Sacred place in the Bashkir yurt. False human history. Bashkir yurt. Municipal budgetary institution

And common sense tells us that there are factors that make year-round living in a nomadic yurt, to put it mildly, problematic. One of these factors is the long, snowy and cold Bashkir winter. It reaches -40 degrees. Let's look at the points:

1. Heating. The yurt is heated by an open fireplace, the smoke (and most of the heat) from which escapes through a hole in the roof. It is necessary to make a six-month supply of dry firewood, because... drowning with dried horse waste (as, for example, this is done in Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan or Tibet) is a certain cold death. This means you cannot move away from the forest.

2. Nutrition. The only animal available for breeding under nomadic conditions in this climate zone is the horse. Only she is able to survive in the cold in the open air on meager pasture. Question: where will you look for your herd (to taste fresh meat) in an open field knee-deep in snow? This means you must create a food supply for your family for the entire winter. And to do this, you need to dig a reliable glacier next to the yurt for storing mushrooms, berries, fish, dried and frozen meat, otherwise your supplies will become easy prey for rodents, foxes, wolves and connecting rod bears. And this is not an easy job to do every year in a new place. There should be a source of drinking water within walking distance: a stream or river. Because melted snow is distilled water, unsuitable for food.

3. Design. In conditions of heavy snowfall, there is a high probability that the arch will be pressed through by the snow mass - after all, snow does not tend to roll off a rough surface. Occupants should clean it regularly. regardless of the cold, wind and time of day.

Agree, all this bears little resemblance to a free and carefree nomadic life.

By the way: in an open fire, within a few months all your clothes and belongings will be smoked beyond recognition. In this respect, the yurt is not much different from the Chukchi tent. Therefore, the colorful decoration of exhibition Bashkir yurts has little to do with life.

From all of the above, one can draw the only conclusion: a yurt, in the Bashkir climate, is a purely summer dwelling, i.e. mobile summer house. And it is more comfortable and safer to spend the Bashkir winter in a wooden log house. And official historical science supports us in this conclusion. We read everywhere: the Bashkirs switched from a nomadic lifestyle to a semi-nomadic one. Those. They spent the winter in stationary warm dwellings, which met all the requirements listed above, and in the summer they wandered after their herds, carrying a yurt with them. Yes, everything is correct, most readers will say. No, it’s not like that, I’ll say. Why? Because all these nomadic and semi-nomadic terms were invented by people who wrote such historical tales in warm offices and never lived in conditions subsistence farming. There is not and cannot be in the conditions of the Bashkir climate either a nomadic or semi-nomadic way of life, but only a sedentary one. THE BASHKIRS WERE NEVER NOMADS! Let me explain:

In the summer you graze your herd, count the offspring - everything is fine. Autumn is coming, you need to return to your winter quarters and stock up for the winter. Question: WHAT TO DO WITH THE HERD?! The answer is unexpected and the only possible one: THROW IT IN AN OPEN FIELD! No options! Alone with wolves, winter cold and lack of food, horses are not geese and do not fly south. Paradox? But you are a nomad and do not prepare food for the winter. And even if you wanted to, it’s impossible to do this: you don’t have a tractor, or even a scythe... And you don’t know metal. And even if they did know, then we are talking about a herd and not about one horse, and this is a completely incommensurable scale. And where should you look for your herd in the spring, or rather, what’s left of it? And will it remain... After all, it is impossible to reduce the number of wolves with the help of a bow and arrow, and horse theft has always been an easy and profitable criminal business. In addition, a horse is not a domestic animal and it easily gets along without a person in nature, and in the spring it will not return to you on its own. And Bashkiria is not the African Serengeti Park, where, at the end of winter, you will go and catch a new herd.

So what should we do? But you, dear nomad, need to moderate your appetites from a herd to a couple of pigs, a couple of cows, a dozen chickens or geese, a dozen sheep (it’s just not clear where to get them - after all, neither domestic pigs, nor cows, nor sheep are found in nature, no chicken and no geese?) and one horse. Settle in a society of your own kind (so that it’s not so scary) in a wooden log house (if, of course, you have an axe, even a stone one, and the strength to build it), since life in a dugout is contraindicated for human health, and in a yurt it’s cold, damp, smoky, dark and unsafe, on the river bank, so that there is somewhere to catch fish, near the forest, so that there is somewhere to go for mushrooms, berries and firewood, and all summer long not to sunbathe in the sun, looking at the grazing herds, but to water the ground abundantly - mother with her own sweat, preparing feed for the cattle for the long winter (although I can hardly imagine how this can be done without a metal scythe). Plant a vegetable garden for yourself and your family (you can use a wooden shovel). Harvest firewood and wild plants. And if, God forbid, you already know grains, then it’s lost: you are no longer a person, but a working animal and will end your life in the furrow. Because no human body is able to withstand the kind of physical activity that cheerful men from historical science prescribed for you in their textbooks.

Imagine, your humble servant lived a similar (with great stretch, of course) life in a remote Transbaikal village in the 70s of the last century. To feed 5 heads of cattle, 2 pigs and a dozen chickens in the winter, my father and I waved our scythes all summer. There was also a vegetable garden, and an endless potato field. Everyday care for all this cattle - I remember how one winter night (-42) they helped the first heifer to give birth, pulling the calf by the front legs.... And my parents still worked on the state farm. And the cows must be milked at 5 in the morning, and drinking water must be brought in a two-hundred-liter barrel on a cart (on a sleigh) from the river several kilometers away... And a car of firewood for the winter must be brought 120 kilometers away, sawed and chopped. Etc. Continuous physical labor that cannot be put off until tomorrow. And this was in the presence of electricity, technology and civilization - at first there was even a public bathhouse! And they didn’t bake bread, but bought it in a store - it was brought from the regional center 50 kilometers away.+

1. The Bashkirs have never been either nomads or semi-nomads, because such a way of life is impossible in the climatic conditions of Bashkortostan.

2. The yurt is not the national dwelling of the Bashkirs, since there was no need for it. People simply did not have time to go out into nature with a yurt and smell flowers; in the summer they were faced with hard labor on the ground.+

3. Why do the Bashkirs consider themselves nomads? I think that SOMEONE (or SOMETHING) WITH POWER OVER US simply put this thought into their (and our) minds.

Anyone who does not agree with my conclusions, let him explain: why did the Bashkirs suddenly change their free, well-fed and carefree nomadic life to a settled life full of hardships, hard labor and poverty? WHAT DID THEY TRADE THEIR HERDS FOR?!

2. Bikbulatov N.V. Bashkirs. Brief historical and ethnographic reference book. Ufa, 1995.

3. Vainshtein S.I. Tuvinians-Todzha: historical and ethnographic essays. M., 1961.

4. Vainshtein S.I. Historical ethnography of Tuvans. Problems of nomadic farming. M., 1972.

5. Levshin. A.M. From the history of the Kyrgyz-Kaisak hordes and steppes. Alma-Ata, 1997.

6. Kovalevsky A.N. A book by Ahmed ibn Fadlan about his journey to the Volga. Kharkov, 1956.

7. Mukanov M.S. Kazakh yurt. Alma-Ata, 1981.

8. Popov A.A. Housing // Historical and Ethnographic Dictionary of Siberia. M.-L., 1961.

9. Rona Tash A. In the footsteps of nomads. M., 1964.

10. Rudenko S.I. Bashkirs. Historical and ethnographic essays. M.-L., 1955.

11. Sevortyan E.V. Etymological dictionary of Turkic languages. M., 1974.

12. Shitova S.N. Traditional settlements and dwellings of the Bashkirs. M., 1984.

R. M. Yusupov

In the past, yurts (tirmә) were made by special craftsmen (tirmase, oҫta), who were famous people in the regions of Bashkiria. According to S.N. Shitova and other authors, there was a clear specialization among the masters of making yurts. Some craftsmen made only lattice frames of yurts (village Abdulnasyrovo, Khaibullinsky district), others - dome poles (uҡ) (villages Abdulkarimovo, Kuvatovo, Yangazino, Baymaksky district). The wooden rim for the installation of a light-smoke hole in the upper part of the dome was made by special craftsmen in the village of Ishberdy, Baymaksky district, and the village of Rafikovo, Khaibullinsky district, since there were many birch forests nearby. Felts for covering the lattice frame of the yurt, its domed part, and separately the dome opening were made only by women in the villages of the southeastern and trans-Ural regions of Bashkiria. Among the cat makers there were also craftswomen who were especially recognized for their skills. The craftsmanship and practical skills of the craftsmen were usually passed on from generation to generation, that is, in most cases it was a family affair that ensured the well-being of the family.

Material for making a yurt

The main requirement for wood material in the manufacture of the lattice base of the vertical walls of the yurt (kirәgә), consisting of individual gratings (ҡanat), as well as long domed poles (уҡ), was primarily lightness and at the same time strength. In most cases, ordinary willow and willow have this quality. It is they, when skillfully made, that give the yurt lightness and grace. The wooden rim that forms the arch of the yurt over its domed part (syғaraҡ, tagaraҡ) must be heavy and durable, since the rim with its weight holds and gives strength to the domed part, and the entire structure of the yurt. Therefore, the wooden rim for the yurt dome is made from curved trunks of birch (kaiyn), black willow (kara tal). Kazakh, Turkmen and other Central Asian craftsmen make blanks for the rim of a yurt from elm (kara agas), which is distinguished by its heaviness and strength. It was used to install large yurts, but was very expensive. The density and strength of birch and elm wood ensured the reliability and durability of rims made from these materials, since, among other things, they were resistant to the effects of meteorological precipitation. In this regard, a wooden rim made from black willow was less strong and durable.

Procurement of raw materials

The raw materials for the manufacture of structural parts of the yurt were prepared before or after sap flow in tree trunks. Craftsmen usually harvested birch and willow trunks in early spring, at the end of February - mid-March, or in late autumn, at the end of October, in November. Cut blanks 200-250 cm long for gratings and dome poles were dried in the shade, in a dry room, laid on a flat surface, cleared of bark, planed with a special carpentry tool - two-handed tarty, and also corrected irregularities with a small plane (yyshҡy).

