Homo sapiens and other species. When did Homo sapiens appear and how does he differ from other species of people?

Difficulties of classification

It would seem that no problems should arise with the classification of the animal species known as Homo sapiens sapiens (reasonable man). It would seem, what could be simpler? It belongs to the chordates (subphylum vertebrates), to the class of mammals, to the order of primates (humanoids). In more detail, his family is hominids. So, his race is human, his species is intelligent. But the question arises: how is it different from others? At least from the same Neanderthals? Were extinct species of humans really that unintelligent? Can a Neanderthal be called a distant but direct ancestor of man of our time? Or maybe these two species existed in parallel? Did they interbreed and produce joint offspring? Until work is done to study the genome of these mysterious Homo sapiens neanderthalensis, there will be no answer to this question.

Where did the Homo sapiens species originate?

Most scientists believe that the common ancestor of all people, both modern and extinct Neanderthals, appeared in Africa. There, during the Miocene era (this is approximately six or seven million years ago), a group of species separated from the hominids, which subsequently evolved to the genus Homo . First of all, the basis for this point of view was the discovery of the oldest remains of a man called Australopithecus. But soon other finds of ancient people were discovered - Sinanthropus (in China) and Homo heidelbergensis (in Europe). Were these varieties of the same genus?

Were they all ancestors of modern humans or dead-end branches of evolution? One way or another, Homo sapiens appeared much later - forty or forty-five thousand years ago, during the Paleolithic. And the revolutionary difference between homo sapiens and other hominids moving on their hind limbs was that he made tools. His ancestors, however, like some modern monkeys, only used improvised means.

Secrets of the family tree

Even 50 years ago, they taught in school that Homo sapiens descended from Neanderthals. He was often represented as a hairy half-animal, with a sloping skull and protruding jaw. And Homo Neanderthals, in turn, evolved from Pithecanthropus. Soviet science depicted him almost as a monkey: on half-bent legs, completely covered with hair. But if everything is more or less clear with this ancient ancestor, then the relationship between Homo sapiens sapiens and Neanderthals is much more complicated. It turns out that both of these species existed for some time at the same time and even in the same territories. Thus, the hypothesis of the origin of Homo sapiens from Neanderthals requires additional evidence.

Did Homo neanderthalensis belong to the Homo sapiens species?

A more thorough study of the burials of this species showed that the Neanderthal was completely upright. In addition, these people had articulate speech, tools (stone chisels), religious cults (including funeral ones), and primitive art (jewelry). However, he was distinguished from modern man a number of features. For example, the absence of a chin protrusion, which suggests that the speech of such people was not sufficiently developed. The findings confirm the following facts: Neanderthal man arose one hundred and fifty thousand years ago and flourished until 35-30 thousand years BC. That is, this happened at a time when the species “Homo sapiens sapiens” had already appeared and clearly formed. The “Neanderthal” completely disappeared only during the era of the last glaciation (Wurmsky). It is difficult to say what caused his death (after all, the change in climatic conditions affected only Europe). Perhaps the legend of Cain and Abel has deeper roots?

For a long time in the Anthropocene, biological factors and patterns were gradually replaced by social ones, which finally ensured the appearance of a modern type of man in the Upper Paleolithic - Homo sapiens, or reasonable man. In 1868, five human skeletons were discovered in the Cro-Magnon cave in France, along with stone tools and drilled shells, which is why Homo sapiens are often called Cro-Magnons. Before Homo sapiens appeared on the planet, there was another humanoid species called Neanderthals. They populated almost the entire Earth and were distinguished by their large size and serious physical strength. Their brain volume was almost the same as that of a modern earthling - 1330 cm3.
Neanderthals lived during the Great Ice Age, so they had to wear clothes made from animal skins and hide from the cold in the depths of caves. Their only rival in natural conditions could only be a saber-toothed tiger. Our ancestors had highly developed brow ridges; they had a powerful, forward jaw with large teeth. The remains found in the Palestinian cave of Es-Shoul, on Mount Carmel, clearly indicate that Neanderthals are the ancestors of modern humans. These remains combine both ancient Neanderthal features and features characteristic of modern humans.
It is assumed that the transition from Neanderthal to man of the current type took place in the most climatically favorable regions of the globe, in particular in the Mediterranean, the Anterior and Central Asia, Crimea and the Caucasus. Recent studies show that Neanderthal man lived for some time even at the same time as Cro-Magnon man, the direct predecessor of modern man. Today, Neanderthals are considered to be a kind of side branch of the evolution of Homo sapiens.
Cro-Magnons appeared about 40 thousand years ago in East Africa. They populated Europe and, within a very short period, completely replaced the Neanderthals. Unlike their ancestors, Cro-Magnons were distinguished by a large, active brain, thanks to which they took an unprecedented step forward in a short period of time.
Because man a sapient lived in many regions of the planet with different natural and climatic conditions, this left a certain imprint on his appearance. Already in the era Upper Paleolithic Racial types of modern man began to develop: Negroid-Australoid, Euro-Asian and Asian-American, or Mongoloid. Representatives of different races differ in skin color, eye shape, hair color and type, skull length and shape, and body proportions.
Hunting became the most important activity for Cro-Magnons. They learned to make darts, tips and spears, invented bone needles, used them to sew the skins of foxes, arctic foxes and wolves, and also began to build dwellings from mammoth bones and other improvised materials.
For collective hunting, building houses and making tools, people began to live in clan communities, consisting of several large families. Women were considered the core of the clan and were mistresses in common dwellings. Sprawl frontal lobes human development contributed to the complication of his social life and the diversity of his work activities, and ensured the further evolution of physiological functions, motor skills and associative thinking.

The technology for producing labor tools was gradually improved, and their range increased. Having learned to take advantage of his developed intellect, Homo sapiens became the sovereign master of all life on Earth. In addition to hunting mammoths, woolly rhinoceroses, wild horses and bison, as well as gathering, Homo sapiens also mastered fishing. The way of life of people also changed - a gradual settlement of individual groups of hunters and gatherers began in forest-steppe areas rich in vegetation and game. Man learned to tame animals and domesticate some plants. This is how cattle breeding and agriculture appeared.
A sedentary lifestyle ensured the rapid development of production and culture, which led to the flourishing of housing and economic construction, the production of various tools, and the invention of spinning and weaving. It started to take shape completely new type management, and people began to depend less on the vagaries of nature. This led to an increase in the birth rate and the spread of human civilization to new territories. The production of more advanced tools became possible thanks to the development of gold, copper, silver, tin and lead around the 4th millennium BC. There was a social division of labor and specialization of individual tribes in production activities, depending on certain natural and climatic conditions.
We draw conclusions: at the very beginning, human evolution occurred at a very slow pace. It took several million years since its inception ancient ancestors, so that a person reaches the stage of his development at which he learned to create the first cave paintings.
But with the appearance of Homo sapiens on the planet, all of his abilities began to develop rapidly, and in a relatively short period of time, man became the dominant form of life on Earth. Today our civilization has already reached 7 billion people and continues to grow. At the same time, the mechanisms of natural selection and evolution are still at work, but these processes are slow and rarely amenable to direct observation. The emergence of Homo sapiens and the subsequent rapid development of human civilization led to the fact that nature gradually began to be used by people to satisfy their own needs. The impact of people on the biosphere of the planet has produced significant changes in it - the species composition of the organic world in the environment and the nature of the Earth as a whole has changed.

Today there is a prevailing hostility in science towards the very idea of ​​"gods", but in reality this is simply a matter of terminology and religious convention. A striking example- cult of airplanes. After all, oddly enough, the best confirmation of the theory of the Creator-God is himself Man - Homo sapiens. Moreover, according to the latest research, the idea of ​​God is embedded in humans at the biological level.

