To the question about the attitude of the heroes towards the Cherry Orchard?? urgent need!!! given by the author Efa Patrick the best answer is The Cherry Orchard is a secluded, quiet corner, dear to the heart of everyone who grew up and lives here. He is handsome, handsome with that calm, sweet, cozy beauty that so attracts a person to home. The beauty of nature has always influenced the souls and hearts of people, unless, of course, their soul is still alive and their heart has not hardened.
The heroes of “The Cherry Orchard” Ranevskaya, Gaev and everyone whose life was connected with the cherry orchard for a long time love it: the gentle, subtle beauty of flowering cherry trees left an indelible mark on their souls. The entire action of the play takes place against the backdrop of this garden. The Cherry Orchard is always invisibly present on the stage: they talk about its fate, they try to save it, they argue about it, they philosophize about it, they dream about it, they remember it.
“After all, I was born here,” says Ranevskaya, “my father and mother, my grandfather lived here, I love this house, I don’t understand my life without the cherry orchard, and if you really need to sell, then sell me along with the orchard. .."
For Ranevskaya and Gaev The Cherry Orchard- an integral part of the family nest, small homeland, where they spent their childhood and youth, where their best dreams and hopes were born and died out, the cherry orchard became a part of them. The sale of the cherry orchard symbolizes the end of their aimlessly lived life, from which only bitter memories remain. These people with subtle spiritual qualities, perfectly developed and educated, cannot save their cherry orchard, the best part own life,
Anya and Trofimov also grew up in the cherry orchard, but they are still very young, plump vitality and energy, so they leave the cherry orchard with ease and joy.
In the image of Anya and Trofimov, Chekhov embodied everything best features representatives of new times. But at the same time, we see shortcomings in them. Trofimov denounces noble parasitism and nevertheless lives in a noble estate for a long time. Trofimov looks at Lopakhin as if he were a predator and at the same time confesses to him: “After all, I love you.”
Another hero, Ermolai Lopakhin, looks at the garden from the point of view of “circulation of business.” He busily suggests that Ranevskaya and Gaev divide the estate into summer cottages and cut down the garden.
While reading the play, you begin to become imbued with the concerns of its characters and worry about the fate of the cherry orchard itself. The question inevitably arises: why is the cherry orchard dying? Was it really impossible to do at least something to save the garden, which is so dear to the characters in the work? Chekhov gives a direct answer to this: it is possible. The whole tragedy lies in the fact that the owners of the garden are not capable of this due to their character; they either live in the past, or are too frivolous and indifferent to the future.
Ranevskaya and Gaev worry not so much about the judge of the cherry orchard, but about their own unfulfilled dreams and aspirations. They talk much more about their experiences, but when the fate of the cherry orchard is decided, they easily and quickly return to their usual way of life and their real concerns.
Anya and Trofimov are completely focused on the future, which seems bright and carefree to them. For them, the cherry orchard is an unwanted burden that must be gotten rid of in order to plant a new, progressive cherry orchard in the future.
Lopakhin perceives the cherry garden as an object of his business interests, an opportunity to make a profitable deal, the fate of the garden itself does not bother him. For all his penchant for poetry, business and benefit come first for him.
Lyubov Andreevna - main character Chekhov's play "The Cherry Orchard". This woman is the main representative of the female half of the nobility of that time with all their vices and positive features. It is in her house that the play takes place.
She skillfully combines both positive and negative traits of her character.
Ranevskaya is a naturally beautiful woman with good manners, a true noblewoman, kind, but very trusting in life. After the death of her husband and tragic death son, she goes abroad, where she lives for five years with her lover, who eventually robs her. There Lyubov Andreevna leads a lavish lifestyle: balls, receptions, all this costs a lot of money. Meanwhile, her daughters live in poverty, but she has a cool attitude towards them.
She is far from reality, lives in her own world. Her sentimentality is manifested in longing for her homeland, for her lost youth. Having arrived, after long absence home, where she returns in the spring, Ranevskaya finds peace. Nature itself, with its beauty, helps her in this.
At the same time, she does not think about the future, throws a ball, knowing that she has no money for later life. Lyubov Andreevna simply cannot give up a beautiful life.