Making dome poles

In order to give the desired bend in the lower part of the dome poles, the lower, thicker part was hewn over an area of ​​70-80 cm, giving a flattened shape up to 4-5 cm wide. After this, the workpiece was soaked in water or steam to soften it before the bending procedure the lower part of the dome poles, which gave the spherical shape to the domed part of the yurt. After the soaking procedure, the lower part of the dome poles was bent on special machines, placing 6-8 pieces on top of each other. The shape of the bend was checked with a special pattern. Village craftsmen in the regions of Bashkiria bend in a simpler traditional way. Three stakes up to 0.5 m high were driven into the ground or inserted into specially knocked out holes on the floor or wall of the workshop. The distance between the first and second stake was up to 1.5 m or a little more, the third stake was driven into the ground or floor at a distance of 40-50 cm from the second stake, but not on the same line, but 30-40 cm below. Soaked poles 200-250 cm long (220 cm on average) were bent at the thick part and inserted between pegs and dried for 10 days or more. After drying, the dome poles took the desired bending shape, which gave the yurt dome volume and sphericity. The thickness of the dome pole in the lower part, which was tied to the lattice, was, as already said, 4-5 cm, in the central part - 3-4 cm, the upper end of the pole, which was inserted into the wooden rim of the vault, was made tetrahedral for the strength of the connection.

The poles that were attached above the top of the door frame were made shorter than the others, since the top crossbar of the door frame, to which the poles were attached, was 20-30 cm higher than the lattice walls of the yurt. Special oblique grooves were made in the upper crossbar of the door frame, into which the lower ends of the dome poles above the door were inserted (Fig. 1.2). A hole was drilled in the bottom of each pole through which a rawhide strap or strong rope was passed to tie the pole to the upper bars (crosshairs) of the end bars of the grid. The number of poles thus depended on the number of forks in each lattice. A yurt of 5-6 trellises required an average of 100-120 dome poles 200-220 cm long made of birch or willow.

Making yurt bars

The vertical walls of the yurt (kirәgә, tiras) are sliding and consist of individual links-lattices of an elongated shape (ҡanat), which cover its frame as if with wings. The size of the yurt depended on the number of lattice links. Medium yurts were most often made of 5-6 latticeworks. For special occasions, weddings, etc. they made spacious, high yurts of 10-12 sections. The material for the gratings was most often willow and willow, which grew in abundance along the banks of rivers and reservoirs. They met the main requirements for gratings - they were light, flexible and resistant to fracture. The material prepared in the spring-autumn period was also dried and leveled on both sides with a plane. On average, the length of the slats for the gratings was 180-200 cm, thickness 1.5-2 cm, width up to 3 cm. The slats in the central part were slightly bent outward. To do this, they also drove 3 stakes into the ground or floor at a distance of 60-70 cm from each other, the central stake was 10-15 cm from the side stakes from the center line. 5 pieces of willow planks were inserted between the stakes and kept until the curvature in the central part of the plank was completely fixed for 10-12 days. The bend gave a convexity to the side walls of the yurt. Individual gratings (ganat) consisted of an even number of willow or willow slats. Usually there were 44-48 slats in one lattice: 22-24 in each direction, since the slats overlapped each other in different directions and fastened at the crosshairs with rawhide straps with knots at the ends. (Fig. 1.3.) Wealthy and wealthy pastoralists could fasten the slats with hammered copper nails. Among the Kyrgyz and rich Kazakhs in the past, planks were most often fastened with copper or even silver rivets with chased heads. After assembling the gratings, they were painted on the inside with red paint. In a normally stretched form, each lattice with 24 slats in each direction and a distance between slats of 10-15 cm had a length of 270 to 350 cm.

Making a light smoke wooden rim

The wooden rim is usually made of two parts, of two halves. The diameter is on average 120-150 cm. Both halves of the rim were made from curved birch trunks, carefully trimmed, giving them the shape of a semicircle, or from a simple birch trunk, which, after a week of steaming in warm water, was curved using the same stakes, driving them into ground according to the size of the rim and the required curvature. After giving both halves of the rim the shape of semicircles, they were joined, tightly tightened, with a rawhide strap, which was passed through holes drilled at the end ends of the semicircles. Over the joints, the joint was wrapped with raw leather, the edges of which were stitched. As the skin dried, it tightened and very firmly fixed the junction of the semicircles, resulting in a very durable one-piece light-smoke rim. Next, through holes were made in the side surface of the rim, directed obliquely from bottom to top, into which, when assembling the dome, the pointed or tetrahedral ends of the dome poles were inserted. The number of holes in the rim was equal to the number of dome poles (100-120 pieces). A dome was made over the light-smoke rim from arched planks curved upward and intersecting in the center. The arcs, having previously bent, were inserted into the drilled holes along the upper end of the rim, 3-4 pieces in each direction. Thus, these planks, curved upward to a height of up to half a meter above the light-smoke hoop, logically completed the spherical shape of the tented part of the yurt. The inner side of the wooden circle-rim, as well as the lower surface of the arched crossbars, were decorated with carvings.

Making yurt doors

Until the end of the 19th – beginning of the 20th centuries. Instead of a door, the entrance to the yurt was covered from the outside with thick, sometimes double-layered, stitched felt. The width of the felt canopy was wider than the doorway, thanks to which it was tightly covered. In the summer, the felt canopy was rolled up and hung above the door; if necessary, it could be easily lowered.

Since the beginning of the 20th century. began to make wooden single and double doors. During the period of his research in pre-revolutionary Bashkiria in 1905-1908. S.I. Rudenko found that the yurts, with rare exceptions, mostly had wooden doors. According to our informants, the door frame was made from local building materials: linden (the lightest and most popular), aspen, oak and pine. The door frame boards were prepared from boards 120 cm long, 15 cm wide and 4-5 cm thick. The internal size of the door opening was 160 by 80 cm. Through holes were drilled in the side jambs of the door frame along its width, to which the felt sides were pulled up and secured with straps , covering the lattice walls of the yurt. In the upper side of the door crossbar, 5-6 holes were drilled to a depth of 2-3 cm, into which the lower ends of the dome poles were inserted. (Fig. 1.2) To securely fasten the outer grilles parallel to both side jambs of the door frame, one vertical round post with a diameter of 3-4 cm was attached. The post was inserted into special holes drilled at the ends of the upper and lower crossbars of the door frame, which protruded 10-12 cm beyond the edges of the door frame. The door was usually made of double doors, and the inside was covered with red paint. From the outside, during the cold off-season, it was insulated with felt panels. The door was usually secured with special wide straps or door hinges.

Assembling the yurt

Having arrived at the summer camp, they unloaded folded and tied gratings, dome poles, felt tires, a light-smoke hoop, a door frame, household utensils, dishes, etc. from loaded horses and carts. After this, they chose a place to install the yurt on a more or less level place, closer to the water and the edge of the forest, if there was a forest nearby. After this, the assembly of the yurt began. Traditionally, this work was carried out by women. First, they placed a door frame on the eastern side, to which the first lattice was attached with straps on the left side, and all the others were attached to it, fastening them together with straps and tightly tying them at the joints with horsehair ropes (Fig. 1.1). The very last grille was attached to the vertical post on the right side of the door frame. The ends of the slats of the sidewalls of the grilles were inserted into the holes on the outer sides of the door jambs. After this, along the entire perimeter of the upper edge of the lattice frame of the yurt, the frame was tied with a rope and a colored wool braid woven in a beautiful pattern was stretched over it.

Rice. No. 1. Options for fastening the grille and individual slats

Asia. M., 1991)

Having mounted and rigidly fastened the lattice frame of the yurt (kirәgә, tiҫ), we began to assemble the dome of the yurt. Men helped here. First, on two special poles with pointed ends, 2-3 men raised a light-smoke wooden rim (Fig. 2). Women inserted sharp or faceted ends of poles into the ends of the rim. The lower end of the poles was attached to the crosshairs of the upper edge of the yurt bars. Then the remaining dome poles were sequentially secured with straps to the lattice frame. As has already been said, special holes were drilled at the lower end of these poles, through which rawhide straps were threaded and tightly tied in a knot so that their long ends remained free. These ends were used to tie the lower ends of the poles to the upper crosshairs of the lattice slats.

Rice. No. 2. Assembling the yurt

(from the book by S.I. Weinstein. The world of the nomads of the center

Asia. M., 1991)

After this, the wooden frame of the yurt was covered with felt panels. First, the side walls of the yurt were covered with four long rectangular pieces of felt. Then the domed part of the yurt was covered with three trapezoidal pieces of felt so that the lower edges of the domed felt hung 10-15 cm above the upper edge of the side walls of the yurt. After this, the side walls of the yurt were tied in a circle with special 3-4 belts made of horsehair with a width of 2 to 10 cm. This strengthened the frame of the yurt and tightly pressed the lower overhanging edge of the dome felt to the upper edge of the side walls of the yurt. The dome felt covers were also tightly tied crosswise with 4-6 hair lassos or ropes, the ends of which were tied to pegs nailed into the ground along the perimeter of the yurt. The dome of the light-smoke hole was covered with a special quadrangular felt mat (tondok). The three ends of this felt felt were firmly attached with ropes to the body of the yurt; a rope was attached to the fourth free corner, with the help of which the chimney in the dome of the yurt could be closed or opened. The light-smoke hole was usually open; it was closed only in bad weather. The dome layers of felt were usually thicker than the side ones, and their edges were usually lined with horsehair for rigidity. The domed felt floors were raised using special wooden poles 250-300 cm long, at one end of which there was a sharp metal nail, the other end was simply pointed. The sharp end of a long pole was used to pry up the upper edge of the dome felt, the other end of the pole, resting on the ground, without much difficulty, with two poles they lifted the felt cover onto the dome part of the yurt. In the cold season, the bottom of the yurt was additionally insulated with a wide felt belt, which was tied around with rope. A ditch was dug along the perimeter of the yurt in case of rain and snow melting, so that water would not flow inside the yurt. Usually yurts at summer camps were covered with dark or gray felt. Rich cattle breeders covered their homes with white felt. Wedding yurts were also covered with white felts. On special occasions, the side walls of the yurt were decorated with beautiful decorative fabrics and Chinese silk. The top of the yurt was also covered with light silk over felt covers.

Flooring

The floors were usually covered with several layers of felt. Old, dark, gray felts were laid on the ground. Fresh, white felt coverings were usually laid on top of them. Beautiful handmade mats were laid on them. Small mats were also laid out before the exit and at the entrance. Wooden floors in yurts were usually not laid, since drafts were created in the gaps between the boards and the ground and heat was lost, while with felt flooring the edges of the felt cavities around the perimeter of the yurt were bent upward, thereby creating a tightness and minimizing heat loss. In addition, garbage, dirt, insects, and mice could accumulate under the wooden floors, which, according to the old people, negatively affected the internal comfort and aura of well-being and health inside the yurt.