Since Charles Darwin shocked the scientists and theologians of his time with evidence of the existence of evolution, man has been considered to be the final link in a long evolutionary chain, at the other end of which are the simplest forms of life, from which life has evolved over billions of years since the emergence of life on our planet. vertebrates, then mammals, primates and Man himself.

Of course, a person can be considered as a set of elements, but even then, if we assume that life arose as a result of random chemical reactions, then why did all living organisms on Earth develop from a single source, and not from many random ones? Why is only a small percentage of organic matter included? chemical elements, available in abundance on Earth, and large number elements rarely found on our planet and our life balances on a razor's edge? Does this mean that life was brought to our planet from another world, for example by meteorites?

What caused the Great Sexual Revolution? And in general, there are many interesting things in a person - sensory organs, memory mechanisms, brain rhythms, mysteries of human physiology, a second signaling system, but the main topic of this article will be a more fundamental mystery - the position of man in the evolutionary chain.

It is now believed that the ancestor of man, the ape, appeared on Earth approximately 25 million years ago! Discoveries in East Africa made it possible to establish that the transition to the type of ape (hominid) took place about 14,000,000 years ago. The genes of humans and chimpanzees split from a common ancestral trunk 5 - 7 million years ago. Even closer to us were the dwarf chimpanzees “bonobos”, which separated from chimpanzees about 3 million years ago.

Sex occupies a huge place in human relationships, and bonobos, unlike other monkeys, often copulate in a face-to-face position, and their sex life is such that it overshadows the promiscuity of the inhabitants of Sodom and Gomorrah! So it is likely that our common ancestors with apes behaved more like bonobos than like chimpanzees. But sex is a topic for a separate discussion, and we will continue.

Among the skeletons found, there are only three contenders for the title of the first fully bipedal primate. All of them were discovered in East Africa, in the Rift Valley, cutting through the territories of Ethiopia, Kenya and Tanzania.

About 1.5 million years ago, Homo erectus (upright man) appeared. This primate had a much larger cranium than its predecessors, and it was already beginning to create and use more complex stone tools. The wide range of skeletons found suggests that between 1,000,000 and 700,000 years ago, Homo erectus left Africa and settled in China, Australasia and Europe, but disappeared altogether between about 300,000 and 200,000 years ago for unknown reasons.

Around the same time, the first primitive man appeared on the scene, dubbed by scientists a Neanderthal, after the name of the area where his remains were first discovered.

The remains were found by Johann Karl Fuhlrott in 1856 in the Feldhofer Cave near Düsseldorf in Germany. This cave is located in the Neandertal Valley. In 1863, the English anthropologist and anatomist W. King proposed the name for the find Homo neanderthalensis. Neanderthals inhabited Europe and Western Asia from 300 thousand to 28 thousand years ago. For some time they coexisted with anatomically modern humans, who settled in Europe about 40 thousand years ago. Previously, based on a morphological comparison of Neanderthals with modern humans, three hypotheses were proposed: Neanderthals are the direct ancestors of humans; they made some genetic contribution to the gene pool; they represented an independent branch, which was completely supplanted by modern man. It is the latter hypothesis that is confirmed by modern genetic research. The existence of the last common ancestor of humans and Neanderthals is estimated at 500 thousand years before our time.

Recent discoveries have forced us to radically reconsider the assessment of Neanderthals. In particular, in the Kebara Cave on Mount Carmel in Israel, the skeleton of a Neanderthal man who lived 60 thousand years ago was found, whose hyoid bone was completely preserved, completely identical to the bone of a modern person. Since the ability to speak depends on the hyoid bone, scientists were forced to admit that the Neanderthal had this ability. And many scientists believe that speech is the key to unlocking the great leap in human development.

Nowadays, most anthropologists believe that the Neanderthal was a full-fledged man, and for a long time, in terms of his behavioral characteristics, he was quite equivalent to other representatives of this species. It is quite possible that the Neanderthal was no less intelligent and human-like than we are in our time. It has been suggested that the large, coarse lines of his skull are simply the result of some kind of genetic disorder, like acromegaly. These disturbances quickly dissipated into a limited, isolated population through interbreeding.

But, nevertheless, despite the huge period of time - more than two million years - separating the developed Australopithecus and the Neanderthal, both used similar tools - sharpened stones, and the features of their appearance (as we imagine them) were practically no different.

“If you put a hungry lion, a man, a chimpanzee, a baboon and a dog in a large cage, then it is clear that the person will be eaten first!”

African folk wisdom

The emergence of Homo sapiens is not just an incomprehensible mystery, it seems incredible. For millions of years there was only slight progress in the processing of stone tools; and suddenly, about 200 thousand years ago, it appeared with a cranial volume 50% larger than before, with the ability to speak and a body anatomy quite close to modern one. (According to a number of independent studies, this happened in Southeast Africa.)

In 1911, anthropologist Sir Arthur Kent compiled a list of the anatomical features inherent in each of the primate species that distinguish them from each other. He called them "common features." As a result, he got the following indicators: gorilla - 75; chimpanzees - 109; orangutan - 113; gibbon - 116; humans - 312. How can one reconcile Sir Arthur Kent's research with the scientifically proven fact that the genetic similarity between humans and chimpanzees is 98%? I would reverse this relationship and ask the question - how does a 2% difference in DNA determine the striking difference between humans and their primate cousins?

We must somehow explain how a 2% difference in genes gives rise to so many new characteristics in a person - brain, speech, sexuality and much more. It is strange that the Homo sapiens cell contains only 46 chromosomes, while the chimpanzee and gorilla have 48. The theory of natural selection was unable to explain how such a major structural change - the fusion of two chromosomes - could occur.

In the words of Steve Jones, “...we are the result of evolution - a series of successive mistakes. No one will claim that evolution has ever been so spasmodic that in one step it could have been realized whole plan restructuring of the body." Indeed, experts believe that the possibility of a successful large evolutionary leap, called macromutation, is extremely unlikely, since such a leap is likely to be harmful to the survival of species that are already well adapted to the environment, or in any case ambiguous, for example due to mechanism of action of the immune system, we have lost the ability to regenerate tissue like amphibians.

Catastrophe theory

Evolutionist Daniel Dennett describes the situation elegantly with a literary analogy: someone is trying to improve a classic literary text by making only proofreading changes. While most editing—placing commas or correcting misspelled words—has little effect, significant text editing in almost all cases spoils the original text. Thus, everything seems to be stacked against genetic improvement, but a favorable mutation can occur in a small isolated population. Under other conditions, favorable mutations would have dissolved into the larger mass of “normal” individuals.

Thus it becomes obvious that the most important factor The splitting of species is their geographical separation to prevent mutual crossing. And as statistically unlikely as it may be for new species to arise, there are currently about 30 million different species on Earth. And previously, according to estimates, there were another 3 billion, now extinct. This is only possible in the context of the catastrophic development of history on planet Earth - and this point of view is now becoming increasingly popular. However, it is impossible to give a single example (with the exception of microorganisms) when any species lately(during the last half a million years) has improved through mutation or split into two different species.

Anthropologists have always sought to present the evolution from Homo erectus to as a gradual process, albeit with sharp leaps. However, their attempts to adjust archaeological data to the requirements of a given concept each time turned out to be untenable. For example, how can we explain the sharp increase in skull volume in Homo sapiens?

How did it happen that Homo sapiens gained intelligence and self-awareness, while its relative the ape spent the last 6 million years in a state of complete stagnation? Why has no other creature in the animal kingdom been able to advance to high level mental development?

The usual answer to this is that when a person rose to his feet, both hands were freed and he began to use tools. This advancement accelerated learning through a feedback system, which, in turn, stimulated the process of mental development.