She is kind, helps others, especially old man Firs. But on the other hand, leaving the estate, she forgets about him, leaving him in an abandoned house.
Leading an idle lifestyle cannot be happy. It is her fault for the death of the garden. She did nothing good in her life, so she remained in the past, very unhappy. Having lost the cherry orchard and estate, she also loses her homeland, returning to Paris.
Leonid Gaev
In the play “The Cherry Orchard,” landowner Leonid Gaev is endowed with a unique character. In some ways he is similar to his sister Ranevskaya. He is also characterized by romanticism and sentimentality. He loves the garden and is very worried about selling it, but does absolutely nothing to save the estate.
His idealism is manifested in the fact that he makes unrealistic plans, thinking that his aunt will give money, or Anya will marry successfully, or someone will leave them an inheritance and the garden will be saved.
Leonid Andreevich is very talkative, loves to make speeches, but at the same time he can say stupid things. His nieces often ask him to be quiet.
Completely impractical, lazy, not adapted to change. He lives on everything ready-made, leading a riotous lifestyle in his old world, not understanding new trends. The servant even helps him undress, although over time he will not even remember his devoted Firs.
He does not have a family, because he believes that he needs to live for himself. He lives for himself, visiting gambling establishments, playing billiards and having fun. At the same time, he throws money away, having a lot of debt.
You can't rely on him. He swears that the garden will not be sold, but he does not keep his promise. Gaev is having a hard time with the loss of his garden and estate, he even gets a job as a bank employee, but few people believe that he will stay there because of his laziness.
Ermolai Lopakhin
The merchant Ermolai Alekseevich Lopakhin is a representative of a new class - the bourgeoisie, which replaced the nobility.
Coming from the common people, he never forgets this and treats him well to the common people, because his grandfather and father were serfs on the Ranevsky estate. From childhood he knew what it was simple people and always considered myself a man.
Thanks to his intelligence, perseverance, and hard work, he rose out of poverty and became a very rich man, although he is always afraid of losing his acquired capital. Ermolai Alekseevich gets up early, works hard and achieves success.
Lopakhin is sometimes gentle, kind and affectionate, he notices beauty and, in his own way, he feels sorry for the cherry orchard. He offers Ranevskaya a plan to save the garden, not forgetting that at one time she did a lot for him. And when Ranevskaya refuses to rent out the garden for dachas, the vein of a predator, a conqueror, appears in his features. He buys the estate and garden where his ancestors were slaves, and is triumphant because his old dream has come true. Here his merchant acumen is clearly visible. “I can pay for everything,” he says. Destroying the garden, he does not worry, but rejoices at his gain.
Anya
Anya is one of the heroes who strive for the future.
From the age of twelve she was raised on her uncle's estate, abandoned by her mother, who went abroad. Of course, she could not receive a proper education, because the governess in the past was just a circus performer. But Anya persistently, using books, filled in the gaps in knowledge.
The beauty of the cherry orchard, which she loved very much, and the abundance of time on the estate gave impetus to the formation of her subtle nature.
Anya is sincere, spontaneous and childishly naive. She believes in people, and that is why Petya Trofimov had such a strong influence on her, former teacher her younger brother.
After four years of the girl’s stay abroad, with her mother, seventeen-year-old Anya returns home and meets Petya there. Having fallen in love with him, she sincerely trusted the young high school student and his ideas. Trofimov changed her attitude to the cherry orchard and to the surrounding reality.
Anya wants to leave her parents' house and start new life, passing the exams for the gymnasium course and living by working alone. The girl is ready to follow Petya anywhere. She no longer feels sorry for the cherry orchard or her old life. She believes in a bright future and strives for it.
Believing in a happy future, she sincerely tells her mother goodbye: “We will plant new garden, more luxurious than this..."
Anya is a representative of the youth who can change the future of Russia.
Petya Trofimov
The image of Petya Trofimov in the work is inextricably linked with the theme of the future of Russia.
Petya is the former teacher of Ranevskaya’s son. He is called an eternal student, because he will never finish his studies at the gymnasium. Moving from place to place, he wanders around the country, dreaming of better life, in which beauty and justice will triumph.
