motion by certain “puppeteers” from Zion, and are ready to defend the purity of their race with arms in hand...

Mr. Kartashov’s joy was, of course, very insincere, because no matter how Yu. Delevsky puffed himself up, no matter how much he scolded anti-Semites, he still could not prove and did not prove the falsity of the “Zion Protocols”.

The entire system of evidence of this nimble Jew was built on a painstaking selection of quotes and individual passages from the literature preceding the Protocols of Zion, which expressed the same thoughts as in the Protocols. Here are Abbé Chaboty, Gougenot de Mousseau, and Edouard Drumont, even the shadow of Pobedonostsev is disturbed, Ratcliffe’s novel is examined and, like the crown of creation, a certain “Dialogue of Maurice Joly” is found in the dust of the archive.

This last document indeed contains many passages in common with the “Protocols” not only in content, but also in individual expressions - with the only difference that in the “Protocols” the secret Jewish rulers speak, and in the “Dialogue” - Machiavelli, under which Joly meant Napoleon III.

From this undoubted similarity of the "Dialogue", written in the 60s of the 19th century, with the "Protocols", Yu. Delevsky triumphantly concluded that the "Zion Protocols" are plagiarism - a reworking of the "Dialogue". At first glance, this conclusion seems correct. But this is only at first glance.

In reality, there was no plagiarism here, but only different writers using the same document at different times - the program of Jewish messianism. Is it possible to call authors who, say, quote the Bible, plagiarists? There is no doubt that each such author, copying pages and texts from the Bible, always writes the same words and expressions, expresses the same thoughts. And if Yu. Delevsky had gone through a number of writers who wrote on biblical topics, he could easily have caught them plagiarizing from each other: - after all, they all cite the same texts, and, accordingly, express the same thoughts.

The revolutionary of the 2nd Empire, the Communard of 1871, the French Freemason Maurice Joly undoubtedly belonged to the secret Jewish community and therefore had access to the secret program of the Messinists - the conquerors of the world. Naturally, having received an order from his order to issue a pamphlet against Napoleon III with accusations of imperialism and terror, he attributed to his Macchiaveli (i.e. Napoleon III) all those plans that his, Maurice Joly’s, leaders actually carried out over and over again. forever, a program developed over centuries.

No matter how vengeful the messianists were, there were still quite a few apostasy from them, there were quite a few people who were horrified by Satanism and left their ranks; and it is not surprising that other writers, like Gougenot de Mousseau, Redcliffe and others, learned about the existence of the messianic program and reported some excerpts from it.

S.A. Nilus was lucky enough to obtain most of this mysterious program and publish it. And if certain passages of this program are similarly set out by previous writers, then this is only evidence confirming the constant existence of the messianic program, and in no way refuting it.

The most important and most significant consideration was expressed by the same Henry Ford: - It is not important who and how obtained and published the “Protocols of Zion”, but that the Jewish program, published in 1905, was actually implemented in all its main parts over the next twenty years.

On my own behalf, I will add: The program of the Jewish takeover of the state and peoples was not only carried out at all, but was carried out by the very Jewish force on whose behalf the program of the “Zion Protocols” was announced.

The appearance of this ruling, entirely Jewish, clique of terrorists speaks for itself. This villainous gang of Jews achieved despotic power over the 150 million Russian people by 1917 only because Jewry has always had its own Zionist program, and Jewry has carried out and continues to carry out this misanthropic program with an iron, never-retreating persistence.

Prince M.K. Gorchakov

Prince M.K. Gorchakov created the monarchical publishing house "Down with Evil" in Paris, which published Protocols of Zion(from the book by Nilus 1911)

Protocols of the Elders of Zion

taken from the original edition of S. Nilus,

printed in the Holy Trinity printing house

Sergius Lavra in 1911.

Protocol 1.

The right stands. Freedom is an idea. Liberalism. Gold. Faith. Self-government. Despotism of capital. The internal enemy. Crowd. Anarchy. Politics and morality. The right of the strong. The invincibility of Masonic-Jewish power. End justifies the means. The crowd is blind. Political ABC. Party discord. The most appropriate form of government is autocracy. Alcohol. Classicism. Debauchery. The principle and rules of the Masonic-Jewish government. Terror. Freedom, equality, fraternity. The principle of dynastic rule. Abolition of the privileges of the goyim aristocracy. New aristocracy. Psychological calculation. Abstraction of freedom. Change of people's representatives.

Putting aside the phrase-mongering, we will talk about the meaning of each thought, illuminating the circumstances with comparisons and conclusions.

It should be noted that people with bad instincts are more numerous than good ones, therefore the best results in controlling them are achieved through violence and intimidation, and not through academic reasoning. Every person strives for power, everyone would like to become a dictator if only he could, but at the same time, it is rare that he would not be ready to sacrifice the benefits of everyone for the sake of achieving his own benefits.

What held back the predatory animals called humans? What has guided them until now?

At the beginning social order they submitted to brute and blind force, then to the law, which is the same force, only disguised. I conclude that according to the law of nature, the right is in force.

Political freedom is an idea, not a fact. One must be able to apply this idea when it is necessary to attract the masses of people to one’s party as an ideological bait, if one is planning to break another party in power. This task is made easier if the enemy himself becomes infected with the idea of ​​freedom, with so-called liberalism, and sacrifices his power for the sake of the idea. This is where the triumph of our theory will manifest itself: the loose reins of government are immediately, according to the law of existence, picked up and picked up by a new hand, because the blind power of the people of the day cannot live without a leader, and the new government only takes the place of the old one, weakened by liberalism.

In our time, the power of gold has become a substitute for liberal rulers. There was a time, faith ruled. The idea of ​​freedom is impracticable because no one knows how to use it in moderation. As soon as the people are left to self-government for a while, it turns into licentiousness. From this moment on, civil strife arises, soon turning into social battles, in which states burn and their significance turns to ashes.

Whether the state is exhausted in its own convulsions, or internal strife gives it over to external enemies, in any case, it can be considered irretrievably lost: it is in our power. The despotism of capital, which is entirely in our hands, hands it a straw that the state has to hold on to unwillingly, otherwise it will slide into the abyss.

To the one who, from a liberal soul, would say that reasoning of this kind is immoral, I ask: if each state has two enemies and if in relation to an external enemy it is allowed and is not considered immoral to use all sorts of measures of struggle, such as, for example, not acquainting the enemy with plans of attack or defense, to attack him at night or with an unequal number of people, then why can the same measures against the worst enemy, the violator of the social order and prosperity, be called unlawful and immoral?

Can a sound logical mind hope to successfully lead crowds with the help of reasonable exhortations or persuasion, with the possibility of a contradiction, even if it is senseless, but which may seem more pleasant to a superficially intelligent people? Guided solely by petty passions, beliefs, customs, traditions and sentimental theories, people in the crowd and the people of the crowd succumb to party splits, which prevent any agreement even on the basis of completely reasonable exhortation. Every decision of the crowd depends on a random or rigged majority, which, due to ignorance of political secrets, pronounces an absurd decision, laying the germ of anarchy in government.

Politics has nothing to do with morality. A ruler guided by morality is apolitical and therefore unstable on his throne. Whoever wants to rule must resort to both cunning and hypocrisy. The great national qualities - frankness and honesty - are vices in politics, because they overthrow the strongest enemy better and more accurately. These qualities should be attributes of the goyim kingdoms, but we should not be guided by them.

Our right is in force. The word “right” is an abstract and unproven thought. This word means nothing more than: Give me what I want, so that I thereby receive proof that I am stronger than you.

Where does law begin? Where does it end?