These are the main stages and features of making a Turkic yurt with a spherical dome from traditional materials and in a traditional way. The yurt is easy to assemble and disassemble. 2-3 women can install it within one hour. Men help women only when lifting a wooden light-smoke hoop. The yurt retains heat well, and in the summer heat it is cool and cozy. If it is very hot, the lower felts are lifted and tied with ropes. The side walls covered with light decorative fabrics protect from dust and debris. The main parameters of a 4-5-unit yurt are as follows. The total weight with felt coverings of the walls and dome is 400-450 kg, without felt coverings – 150-200 kg. Circumference – about 16-18 m, height – up to 3 m or more, diameter – 8-10 m, area – about 20 m². However, upon entering the yurt, all dimensions lose meaning, and its interior space and decoration amaze you with its peace, security and simple earthly happiness.

Literature

1. Bikbulatov N.V., Yusupov R.M., Shitova S.N., Fatykhova F.F. Bashkirs. Ethnic history and traditional culture. Ufa, 2002.

2. Levshin A.I. Description of the Kyrgyz-Cossack or Kyrgyz-Kaisak hordes and steppes. Almaty, 1996.

    Mukanov M.S. Kazakh yurt. Alma-Ata, 1981.

    Peoples of Central Asia and Kazakhstan. M., 1962. T.II.

    Rudenko S.I. Bashkirs. Historical and ethnographic essays. M.-L.. 1955.

    Shitova S.N. Traditional settlements and dwellings of the Bashkirs. M., 1984.

HOUSING BASHKIR, traditional residential buildings for sleep, recreation, household needs, etc., part of traditional material culture Bashkir people. The dwelling of the Bashkir nomads was a yurt. During the transition to a sedentary lifestyle, dwellings of various types appear. Their choice was determined natural conditions, in which the Bashkir tribes lived - mountainous areas or plains, forest or steppe zone. Logs, bark, bast, turf, clay, and manure were used as building materials. Wicker roofs and walls were made from bushes and reeds, and adobe bricks were made from clay and straw.

Log huts of various sizes and layouts were common among the Bashkirs. Depending on the wealth of the owner, it could be a hut with two windows or big house in six to eight window openings. In poor houses, windows were covered with ox bladder, fish skin, and oiled paper. Rich huts had glass windows.

The craftsmen who carried out the construction sought to give each building individuality. This was achieved primarily by decorating the facades with wooden carvings. Patterns were applied to window frames, shutters, pediments, and dormers. Mainly two motifs were used - a rhombus or a circle (symbolic image rising sun). An additional element was 8-shaped curls in various combinations.

In addition to log houses, houses with a wooden frame, such as wicker huts - “siten oy”, were also common in Bashkir villages. To construct them, stakes were dug along the walls of the future dwelling at a distance of half a meter. They were braided with branches, coated with ordinary clay and whitened with white clay. Houses made of adobe brick predominated in the southern regions of what is now Bashkortostan. The basis of adobe brick was horse manure (less often straw) and clay: in the steppe it was more difficult to find than straw, which was more often used for livestock feed than for household needs.

The huts were also covered with straw soaked in clay. There were houses with earth filling (tultyrma). During the construction process, the pillars along the perimeter of the future house were covered with birch tree trunks split in half on the outside and inside. The resulting space was filled with earth, and the walls were coated with clay. The Bashkirs of the Kurgan region built adobe huts. During the construction process, wooden molds were used, into which clay mortar was filled. As the clay dried, the mold was raised until the wall reached the required height. The corners were fastened with pillars.

The poorest of the Bashkirs built plaster or turf huts. The construction technique was similar to adobe houses, but instead of mud bricks, pieces of turf cut into rectangles were used.

For houses of all types, one principle was required - dividing the house into two parts, male and female. This planning principle was directly related to the norms of behavior established by Islam. The traditional dwelling of the Arabs was divided into front, front, male and internal, rear, female, closed parts. This was due to the rectangular layout of both the house and the tent. Among the Turks and Mongols, division followed a different principle - into left (male) and right (female) parts. So here we should talk about the imposition of the principles of Islam on the traditional ideas of the Turks. Thus, among the Mongolian peoples, the yurt is divided in exactly the same way as among the Turks, although they were never Muslims.

Lit.: Kalimullin B.G. Bashkir folk architecture. – Ufa, 1978; Shitova S.N. Traditional settlements and dwellings of the Bashkirs. – M., 1984.

2019-02-04T19:32:37+05:00 Culture of the peoples of Bashkortostan My house Bashkirs, history, local history, construction, ethnographyBASHKIR HOUSING, traditional residential buildings for sleep, recreation, household needs, etc., part of the traditional material culture of the Bashkir people. The dwelling of the Bashkir nomads was a yurt. With the transition to a sedentary lifestyle, dwellings of various types appear. Their choice was determined by the natural conditions in which the Bashkir tribes lived - mountainous areas or plains, forest or...CULTURE OF THE PEOPLES OF BASHKORTOSTAN Dictionary-reference book

The Bashkir yurt is set up for excursions in the Bashkir courtyard. The Bashkirs, like many nomadic peoples of Eurasia, spent about half of their lives in temporary dwellings, the oldest and most universal type of which was the lattice yurt (tirme), warm in cold weather, cool in hot weather. There are about 3.5 thousand Bashkirs in Saratov. The types of dwellings among the Bashkirs are more varied; the most common are log houses (wooden) and wattle and adobe (made of clay). The eastern Bashkirs had felt yurts (tirme) in their summer nomadic camps.

The yurt is, of course, an outstanding invention of ancient pastoralists - nomads. Because of its ease of transportation, stability in steppe winds and hurricanes, ability to retain heat in cold weather, coolness in hot weather, ability to quickly disassemble and assemble, etc. - it was an ideal home.

The traditional yurt as a dwelling among the Bashkirs has not survived today. It can be seen at the Bashkir folk festival “Sabantuy”, as well as in major museums of Bashkortostan.

The Bashkir yurt amazes with the variety of manufacturing methods, and the ornamentation of its furnishings competes with the beauty and brightness of the colors of nature. The portable, prefabricated yurt ideally corresponded to the basic principle of semi-nomadic life: I carry everything I own with me. To transport this relatively compact and light house, two or three camels or three to four horses are required. The picture of women assembling a yurt is similar to the picture of the creation of the world. First, a door is installed - a gate from one world to another. The threshold is like a boundary between the external world and the human world.

Rising to his full height in the yurt, the man remembered Allah, raised the dome of his house and made it a window into the sky. Nomadism is one of the most striking and unique phenomena in the history of world culture. The yurt can undoubtedly be considered one of the most important achievements of material culture. She went through a long evolutionary path before developing to her present form.

Adapted to local conditions, the nomadic yurt is seismically safe - due to the movable structure of the walls, cheap - due to the availability of “building” material, it has the ability to vary the size of the living area. The round shape of the walls eliminates pathogenic energy harmful to human health, characteristic of buildings with right angles; there is always clean air in it. These and many other properties of the yurt developed over two to three millennia.

Traditionally, the entrance is located on the south side of the yurt. The part of the home on the opposite side is considered the main part and is intended for guests. The constant place of the hearth is in the center of the yurt opposite the hole for the smoke to escape. In cases where the hearth is taken outside, a beautiful tablecloth is laid out in this place, which plays the role of a table. Saddle cloths, soft pillows or fabric bedding were scattered around her.

Sharshau has always been considered a very important element of a nomadic dwelling. This is a curtain made of thick fabric that divides the Bashkir yurt into two unequal parts:

1. female. According to the customs of the people, it is always smaller and is invariably located on the right side of the entrance. Items necessary for conducting household: kitchen utensils, food supplies, children's and women's clothing, etc.

2. male. The left side is larger and is always used as a living room. Colorful rugs, tablecloths, towels and bedding are hung throughout the room. The lattice walls are covered not only with patterned works, but also with the warrior’s equipment, decorated with national ornaments. Here you can see quivers for arrows, cases for gunpowder, a pouch for shot and horse harness.

The place of honor for guests – the uryn – is located opposite the entrance. There is also a carved wooden chest on a beautiful stand. The most valuable things are stored on it: carpets, rugs, blankets and pillows. They are carefully tied with a patterned ribbon with colored ornaments on a red or black background.

The emergence of permanent Bashkir settlements is mainly associated with the transition of the Bashkirs to a semi-sedentary and sedentary life. If in the northwestern agricultural regions most of the villages arose even before the union with the Russian state, then in the southern and eastern parts of Bashkiria, where even in the 18th-19th centuries. Semi-nomadic cattle breeding dominated, and permanent settlements appeared only two or three centuries ago. The first Bashkir villages, like nomadic auls, were located near water sources, along the banks of rivers and lakes, and retained a cumulus layout. Each village included one clan division and numbered no more than 25-30 households. In cases where several clan groups settled together, each of them retained territorial isolation; the border was a river, a ravine or a wasteland. In pastoral areas, when villages grew, part of the families or an entire clan subdivision was separated from the aul, forming a new settlement. Therefore, in the east and south, even in the 19th century. There were few large Bashkir villages. In the northern and western regions, high population density contributed to the growth of auls into large villages, numbering several hundred households.

In the 20s of the XIX century. For the convenience of managing the region, the tsarist administration began redevelopment of Bashkir villages according to the type of Russian villages. The provincial government drew up plans for the villages and assigned land surveyors. The reconstruction of villages according to the street type dragged on for several decades, and at the end of the 19th century. There were settlements, mainly in the east, with a random arrangement of estates. However, most Bashkir villages in late XIX- early 20th century consisted of one, or less often - two or three streets, separated by alleys along which one could go to the river or beyond the outskirts. In the center of the settlement stood a mosque - a rectangular wooden building with a cone-shaped dinar.

At the beginning of the 20th century. in the northern and western regions of Bashkiria, which were more influenced by capitalism, some consolidation of villages occurred. In the eastern part of Bashkiria, villages rarely numbered more than a hundred households; Only volost centers were relatively large here

At the turn of the XIX-XX centuries. among the Bashkirs one could find a wide variety of dwellings, ranging from felt yurts to log huts. This is explained by the complexity of the ethnic history of the people, the peculiarities of the economy in different areas, as well as the diversity of natural conditions. If in the settled northwestern regions at the turn of the 19th-20th centuries. the house was the only type of construction, then in the south and east, along with log, adobe or turf huts, there were various types of light nomadic dwellings.