Trofimov realistically perceives the events taking place, realizing that the garden is beautiful, but its destruction is inevitable. He hates the nobility, is convinced that their time is up, condemns people who use the work of others and preaches the ideas of a bright future where everyone will be happy. But the point is that he only preaches and does nothing for this future himself. For Trofimov, it does not matter whether he himself reaches this future or shows the way to others. And he knows how to speak and convince perfectly.
Petya convinced Anya that it was impossible to live the old life, that changes were needed, that we needed to get rid of poverty, vulgarity and dirt and become free.
He considers himself a free man and refuses Lopakhin’s money, just as he refuses love, denying it. He tells Anya that their relationship is higher than love and calls on her to believe him and his ideas.
At the same time, Petya is petty. When he lost his old galoshes, he was very upset, but was happy when the galoshes were found.
This is how he is, Petya Trofimov - an ordinary intellectual with progressive views, who has many shortcomings.
Varya
Varya, unlike other characters in the work, lives in the present, and not in the past and future.
At 24 years old, she is simple and rational. When my mother went abroad, all the housekeeping tasks fell on her shoulders, and she coped with it for the time being. Varya works from morning to evening, saving every penny, but the extravagance of her relatives was able to protect the estate from ruin.
She is very religious and dreams of joining a monastery, but she couldn’t raise the money to go to holy places. People around her don’t believe in her religiosity, but in reality she is.
Varya is direct and strict, she is not afraid to make comments, but she makes them correctly. At the same time, she has a feeling of love and tenderness. She loves her sister Anya very much, calls her darling, beauty, and is very worried that she is in love with Petya Trofimov, because he is not a match for her.
Varya likes Lopakhin, whom her mother hopes to marry her to, but she understands that he will not propose to her, because he is busy accumulating his own wealth.
But for some reason Trofimov considers Varya limited, not understanding what is happening. But this is not so, the girl understands that the estate has fallen into disrepair and is ruined, that it will be sold and the cherry orchard will not be saved. This is reality as she understands it, and we must continue to live in this reality.
In her new life, Varya will survive even without money, because she has a practical character and is adapted to life’s difficulties.
Charlotte Ivanovna
Charlotte Ivanovna - minor character in the play. She is the governess of the Ranevsky family. She herself comes from a family of circus performers who made their living by performing.
WITH early childhood and Charlotte helped her parents perform circus acts, and when her parents died, she was raised by a German lady, who gave her an education. Growing up, Charlotte began working as a governess, earning her living.
Charlotte knows how to perform tricks and tricks, she says in different voices. All this was left to her from her parents, although she knows nothing more about them, not even her age. Some heroes consider her an attractive woman, but nothing is said about the heroine’s personal life.
Charlotte is very lonely, as she says: “...I have no one.” But she is a free person and does not depend on circumstances, she only observes what is happening from the outside and evaluates what is happening in her own way. So, she speaks with slight reproach about the wastefulness of her owners, but says it with such ease that it is noticeable that she does not care.
The image of Charlotte is in the background, but some of her remarks are connected with the actions of the main characters of the play. And at the end of the work, Charlotte worries that she has nowhere to live and needs to leave the city. This highlights the fact that she is just as homeless as her owners.
Several interesting essays
- The image of the Nurse in Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet
One of the main characters in Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet is the Nurse. This is a middle-aged woman who works in the house of the Capulet lords and has raised their daughter Juliet since birth.
- Essay on the Olympic Games in ancient Greece from the perspective of the viewer
The extraordinary five days have finally arrived olympic games. The stands are crowded, spectators are waiting for the most striking achievements. Orators and philosophers speak before the start of the competition
- Essay My native Russian language reasoning
Since ancient times, people have exchanged thoughts, expressed their emotions and conveyed information not only through gestures, but also through language. After all, only humans can write and read, this is one of the main differences between us and animals.
- Essay about Winter evening 6th grade
Each season has its own characteristics. But their phenomena become most colorful at certain times of the day.
- Theme and idea of the comedy Minor Fornvizina essay
The main theme of this work is considered to be the theme of education. young nobility. The writer describes it through the contrast between the heroes of the thoughts of enlightenment and those who have already outlived their foundations of the feudal class.
