What does a music critic create? Sergey Sosedov, music critic: biography, personal life

19.04.2019

That is, analysis, assessment and judgment about the phenomena of any area of human activity, usually in the field of culture.

Childhood and youth

Music critic Sergei Sosedov was born in Moscow. Was born future star May 23, 1968. His father was an employee of the capital's metro, and his mother was an engineer by training, his brother works in hardware store. Along with secondary school He also attended a music school, where he learned to play the piano.

Seryozha studied well. On parent meetings mother and father felt only pride for their son. But relationships with classmates did not work out. Sergei noticed that they openly mocked him, because he was not like everyone else.

In one interview, Sosedov told how at school teachers set him as an example. The talented boy was allowed a lot, because he worked hard. Sometimes I took an extra day to rest, because I didn’t have the strength from the crazy amount of tasks. Coming to class, Sosedov was always prepared. He was interested in acquiring new knowledge.

After graduating, he immediately began working as a courier for a newspaper. Young Seryozha wrote excellent essays, which determined his future path and led him to journalism. It was in "Gudok" that he received his first experience.

The dream of becoming an announcer and the first success in the newspaper

But Sergei Sosedov dreamed of becoming an announcer. He still talks with delight about Soviet television, admiring the “polished” quality of the material that was broadcast. But it was not meant to be. His personality is too flamboyant for a news anchor who is required to keep a low profile. After the newscasting job didn’t work out, the aspiring journalist goes to work as a courier for a newspaper.

Later, the future music critic Sergei Sosedov begins to attend history classes musical genre. Thanks to these two interests, he publishes an interview with Edita Piekha in the newspaper. The singer, having read it, expressed her delight in the form of personal gratitude.

Start of journalistic activity

Sergei Vasilyevich became a professional journalist after graduating from Moscow University. While studying, he interned at " Rossiyskaya newspaper", which gave knowledge about the intricacies of this craft. The result was not long in coming; in 1996 he received a diploma with honors.

Sergey Vasilyevich Sosedov managed to work in many Russian publications: “Relax”, “AiF”, “Seven Days”, “Artist” and others. He mainly wrote articles on the topics of medicine, aviation, travel, show business, but he considered music criticism to be the most important.

Neighbors in Ukraine

In 2010, music critic Sergei Sosedov sat on the jury of the Ukrainian vocal show. His extraordinary personality immediately attracted the attention of many television viewers. The judge fell in love with the public, because his endless competence in the musical field cannot but fascinate. “The X Factor” and Sergei Sosedov have become synonymous for Ukrainian viewers.

The phenomenon of his nature is that positive comments are taken seriously and become an elixir for the participants, while negative ones do not hurt. How does he do this? Probably because he looks at everything through the prism of art.

Subtle nature

Despite his popularity, he is friends with everyone who is friends with him. One of his friends is a concierge who works in one of the Kyiv houses where Sosedov lived for some time. He even had a ritual: wherever he went, he went to Galina Ivanovna to report. A simple woman was flattered by such an attitude star person. But she also did not remain in debt, sometimes spoiling him with pies and other goodies. This man became the second family of Sergei Sosedov.

He says that one day he calls him and asks: “How are you fed on the set? It seems to me that you are malnourished. Maybe I’ll come to you and cook for two days? How is your apartment? Is it clean?” Such words moved Sergei to tears.

After all, the famous journalist admitted that dear mother- the only person who is waiting for him. Sergei's father died several years ago. Dad was very proud of his son’s achievements and supported him in all his endeavors. His departure was a great loss, because his mother and brother are reserved about the success of the music critic.

The origins of the loneliness of a talented journalist

Sergei understood that he was not interested in being with his peers. While they were walking, he preferred books. Only his family could accept the guy for who he is. Sergei Sosedov had a sacred attitude towards his parents, he was a home boy, and since the fifth grade he practically did not walk on the street. Apparently he found a huge, exciting world inside himself, and life around him ceased to interest him.

Then the talented young man did not think that he was putting his own happiness on the line. My personal life didn’t work out either. Sergei Sosedov admits that loneliness is a difficult condition, but he is used to it.

Unfortunately, popularity, recognition and even the love of fans cannot help in this sensitive issue. They were not close with their brother Vladimir either. Even as adults, family members do not communicate often. Mom is surprised at how different her children are. The eldest was always the soul of the courtyard, he loved to play football. One day, Vladimir forced Sergei to play hockey. 10 minutes later he broke his lip, and that was the end of the younger Sosedov’s sporting activities.