Recent scientific research confirms that in some cases, electrochemical processes in the brain can promote the growth of dendrites - tiny signal receptors that connect to neurons ( nerve cells). Experiments with experimental rats have shown that if toys are placed in a cage with rats, the mass of brain tissue in rats begins to grow faster. Researchers Christopher A. Walsh and Anjen Chenn were even able to identify a protein, beta-catenin, that is responsible for why the human cerebral cortex is larger than that of other species. Walsh explained the results of their research: “The brain cortex of mice is normally smooth. In humans, it is highly wrinkled due to the large volume of tissue and lack of space in the skull. It can be compared to putting a piece of paper in a ball. We found that mice with increased production of beta. Catenin’s cerebral cortex was much larger in volume, it was wrinkled in the same way as in humans. ”Which, however, did not add clarity. After all, in the animal kingdom there are a lot of species whose representatives use tools, but at the same time do not become intelligent.

Here are some examples: the Egyptian kite throws stones from above at ostrich eggs, trying to break their hard shells. The Galapagos woodpecker uses cactus twigs or needles in five different ways to pluck tree beetles and other insects from rotten trunks. A sea otter on the Pacific Coast of the United States uses one stone as a hammer and another as an anvil to break the shell to obtain its favorite delicacy, the bear's ear shell. Our closest relatives, chimpanzees, also make and use simple tools, but do they reach our level of intellectual development? Why did humans become intelligent, but chimpanzees not? We always read about the search for our earliest ape ancestors, but in reality it would be much more interesting to find the missing link of Homo super erectus.

But let's return to man. According to common sense, it should have taken another million years to move from stone tools to other materials, and perhaps another hundred million years to master mathematics, civil engineering and astronomy, but for inexplicable reasons man continued living a primitive life, using stone tools, only for 160 thousand years, and about 40-50 thousand years ago, something happened that caused the migration of humanity and the transition to modern forms of behavior. Most likely it was climate change, although the issue requires separate consideration.

A comparative analysis of the DNA of different populations of modern people suggested that even before leaving Africa, about 60-70 thousand years ago (when there was also a decrease in numbers, although not as significant as 135 thousand years ago), the ancestral population was divided at least into at least three groups, which gave rise to the African, Mongoloid and Caucasian races.

Some racial characteristics may have arisen later as an adaptation to living conditions. This applies at least to skin color, one of the most significant racial characteristics for most people. Pigmentation provides protection from solar radiation, but should not interfere with the formation, for example, of certain vitamins that prevent rickets and are necessary for normal fertility.

Since man came out of Africa, it would seem to go without saying that our distant African ancestors were similar to the modern inhabitants of this continent. However, some researchers believe that the first people who appeared in Africa were closer to the Mongoloids.

So: just 13 thousand years ago, Man settled almost throughout the entire globe. Over the next thousand years, he learned to farm, and after another 6 thousand years he created a great civilization with advanced astronomical science). And finally, after another 6 thousand years, man goes into the depths of the solar system!

We do not have the means of determining an accurate chronology for the periods where the carbon isotope method ends (about 35 thousand years before our time) and further into history throughout the middle Pliocene.

What reliable data do we have about Homo sapiens? At a conference held in 1992, the most reliable evidence obtained at that time was summed up. The dates given here are averages for a number of all specimens found in the area and are given with an accuracy of ±20%.

The most significant discovery, made in Kaftsekh in Israel, is 115 thousand years old. Other specimens, found in Skule and Mount Carmel in Israel, are 101 thousand-81 thousand years old.

Specimens found in Africa, in the lower layers of the Border Cave, are 128 thousand years old (and using ostrich egg shell dating, the age of the remains is confirmed to be at least 100 thousand years old).

IN South Africa, at the mouth of the Klasis River, dates range from 130 thousand to 118 thousand years before the present (BP).
And finally, in Jebel Irhoud, in South Africa, specimens with the earliest dating were discovered - 190 thousand-105 thousand years ago.

From this we can conclude that Homo sapiens appeared on Earth less than 200 thousand years ago. And there is not the slightest evidence that there are earlier remains of modern or partially modern humans. All specimens are no different from their European counterparts - the Cro-Magnons, who settled throughout Europe about 35 thousand years ago. And if you dressed them in modern clothes, they would be practically no different from modern people. How did the ancestors of modern humans appear in Southeast Africa 150-300 thousand years ago, and not, say, two or three million years later, as the logic of evolution would suggest? Why did civilization begin in the first place? There is no obvious reason why we should be more civilized than the tribes in the Amazon jungle or the impenetrable forests of New Guinea, who are still at a primitive stage of development.

Civilization and Methods of Controlling Human Consciousness and Behavior

Resume

  • The biochemical composition of terrestrial organisms indicates that they all developed from a “single source,” which, however, does not exclude either the hypothesis of “random spontaneous generation” or the version of “the introduction of the seeds of life.”
  • Man is clearly out of the evolutionary chain. Despite the huge number of “distant ancestors,” the link that led to the creation of man has never been found. At the same time, the speed of evolutionary development has no analogues in the animal world.
  • It is surprising that modification of just 2% of the chimpanzee's genetic material caused such a radical difference between humans and their closest relatives, the apes.
  • Features of the structure and sexual behavior of humans indicate a much longer period of peaceful evolution in a warm climate than determined from archaeological and genetic data.
  • The genetic predisposition to speech and the efficiency of the internal structure of the brain strongly indicate two essential requirements of the evolutionary process - its incredibly long period, and the vital need to achieve an optimal level. The course of the supposed evolutionary development does not at all require such efficiency of thinking.
  • Infants' skulls are disproportionately large for safe delivery. It is quite possible that we inherited the “skulls” from the “race of giants”, so often mentioned in ancient myths.
  • The transition from gathering and hunting to agriculture and cattle breeding, which occurred in the Middle East about 13,000 years ago, created the preconditions for the accelerated development of human civilization. Interestingly, this coincides in time with the supposed Great Flood, which destroyed the mammoths. By the way, around that time the Ice Age ended.
Neanderthals [The History of Failed Humanity] Vishnyatsky Leonid Borisovich

Homeland of homo sapiens

Homeland of homo sapiens

With all the diversity of views on the problem of the origin of homo sapiens (Fig. 11.1), all proposed options for its solution can be reduced to two main opposing theories, which were briefly discussed in Chapter 3. According to one of them, monocentric, the place of origin of people of modern anatomical type there was some rather limited territorial region, from where they subsequently settled throughout the planet, gradually displacing, destroying or assimilating the hominid populations that preceded them in different places. Most often, East Africa is considered as such a region, and the corresponding theory of the emergence and spread of homo sapiens is called the “African exodus” theory. The opposite position is taken by researchers who defend the so-called “multiregional” - polycentric - theory, according to which the evolutionary formation of homo sapiens occurred everywhere, that is, in Africa, Asia, and Europe, on a local basis, but with more or less widespread exchange genes between populations of these regions. Although the dispute between monocentrists and polycentrists, which has a long history, is still not over, the initiative is now clearly in the hands of supporters of the theory of the African origin of homo sapiens, and their opponents have to give up one position after another.

Rice. 11.1. Possible origin scenarios Homo sapiens: A- the candelabra hypothesis, which assumes independent evolution in Europe, Asia and Africa from local hominids; b- multiregional hypothesis, which differs from the first by recognizing the exchange of genes between populations of different regions; V- the hypothesis of complete replacement, according to which our species originally appeared in Africa, from where it subsequently spread throughout the planet, displacing the forms of hominids that preceded it in other regions and without mixing with them; G- assimilation hypothesis, which differs from the complete replacement hypothesis by recognizing partial hybridization between sapiens and the indigenous populations of Europe and Asia

First, fossil anthropological materials clearly indicate that people of a modern or very close to such physical type appeared in East Africa already at the end of the Middle Pleistocene, that is, much earlier than anywhere else. The oldest currently known anthropological find attributed to homo sapiens is the skull of Omo 1 (Fig. 11.2), discovered in 1967 near the northern coast of Lake. Turkana (Ethiopia). Its age, judging by the available absolute dating and a number of other data, ranges from 190 to 200 thousand years ago. The well-preserved frontal and, especially, occipital bones of this skull are anatomically quite modern, as are the remains of the bones of the facial skeleton. A fairly developed chin protuberance is recorded. According to the conclusion of many anthropologists who studied this find, the skull of Omo 1, as well as the known parts of the postcranial skeleton of the same individual, do not bear signs that go beyond the usual range of variability for homo sapiens.