A.P. Chekhov wrote his famous play “The Cherry Orchard” in 1903. In this play, the central place is occupied not so much by the personal experiences of the characters, but by an allegorical vision of the fate of Russia. Some characters personify the past (Ranevskaya, Gaev, Firs, Varya), others - the future (Lopakhin, Trofimov, Anya). The characters in Chekhov's play "The Cherry Orchard" reflect the society of that time.
Main characters
The heroes of Chekhov's "The Cherry Orchard" are lyrical characters with special features. For example, Epikhodov, who was constantly unlucky, or Trofimov, an “eternal student.” Below will be presented all the characters of the play "The Cherry Orchard":
- Ranevskaya Lyubov Andreevna, mistress of the estate.
- Anya, her daughter, 17 years old. I am not indifferent to Trofimov.
- Varya, her adopted daughter, 24 years old. In love with Lopakhin.
- Gaev Leonid Andreevich, brother of Ranevskaya.
- Lopakhin Ermolai Alekseevich, a native of peasants, now a merchant. He likes Varya.
- Trofimov Pyotr Sergeevich, eternal student. He likes Anya, but he is above love.
- Simeonov-Pishchik Boris Borisovich, a landowner who constantly has no money, but he believes in the possibility of unexpected enrichment.
- Charlotte Ivanovna, the maid, loves to show tricks.
- Epikhodov Semyon Panteleevich, clerk, unlucky man. He wants to marry Dunyasha.
- Dunyasha, the maid, considers herself like a lady. In love with Yasha.
- Firs, an old footman, constantly takes care of Gaev.
- Yasha, Ranevskaya's spoiled lackey.
Images of the characters in the play
A.P. Chekhov always very accurately and subtly noticed his features in each character, be it appearance or character. This Chekhovian feature is also supported by the play “The Cherry Orchard” - the images of the heroes here are lyrical and even a little touching. Each has its own unique features. For convenience, the characteristics of the heroes of The Cherry Orchard can be divided into groups.
Old generation
Ranevskaya Lyubov Andreevna appears very frivolous, but kind woman, who cannot fully understand that all her money is gone. She is in love with some scoundrel who left her without funds. And then Ranevskaya returns with Anya to Russia. They can be compared to people who left Russia: no matter how good it is abroad, they still continue to yearn for their homeland. The image chosen by Chekhov for his homeland will be written below.
Ranevskaya and Gaev are the personification of the nobility, the wealth of past years, which during the author’s time began to decline. Both brother and sister cannot fully understand this, but nevertheless they feel that something is happening. And by the way they begin to act, you can see the reaction of Chekhov’s contemporaries - it was either a move abroad, or an attempt to adapt to new conditions.
Firs is an image of a servant who was always faithful to her masters and did not want any change in order, because they did not need it. If with the first main characters of “The Cherry Orchard” it is clear why they are considered in this group, then why can Varya be included here?
Because Varya occupies a passive position: she humbly accepts the developing position, but her dream is the opportunity to walk in holy places, and strong faith was characteristic of people of the older generation. And Varya, despite her seemingly vigorous activity, does not take an active part in conversations about fate cherry orchard and does not offer any solutions, which shows the passivity of the rich class of that time.
Younger generation
Representatives of the future of Russia will be considered here - these are educated young people who put themselves above any feelings, which was fashionable in the early 1900s. At that time, public duty and the desire to develop science came first. But one should not assume that Anton Pavlovich portrayed revolutionary-minded youth - this is, rather, a depiction of the majority of the intelligentsia of that time, who were only engaged in discussing lofty topics, putting themselves above human needs, but were not adapted to anything.
All this was embodied in Trofimov - the “eternal student” and “shabby gentleman”, who was never able to graduate from anything and had no profession. Throughout the play he only talked about various matters and despised Lopakhin and Varya, who was able to admit the idea of his possible romance with Anya - he is “above love.”
Anya is a kind, sweet, still completely inexperienced girl who admires Trofimov and listens carefully to everything he says. She personifies youth, who have always been interested in the ideas of the intelligentsia.