The main topic for discussion by journalists and the public is undoubtedly personal life. Sergei Sosedov is used to the fact that those around him can interpret all his actions and inactions in their own way. Many try to attribute to him novels with every man on whom the admiring glance of the extraordinary showman was cast. The journalist himself reduces all guesses to nothing.

He did not hide his sympathy for the participants of the X Factor and Roman Veremeychik, because there is nothing shameful in this. He was credited with having affairs with some representatives of show business, to which he replied: “I have many friends, men and boys. Yes, why not?!” However, the famous journalist does not deny that he does not see himself in marriage with a woman, because it is routine, and he is a bird of free flight, a loner.

His admiration for Roman Veremeychik at one time made the country sit with its mouth open. He expressed a lot of wonderful words addressed to this participant, openly admitted that he was breathing unevenly towards him. Everyone got the idea that Roma was his boyfriend. Sergei Sosedov himself provoked these rumors, because he is not ashamed of his homosexuality, unlike Roma, who was clearly shocked by this situation.

Sergey Sosedov in 2017

Now music critic Sergei Sosedov appears as an expert in the TV shows “Live”, “The Stars Aligned” and “Meeting Place”.

Unfortunately, the showman does not blog, he does not have accounts in in social networks, so you can only learn about news from the life of a star from interviews.

One thing is clear that the personality of Sergei Vasilyevich Sosedov cannot leave anyone indifferent. They either hate him fiercely, or they love him to death and are ready to give him everything.

He does not strive for luxury. Sergei admits that he would like to buy a music center, but the living space does not allow it. His apartment in Moscow is very small. The journalist had to recycle an archive of newspapers with personal publications.

He laughs at questions about his image. After all, he didn’t hone any nuances, all this was given by nature, he was born that way. Sergei Vasilyevich Sosedov paid a lot of attention to his journalistic style, and the unique timbre of his voice and modulation only complemented this image and became his calling card.

Many people admire Sergei Sosedov. The biography of this person cannot leave anyone indifferent; it is non-trivial. But there are viewers who don't take him seriously. This is due to excessive femininity, manner of speaking and extravagance. famous showman. He is not shy about extraordinaryness and considers it his highlight. They make fun of him, but in their hearts they agree with every word.

All writing people are divided into two categories. The first includes the creators literary works. To the second - those who devote these works critical articles. There is also a third category, which includes people who do not know how to write, but have great respect for this creative process. But today’s article is not about them. We have to figure out what criticism is. What is it for? What is the job of a literary critic?

Definition

What's happened literary criticism? It is impossible to answer this question in a few words. It is a rich, varied concept. Writers and scientists have repeatedly tried to define literary criticism, but each of them has come up with their own, author’s own definition. Let's consider the origin of the word.

What is "criticism"? This is a word of Latin origin that translates as "judgment". The Romans borrowed it from the Hellenes. In ancient Greek there is a word κρίνω, meaning “to judge”, “to pass judgment”. Giving general definition criticism, it is worth saying that it can be not only literary, but also musical. In every field of art there are people who create works and those who analyze and evaluate them.

There are professions such as restaurant critic, theater critic, film critic, art critic, photo critic and so on. Representatives of these specialties are by no means idle observers and idle talkers. Not everyone knows how to analyze and dissect a work, be it literature, painting or cinema. This requires certain knowledge and skills.

Musical critic

This profession arose not so long ago - just in the 19th century. Of course, even before this there were people who talked about music and devoted their notes to this topic. But only with the advent of periodicals did specialists appear who could already be called music critics. They wrote treatises no longer on general humanitarian issues. philosophical topics, mentioning from time to time the work of one or another composer. They occupied a hitherto empty niche.

What is criticism piece of music? This is an analysis and assessment based on deep knowledge and experience. This is a specialty that is acquired at higher education educational institution. To become a critic in this field, you must first graduate music school, then a specialized school, then enter a university, for example, the Tchaikovsky Conservatory at the Faculty of History and Theory. As you can see, acquiring this profession is not easy.

The emergence of criticism

The foundations of this science originated in Ancient Greece. In antiquity, of course, there were no theorists who zealously controlled literary process. Athenian citizens did not gather in the square to listen to a literary critic's treatise smashing Aeschylus's Oresteia or Euripides' Medea to smithereens. But the long, lengthy arguments of Aristotle and Plato are nothing more than an attempt to understand why a person needs art, by what laws it exists and what it should be.

Purposes of criticism

The basis for the emergence and development of this science is the appearance of literary texts. What is criticism? This is something that cannot exist without fiction. The critic pursues the following goals in his work:

Identifying contradictions.
Analysis, discussion.
Identifying errors.
Scientific verification of historical accuracy.