Rice. 11.2. Omo 1 skull is the oldest of all anthropological finds attributed to homo sapiens

In general, three skulls found not so long ago at the Kherto site in Middle Awash, also in Ethiopia, are very close in structure to the finds from Omo. One of them has reached us almost entirely (except for the lower jaw), the other two are also quite well preserved. The age of these skulls ranges from 154 to 160 thousand years. In general, despite the presence of a number of primitive features, the morphology of the skulls from Kherto allows us to consider their owners as ancient representatives of the modern human form. The remains of people of a modern or very similar anatomical type comparable in age were discovered at a number of other East African sites, for example in the Mumba Grotto (Tanzania) and the Dire Dawa Cave (Ethiopia). Thus, a number of well-studied and fairly reliably dated anthropological finds from East Africa indicate that people who did not differ or differed little anatomically from the current inhabitants of the Earth lived in this region 150-200 thousand years ago.

Rice. 11.3. Some links in the evolutionary line believed to have led to the appearance of the species Homo sapiens: 1 - Bodo, 2 - Broken Hill, 3 - Latoli, 4 - Omo 1, 5 - Border

Secondly, of all the continents, only Africa is known to have a large number of remains of hominids of a transitional nature, allowing at least general outline to trace the process of transformation of local homo erectus into people of a modern anatomical type. It is believed that the immediate predecessors and ancestors of the first homo sapiens in Africa could be hominids represented by skulls such as Singa (Sudan), Florisbad (South Africa), Ileret (Kenya) and a number of other finds. They date back to the second half of the Middle Pleistocene. Skulls from Broken Hill (Zambia), Ndutu (Tanzania), Bodo (Ethiopia) and a number of other samples are considered as somewhat earlier links in this line of evolution (Fig. 11.3). All African hominids, anatomically and chronologically intermediate between Homo erectus and Homo sapiens, are sometimes classified together with their European and Asian contemporaries as Homo heidelbergensis, and sometimes included in special types, the earlier of which is called homo rhodesiensis ( Homo rhodesiensis), and the later Homo Helmei ( Homo helmei).

Thirdly, genetic data, according to most experts in this field, also point to Africa as the most likely initial center for the formation of the species Homo sapiens. It is no coincidence that the greatest genetic diversity among modern human populations is observed there, and as we move away from Africa, this diversity decreases more and more. This is how it should be if the theory of the “African exodus” is correct: after all, the populations of homo sapiens, which were the first to leave their ancestral home and settled somewhere in the vicinity of it, “captured” only part of the species’ gene pool on the way, those groups that then branched off from them and moved even further - only part of part and so on.

Finally, fourthly, the skeleton of the first European homo sapiens is characterized by a number of features that are typical of inhabitants of the tropics and hot subtropics, but not of high latitudes. This has already been discussed in Chapter 4 (see Fig. 4.3–4.5). This picture agrees well with the theory of the African origin of people of modern anatomical type.

From the book Neanderthals [The History of Failed Humanity] author Vishnyatsky Leonid Borisovich

Neanderthal + homo sapiens = ? So, as we already know, genetic and paleoanthropological data indicate that the widespread spread of people of a modern anatomical type outside Africa began about 60–65 thousand years ago. They were first colonized

author Kalashnikov Maxim

“Golem sapiens” We, as an intelligent form on Earth, are not at all alone. Next to us there is another mind - non-human. Or rather, superhuman. And this is Evil incarnate. His name is the intelligent Golem, Holem sapiens. We have been leading you to this conclusion for a long time. He's really scary and

From the book The Third Project. Volume II "Transition Point" author Kalashnikov Maxim

Goodbye homo sapiens! So, let's summarize. The breakdown of connections between the natural and social components of the Greater Human World, between technological needs and natural capabilities, between politics, economics and culture inevitably plunges us into a period

From the book Secrets of Great Scythia. Notes of a Historical Pathfinder author Kolomiytsev Igor Pavlovich

Homeland of the Magogs “Sleep, you unhearing one, otherwise Gog and Magog will come,” - for centuries in Rus' this was how little naughty children were scared. For it is said in the prophecy of John the Theologian: “When the thousand years are ended, Satan will be released and will go out to deceive the nations that are at the four corners of the earth,

From the book Naum Eitingon - Stalin's punishing sword author Sharapov Eduard Prokopyevich

The hero's homeland The city of Shklov is located on the Dnieper - the center of the district of the same name in the Mogilev region of the Republic of Belarus. The regional center is 30 kilometers away. There is a railway station on the Orsha-Mogilev line. The city's 15,000 population works on paper

From the book Forgotten Belarus author

Small Motherland

From the book History of Secret Societies, Unions and Orders author Schuster Georg

THE HOMELAND OF ISLAM To the south of Palestine, bounded on the west by the Red Sea, on the east by the Euphrates and the Persian Gulf, the large Arabian Peninsula stretches far into the Indian Ocean. The interior of the country is occupied by a vast plateau with endless sandy deserts, and

From the book Ancient World author Ermanovskaya Anna Eduardovna

Homeland of Odysseus When the Phaeacians finally sailed to Ithaca, Odysseus was fast asleep. When he woke up, he did not recognize his native island. His patron goddess Athena had to reintroduce Odysseus to his kingdom. She warned the hero that his palace was occupied by pretenders to the throne of Ithaca,

From the book Myths about Belarus author Deruzhinsky Vadim Vladimirovich

THE HOMELAND OF BELARUSSIANS The degree of prevalence of these purely Belarusian features on the map of present-day Belarus allowed scientists to reconstruct the genealogy of the Belarusians and identify the HOMELAND of our ethnic group. That is, the place where the concentration of purely Belarusian traits is maximum.

From the book Pre-Letopic Rus'. Pre-Horde Rus'. Rus' and Golden Horde author Fedoseev Yuri Grigorievich

Pre-Annalistic Rus' Common ancestors. Homo sapiens. Space disasters. World Flood. First resettlement of the Aryans. Cimmerians. Scythians. Sarmatians. Veneda. The emergence of Slavic and Germanic tribes. Goths. Huns. Bulgarians. Obry. Bravlin. Russian Kaganate. Hungarians. Khazar genius. Rus

From the book “We bombed all objects to the ground!” Bomber pilot remembers author Osipov Georgy Alekseevich

The Motherland is Calling Having flown to the Drakino airfield on October 10, our regiment became part of the 38th Air Division of the 49th Army. In front of the troops of the 49th Army, the enemy continued the offensive, crashing like wedges into the location of our troops. There was no continuous front. October 12 units of the 13th Army

From the book It Was Forever Until It Ended. Last Soviet generation author Yurchak Alexey

“Homo soviticus”, “double consciousness” and “masked pretenders” Among studies of “authoritarian” systems of power, a common model is according to which participants in political statements, acts and rituals in such systems are supposedly forced to pretend in public

From the book Warrior under St. Andrew's Flag author Voinovich Pavel Vladimirovich

Homeland of Elephants All history became just parchment from which the original text was scraped off and a new one was written as needed. George Orwell. “1984” After the war, ideology in the Soviet Union began to increasingly take on the colors of Russian chauvinism and great power.