But one of the most striking and characteristic images of that era was Lopakhin, a native of peasants who managed to make a fortune for himself. But, despite his wealth, he remained essentially a simple man. This is an active person, a representative of the so-called “kulaks” class - wealthy peasants. Ermolai Alekseevich respected work, and work always came first for him, so he kept postponing an explanation with Varya.
It was during that period that Lopakhin’s hero could appear - then this “rising” peasantry, proud of the realization that they were no longer slaves, showed a higher adaptability to life than the nobles, which is proven by the fact that it was Lopakhin who bought Ranevskaya’s estate.
Why was the characterization of the characters in The Cherry Orchard chosen specifically for these characters? Because it is on the characteristics of the characters that their internal conflicts will be built.
Internal conflicts in the play
The play shows not only the personal experiences of the characters, but also the confrontation between them, which makes the images of the heroes of “The Cherry Orchard” brighter and deeper. Let's take a closer look at them.
Ranevskaya - Lopakhin
Most main conflict is in the pair Ranevskaya - Lopakhin. And it is due to several reasons:
- belonging to different generations;
- contrast of characters.
Lopakhin is trying to help Ranevskaya preserve the estate by cutting down the cherry orchard and building dachas in its place. But for Raevskaya this is impossible - after all, she grew up in this house, and “dachas are so vulgar.” And in the fact that it was Ermolai Alekseevich who bought the estate, she sees this as a betrayal on his part. For him, buying a cherry orchard is the resolution of his personal conflict: he, a simple man, whose ancestors could not go beyond the kitchen, has now become the owner. And this is where his main triumph lies.
Lopakhin - Trofimov
The conflict in a pair of these people occurs due to the fact that they have opposing views. Trofimov considers Lopakhin an ordinary guy, rude, limited, who is not interested in anything other than work. The same one believes that Pyotr Sergeevich is simply wasting his mental capacity, does not understand how one can live without money, and does not accept the ideology that man is above all earthly things.
Trofimov - Varya
The confrontation is most likely based on personal hostility. Varya despises Peter because he is not busy with anything, and fears that with the help of his clever speeches he will make Anya fall in love with him. Therefore, Varya tries in every possible way to prevent them. Trofimov teases the girl “Madame Lopakhina,” knowing that everyone has been waiting for this event for a long time. But he despises her because she equated him and Anya with herself and Lopakhin, because they are above all earthly passions.
So, above it was briefly written about the characters of the heroes of Chekhov’s “The Cherry Orchard”. We described only the most significant characters. Now we can move on to the most interesting thing - the image of the main character of the play.
The main character of "The Cherry Orchard"
The attentive reader has already guessed (or is guessing) that this is a cherry orchard. He personifies Russia itself in the play: its past, present and future. Why did the orchard itself become the main character of “The Cherry Orchard”?
Because it is to this estate that Ranevskaya returns after all the misadventures abroad, because it is because of him that the heroine’s internal conflict intensifies (fear of losing the garden, awareness of her helplessness, reluctance to part with it), and a confrontation arises between Ranevskaya and Lopakhin.
The Cherry Orchard also helps resolve internal conflict Lopakhin: he reminded him that he was a peasant, an ordinary man who miraculously managed to get rich. And the opportunity that arose with the purchase of the estate to cut down this garden meant that now nothing else in those parts could remind him of his origin.
What did the garden mean to the heroes?
For convenience, you can write the characters’ attitude towards the cherry orchard in a table.
| Ranevskaya | Gaev | Anya | Varya | Lopakhin | Trofimov |
| A garden is a symbol of wealth and well-being. The most connected with him happy memories childhood. Characterizes her attachment to the past, so it is difficult for her to part with it | Same attitude as my sister | For her, the garden is an association with childhood, but due to her youth, she is not so attached to it, and still has hopes for a bright future | The same association with childhood as Anya’s. At the same time, she is not upset about its sale, since she can now live the way she wants | The garden reminds him of his peasant origins. By knocking it out, he says goodbye to the past, while at the same time hoping for a happy future. | Cherry trees are a symbol of serfdom for him. And he believes that it would even be right to abandon them in order to free himself from the old way of life |
Symbolism of the cherry orchard in the play
But how then is the image of the main character of “The Cherry Orchard” connected with the image of the Motherland? Through this garden, Anton Chekhov showed the past: when the country was rich, the class of nobles was in its prime, and no one thought about the abolition of serfdom. In the present, there is already a decline in society: it is divided, guidelines are changing. Russia was already on the threshold new era, the nobility became smaller, and the peasants gained strength. And the future is shown in Lopakhin’s dreams: the country will be ruled by those who are not afraid to work - only those people will be able to lead the country to prosperity.