The main type of summer housing among the Bashkirs of the steppe and foothill regions was a lattice yurt, or wagon, covered with felt and felts. (tirme). In the northeast, yurts of the Mongolian type, which are characterized by a cone-shaped top, were common; in the south and in the Dema basin - yurts of the Turkic type, with a hemispherical top. The entrance to the yurt was usually covered with a felt. There was an open fireplace in the center of the yurt; the smoke from the hearth came out through the open door and through a hole in the dome, from which the mat covering it was removed for the duration of the firebox. Curtain (sharshau) Along the line of the door, the wagon was divided into two parts: to the right of the door* on the women's half (sharshau ese), household utensils and products were placed; on the left, on the men's side (ishek yak) along the walls there were chests with property, felts were spread out next to them, pillows and blankets lay, weapons, saddles, harnesses, outerwear, patterned towels hung on the walls. Subsequently, the division of the tent into male and female halves lost its meaning, and the yurt began to be divided into “clean” and “household” parts. The Bashkir yurt, simple in design and internal structure, was easily disassembled and transported to another place.

At the end of the 19th century. in the steppe Bashkiria, many insolvent families lived in summer camps and in conical huts (tshg/bshg), the pole frame of which was covered with tree bark, leaves and felt, or in booths resembling a yurt (alasyt) made of wooden frames covered with bark. The internal structure of these dwellings was similar to a yurt.

The Bashkirs of the mountain-forest regions erected small log huts at their summer camps ( burama) with an earthen floor, no ceiling, and a gable roof made of bark. This dwelling had no windows and was lit through the door and the cracks between the poorly fitted logs of the walls. In log cabins, the hearth was located in one of the corners at the entrance; opposite the hearth, along the front and side walls, low log platforms were built, which were covered with grass and branches. Burams were not portable dwellings: the simple technology of their construction and the abundance of building materials allowed the Bashkirs to have such log houses at every summer camp.

Mostly wood was used in the construction of winter dwellings. In the Trans-Ural steppe regions and in the Dema plain, houses were built with wicker, adobe or stone walls. To cover the huts here, instead of planks, wood chips and bark - materials common in mountain forest areas - turf and straw were used.

Of the types of permanent dwellings in the past, all of Bashkiria was characterized by a small four-walled hut with a gable roof, two or three windows, without a special foundation, and with a floor raised to the second crown. Such a log hut, especially in forest areas, had much in common with the burama.

In the second half of the 19th century. Wealthy Bashkirs appeared in three-part dwellings (two huts separated by a vestibule) and two-room huts with vestibules the entire length of the log house and separate entrances to each room or with a transition from one room to another. The cultural influence of neighboring peoples, primarily the Tatars and Russians, played a significant role in the appearance of these dwellings.

Bashkir peasants in most cases built their own residential and outbuildings. But in the 19th century. Professional carpenters had already appeared who, moving from village to village, built large houses with carved platbands, friezes and pediments mainly for rich peasants. In the south and southeast of Bashkiria, all the peasants of an entire village were often engaged in carpentry. Employed by residents of surrounding villages, they built houses not only in Bashkir, but also in Russian, Tatar and other villages.

In the huts, to a certain extent, the furnishings of a yurt and, to an even greater extent, of a burama were repeated. The hut retained the hearth and bunks characteristic of a yurt and burama (kike, uryndyk), serving as a place for both dining and relaxation. As in burama, bunks were located along the side and front walls (in mountainous forest areas) or along one wall opposite the entrance. The hearth was usually built to the right of the door, at some distance from the walls. Back in the 19th century. in remote villages of the steppe south-eastern and mountain-forest regions, unique stove-fireplaces were common (syual) with a straight chimney and a high firebox. A small fireplace was built next to them (mustache) with a built-in boiler. In the north-west of Bashkiria and in the Trans-Urals, especially in the vicinity of Russian villages, at the beginning of the 20th century. Russian-type stoves were installed, which, however, were distinguished by a complex system of chimneys. A feature of the Bashkir stove was the combination of a heating shield (mayes) with a small fireplace, which used to be attached to the suval. At the beginning of the century, in some Bashkir villages, under the influence of the Russian population, Dutch brick ovens appeared. In two-room huts they were installed in the “clean half” - the room for receiving guests, while in the second room a stove with a boiler was installed.

The division of the premises into clean and utility parts, transferred from the nomadic dwelling, was also observed in the four-walled hut: the clean half of the house was separated by a long curtain extending from the stove. The decoration of the Bashkir huts was complemented by felts spread out on the bunks (in the south) or woven rugs (in the north), numerous pillows and blankets folded in the corner of the bunks, hanging on the walls and on a pole attached in one of the front corners, towels, clothes, and items of horse harness. Factory furniture was only available in wealthy families.

Differences in the economy also left their mark on the structure of Bashkir estates. At the beginning of the century, in the northern, agricultural regions, the estate was characterized by numerous outbuildings; They distinguished between a “clean” yard, where there was a house and a cage, a utility yard with premises for livestock, sheds, paddocks, and, finally, a vegetable garden in which there was a bathhouse. The few buildings in the Bashkir estate were located, as a rule, freely, at a considerable distance from one another. In the southeast and in the steppes near the Dema, where nomadic and semi-nomadic cattle breeding persisted for a long time, often the only structure other than a residential building was a barn with an open pen for livestock. It is no coincidence that in the Trans-Ural region, until recently, all outbuildings were called kerte- i.e. the same way as pens for cattle on migrations.

Already in the first decades after the October Revolution, especially after collectivization Agriculture, mass construction and improvement of Bashkir villages began. With the help of the state, with the assistance and support of collective farms, many Bashkir families erected spacious log houses instead of cramped, dilapidated huts. New public buildings appeared in the villages: schools, clubs, first aid stations, hospitals, collective farm economic and administrative buildings.

Particularly great changes have occurred in Bashkir villages in the last decade. The rise of all branches of agriculture, the improvement of the material well-being of the collective farm peasantry, and the increased cultural needs of the population were reflected in the rapid development of individual and social construction. In 1958 alone, about 24 thousand houses were built in the villages of Bashkiria. Currently, most villages have been renovated by more than half, some have been rebuilt almost from scratch. When rebuilding settlements, much attention is paid to their improvement; landscaping of streets, organization of water supply, electrification and radio installation.

Modern rural construction is characterized by the reconstruction of villages according to an architectural plan. Comprehensive planning of rural construction for entire administrative regions began. In 1960, the design organizations of the republic, as an experiment, drew up a long-term plan for the reconstruction of villages in the Karmaskalinsky district. Such plans provide for the maximum consolidation of settlements, a clear functional division of the village territory into production, residential and recreation areas, construction of buildings for cultural and public institutions, consumer service enterprises, organization of a network of public amenities.

Collective farm construction teams and inter-collective farm production construction organizations play a major role in the reconstruction of villages. Construction crews are constructing industrial buildings and helping collective farmers build houses. By the beginning of 1963, there were more than 20 thousand construction specialists in the collective farm brigades of Bashkiria. Inter-collective farm organizations, combining the resources and forces of adjacent collective farms, organize the production of building materials, the development of stone quarries, the preparation and delivery of lumber, and manage carpentry workshops.

Every year the number of huts made of adobe, wattle and clay decreases; There are almost no houses covered with straw, bark, or turf. Timber and brick buildings are the most typical for modern housing. Many collective farms in treeless areas widely use local building materials: clay, sand, limestone, stone, etc. The tasks of industrial enterprises and construction organizations include providing collective farmers with slate, tiles, and iron.

Along with the use of new building materials, architectural techniques are being improved and the internal layout of homes is changing. A modern Bashkir house is most often a fairly large five- to six-window log house, placed on wooden pedestals dug into the ground or a stone foundation; a gable or hip roof is covered with planks, slate or tiles. Cornices, pediments and window frames are decorated with carvings and paintings. Folk Bashkir craftsmen, relying on the rich traditions of architectural carving of Russians and other peoples, select the ornamental forms that are most in keeping with the spirit of the times, develop new techniques that satisfy the tastes of the collective farm peasantry and at the same time fully correspond to the pace of housing construction in the countryside.

In the interior layout, there is a noticeable desire for greater convenience in everyday life. Usually, the middle wall of a five-walled log house and plank partitions divide a Bashkir’s house into several rooms: an entrance hall, a kitchen, a bedroom, a living room, etc. Even in the treeless northwestern regions, where one-room huts still predominate, the room is divided by short curtains attached to matice. Particularly large changes in the internal layout of homes occurred in the northeast, where houses with four to five rooms appeared. In the first rooms from the entrance - the kitchen and the hallway - many features inherited from pre-revolutionary life are preserved: here there is a bulky stove with a stove and a boiler mounted on the side, next to it on a shelf (kashte) or household utensils and dishes are stored in a closet; small narrow bunks are built in the corner of the door. The remaining rooms are furnished in a city style. These rooms are heated with a small Dutch oven. The features of the new decoration of residential premises are closely intertwined with national traditions. National color is created by nailed to the mat or

embroidered curtains to the walls near the ceiling ( kashaea), canopy covering the bed, woven carpets or felt mats laid on the floor or on benches.

There have also been changes in the development of estates. True, the division of the yard into “clean” and economic parts continues to exist, and the traditional free arrangement of outbuildings on the estate is preserved. In the conditions of collective farming, there is no need for some buildings - stables, barns for storing agricultural implements, the area occupied by a vegetable garden is noticeably reduced, and economic services are located more compactly. The modern Bashkir estate is well landscaped.

The development of industry in the region after joining the Russian state, the construction of fortresses and factories, and the settlement of Bashkir lands by newcomers led to the emergence of large settlements: cities, trade and industrial centers. The first city on the territory of Bashkiria was Ufa, founded by the tsarist government in the second half of the 16th century. as a strategic post in the east of Russian possessions. Located in the center of the Bashkir lands, at the junction of land and waterways, Ufa from a small military-type fortress by the 18th century. turned into one of the transport, trade and administrative centers of the Urals. According to the 1897 census, there were about 50 thousand inhabitants in Ufa. Among them, the Bashkirs did not make up even one percent; they were represented mainly by Muslim clergy and merchants.

Pre-revolutionary Ufa was built up mainly with two-story wooden houses. The largest buildings were the stone houses of the Provincial Zemstvo Council, the Peasant Bank, numerous churches and mosques. Administrative offices and mansions of Russian, Tatar and Bashkir nobles and merchants were located in the city center. On the outskirts, along the slopes of the ravines, workers' shacks were built. Of the industrial enterprises, the most significant were the Gutman iron and copper foundry, steam locomotive and ship repair shops and two steam mills. Cultural institutions were represented only by secular and religious schools and a few libraries with a small collection of literature. There was no permanent theater in Ufa. Various clubs served as places of entertainment for representatives of “high society.”