From the book Nine Centuries of the South of Moscow. Between Fili and Brateev author Yaroslavtseva S I

The Motherland called them. In the chronological description of the past, the 20th century, I have already touched upon the period of the Great Patriotic War 1941–1945 But, speaking about the history of the development of the Zyuzin agricultural artel, I could not touch in more detail on other problems related to the war. And

From the book History of Imperial Relations. Belarusians and Russians. 1772-1991 author Taras Anatoly Efimovich

CONCLUSION. HOMO SOVIETICUS: BELARUS VARIANT (Maxim Petrov, Doctor of Science in Information Technology) Anyone who is a slave against his will can be free in his soul. But he who became free by the grace of his master, or gave himself into slavery,

From the book Mind and Civilization [Flicker in the Dark] author Burovsky Andrey Mikhailovich

Chapter 6. Sapiens, but not our relative This lemur really gave the impression of a small man with a dog's head. B. Euvelmans Sapiens, but not homo? It is believed that there were no human ancestors in America. There were no apes there. Ancestors of a special group

In light of already published and future videos, for the general development and systematization of knowledge, I offer a general overview of the genera of the hominid family from the later Sahelanthropus, who lived about 7 million years ago, to Homo sapiens, who appeared from 315 to 200 thousand years ago. This review will help you avoid falling into the trap of those who like to mislead and systematize their knowledge. Since the video is quite long, for convenience, in the comments there will be a table of contents with a time code, thanks to which you can start or continue watching the video from the selected type or type if you click on the blue numbers in the list. 1. Sahelanthropus (Sahelanthropus) this genus is represented by only one species: 1.1. The Chadian sahelanthropus (Sahelanthropus tchadensis) is an extinct species of hominid, approximately 7 million years old. His skull, named Toumaina, meaning "hope of life", was found in the north-west of the Republic of Chad in 2001 by Michel Brunet. Their brain volume, supposedly 380 cm cubic, is approximately the same as that of modern chimpanzees. Based on the characteristic location of the foramen magnum, scientists believe that this is the most ancient skull an upright walking creature. Sahelanthropus may represent the common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees, but there are still a number of questions about its facial features that may call into question the status of australopithecus. By the way, the belonging of Sahelanthropus to the human ancestry is disputed by the discoverers of the next genus with the only species Ororin tugensis. 2. The genus Orrorin includes one species: Orrorin tugenensis, or the man of the millennium, this species was first found in 2000 in the Tugen mountains of Kenya. Its age is about 6 million years. Currently, 20 fossils have been recovered from 4 sites: these include two parts of the lower jaw; symphyses and several teeth; three thigh fragments; partial humerus; proximal phalanx; and distal phalanx of the thumb. By the way, Orrorins have femurs with obvious signs of upright posture, in contrast to indirect ones in Sahelanthropus. But the rest of the skeleton, except for the skull, indicates that he climbed trees. Orrorins were about 1 m tall. 20 centimeters. In addition, accompanying findings indicated that Orrorin did not live in a savanna, but in an evergreen forest environment. By the way, it is precisely this type that is demonstrated by lovers of sensations in anthropology or supporters of ideas about the extraterrestrial origin of people, saying that 6 million years ago aliens visited us. As evidence, they note that this species has a femur closer to the human than that of a later species of Australopithecus afarensis, named Lucy, aged 3 million years, this is true, but understandable, which is what scientists did 5 years ago, describing the level of primitiveness of the similarity and that it is similar to primates that lived 20 million years ago. But to add to this argument, “TV experts” report that the reconstructed shape of Orrorin’s face is flat and similar to a human’s. And then look carefully at the images of the finds and find the parts from which you can assemble a face. Don't you see? Me too, but they are there, according to the authors of the programs! At the same time, they show video fragments about completely different finds. This is designed to ensure that hundreds of thousands, or even millions of viewers trust them and they will not check. This is how you mix truth and fiction and you get a sensation, but only in the minds of their adherents, and unfortunately there are quite a few of them. And this is just one example. 3. Ardipithecus, an ancient genus of hominids that lived 5.6-4.4 million years ago. At the moment, only two species have been described: 3. 1. Ardipithecus kadabba was found in Ethiopia in the valley of the Middle Awash River in 1997. And in 2000, further north, a few more finds were found. The finds consist mainly of teeth and skeletal bone fragments from several individuals dating back 5.6 million years. The following species from the genus Ardipithecus is described more qualitatively. 3.2. Ardipithecus ramidus or Ardi, which means earth or root. Ardi's remains were first discovered near the Ethiopian village of Aramis in 1992 in the Afar Depression in the Awash River valley. And in 1994, more fragments were obtained, amounting to 45% of the total skeleton. This is a very significant find, which combines characteristics of both monkeys and humans. The age of the finds was determined based on their stratigraphic position between two volcanic layers and was 4.4 million years. And between 1999 and 2003, scientists discovered the bones and teeth of nine more individuals of the species Ardipithecus ramidus, on the north bank of the Awash River in Ethiopia west of Hadar. Ardipithecus ramidus is similar to most primitive, previously recognized hominins, but unlike them, Ardipithecus ramidus had a great toe that retained grasping ability, adapted for climbing trees. However, scientists argue that other features of its skeleton reflect adaptations to upright walking. Like later hominins, Ardi had smaller fangs. Its brain was small, about the size of a modern chimpanzee, and about 20% the size of a modern human's brain. Their teeth indicate that they ate both fruits and leaves without preference, and this is already the path to omnivory. In terms of social behavior, weak sexual dimorphism may indicate reduced aggression and competition between males in a group. Ramidus legs are well suited for walking both in the forest and in meadows, swamps and lakes. 4. Australopithecus (Australopithecus), here it should immediately be noted that there is also the concept of australopithecus, which includes 5 more genera and is divided into 3 groups: a) early australopithecus (7.0 - 3.9 million years ago); b) gracile australopithecus (3.9 - 1.8 million years ago); c) massive australopithecus (2.6 - 0.9 million years ago). But Australopithecines as a genus are fossilized higher primates, possessing signs of upright walking and anthropoid features in the structure of the skull. Who lived in the period from 4.2 to 1.8 million years ago. Let's look at 6 species of Australopithecus: 4. 1. Australopithecus anamensis is believed to be the ancestor of humans who lived about four million years ago. Fossils have been found in Kenya and Ethiopia. The first record of the species was discovered in 1965 near Lake Turkana in Kenya, previously the lake was called Rudolf. Then in 1989, teeth of this species were found on the northern bank of the Turkana, but in the territory of modern Ethiopia. And already in 1994, about a hundred additional fragments from two dozen hominids were discovered, including one complete lower jaw, with teeth resembling human ones. And only in 1995, on the basis of the described findings, the species was identified as Australopithecus Anamensis, which is considered a descendant of the species Ardipithecus ramidus. And in 2006, a new find of Australopithecus anamas was announced, in northeastern Ethiopia, about 10 km. from the location where Ardipithecus ramidus was found. The age of the Anamanian Australopithecus is about 4-4.5 million years. Australopithecus Anamensis is considered the ancestor of the next species of Australopithecus. 