The sale of Ranevskaya's cherry orchard for debts and its purchase by Lopakhin is a symbolic transfer of the country from the rich class to ordinary workers. Debt here means debt for how their owners treated them for a long time, how they exploited the common people. And the fact that power in the country is passing to the common people is a natural result of the path along which Russia has moved. And the nobility had only to do what Ranevskaya and Gaev did - go abroad or go to work. And the younger generation will try to fulfill their dreams of a bright future.
Conclusion
Having carried out such a small analysis of the work, one can understand that the play “The Cherry Orchard” is a deeper creation than it might seem at first glance. Anton Pavlovich was able to masterfully convey the mood of society at that time, the situation in which it found itself. And the writer did this very gracefully and subtly, which allows this play to remain loved by readers for a long time.
The image of a cherry orchard in the minds of the heroes of L. P. Chekhov’s play “The Cherry Orchard”
The Cherry Orchard unites all the characters in the play around itself. The writer connects the characters different ages And social groups, and they will have to decide one way or another the fate of the garden, and therefore their own fate.
The owners of the estate are Russian landowners Gaev and Ranevskaya. Both brother and sister are educated, smart, sensitive people. They know how to appreciate beauty, they feel it subtly, but due to inertia they cannot do anything to save it. Gaev and Ranevskaya are deprived of a sense of reality, practicality and responsibility, and therefore are unable to take care of themselves or their loved ones. They cannot follow Lopakhin’s advice and rent out the land, despite the fact that this would bring them a substantial income: “Dachas and summer residents - it’s so vulgar, sorry.” They are prevented from taking this measure by special feelings that connect them with the estate. They treat the garden as a living person with whom they have a lot in common. For them, the cherry orchard is the personification of a past life, a bygone youth. Looking out the window at the garden, Ranevskaya exclaims, “Oh my childhood, my purity! I slept in this nursery, looked at the garden from here, happiness woke up with me every morning, and then it was exactly the same, nothing has changed.” Returning to homestead, she again felt young and happy.
Lopakhin does not share the feelings of Gaev and Ranevskaya. Their behavior seems strange and illogical to him. He wonders why they are not influenced by the arguments for a prudent way out of a difficult situation, which are so obvious to him. Lopakhin knows how to appreciate beauty: he is delighted by the garden, “more beautiful than which there is nothing in the world.” But he is an active and practical person. He sincerely tries to help Gaev and Ranevskaya, constantly convincing them: “Both the cherry orchard and the land must be rented out for dachas, do this now, as soon as possible, the auction is just around the corner!” Understand! But they don't want to listen to him. Gaev is only capable of empty oaths: “On my honor, I swear whatever you want, the estate will not be sold!..”
However the auction took place, and Lopakhin bought the estate. For him, this event has a special meaning: “I bought an estate where my grandfather and father were slaves, where they were not even allowed into the kitchen. I’m dreaming, it’s only imagining it, it’s only seeming...” Thus, for Lopakhin, the purchase of the estate becomes a kind of symbol
his success, a reward for many years of work. For Lopakhin, a cherry orchard is just land that can be sold, mortgaged or bought. In his joy, he does not even consider it necessary to show a basic sense of tact towards the former owners of the estate. He begins to cut down the garden without even waiting for them to leave. In some ways, he is akin to the soulless lackey Yasha, who completely lacks such feelings as kindness, love for his mother, and attachment to the place where he was born and raised. In this he is the direct opposite of Firs, in whom these qualities are unusually developed. Firs is the most an old man in the house. He has faithfully served his masters for many years, sincerely loves them and, like a father, is ready to protect them from all troubles. Perhaps Firs is the only character in the play endowed with this quality - devotion. Firs is a very integral person, and this integrity is fully manifested in his attitude towards the garden. For an old footman, the garden is a family nest, which he strives to protect just like his masters.