A great many literary works are created every year. The most talented of them find their readers. However, it often happens that a work that is devoid of any literary value arouses considerable interest. Literary critics do not impose their opinions on readers, but they have a huge influence on their perception.

Once upon a time, no one appeared in the literary field famous writer from Little Russia. Its small romantic stories were worthy of attention, but one cannot say that they were read deeply. Creation young writer received a resonance in society thanks to the light hand of an eminent critic. His name was Vissarion Belinsky. Aspiring writer - Nikolai Gogol.

Criticism in Russia

The name of Vissarion Belinsky is known to everyone school curriculum. This man had a huge influence on the work of many writers who later became classics.

In Russia, literary criticism was formed in the 18th century. IN XIX century it acquired a magazine character. Critics increasingly began to touch upon philosophical topics in their articles. Analysis of a work of art has become a pretext for thinking about the problems of real life. IN Soviet era, especially in the twenties of the last century, there was a process of destruction of the traditions of aesthetic criticism.

Critic and writer

It is easy to guess that the relationship between them is not going too smoothly. There is an inevitable antagonism between critic and writer. This antagonism intensifies when the creation literary texts and their consideration is influenced by ambition, desire for primacy and other factors. A critic is a person with literary education, analyzing piece of art without taking into account political and personal preferences.

Russian history knows many cases when criticism was in the service of power. This is exactly what has been talked about around the world. famous novel Bulgakov "The Master and Margarita". The writer has repeatedly encountered unscrupulous critics. IN real life There was no way I could take revenge on them. The only thing left for him was to create unsightly images of Latunsky and Lavrovich - typical critics of the 20s. On the pages of his novel, Bulgakov took revenge on his offenders. But this did not change the situation. Many prose writers and poets still continued to “write” on the table. Not because their works were mediocre, but because they did not correspond to the official ideology.

Literature without criticism

One should not assume that critics do nothing but praise or destroy the work of this or that author. They in some way control the literary process, and without their intervention it would not have developed. A real artist must respond adequately to criticism. Moreover, he needs it. A writer who is convinced of high artistic value his creations and does not listen to the opinions of his colleagues - rather not a writer, but a graphomaniac.

I will answer as a person who is sometimes mistakenly called a music critic:

Shit. No, really. Any person who calls himself a "critic" suffers from the deepest stage of idiocy. The music critic is the apogee of meaninglessness, the apotheosis of ruthlessness and narcissism. What exactly is professional activity music critic (or any other):
- If this is a well-known critic who has his own column, for example, in some publication, then this is what he does: young authors send him their works; overcoming laziness, he leafs through some news in search of works of already accomplished creators (in our case, musicians). And if there is nothing from the second, then he selects the most promising young creative units and presents them as a sensation he has “unearthed.” If in his opinion there are none, then he selects something and carefully coats it with poop. On rare occasions, a music critic picks an album that everyone liked, wonders "what the hell," and smears poop all over it, adjusting the imperishable halo over the fried head chicken leg, trusting that people definitely take his great opinion into account.
- If this is a little-known critic, then he generally tries to smear everything that can be smeared with poop. While already pooped music albums, he carefully washes from the angle from which he looks at the release. Little-known critics are not surprised by anything, they are not interested in anything except the underground, because only the future of the Russian Federation lies behind marginal music.

And only in rare cases, such as critics (if that’s what they call themselves, of course) from the site The-Flow.ru command respect. Although sometimes there are some obvious mistakes there, I have not read more constructive criticism and comments anywhere on the Russian Internet. For example, the review of Timati’s “Olympus” was so meticulously executed that, compared to other “Timati’s album is a clot of feces in a dung pit,” this gorgeous article from The Flow looked truly professional and credible. This is generally a very rare skill for journalists: the ability to convince, and not impose their claims on the reader. And, of course, Artemy Troitsky stands and will always stand apart among music critics. At least he has unique ability move in space using legs and transport. Usually, music critics only occasionally go to some kind of get-together with “their people”, and spend the rest of the time thinking about the meaning of life.

But in general, if you see the word "critic", then do not read further. Download albums, buy albums, go to concerts, put these people out of work. No article by any critic can replace your touch with creativity, be it good or bad. The only sensible critic lives in your head.

Don't listen to the critics. Listen to music.

I completely disagree. Music critics are basically musicologists. They have been studying academic music for more than 20 years and know a lot about the art and profession of a musician, and you claim that they “cover other people’s submitted material with poop.”

Answer

Does having an education (and not everyone) a priori make a person honest? Smart? Good? Conscientious? Gives him moderate self-esteem and the desire to be objective and fair? So our deputies all study first at law faculties, then practice for a long time and learn to govern our mighty country. And our police are well-educated - people pass standards, graduate from academies, spend 10 years regulating traffic on the roads and learn to catch criminals. Why don’t we all still poop like a rainbow then? Maybe because it is either not true or is not a guarantee of anything adequate?