The district towns of Sterlitamak, Birsk, and Belebey were even more remote. The author of the famous "Essays on the Life of Wild Bashkiria" N.V. Remezov, who visited the largest of the district centers of the region, Sterlitamak, at the end of the 19th century, wrote: "... in the district town of Sterlitamak, forever buried in the mud..., there were several streets with wooden buildings, a cathedral in the square, a government building there, a bazaar in the neighborhood and a stockade in the pasture.” At the beginning of the 20th century, several industrial enterprises were founded in Sterlitamak - two or three small mills, a sawmill, a tannery, which, however, did not change the appearance of the city.

By the 18th century - the birth of the mining industry in the Southern Urals - the appearance of the first workers' settlements. These were settlements of serf peasants assigned to industrial enterprises, mostly Russians. Factory villages were relatively small and differed little in appearance from the surrounding villages.

In the second half of the 19th century, after the abolition of serfdom, rows of squat barracks-barracks grew up next to the old-timers’ huts in workers’ settlements, capable of accommodating a large number of workers rushing from agriculture to industry. Unsanitary conditions due to large crowds of people, smoke and soot settling everywhere, and the dirt of unpaved streets determined the appearance of the factory settlements. At the beginning of the 20th century. At some of the largest factories (Beloretsk, Tirlyansk) medical centers and schools appeared. In most cases, in a factory village, the only place where workers could spend their few free hours was the tavern.

The development of the economy of Soviet Bashkiria caused rapid urban growth. The capital of the republic, Ufa, has turned into a large modern city with a population of 640 thousand people. Multi-storey comfortable buildings, wide asphalt streets immersed in greenery, squares, parks, public gardens, busy traffic - this is the appearance of today's Ufa. Ufa is home to the largest oil refineries and chemical plants, plywood and woodworking plants, light and food industry factories. Ufa is the scientific and cultural center of the republic. There are a university, medical, aviation, oil and agricultural institutes, numerous research institutions, opera and drama theaters, a philharmonic society, many libraries, art, local history and other museums, a republican radio committee, and a television center.

Great changes have also occurred in the appearance of other cities of the republic. Sterlitamak has become the center of the chemical industry of national importance. The cities of Birsk and Belebey became economically developed and more comfortable.

With the development of new industries, new socialist cities grew. The center of nonferrous ore mining was Sibay, the oil and oil refining industries were Ishimbay, Salavat, Tuymazy, Oktyabrsky, Neftekamsk, and the coal industry was Kumertau and Meleuz. The young cities of Bashkiria are distinguished by a single architectural style, simplicity of planning, livability. Another feature of them is the relocation of industrial enterprises outside the residential area, connecting the factory area with the city center by constant transport.

There are 34 urban-type settlements on the territory of the Bashkir Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic. They are built up with two- and three-story comfortable houses. In the villages there are cultural palaces, clubs, cinemas, shops, and canteens. All this characterizes new life workers of Bashkiria.

The peculiarities of the economy of various regions of the region, long-term and diverse cultural ties of the Bashkirs with other peoples left their mark on the nature of the clothing of their individual groups. The southeastern Bashkirs, who for a long time maintained a semi-nomadic cattle-breeding way of life, even in the last century widely used leather, skins and wool for sewing shoes, outerwear and hats; they were also familiar with making canvas from nettles and wild hemp. In the 18th century The southeastern Bashkirs sewed underwear mainly from Central Asian or Russian factory fabrics, which is explained by the establishment of trade relations with Central Asia, and after joining Russia - through Orenburg and Troitsk - with the internal markets of the empire. Bashkir population along the lower reaches of the river. Beloy, who early settled down, made clothes mainly from nettle and hemp canvas, and later from linen. Winter clothes and hats here were in most cases made from the fur of fur-bearing animals or the skins of domestic animals.

The national men's costume in the last century was the same for the entire Bashkir population. Underwear and at the same time outerwear were a tunic-like shirt with a turn-down collar and trousers with wide legs. A short sleeveless vest was worn over the shirt ( kamzul); When going out, they put on a wedged caftan ( pezaki) with a blind fastener and a stand-up collar or a long, almost straight robe made of dark fabric ( Elen, Bishmat). Nobles and ministers of religious worship wore robes made of colorful Central Asian silk. In the cold season, the Bashkirs wore spacious cloth robes ( Sackman), sheepskin coats ( dash toon) or sheepskin coats ( bille tun).

Skullcaps were the everyday headdress of men (tubetay). Elderly people wore skullcaps made of dark velvet, young people wore bright ones, embroidered with colored threads. In the cold season, felt hats or fur hats covered with fabric were worn over skullcaps. (burk, cache). In the southern, especially in the steppe, regions, warm fur malakhai were worn during snowstorms (tolashyn) with a small crown and a wide lobe that covered the back of the head and ears.

The most common footwear throughout the east of Bashkiria, as well as in the Chelyabinsk and Kurgan regions, were boots (saryk) with soft leather heads and soles and high cloth or canvas tops, tied at the knees with a cord. In the northern regions, the Bashkirs are almost all year round walked in bast shoes (Sabata), similar to Tatar ones. In the rest of the territory they wore homemade leather shoes (kata). Leather boots ( itek) were considered festive shoes. Elderly men from wealthy families wore soft boots ( sitek) with leather or rubber galoshes.

Women's clothing was more varied. It showed age and social differences and the characteristics of individual population groups more clearly. The underwear of the Bashkirs were dresses (kuldek) and bloomers (pants). In the 19th century Most women's dresses were cut off at the waist. with a wide skirt gathered at the waist and slightly tapered sleeves. Tunic-like dresses with straight sleeves, sewn-in gussets and side gussets, characteristic in the past not only of the Bashkirs, but also of many peoples of Eastern Europe, Siberia and Central Asia, were very rare. Many women decorated their dresses with ribbons and braids, sewing them in a semicircle near the chest slit. Married women wore a breastband under their dresses until they were very old ( tushelderek)- a rectangular flap with curved upper corners and straps sewn to them; the central part of the bib was decorated with ribbons, strips of multi-colored fabrics or a simple pattern made with a chain stitch. The dress was worn with short, fitted sleeveless vests (kamzul), trimmed along the edges of the sides and the floors with several rows of braid. (uka), coins and plaques. In the north of Bashkiria in the last century, a variegated or canvas apron became widespread ( alyapkys), lightly decorated with braided patterns or embroidery. In the beginning, the apron was work clothes. Later, in the northeastern regions, an apron embroidered with bright threads became an integral part of the festive costume.

Dark robes (elen - in the south, beshmet - in the north), slightly fitted at the waist and widened at the bottom, were worn every day. Braiding, tinsel, coins, openwork pendants, and beads were sewn onto festive velvet robes. Women from wealthy families decorated their clothes especially richly. Homespun robes were common in the northwestern regions (syba), similar to the Mari. Warm winter robes made of white homemade cloth were also decorated with coins and tinsel. (aka szh-man). Fur coats made of expensive fur - beaver, otter, marten, fox (bada tun, kama tun) worn by rich Bashkirs; the less wealthy made sheepskin coats. In poor families, not every woman even had sheepskin coats; Often, when leaving the house, they threw a woolen or down shawl over their shoulders or put on their husband's fur coat.

The most common headdress for women of all ages was a small cotton scarf. (yaulyk), tied under the chin at two adjacent corners. In the eastern and trans-Ural regions, young women wore a bright veil for a long time after their wedding. ("kushyaulik). It was sewn from two red factory scarves with a large white or yellow floral pattern; it was secured under the chin with a braid decorated with one or two rows of coins and pendants made of beads, corals, cloves, and coins. In these same areas, elderly women and old women wore a towel (2-3 m long) linen headdress ( tadtar) with embroidery at the ends, reminiscent of the headdresses of the Chuvash and Finnish-speaking peoples of the Volga region. In the north of Bashkiria, girls and young women wore small velvet caps under their headscarves ( kalpak), embroidered with beads, pearls, corals, and older women - quilted cotton spherical caps ( stupid). In the eastern and southern parts, married women wore high fur hats (t gama burk, ham-sat b^rk). In the southern half of Bashkiria, women's helmet-shaped caps (t gashmau), decorated with beads, corals and coins with a round neckline at the top and a long blade running down the back. In some areas of the Trans-Urals, high tower-shaped hats decorated with coins were worn over the kashmau. (caldpush).

The heavy headdresses of the southern Bashkirs went well with wide trapezoidal or oval-shaped bibs (kakal, sel-ter etc.), completely sewn up with rows of coins, corals, plaques and precious stones. Most northern Bashkirs did not know such decorations; Various types of coin necklaces were worn on the chest here. Bashkirs wove laces into their braids with openwork pendants or coins at the ends, and threads with corals strung on them; the girls attached a spade-shaped braid sewn with coral to the back of their heads ( elkelek).

Common women's jewelry were rings, rings, bracelets, and earrings. Expensive jewelry (bibs sewn with coins, corals, pearls, precious stones, headdresses, silver necklaces and openwork earrings) was worn mainly by rich Bashkirs. In poor families, jewelry was made from metal plaques, tokens, fake precious stones, pearls, etc.

Women's shoes differed little from men's. Women and girls wore leather shoes, boots, bast shoes, and shoes with canvas tops (saryk). The backs of women's canvas boots, unlike men's, are bright.

decorated with colored appliqué. Trans-Ural Bashkirs wore brightly embroidered high-heeled boots on holidays (kata).

Some changes in the costume of the Bashkirs occurred at the end of the 19th - beginning of the 20th centuries. and were associated mainly with the penetration of commodity-money relations into the Bashkir village. Under the influence of the Russian workers and urban population, the Bashkirs began to sew clothes from cotton and woolen fabrics and buy factory goods: shoes, hats, outerwear (mainly men's) clothing. The cut of women's dresses has become noticeably more complicated. However, for a long time, Bashkir clothing continued to retain traditional features.

The modern Bashkir collective farm peasantry does not wear homespun clothes. Women buy satin, chintz, staple, thick silk (satin, twill) for dresses; for men's and women's underwear - white linen, teak; Everyday sleeveless vests and jackets are made from dark cotton fabrics, while holiday ones are made from plush and velvet. However, traditionally cut clothing is already noticeably replacing ready-made factory-made dresses. The Bashkir population buys men's suits and shirts of urban cut, women's dresses, raincoats, coats, short coats, padded jackets, fur hats with earflaps, caps, shoes, galoshes, leather and rubber boots and other things. Knitted and cotton underwear became widespread.