Petya Trofimov is a representative of the new generation. He doesn't care about the fate of the cherry orchard at all. “We are above love,” he declares, thereby admitting his inability to have serious feelings. Petya looks at everything too superficially: not knowing real life, he tries to rebuild it on the basis of far-fetched ideas. Outwardly, Petya and Anya are happy. They want to move towards a new life, making a decisive break with the past. For them, the garden is “all of Russia,” and not just this cherry orchard. But is it possible to love the whole world without loving your home? Both heroes rush to new horizons, but lose their roots. Mutual understanding between Ranevskaya and Trofimov is impossible. If for Petya there is no past and memories, then Ranevskaya deeply grieves: “After all, I was born here, my father and mother, my grandfather lived here, I love this house, without the cherry orchard I don’t understand my life...”
The cherry orchard is a symbol of beauty. But who will save beauty if people who are able to appreciate it are unable to fight for it, and energetic and active people look at it only as a source of profit and profit?
The cherry orchard is a symbol of goodness, and therefore expressions such as “cut off the roots”, “trample the flower” or “hit the tree with an ax” sound blasphemous and inhumane.
Reflecting on the characters and actions of the characters in the play, we think about the fate of Russia, which for us is the “cherry orchard”.
/ / / The attitude of the play's heroes to the cherry orchard (Ranevskaya, Gaev, Firs, Anya, Lopakhin, Petya Trofimov)Each character in Chekhov's play had an individual attitude towards the estate and the cherry orchard in particular. And if sometimes it’s hard to call this feeling love, then it certainly wasn’t indifference.
Each character in the play had his own story related to the garden. It was associated with childhood, serenity, purity, and an intoxicating aroma. For her, the garden is the meaning of life. The woman cannot imagine her life without him, and in the event of an auction, she says that the garden should be sold along with her.
But after the auction, the woman quickly comes to her senses and calmly accepts the loss. The author notes that in some way, she is even glad that everything is finally over. Perhaps this happens because she has money again, she has something to live on, and quite comfortably.
Just like his sister, he loves the garden very much. For a man, losing him means losing something dear and accepting complete defeat. He promises Lyubov that he will do everything to buy back the estate. The man is confident to the last that it is within his power. After the auction, Gaev is upset, does not comment on the “loss” and almost does not talk to anyone. The inspired Ermolai tells everything for him.
Buys the garden at auction. He literally “steals it from under the nose” of another merchant, throwing in ten thousand each time throughout the auction. As a result, the amount was very significant, which led to the unconditional victory of Ermolai. The man is rejoicing. His interest in the garden is significant. The business plan he drew up will bring him a lot of profit and the garden will more than pay for itself. However, the cherries will no longer please the eye; they are all immediately sent under the ax. This shows that Ermolai did not perceive the garden as something beautiful and unearthly. This place interests him only from the point of view of profit. The man believes that admiring the garden is a relic of the past. Moreover, it does not bring money, which means it is a waste of time for a pragmatic person.
For the old footman, the garden evokes memories of the former wealth of the masters. When the harvested cherries were dried according to a special recipe, they were exported for sale. It was not for nothing that he remembered this, since he believes that cherry trees should not only please the eye, but also generate income.
For Ranevskaya, Ranevskaya’s daughter, at first, like her mother, the garden initially evokes a storm of emotions. The girl is happy to be at home again and admire the beautiful flowers. However, after communicating with Peter, she radically changes her attitude towards the estate. The girl thinks about the utopia of serf life, about the remnants of the past.
When the cherry orchard is finally sold, Anya reassures her mother, promising her to plant a new orchard that will be many times better. The girl leaves with undisguised happiness the places where she spent her childhood.
A similar situation occurs with. He talks about the garden with undisguised contempt, boldly looks into the future and calmly leaves the estate, and this despite the fact that he remains practically homeless.
Each character in the story is shown through the image of a cherry orchard - their attitude to life itself. Some cling to the past, others worry about the future, and still others simply live in the present.