4.2. Australopithecus afarensis, or "Lucy" after the first discovery, is an extinct hominid that lived between 3.9 and 2.9 million years ago. Australopithecus afarensis was closely related to the genus Homo, as a direct ancestor or close relative of an unknown common ancestor. Lucy herself, 3.2 million years old, was discovered in 1974 in the Afar Basin near the village of Hadar in Ethiopia on November 24. "Lucy" was represented by an almost complete skeleton. And the name "Lucy" was inspired by the Beatles song "Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds." Australopithecus afarensis has also been found in other localities such as Omo, Maka, Feij and Belohdeli in Ethiopia and Koobi Fore and Lotagam in Kenya. Representatives of the species had fangs and molars that were relatively larger than those of modern people, and the brain was still small - from 380 to 430 cubic cm - and the face had protruding lips. The anatomy of the arms, legs, and shoulder joints suggests that the creatures were partly arboreal as well as terrestrial, although the overall anatomy of the pelvis is much more humanoid. However, thanks to their anatomical structure, they could walk with a straight gait. The upright posture of Australopithecus afarensis may just be due to climate changes in Africa from the jungle to the savannah. In Tanzania, 20 km from the Sadiman volcano, in 1978, footprints of a family of upright hominids were discovered preserved in volcanic ash south of the Olduvai Gorge. Based on sexual dimorphism—the difference in body size between males and females—these creatures most likely lived in small family groups containing one dominant, larger male and several small breeding females. "Lucy" would live in a group culture that involves socializing. In 2000, skeletal remains were discovered in the Dikika area, believed to be 3 year old child Australopithecus afarensis, who lived 3.3 million years ago. These australopithecines, according to archaeological finds, used stone tools to cut meat from animal carcasses and crush them. But this is only the use, not the manufacture of them. 4.3. Australopithecus bahrelghazali or Abel is a fossil hominin first discovered in 1993 in the Bahr el Ghazal valley at the Koro Toro archaeological site in Chad. Abel is approximately 3.6-3 million years old. The find consists of a mandibular fragment, a lower second incisor, both lower canines and all four of its premolars. IN separate species this Australopithecus got there thanks to its lower three root premolars. This is also the first Australopithecus discovered north of the previous ones, which indicates their wide distribution. 4.4 Australopithecus africanus was an early hominid that lived 3.3 - 2.1 million years ago - in the late Pliocene and early Pleistocene. Unlike the previous species, it had a larger brain and more human-like features. Many scientists believe that he is the ancestor of modern humans. Australopithecus africanus has only been discovered at four sites in southern Africa - Taung in 1924, Sterkfontein in 1935, Makapansgat in 1948 and Gladysvale in 1992. The first discovery was a baby skull known as the "Baby of Taung" and described by Raymond Dart, who assigned the name Australopithecus africanus, meaning "southern ape of Africa". He argued that this species was intermediate between apes and humans. Further discoveries confirmed their identification as a new species. This australopithecus was a bipedal hominid with arms slightly longer than the legs. Despite its somewhat more humanoid cranial features, other more primitive features are present, including ape-like, curved climbing fingers. But the pelvis was more adapted to bipedalism than in the previous species. 4.5. Australopithecus garhi, 2.5 million years old, was discovered in the Bowri sediments of Ethiopia. "Garhi" means "surprise" in the local Afar language. For the first time, tools similar to the Oldowan stone working culture were discovered along with the remains. 4.6. Australopithecus sediba is a species of early Pleistocene australopithecus with fossils dating back approximately 2 million years. This species is known from four incomplete skeletons discovered in South Africa in a place called the “cradle of humanity,” 50 km northwest of Johannesburg, within the Malapa Cave. The discovery was made thanks to the Google Earth service. "Sediba" means "spring" in the Sotho language. The remains of Australopithecus sediba, two adults and one infant aged 18 months, were found together. In total, more than 220 fragments have been excavated so far. Australopithecus sediba may have lived in the savannah, but the diet included fruits and other forest products. The height of the sediba was about 1.3 meters. The first specimen of Australopithecus sediba was discovered by 9-year-old Matthew, son of paleoanthropologist Lee Berger, on August 15, 2008. The mandible found was part of a juvenile male whose skull was later discovered in March 2009 by Berger and his team. Fossils of various animals were also found in the cave area, including saber-toothed cats, mongooses and antelopes. Sediba's brain volume was about 420-450 cubic cm, which is about three times less than that of modern people. Australopithecus sediba had amazing modern hand , whose gripping accuracy presupposes the use and manufacture of the tool. Sediba may have belonged to the late South African branch of Australopithecus, which coexisted with representatives of the genus Homo already living at that time. Currently, some scientists are trying to clarify the dating and look for a connection between Australopithecus sediba and the genus Homo. 5. Paranthropus (Paranthropus) - a genus of fossil higher primates. They were found in East and Southern Africa. They are also called massive australopithecines. Finds of Paranthropus are dated from 2.7 to 1 million years. 5.1. Ethiopian paranthropus (Paranthropus aethiopicus or Australopithecus aethiopicus) The species was described from a 1985 find in the Lake Turkana area, Kenya, known as the "black skull" due to its dark coloration, due to the manganese content. The skull dates back 2.5 million years. But later, part of the lower jaw, discovered in 1967 in the Omo River Valley, Ethiopia, was also attributed to this species. Anthropologists believe that Ethiopian Paranthropus lived between 2.7 and 2.5 million years ago. They were quite primitive and have many features in common with Australopithecus afarensis, perhaps they were their direct descendants. Their special feature was their jaws that protruded strongly forward. This species is believed by scientists to diverge from the Homo lineage on the hominid evolutionary tree. 5.2. Paranthropus boisei, aka Australopithecus boisei, aka "Nutcracker" was an early hominin described as the largest of the genus Paranthropus. They lived in East Africa during the Pleistocene era from approximately 2.4 to 1.4 million years ago. The largest skull was discovered in Konso in Ethiopia and dates back 1.4 million years. They were 1.2-1.5 m tall and weighed from 40 to 90 kg. The well-preserved skull of Paranthropus boice was first discovered in Tanzania's Olduvai Gorge in 1959 and was given the name "Nutcracker" due to its large teeth and thick enamel. It was dated at 1.75 million. And 10 years later, in 1969, the son of the discoverer of the “nutcracker” Mary Leakey, Richard, discovered another Paranthropus boyes skull in Koobi Fora near Lake Turkana in Kenya. Judging by the structure of their jaws, they ate massive plant foods and lived in forests and shrouds. Based on the structure of the skull, scientists believe that the brain of these paranthropes was quite primitive, with a volume of up to 550 cubic cm. 5.3. Massive paranthropus (Paranthropus robustus). The first skull of the species was discovered in Kromdraai in South Africa in 1938 by a schoolboy who later traded it for chocolate to anthropologist Robert Broome. Paranthropus or the massive Australopithecines were bipedal hominids that likely descended from the gracial Australopithecines. They are characterized by robust braincases, and gorilla-like cranial ridges, which suggest strong chewing muscles. They lived between 2 and 1.2 million years ago. The remains of massive Paranthropus have only been found within South Africa at Kromdraai, Swartkrans, Drimolen, Gondolin and Kupers. The remains of 130 individuals were discovered in a cave at Swartkrans. Dental studies have shown that massive Paranthropus rarely lived past 17 years of age. The approximate height of the males was about 1.2 m, and their weight was approximately 54 kg. But the females were just under 1 meter tall and weighed about 40 kg, which indicates fairly large sexual dimorphism. Their brain size ranged from 410 to 530 cubic meters. cm. They ate more massive food, such as tubers and nuts, possibly from open forests and savannas. 6. Kenyanthropus (Kenyanthropus) is a genus of hominids that lived from 3.5 to 3.2 million years ago in the Pliocene. This genus is represented by one species, Kenyanthropus flatface, but some scientists consider it a separate species of australopithecus, like Australopithecus flatface, while others classify it as Australopithecus afarensis. 6.1. The Kenyanthropus platyops was found on the Kenyan side of Lake Turkana in 1999. These Kenyanthropes lived from 3.5 to 3.2 million ago. This species remains a mystery, and suggests that 3.5 - 2 million years ago there were several human-like species, each of which was well adapted to life in a certain environment. 