Men's clothing has undergone especially great changes. The modern costume of middle-aged and young collective farmers in most regions of Bashkiria is almost no different from the urban one. It consists of a factory-cut shirt, trousers, jacket, shoes or boots, and in winter they wear coats, hats and felt boots. In some places, mainly in the northeast, among the Bashkirs of the Chelyabinsk and Kurgan regions, some traditions in clothing are still preserved: in holidays Here it is customary to wear a shirt embroidered along the collar and placket (a wedding gift from the bride to the groom), belted with a wide towel belt ( bilmau); The headdress of young people is still the embroidered skullcap. The clothing of older Bashkirs retains more traditional features. Many older men continue to wear sleeveless vests, caftans (kezeks), beshmets, and dark velvet skullcaps. Even in cases where an old man wears factory-made clothes, some features of its wearing are preserved: the shirt is worn untucked, the jacket is not buttoned, trousers are tucked into woolen socks, rubber galoshes are on the feet, a skullcap or felt hat is on the head, replacing the previous felt one.

Changes in women's clothing touched primarily on the costume of young people. Traditional clothing has been least preserved in the western regions of Bashkiria, where the costume of rural youth is almost no different from urban youth. Elderly women, although they use factory-made clothes, continue to wear old-fashioned dresses, velvet sleeveless vests, and in some cases, fitted robes decorated with braiding. There are much more traditional features in the costume of the Eastern Bashkirs, especially in the Kurgan and Chelyabinsk regions. A closed dress with a stand-up collar and slightly narrowed long sleeves, with a wide skirt decorated at the bottom with one or two frills or ribbons, and a velvet camisole sewn up along the edge with rows of galloon and coins - this is the usual costume of a Bashkir woman of these places. In some areas of the Trans-Urals, young women still wear head scarves (kushyauls).

Particularly durable national traditions are preserved in women's festive dresses. In the northeast of Bashkiria, for example, girls and young women sew festive dresses and aprons from shiny, brightly colored satin or black satin, embroidering the hem and sleeves with a large pattern with wool or silk threads. The outfit is complemented

Velvet caps worn slightly on one side, decorated with beads or bugles, small embroidered scarves, accordion-style white woolen stockings, shiny rubber galoshes. Often on holidays you can see ancient jewelry on women (massive bibs made of corals and coins, etc.) - However, traditional clothing, even in the eastern regions, is gradually being replaced by urban-type clothing; New styles appear, and considerations of convenience and expediency come to the forefront in choosing a suit.

In the cities, the traditional Bashkir costume has not been preserved. Only in some working-class villages in the Trans-Ural region do women continue to wear large scarves, embroidered aprons, and ancient jewelry. The vast majority of Bashkir workers - both men and women - dress in city suits, which they purchase in stores or order from sewing workshops. In winter, many women wear down (so-called Orenburg) scarves, which, by the way, are also readily bought by Russian women.

The Bashkirs, like other pastoral peoples, had a varied dairy and meat cuisine. Milk and dairy dishes occupied the main place in the diet of many families, especially in summer. The traditional meat dish of the southern Bashkirs was boiled horse meat or lamb cut into pieces with broth and noodles ( bishbarma, kuldama). Along with this dish, guests were served pieces of dried sausage (tga^bg), made from raw meat and fat. Along with meat and dairy foods, the Bashkirs have been preparing dishes from cereals for a long time. In the Trans-Urals and some southern regions, a stew was made from whole barley grains, a favorite dish of adults

and children were whole or crushed, roasted and roasted grains of barley, hemp and spelt ( kurmas, talkan). As agriculture developed, plant foods began to occupy an increasingly prominent place in the diet of the Bashkir population. In the northern and western regions, and later in the southern regions, flat cakes and bread began to be baked. Stews and porridges were made from barley and spelled grains, and noodles were made from wheat flour. (kalma). Flour dishes were considered delicious youasa, bauyrkak- pieces of unleavened wheat dough cooked in boiling fat. Under the influence of the Russian population, the Bashkirs of these areas began to bake pancakes and pies.

Until the 1920s, Bashkirs almost did not consume vegetables and vegetable dishes. Only potatoes at the beginning of the 20th century. took an important place in the diet of the northwestern Bashkirs.

The intoxicating drink of the Bashkirs of the northern and central regions was prepared with honey aces ball- a type of mash, and in the south and east - buzz-- vodka of barley, rye or wheat malt.

Despite the diversity national dishes, the bulk of the Bashkirs ate sparingly. Even on holidays, not every family had meat. The daily food of most Bashkirs was milk, edible wild plants, dishes made from cereals and flour. The Bashkirs experienced especially great difficulties in nutrition starting from the second half of the 19th century, when the cattle breeding economy fell into decay, and farming had not yet become a common occupation of the Bashkir population. During this period, most Bashkir families lived from hand to mouth almost all year round.

It was difficult for the Bashkirs who worked in mines, factories, and gold fields. Receiving rations from the administration or taking food on credit from a local shopkeeper, Bashkir workers ate very low quality food. At many enterprises, the administration gave the Bashkirs baked bread, but it was so bad that they were forced to exchange it with the Russian population, receiving a pound of Russian kalach for 5-10 pounds of “Bashkir” bread. Instead of the beef meat allotted by agreement, the Bashkirs were given heads, trimmings, etc.

Nowadays, dairy, meat and flour products still occupy the main place in the diet of every Bashkir family, both in the village and in the city. Heavy cream collected from baked milk is used as a seasoning for porridges, tea and stews. From sour cream (kaymak) churning butter (May). By fermenting milk, it is used to make cottage cheese (eremsek), spoiled milk (katyk) and other products. Reddish sweet curd mass dried over low heat (ezhekey) It is prepared for future use: it is often served with tea as a tasty dish. In the southern regions of Bashkiria, sour and salted cheese curds are prepared from sour milk (by prolonged boiling and squeezing the resulting mass) (king)] they are consumed fresh (yesh short) or, having dried, they are stored for the winter, then served with tea and stews. In the summer heat, Bashkirs drink sour milk diluted with water (airan, diren). Among the southern groups, a spicy thirst-quenching drink is kumiss, made from mare's milk. The favorite drink of Bashkirs is tea. Honey is served with tea as a sweet.

What’s new in the Bashkir diet is the even distribution of food across the seasons. If earlier in winter most families had a monotonous, half-starved table, now the Bashkir population eats a variety of foods all year round.

In all regions of Bashkiria, potatoes, cabbage, cucumbers, onions, carrots and other vegetables, as well as berries and fruits, occupy an important place in the diet. More diverse than steel flour products and cereal dishes. Indispensable food product is now baked bread. In rural stores and shops, Bashkirs buy cereals, sugar, candy, cookies, pasta, etc. Under the influence of Russian cuisine, the Bashkirs have new dishes: cabbage soup, soups, fried potatoes, pies, jam, pickled vegetables, mushrooms. Accordingly, traditional foods made from cereals (kurmas, talkan, kuzhe, etc.) and some flour and meat dishes. At the same time, such favorite Bashkir dishes as bishbarmak and salma are recognized by Russians and other peoples of the region. The stores sell katyk, korot, eremsek, ezhekey, prepared according to national recipes. These dishes are included in the regular menus of canteens and other catering establishments. Specialized farms and factories produce Bashkir kumiss for wide consumption, which has become the favorite drink of the entire population of the republic.

The diet of Bashkir families in cities and workers' settlements differs little from the diet of the rest of the population. Many people, especially young people, use factory and city canteens. Families prefer to eat at home, but every day housewives are more and more willing to use the services of home kitchens, stores that sell semi-finished products, and canteens that sell meals at home.

Bashkir cattle breeders widely used utensils made from the skins and skins of domestic animals. Leather vessels filled with kumiss, ayran or sour milk were taken on a long journey or to work in the forest and field. In huge leather bags ( kaba), with a capacity of several buckets, they prepared kumiss.

Wooden utensils were widespread in everyday life: ladles for pouring kumis ( Izhau), various sizes of bowls and cups (tobacco, ashtawi etc.), tubs (silzh, batman), wooden barrels used for storing and transporting honey, flour and grain (tepeng) for water, kumiss, etc.

Only wealthy families had teapots and samovars. Several poor Bashkir families often used one cast-iron cauldron embedded in the stove for cooking. (a^an).

At the beginning of the 20th century. purchased metal, ceramic and glassware appeared in Bashkir households. Due to the decline of cattle breeding, the Bashkirs stopped making leather utensils. New utensils began to replace wooden ones. Dugout tubs and bowls served mainly for storing food.

Nowadays, Bashkirs everywhere use enamel and aluminum pans, mugs and teapots, and cast iron frying pans for cooking. Tea and tableware, porcelain, glasses, glass vases, metal spoons and forks appeared. Urban utensils became firmly established in the life of Bashkir collective farmers. However, in villages, housewives still prefer to store dairy products in wooden containers. Kumis is also prepared in wooden tubs equipped with wooden beaters. In cities and workers' settlements, Bashkirs use exclusively factory-made dishes.

FAMILY AND SOCIAL LIFE

The social life of the Bashkirs on the eve of the October Revolution was characterized by a peculiar and complex interweaving of feudal, capitalist relations that had begun to develop, and still strong remnants of the patriarchal urban system. The noticeable role of patriarchal-tribal traditions in the social life of the Bashkirs was explained, on the one hand, by the structure of their economy, and on the other, by the influence of the national-colonial policy of tsarism, which, in order to strengthen its dominance, sought to preserve the surviving forms of the socio-economic system of the oppressed peoples. Semi-nomadic cattle breeding, which survived in certain areas, was no longer dictated by economic necessity. However, patriarchal-feudal social relations associated with the nomadic pastoral form of economy and the traditions of the clan system were destroyed slowly.

The relative stability of patriarchal-tribal traditions was determined by the peculiarities of land relations in Bashkiria. With the annexation to the Russian state, the Bashkir tribes and clans (volosts - according to Russian sources) received royal charters for ownership of land estates. Usually, the territories they had long occupied were given over to the common possession of members of the clan. Already in the 17th century, and in the western part of Bashkiria much earlier, the fragmentation of communal estates between villages or groups of villages began. However, this process was slowed down both by the tsarist administration, which sought to preserve the volosts as tax-paying units, and by the Bashkir feudal lords, who owned hundreds and thousands of heads of livestock and were therefore interested in maintaining the appearance of common clan land ownership. In the XVII-XVIII centuries. the herds of some Bashkir elders numbered up to 4 thousand heads of livestock. At the same time, the number of farms that did not have livestock grew rapidly. IN early XIX c. almost half of the farms in the northwestern regions of Bashkiria were horseless. With such a sharp property differentiation of Bashkir households, communal land ownership actually turned into a legal fiction that covered up the feudal usurpation of communal lands.