Answer

Comment

Any critics exist for the sake of one goal/task/mission. They describe works of art. There are always two types of newsmakers: those who actually create the news, and those who comment on it. The second perform important task by reflecting on what is happening. The product of their activity will be a description of phenomena cultural life. And, the most interesting thing is that there is no one else to do this except them, if only because you need to be a passionate person in order to engage in such activities, to experience a genuine and insatiable interest in art. In many ways, based on the results of expressing their opinion, a global conclusion will be made about whether a work of art will go down in history or not.

It’s one thing for critics to praise/crap without justification, but another thing music journalists who describe their impressions, referring, among other things, to their feelings and analogies. And then, it also depends on the status of the publication and/or journalist. And if a person calls himself a critic, then, most likely, only what I described at the beginning. The same AK Troitsky does not call himself a critic, although he is considered one, but he denies it. Troitsky should be respected enough for his organizational abilities.

Answer

Comment

I will answer as a person who often has to read critical articles in order to understand music that is new to me or to see some unexpected facets in familiar and already loved music.

Criticism is not only about evaluation. The meaning of this word is broader. For example, in the “Critique of Pure Reason” Kant does not at all raise the question of whether reason is good or bad; his task was to study and describe the cognitive abilities of man. It is similar with other types of criticism - its goal is to interpret, transform into a text and describe as a structure that which itself is not a text in the usual sense of the word. What trends exist in music? How do they relate to current events? What is the connection between musical heritage and modernity and what is this legacy? How is the musical sphere connected with other social spheres - with the economy, other areas of art, and so on? Music critics like Theodor Adorno, David Toope and the like should and do ask themselves similar questions. There is a fine line between a music critic and a journalist; in the same way, music criticism is closely related to music history, musicology and cultural studies.

Of course, evaluation as an element of a critic’s work is the most noticeable - the interests of musicians and their fans are touched to the quick; In addition, most reviews - especially in the genres of popular music - really aim to make a verdict, to orient the listener as to whether he should listen to the release or not, i.e. make a judgment of taste. However, in my opinion, this is not the essence of the critic’s occupation: a critic, I repeat, is a researcher and interpreter who, thanks to his writing skills and musical education/eruditeness, transforms some intricate musical area into a world clearly presented in textual form with its own logical and associative connections, causes and effects, etc. The music of some composers is so complex, individual and unusual that it requires someone's work, including textual work, in order to be understandable, as far as this word is suitable for music, and interesting.

Text for our mind performs approximately the same function as a stick for our hand - it is a tool that gives us additional capabilities. In the case of text, these are shadows of those emotions that we ourselves did not feel, thoughts that did not occur to us, etc.; text and culture are like a powerful exoskeleton for our minds. Accordingly, the critic, as the author of texts, also performs an educational function; he enriches our personal experience his own, gives us conceptual tools, concepts, images so that we can understand new, alien, incomprehensible music. Like any technical means, and writing and texts are technical means of a special kind, they can instill laziness in us (we can, relatively speaking, “stop walking on our own two feet even to go to the store in the neighborhood and drive a car”), and I can be good help- "One head it's good, but two better".

MUSICAL CRITICISM - an assessment of the phenomena of modern musical life, associated with the op-re-de-la-noy es-thetical in-zi-tsi-ey and you-ra-zhae -may in literary-public-literary genres: critical articles, reviews, but-graphic notes, reviews yah, essays, on-le-mic re-p-li-kah, es-se.

In a broader sense, as an assessment of the phenomena of musical art, music criticism is part of all research. knowledge about music. musical criticism is closely connected with mu-zy-ko-ve-de-ni-em, musical es-te-ti-koy, fi-lo-so-fi-ey mu-zy-ki. In ancient times and the Middle Ages, musical criticism was not yet a well-established independent phenomenon. The assessment, on the one hand, is not on the average, but op-re-de-la-la-was applied to us for the mu- zy-ki (look Applied music), on the other hand - based on broad, non-specific artistic cri-te-rii ( look

What does a music critic create? Sergey Sosedov, music critic: biography, personal life

see also

See what “Music critic” is in other dictionaries:

Books

Childhood and youth

The dream of becoming an announcer and the first success in the newspaper

Start of journalistic activity

Neighbors in Ukraine

Subtle nature

The origins of the loneliness of a talented journalist

Sergey Sosedov in 2017

Definition

Musical critic

The emergence of criticism

Purposes of criticism

Criticism in Russia

Critic and writer

Literature without criticism