7. The genus Humans or Homo includes both extinct species and Homo sapiens. Extinct species are classified as ancestral, especially Homo erectus, or as closely related to modern humans. The earliest representatives of the genus currently date back 2.5 million years. 7.1. Homo gautengensis is a species of hominin that was identified in 2010 following a fresh look at a skull found back in 1977 in Sterkfontein Cave in Johannesburg, South Africa, Gothenburg Province. This species is represented by South African fossil hominins previously classified as Homo habilis, Homo ergaster, or in some cases Australopithecus. But Australopithecus sediba, which lived at the same time as Homo Gautengensis, turned out to be much more primitive. The identification of Homo gautengensis was made from fragments of skulls, teeth and other parts found at various times in caves at a site called the Cradle of Humankind in South Africa. The oldest specimens are dated at 1.9-1.8 million years. The youngest specimens from Swartkrans date from approximately 1.0 million to 600 thousand years ago. According to the description, Homo hautengensis had large teeth suitable for chewing plants and a small brain, most likely he consumed a predominantly plant diet, unlike Homo erectus, Homo sapiens and, probably, Homo habilis. Scientists believe it made and used stone tools, and judging by the burnt animal bones found with the remains of Homo hautengensis, these hominins used fire. They were slightly taller than 90 cm, and their weight was about 50 kg. Homo hautengensis walked on two legs, but also spent significant time in trees, possibly feeding, sleeping and hiding from predators. 7.2. Homo rudolfensis, a species of the genus Homo that lived 1.7-2.5 million years ago, was first discovered in 1972 at Lake Turkana in Kenya. However, the remains were first described in 1978 by Soviet anthropologist Valery Alekseev. Remains were also found in Malawi in 1991 and in Koobi Fora, Kenya in 2012. Homo Rudolph coexisted in parallel with Homo habilis or Homo habilis and they could interact. Possibly the ancestor of later Homo species. 7.3. Homo habilis (Homo habilis) is a species of fossil hominid that is considered a representative of our ancestors. Lived from approximately 2.4 to 1.4 million years ago, during the Gelasian Pleistocene. The first finds were made in Tanzania in 1962-1964. Homo habilis was considered the earliest known species of the genus Homo, until the discovery of Homo hautengensis in 2010. Homo habilis was short and had disproportionately long arms compared to modern humans, but with a flatter face than australopithecines. The volume of his skull was less than half that of modern humans. His finds are often accompanied by primitive stone tools from the Olduvai culture, hence the name "Handy Man". And to describe it more simply, the body of the Habilis resembles Australopithecus, with a more human-like face and smaller teeth. Whether Homo habilis was the first hominid to master stone tool technology remains controversial, since Australopithecus garhi, dated 2. 6 million years old, was found along with similar stone tools, and is at least 100-200 thousand years older than Homo habilis. Homo habilis lived in parallel with other bipedal primates, such as Paranthropus boisei. But Homo habilis, perhaps through tool use and a more varied diet, judging by dental analysis, became the ancestor of a whole line of new species, while the remains of Paranthropus boisei were no longer found. Also, Homo habilis may have coexisted with Homo erectus about 500 thousand years ago. 7.4. Homo ergaster is an extinct but one of the earliest Homo species that lived in eastern and southern Africa during the Early Pleistocene, 1.8 - 1.3 million years ago. The working man, named for his advanced technology of hand tools, is sometimes referred to as the African Homo erectus. Some researchers believe working person, the ancestor of the Acheulean culture, while other scientists award the palm to early erectus. There is also evidence of their use of fire. The remains were first discovered in 1949 in southern Africa. And the most complete skeleton was discovered in Kenya on the western shore of Lake Turkana, it belonged to a teenager and was called the “Boy from Turkana” or also “Nariokotome Boy”, his age was 1.6 million years. This finding is often classified as Homo erectus. Homo ergaster is thought to have diverged from the Homo habilis lineage between 1.9 and 1.8 million years ago and existed for about half a million years in Africa. Scientists also believe that they quickly became sexually mature, even in their youth. Its distinguishing feature was also its rather tall height, about 180 cm. Working humans are also less sexually dimorphic than Austropithecus, which may mean more prosocial behavior. His brain was already larger, up to 900 cubic centimeters. Some scientists believe that they could use a proto-language based on the structure of the cervical vertebrae, but this is just speculation at the moment. 7.5. The Dmanisian hominid (Homo georgicus) or (Homo erectus georgicus) is the first representative of the genus Homo to leave Africa. Finds dating back to 1.8 million years were discovered in Georgia in August 1991 and were described in different years also as Georgian Man (Homo georgicus), Homo erectus georgicus, Dmanisi hominid (Dmanisi) and as Working Man (Homo ergaster). But it was isolated as a separate species and they, together with erectus and ergasters, are also often called archanthropes, or if we add Heidelberg man of Europe and Sinanthropus from China, then we get Pithecanthropus. In 1991 by David Lordkipanidze. Along with ancient human remains, tools and animal bones were found. The brain volume of Dmanisian hominids is approximately 600-700 cubic centimeters - half that of modern humans. This is the most small brain a hominid that has been found outside of Africa other than Flores man (Homo floresiensis). The Dmanisian hominid was bipedal and shorter in stature compared to the abnormally tall ergasters; the average height of male individuals was about 1.2 m. Dental conditions indicate omnivory. But no evidence of the use of fire was found among archaeological finds. Possibly a descendant of Rudolph Man. 7.6. Homo erectus, or simply Erectus, is an extinct species of hominid that lived from the late Pliocene to the late Pleistocene, approximately 1.9 million to 300,000 years ago. About 2 million years ago, the climate in Africa changed to drier. A long period of existence and migration could not but create many different views of scientists on this species. According to available data and their interpretation, the species originated in Africa, then migrated to India, China and to the island of Java. Overall, Homo erectus spread throughout the warmer parts of Eurasia. But some scientists suggest that Erectus appeared in Asia and only then migrated to Africa. Erectus have existed for over a million years, longer than other human species. The classification and ancestry of Homo erectus is quite controversial. But there are some subspecies of erectus. 7.6.1 Pithecanthropus or "Javanese man" - Homo erectus erectus 7.6.2 Yuanmou man - Homo erectus yuanmouensis 7.6.3 Lantian man - Homo erectus lantianensis 7.6.4 Nanjing man - Homo erectus nankinensis 7.6.5 Sinanthropus or "Beijing man" - Homo erectus pekinensis 7.6.6 Meganthropus - Homo erectus palaeojavanicus 7.6.7 Javanthrope or Soloi man - Homo erectus soloensis 7.6.8 Man from Totavel - Homo erectus tautavelensis 7.6.9 Dmanisian hominid - Homo erectus georgicus 7.6.10 Man from Bilzingsleben - Homo erectus bilzingslebenensis 7.6.11 Atlantrop or Moorish man - Homo erectus mauritanicus 7.6.12 Man from Cerpano - Homo cepranensis, some scientists distinguish it, like many other subspecies, into a separate species, but the 1994 find in the vicinity of Rome is represented only by the skull, therefore there is little data for a more thorough analysis. Homo erectus got its name for a reason; his legs were adapted for both walking and running. Temperature exchange was increased due to sparser and shorter body hair. It is quite possible that erectus have already become hunters. Smaller teeth may indicate changes in diet, most likely due to the processing of food by fire. And this is already the path to increasing the brain, the volume of which in erecti varied from 850 to 1200 cubic cm. They were up to 178 cm tall. The sexual dimorphism of erectuses was less than that of their predecessors. They lived in groups of hunter-gatherers and hunted together. Fire was used both for warmth and cooking, and to scare away predators. They made tools, hand axes, flakes, and in general were carriers of the Acheulean culture. In 1998 there were suggestions that they were building rafts. 