Began in the 17th century. the process of fragmentation of ancestral land estates continued in the 18th and 19th centuries. Formally, common volost (general clan) land ownership in a number of Bashkir regions remained until the middle of the 19th century, but in fact the land was divided between villages. The division of land between villages was gradually consolidated legally: separate charters or acts of boundary commissions were issued for land ownership. Bashkir village in the 19th century. In essence, it was a territorial community in which, along with maintaining common ownership of part of the land (pasture, forest, etc.), there was a division (according to the number of souls) of arable land and hayfields.

The penetration of capitalist relations into the Bashkir village in different areas occurred unevenly. In the western agricultural regions this process proceeded relatively quickly. Huge areas of communal land gradually became the property of rich farms. The dispossession of the bulk of the peasants and the enrichment of the kulaks especially intensified at the beginning of the 20th century. According to 1905 data, in three districts of the western part of Bashkiria, rich kulak farms, accounting for over 13% of all farms, concentrated in their hands about half of all communal lands; at the same time, more than 20% of peasant households had plots of less than 6 acres per household. The ruined Bashkirs were forced to go into bondage to the landowner or to their rich relative. The kulak elite in a Bashkir village usually consisted of representatives of secular and spiritual authorities: elders, elders, mullahs. In exploiting ordinary community members, they widely used forms of feudal oppression, covered by remnants of tribal relations (helping rich relatives for food, various types of labor, etc.). By the beginning of the 20th century. In the west of Bashkiria, capitalist forms of exploitation became widespread. In the eastern regions, feudal forms of exploitation, veiled by the traditions of patriarchal-tribal relations, persisted much longer.

One of the main features of the patriarchal-clan way of life of the Eastern Bashkirs were clan divisions (ara, aimag), which united a group of related families (on average 15-25) - descendants of one common ancestor by male line. The great importance of clan divisions in social relations was determined to a large extent by the fact that for many centuries, in some places until the end of the 19th century, the custom of members of the Ara (aimak) going out together to travel together was preserved. Pastures, which were formally in the common possession of the clan, were gradually assigned to clan divisions due to long-standing traditions. The clan division, like the clan, did not have firmly defined boundaries of its land territories, but each ara and each aimak for many decades from year to year roamed along the traditional route, grazing livestock on the same pastures, thereby realizing their ownership of part of the ancestral lands. Bashkir feudal lords used these traditions to usurp land property. In the XVII-XVIII centuries. large feudal lords created pastoral-nomadic groups, while maintaining the appearance of clan divisions. The herding-nomadic group included not only the ruined relatives of the feudal lord, but also the farm laborers who served on his farm (yals) from other Bashkir families. These groups roamed with the feudal lord's cattle on their ancestral lands.

The emergence and development of pastoral nomadic groups meant the further disintegration of clans and the strengthening of territorial ties. From the second half of the 19th century. migration by the clan unit gradually became rare due to the sharp decrease in the number of livestock. The Bashkirs of one village, who had livestock, regardless of whether they belonged to an ara or an aimak, united into one pastoral nomadic group. Usually it was a rich cattle owner and his sauna workers, who continued to roam the communal lands.

With the development of agriculture in the eastern regions of Bashkiria, as well as in the western, there is a gradual fragmentation of ancestral land estates between villages - rural communities. Arable and hay lands are distributed among the community members according to the number of souls. Part of the so-called free land remained in the common use of the communities. Despite the emerging new land relations, patriarchal clan traditions still had a strong impact on the social life of the Eastern Bashkirs. Huge areas of land, especially the “free lands” of the community, continued to be controlled by the feudal elite. Working Bashkirs, who had neither livestock to cultivate the land nor farming skills, were forced to rent out their plots of land. In fact, leasing land for a long period was tantamount to alienation. The Bashkir peasant, having given his allotment for rent or lost it altogether, often went to work as a farm laborer for his own tenant - a rich community member or a Russian kulak.

Thus, the developing capitalist relations that captured Bashkiria in the post-reform period, destroying the semi-nomadic cattle-breeding economy of the eastern Bashkirs and strengthening social differentiation in the Bashkir village, weakly affected the centuries-old

patriarchal-feudal forms of exploitation. Capitalist relations, intertwined with pre-capitalist ones, appeared in Bashkiria in a primitive and therefore most painful form for the working people. A reactionary role in the social life of the Bashkirs was played by the patriarchal-tribal ideology, remnants of tribal life, the illusion of the “commonality” of interests of the members of the clan, which obscured the class consciousness of the working people and slowed down the growth of the class struggle.

The victory of the October Revolution and the establishment of the dictatorship of the proletariat created the political prerequisites for the formation of socialist public relations. The revolution forever swept away the national-colonial oppression of tsarism, thereby eliminating the legal inequality of the oppressed peoples of Russia. The working Bashkirs had to go through a difficult path to achieve complete and actual equality: it was necessary to eliminate centuries-old economic and cultural backwardness. These difficulties were successfully overcome in a historically short period of time on the basis of the Leninist national policy of the Communist Party, thanks to the enormous practical assistance of the Soviet government and the Russian people in the cause of socialist industrialization, collectivization of agriculture, and development of the culture of the republic.

The creation of socialist industry in Bashkiria and the reconstruction of agriculture radically changed the social structure of Bashkir society and the nature of social relations. The bulk of the rural population of the republic is the collective farm peasantry, including the Bashkir peasantry. As a result of industrialization, a new working class was formed in Bashkiria; Tens of thousands of workers from the indigenous population came to industry. The national intelligentsia has grown; The size of the Bashkir population in cities increased noticeably.

In the process of building socialism, the working Bashkirs developed and firmly established such spiritual traits as a communist attitude towards work and public property, a sense of friendship with all peoples, and devotion to the cause of socialism, which are common to all Soviet socialist nations.

The dominant form of family among the Bashkirs in the 19th century.

there was a small family. At the same time, at the end of the century, among the eastern groups of the Bashkir population there were many undivided families in which married sons lived with their father. As a rule, these were wealthy families, connected, in addition to ties of blood relationship, by common economic interests.

The vast majority of Bashkir families were monogamous. Mostly bais and clergy had two or three wives; men from less wealthy families remarried only if the first wife turned out to be childless or became seriously ill and could not work on the farm.

The head of the family was the father. He managed the family property, his word was decisive not only in all economic matters, but also in determining the fate of children, family customs and rituals.

The situation of older and younger women was different. The older woman enjoyed great honor and respect. She was involved in all family affairs and managed household chores. With the arrival of the daughter-in-law at home (dusty) the mother-in-law was completely freed from all housework, and a young woman was now doing them. Under the strict supervision of her mother-in-law, the daughter-in-law worked in her husband’s house from early morning until late evening, performing a variety of duties: cooking, cleaning the home, processing household raw materials and sewing clothes, caring for cattle, milking mares and cows. In many regions of Bashkiria

even at the beginning of the 20th century. there were customs that were humiliating for women, according to which the daughter-in-law covered her face from her father-in-law, mother-in-law and her husband’s older brothers, could not talk to them, was obliged to serve during the meal, but she herself had no right to take part in it. Underage girls felt somewhat freer in the family.

The degraded position of women was sanctified by religion. According to her dogmas, the husband was the rightful master in the house. A Bashkir woman had to patiently endure all manifestations of her husband’s dissatisfaction, insults, and beatings. True, the property and cattle, which the woman brought into her husband’s house as a dowry and the right to which remained with her in the future, ensured her some independence. In case of ill-treatment and frequent beatings, the wife had the right to demand a divorce and leave her husband, taking her property. But in reality, women almost never used this right, since customs actually legalized and sanctified by religion protected the interests of men: if the husband refused to let his wife go, the latter’s relatives were obliged to give a ransom for her in the amount of the bride price received for her, otherwise the woman, even becoming free, could not remarry. In addition, the husband had the right to keep the children.

The family customs and rituals of the Bashkirs reflected various stages of their socio-economic history, as well as ancient and Muslim religious prohibitions. Remnants of exogamous customs persisted among the Bashkirs until the October Revolution. With the disintegration of the tribal organization, the marriage ban applied only to members of the tribal unit; at the end of the 19th - beginning of the 20th century. marriage could also take place within a clan division, but only with relatives no closer than the fifth or sixth generation. The marriageable age for girls was considered to be 14-15 years, for boys - 16-17 years. Sometimes, especially in the southeast, children were betrothed while still in the cradle. When announcing their children as future spouses, the parents agreed on the size of the dowry and drank as a sign of the agreement. basha- honey or kumiss diluted with water. In the second half of the 19th - early 20th centuries, when class relations in Bashkir society became especially aggravated, often the only consideration when concluding a marriage was material calculation. The feelings of young people, especially girls, were taken into account little. Often a teenage girl was married to an old man. The custom of levirate, which disappeared from the life of the Bashkirs only at the beginning of our century, placed a humiliating and heavy burden on the woman.

The wedding cycle among the Bashkirs consisted of matchmaking, a wedding ceremony and a wedding feast. Having decided to marry his son, the father sent the chosen girl to his parents as a matchmaker (ko?a, dimsho) the most respected relative or went to woo himself. Having received the consent of the girl’s parents, the matchmaker negotiated with them about wedding expenses, bride price, and dowry. The size of the dowry varied depending on the wealth of related families. The dowry was supposed to include a certain amount of livestock, money, items of clothing - gifts for the future father-in-law and mother-in-law. Rich families gave a large dowry: horses, cows, sheep, poultry, bedding, curtains, felts and carpets, clothes. In addition, the girl prepared gifts for the groom and his relatives. The value of the dowry was to be equal to the bride price. After the agreement, mutual visits to close relatives began, the so-called matchmaking feasts, in which many men and women of the village participated. In the east of Bashkiria, only men took part in them.

After paying most of the dowry, the wedding ceremony was scheduled. On the agreed day, the father, mother and relatives of the bride came to the groom’s village. The father and his close relatives received the guests. Celebration ( Ishchan Kabul, Kalin) lasted several days. Religious rite nikkah took place in the bride's house, where all relatives and guests gathered. The mullah read a prayer and declared the young man and girl husband and wife. The act of marriage ended with a meal. From that time on, the man received the right to visit the girl.

wedding (tui) celebrated after full payment of the bride price in the house of the girl’s parents. On the appointed day, the bride's relatives and neighbors gathered, and the groom arrived, accompanied by relatives. The wedding lasted three days. On the first day, the bride's parents hosted the treat. On the second day, the groom's relatives provided food. Wrestling competitions, horse racing, and all kinds of games were attended by the broad masses of the population who flocked to the wedding from nearby villages.

On the third day of the festival, the young woman left her parents' house. Her departure was accompanied by the performance of ritual songs and traditional lamentations (setsleu,). The young woman, dressed in a wedding dress, the main accessory of which was a large veil that hid her figure, accompanied by her friends, went around the houses of her relatives, leaving each of them a gift. This gift, given only for the sake of observing custom, sometimes in itself was of no value. So, along with scarves and towels, the young woman gave some of her relatives small scraps of fabric or a few woolen threads. She was given cattle, poultry, and money. Then the young woman said goodbye to her parents. Her friends, older brother or maternal uncle, seated her on a cart, "saw her off to the outskirts of the village. At the head of the wedding train were the husband's relatives. Until the end of the journey, only the matchmaker accompanied the young woman from close relatives. Entering her husband's house, the young woman fell to her knees three times in front of father-in-law and mother-in-law, then gave gifts to everyone present. The ceremony of joining the husband’s family ended the next day, when the young woman went along the water to the local source, her husband’s niece or younger sister showed her the way. Before collecting water, the woman threw a silver coin into the stream. For a long time, until the birth of one or two children, the daughter-in-law was obliged to avoid her mother-in-law and especially her father-in-law, not show her face to them, and could not talk to them.

In addition to matchmaking, there were, although rarely, cases of girls being kidnapped. Sometimes a girl was kidnapped, especially in poor families, with the consent of the parents, who in this way sought to avoid wedding expenses.

Of all family rituals Bashkirs, only those that were associated with marriage were furnished with a magnificent ceremony. The birth of a child was celebrated much more modestly. The funeral was also neither particularly solemn nor crowded.

During the birth, all family members left the hut. Only the invited midwife remained with the woman in labor. During difficult births, the woman was forced to walk or, with her stomach tightly tied, she was slightly turned from side to side. They often performed magical actions: to scare away an evil spirit, they shot from a gun, dragged a woman over a dried, stretched wolf's lip, and scratched a mink along her back with a mink paw. After a successful birth, mother and baby were visited by relatives and neighbors for several days. Three days later, the child’s father held a naming celebration. Guests gathered, the mullah and muezzin came. After reading the prayer, the mullah pronounced the name chosen by the father three times over the child’s ear. This was followed by a treat with the obligatory drinking of kumiss and tea.

The funeral rite was closely related to the dominant religion and differed little from the funerals of other Muslim peoples. After washing, the deceased was wrapped in a shroud and carried on a popular stretcher to the cemetery. Only men took part in the funeral procession. The body of the deceased was placed on his back in a niche dug in the southern wall of the grave, with his head to the east and his face turned to the south. The niche was covered with bark or boards and the grave was filled up. A stone slab or wooden pillar was placed on the burial mound. Sometimes they lined the grave with stones. In the northern and central forest regions, houses, or rather roofs on a squat base, were built over the grave from thin logs. On the 3rd, 7th and 40th days, funeral services were held, to which only close relatives were invited; those gathered were treated to thin flatbreads ( yame) and bishbarmak.

Magic spells, used in everyday life, agricultural activities, family life, etc., occupied a significant place among the Bashkirs. By the beginning of the 20th century. Of all types of magic, healing has been preserved the most. In the minds of the Bashkirs, illness was associated with the possession of an evil spirit in a person (or animal). Therefore, the goal of any treatment was to expel it. For preventive purposes, and sometimes for healing, they wore various amulets and amulets (betheu). These were either sayings from the Koran sewn into pieces of leather or birch bark, or, as already mentioned, the bones and teeth of some animals. Cowrie shells sewn onto the headdress, coins, goose down were considered a remedy for the evil eye. Sometimes the disease was “banished” by a kind of witchcraft trick. The sick person went to the place where, in his opinion, the disease overtook him, and in order to distract the evil spirit, he threw some clothes on the ground or put a bowl of porridge. After that, he hurried to run away to the village by another route and hide, “so that the returning illness could not find him.” The Bashkirs also used imitative magic, “transferring” a disease from a person to a rag doll. In some cases, exorcism specialists were invited to “extract” the disease from the patient’s body. (ku,re?d); Quite often, fire produced by friction against wood was used as a cleansing agent during epidemics and epizootics.

Healing magic was usually based on proven remedies traditional medicine. The Bashkirs knew the healing properties of herbs and used them skillfully. For example, in case of fever, the patient was given an infusion of aspen bark or a decoction of wormwood. A poultice of brewed aspen leaf was applied to the tumors. A decoction of thyme and oregano served as a diaphoretic. The use of medicines in most cases was supplemented by magical techniques. Thus, a person with scurvy had to eat winter greens for several days, going for it early at dawn and crawling the road from home to the field.

Pre-Islamic beliefs and magic spells closely intertwined with Muslim ideology. Very often the local mullah acted as the “healer”. Together with sayings from the Koran and whispers, he performed various magical effects. In many cases, the mullah organized sacrifices (on the occasion of drought, during the death of livestock, etc.), which retained a largely pagan coloring.

Thus, just a few decades ago, the family life of the Bashkirs retained many patriarchal features, closely intertwined with Islamic and pre-Islamic religious ideas.

The major transformations that took place in the life of the oppressed peoples after the October Revolution caused fundamental changes not only in social, but also in family relations of the Bashkirs. Modern Bashkir women, along with men, actively participate in public life and production, work on collective and state farm fields, factories and plants, in oil fields. Many women successfully manage teams, farms, collective farms, and head industrial enterprises, workshops and departments. Women's earnings often make up a significant part of the family budget. Illiterate in the past, Bashkir women widely enjoy the right to education. Many of them, after finishing school, continue their studies in secondary specialized and higher educational institutions. Among specialists with higher education - engineers, doctors, teachers, agronomists - there are many Bashkirs.

The involvement of women in industrial and social life has significantly changed family relationships. Family relationships in a modern Bashkir family are built on complete equality, mutual love and respect. All adult family members take an active part in solving household and other matters; Issues of marriage are often resolved by young people on their own.

The marriage age of young people has changed. In order to protect health, in the very first years after the revolution, a law was passed prohibiting marriage before reaching adulthood. Gradually the law turned into a living norm. Now young people very rarely get married before the age of 18. When entering into marriages, considerations of material gain disappeared; The decisive factor was the mutual attraction of young people. Exogamous prohibitions currently apply only to a narrow circle of relatives. Marriages within the village are common. In the process of disappearing religious and national prejudices, the number of mixed marriages is increasing: Bashkir youth are increasingly entering into marriage relationships with Russians, Ukrainians, Tatars, Kazakhs, and Chuvashs.

Traditional wedding rituals have become significantly simplified in Bashkir villages. The custom of paying kalym has disappeared; The nikah ritual is very rarely performed; the duration of the wedding ritual, which in the past was extended until the final payment of the bride price, has been reduced; the number of ceremonies preceding the wedding has decreased. The entire wedding celebration lasts several days, while they mainly adhere to the customs that were characteristic in the past for the main wedding celebration - thuja: treating relatives and guests, dancing and games, exchanging gifts between the relatives of the bride and groom and, finally, seeing off the girl with the performance of some traditional customs (such as, for example, the newlywed visiting all relatives before leaving and giving them gifts, singing farewell songs, etc.).

In recent years, Komsomol weddings have often been held at industrial enterprises and collective farms ( ktsyl tui). Fellow workers take an active part in their organization. The guests of honor at Komsomol weddings are representatives of the local party organization and the Soviet public. At such weddings, traditionally, wrestling and runner competitions, horse racing, games, and dances are organized. A wedding turns into a celebration for the whole team. An important place, along with the performance of the traditional ritual, is occupied by the civil registration of marriage in the city registry office or in the village council, sometimes very solemnly furnished.

In the cities of Bashkiria, even the appearance of many traditional wedding rituals has not been preserved. Young people strive to formalize their marriage in the solemn atmosphere of wedding palaces opened in major cities of the republic. Not only relatives are invited to the wedding, but also work comrades and friends, people of different nationalities. At these weddings, some traditional ceremonies are sometimes performed in a humorous manner, the original meaning of which is usually unknown to young people.

There were changes in other family rituals as well. After giving birth, the young mother and newborn are visited by relatives and friends and given gifts. The birth of a child is a family celebration to which relatives and friends are invited.

The radical changes that took place during the years of Soviet power in the field of health care largely displaced healing magic and witchcraft from the family life of the Bashkirs. Hospitals and pharmacies are now available in all cities, regional centers, and in many villages and workers' settlements. Medical centers have been established in small villages. Trachoma and tuberculosis are no longer widespread diseases. The number of doctors has increased significantly. Now there is one doctor for about a thousand people, whereas before the revolution in areas with a Bashkir population, one medical worker served up to 70 thousand residents.

Not only Bashkir youth, but also people of the older generation seek medical help. Elderly Bashkirs, who previously invited healers when they became ill or, at best, were treated with traditional medicine, now go to an outpatient clinic, use various medications, and agree to complex surgical operations.

Women-mothers and children are surrounded by great care. In the republic, antenatal clinics, maternity hospitals (or departments at hospitals), and obstetric centers are open. If a woman gives birth at home, she will be assisted by a nurse-midwife. As a result, child mortality at birth is close to zero. Doctors and nurses from children's clinics or local medical centers help Bashkir mothers raise their children correctly. Women working in enterprises and collective farms usually use the services of child care institutions. In many villages, seasonal or permanent nurseries and kindergartens have been created using collective farm funds. In the summer, many children relax in pioneer camps and children's health resorts.

The creation of local cadres of doctors helped to implement measures to organize healthcare. In 1914, among the doctors of the Ufa province. there were only two Bashkirs. Now the medical schools of the republic, the Bashkir Medical Institute, annually graduate hundreds of doctors and medical workers, including many Bashkirs. Many Bashkir doctors were awarded the honorary title of Honored Doctor of the RSFSR or the Bashkir Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic. These are well-known in the republic professor A. G. Kadyrov, doctor G. Kh. Kudoyarov and others.