7.7. Homo antecessor is an extinct human species, ranging in age from 1.2 million to 800,000 years. It was found in the Sierra de Atapuerca in 1994. A 900,000-year-old fossil of an upper jaw and part of a skull discovered in Spain belonged to a boy at most 15 years old. Numerous bones, both animal and human, were found nearby with markings that may indicate cannibalism. Almost all of those eaten were teenagers or children. However, no evidence was found indicating a lack of food in the surrounding area at that time. They were approximately 160-180 cm tall and weighed about 90 kg. The brain volume of the previous person (Homo antecessor) was about 1000-1150 cubic centimeters. Scientists suggest rudimentary speech abilities. 7.8. Heidelberg man (Homo heidelbergensis) or protanthropus (Protanthropus heidelbergensis) is an extinct species of the genus Homo, which may be the direct ancestor of both Neanderthals (Homo neanderthalensis), if we consider its development in Europe, and Homo sapiens, but only in Africa. The discovered remains were dated from 800 to 150 thousand years. The first records of this species were made in 1907 by Daniel Hartmann in the village of Mauer in southwestern Germany. After which representatives of the species were discovered in France, Italy, Spain, Greece and China. Also in 1994, a discovery was made in England near the village of Boxgrove, hence the name “Boxgrove Man”. However, the name of the area is also found - “horse slaughterhouse”, which involves cutting up horse carcasses using stone tools. Heidelberg Man used tools from the Acheulean culture, sometimes with transitions into the Mousterian culture. They were on average 170 cm tall, and in South Africa there were finds of individuals 213 cm tall and which dated from 500 to 300 thousand years. Heidelberg man may have been the first species to bury its dead, findings based on 28 remains found in Atapuerca, Spain. Perhaps he used tongue and red ocher as decoration, which is confirmed by finds at Terra Amata near Nice on the slopes of Mount Boron. Dental analysis suggests they were right-handed. Heidelberg Man (Homo heidelbergensis) was an advanced hunter, judging by hunting tools such as spears from Schöningen in Germany. 7.8.1. Rhodesian man (Homo rhodesiensis) is an extinct subspecies of hominin that lived from 400 to 125 thousand years ago. The Kabwe fossil skull is the type specimen of the species, found in the Broken Hill Caves in Northern Rhodesia, now Zambia, by Swiss miner Tom Zwiglaar in 1921. Previously it was classified as a separate species. The Rhodesian man was massive, with very large eyebrows and a broad face. It is sometimes called the "African Neanderthal", although it has features intermediate between sapiens and Neanderthals. 7.9. Florisbad (Homo helmei) is described as an "archaic" Homo sapiens who lived 260,000 years ago. Represented by a partially preserved skull that was discovered in 1932 by Professor Dreyer within the archaeological and paleontological site of Florisbad near Bloemfontein in South Africa. It may be an intermediate form between Heidelberg man (Homo heidelbergensis) and homo sapiens (Homo sapiens). Florisbad was the same size as a modern man, but with large volume the brain is about 1400 cm cubic. 7.10 Neanderthal (Homo neanderthalensis) is an extinct species or subspecies within the genus Homo, closely related to modern humans, and has interbred with them on numerous occasions. The term "Neanderthal" comes from the modern spelling of the Neander Valley in Germany, where the species was first discovered in the Feldhofer Cave. Neanderthals existed, according to genetic data, from 600 thousand years ago, and according to archaeological finds from 250 to 28 thousand years ago, with their last refuge in Gibraltar. The finds are currently being intensively studied and there is no point in describing them in more detail, since I will return to this species, perhaps more than once. 7.11. Homo Naledi Fossils were discovered in 2013 in the Dinaledi Chamber, a cave system rising star, Gauteng province in South Africa, and were quickly recognized as the remains of a new species in 2015, and different from remains found previously. In 2017, the finds were dated from 335 to 236 thousand years. The remains of fifteen individuals, both male and female, were recovered from the cave, including children. New look named Homo naledi, it has an unexpected combination of modern and primitive features, including a rather small brain. "Naledi" was about one and a half meters tall, with a brain volume from 450 to 610 cubic meters. See The word "naledi" means "star" in the Sotho-Tswana languages. 7.12. Homo floresiensis or hobbit is an extinct dwarf species of the genus Homo. Flores man lived from 100 to 60 thousand years ago. The archaeological remains were discovered by Mike Morewood in 2003 on the island of Flores in Indonesia. Incomplete skeletons of nine individuals have been recovered, including one complete skull, from Liang Bua Cave. A distinctive feature of hobbits, as the name suggests, is their height, about 1 meter, and their small brain, about 400 cm3. Stone tools were found along with skeletal remains. There is still debate about Homo Flores, whether he could have made tools with such a brain. The theory was put forward that the found skull was a microcephalus. But most likely this species evolved from erectus or other species in conditions of isolation on the island. 7.13. Denisovans ("Denisovan") (Denisova hominin) are Paleolithic members of the genus Homo that may belong to a previously unknown human species. It is believed to be the third person from the Pleistocene to demonstrate a level of adaptation previously thought to be unique to modern humans and Neanderthals. The Denisovans occupied large territories, stretching from cold Siberia to the tropical rainforests of Indonesia. In 2008, Russian scientists, in Denisova Cave or Ayu-Tash, in Altai mountains, the distal phalanx of the girl’s finger was discovered, from which mitochondrial DNA was later isolated. The owner of the phalanx lived in a cave about 41 thousand years ago. This cave was also inhabited by Neanderthals and modern humans in different times. In general, there are not many finds, including teeth and part of a toe phalanx, as well as various tools and jewelry, including a bracelet made from non-local material. Analysis of mitochondrial DNA from the finger bone showed that Denisovans are genetically different from Neanderthals and modern humans. They may have separated from the Neanderthal lineage after splitting with the Homo sapiens lineage. Recent analyzes have also shown that they overlapped with our species and even interbred several times, at different times. Up to 5-6% of the DNA of Melanesians and Australian aborigines contains Denisovan admixtures. And modern non-Africans have about 2-3% admixture. In 2017, in China, fragments of skulls were found with a large brain volume, up to 1800 cubic cm, and 105-125 thousand years old. Some scientists, based on their description, have suggested that they could belong to the Denisovans, but these versions are currently controversial. 7.14. Idaltu (Homo sapiens idaltu) is an extinct subspecies of Homo sapiens that lived approximately 160 thousand years ago in Africa. "Idaltu" means "firstborn". Fossil remains of Homo sapiens idaltu were discovered in 1997 by Tim White at Herto Buri in Ethiopia. Although the morphology of the skulls indicates archaic features that are not found in later Homo sapiens, they are still considered by scientists as direct ancestors modern Homo sapiens sapiens. 7.15. Homo sapiens is a species of the hominid family from the large order of primates. And it is the only living species of this genus, that is, us. If anyone is reading or listening to this outside of our species, please write in the comments...). Representatives of the species first appeared in Africa about 200 or 315 thousand years ago, if we take into account the latest data from Jebel Irhoud, but there are still many questions there. After which they spread almost throughout the entire planet. Although more modern form how Homo sapiens sapiens, well, a very intelligent person, appeared a little over 100 thousand years ago, according to some anthropologists. Also in early times, in parallel with humans, other species and populations developed, such as Neanderthals and Denisovans, as well as Soloi man or Javanthrope, Ngandong man and Callao Man, as well as others that do not fit into the species Homo sapiens, but according to dating, who lived at the same time. As for example: 7.15.1. The Red Deer Cave people are an extinct population of people, the latest known to science, that do not fit within the variability of Homo sapiens. And perhaps belongs to another species of the genus Homo. They were discovered in the south of China in the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region in the Longling Cave in 1979. The age of the remains is from 11.5 to 14.3 thousand years. Although they may well be the results of crossbreeding between different populations living during that period. These issues will still be discussed on the channel, so a brief description will suffice for now. And now, whoever watched the video from beginning to end, put the letter “P” in the comments, and if in parts, then “C”, only to be honest!