The concept of an eternal image in literature. Eternal images in literature. See what “eternal images” are in other dictionaries

Goethe and Schiller wrote about Don Quixote, and the German romantics were the first to define it as a work of deep and comprehensive philosophical perception of the world.

Don Quixote is one of the most famous “eternal images”. It has a long history of interpretation and reinterpretation.

Eternal images – literary characters which have been repeatedly embodied in art different countries, different eras and became “signs” of culture: Prometheus, Don Juan, Hamlet, Don Quixote, Faust, etc. Traditionally, mythological, biblical, and also legendary characters(Napoleon, Joan of Arc), if these images were used in literary works. Often those characters whose names have become generalized names for certain phenomena are also included in the “eternal images” human types: Plyushkin, Manilov, Cain.

Key concepts: chivalric romances, moral obligation, humanist, Renaissance, ideals.

G. Gogol, working on “ Dead souls”, was guided by this novel. F. Dostoevsky called it a book that “...is given to humanity one at a time every few hundred years.”

Cervantes was a great humanist, the high ideals of the Renaissance were close to him, but he lived and created at a time when illusions about the revival of the “golden times” were melting. In Spain this process was perhaps more painful. Therefore, the novel about Don Quixote is also a kind of revaluation of Renaissance values ​​that have not stood the test at times. Noble dreamers failed to transform the world. The prose of life prevailed over beautiful ideals. In England, William Shakespeare showed this as a tragedy; in Spain, Cervantes portrayed it in his funny and sad novel “Don Quixote.” Cervantes does not laugh at his hero’s desire to act, he only shows that isolation from life can nullify all the efforts of the “idealist and enthusiast.” At the end of the novel, common sense wins: Don Quixote abandons his knightly romances and his plans. But the reader will forever remember the hero who tries “to do good to everyone and not to do evil to anyone.”

Send your good work in the knowledge base is simple. Use the form below

Students, graduate students, young scientists who use the knowledge base in their studies and work will be very grateful to you.

Posted on http://www.allbest.ru/

ESSAY

ETERNAL IMAGES IN WORLD LITERATURE

Eternal images are artistic images works of world literature in which the writer, based on the vital material of his time, was able to create a lasting generalization applicable in the life of subsequent generations. These images acquire a common meaning and retain artistic value up to our time. These are also mythological, biblical, folklore and literary characters who clearly expressed moral and ideological content that is significant for all mankind and have been repeatedly embodied in literature. different nations and eras. Each era and each writer puts their own meaning into the interpretation of each character, depending on what they want to convey to the outside world through this eternal image.

An archetype is a primary image, an original; universal human symbols that form the basis of myths, folklore and culture itself as a whole and are passed down from generation to generation (stupid king, evil stepmother, faithful servant).

In contrast to the archetype, which primarily reflects the “genetic”, original characteristics of the human psyche, eternal images are always a product of conscious activity, have their own “nationality”, time of occurrence and, therefore, reflect not only the universal human perception of the world, but also a certain historical and cultural experience embodied in an artistic image. The universal character of eternal images is given by “the kinship and commonality of the problems facing humanity, the unity of the psychophysiological properties of man.

However, representatives of different social strata at different times they put their own, often unique, content into “eternal images,” i.e., eternal images are not absolutely stable and unchanging. Each eternal image has a special central motif, which gives it the corresponding cultural significance and without which it loses its significance.

One cannot but agree that it is much more interesting for people of a particular era to compare an image with themselves when they themselves find themselves in the same life situations. On the other hand, if the eternal image loses significance for most of any social group, this does not mean that he disappears from this culture forever.

Each eternal image can only experience external changes, since the central motive associated with it is the essence that forever assigns a special quality to it, for example, Hamlet’s “fate” to be a philosophizing avenger, Romeo and Juliet - eternal love, Prometheus - humanism. Another thing is that the attitude towards the very essence of the hero can be different in each culture.

Mephistopheles is one of the “eternal images” of world literature. He is the hero of J. V. Goethe’s tragedy “Faust”.

Folklore and fiction different countries and peoples often used the motive of concluding an alliance between a demon - the spirit of evil and a person. Sometimes poets were attracted by the story of the “fall”, “expulsion from paradise” of the biblical Satan, sometimes by his rebellion against God. There were also farces close to folklore sources, the devil in them was given the place of a mischief maker, a cheerful deceiver who often got into trouble. The name "Mephistopheles" has become synonymous with a caustic and evil mocker. This is where the expressions arose: “Mephistophelian laughter, smile” - sarcastic and evil; “Mephistophelian facial expression” - sarcastic and mocking.

Mephistopheles is a fallen angel who has an eternal debate with God about good and evil. He believes that a person is so corrupt that, succumbing to even a slight temptation, he can easily give his soul to him. He is also confident that humanity is not worth saving. Throughout the entire work, Mephistopheles shows that there is nothing sublime in man. He must prove, using the example of Faust, that man is evil. Very often in conversations with Faust, Mephistopheles behaves like a real philosopher who follows human life and its progress with great interest. But this is not his only image. In communication with other heroes of the work, he shows himself from a completely different side. He will never leave his interlocutor behind and will be able to maintain a conversation on any topic. Mephistopheles himself says several times that he does not have absolute power. The main decision always depends on the person, and he can only take advantage of the wrong choice. But he did not force people to sell their souls, to sin, he left the right of choice to everyone. Each person has the opportunity to choose exactly what his conscience and dignity allow him to do. eternal image artistic archetype

It seems to me that the image of Mephistopheles will be relevant at all times, because there will always be something that will tempt humanity.

There are many more examples of eternal images in literature. But they have one thing in common: they all reveal eternal human feelings and aspirations, try to solve eternal problems that torment people of any generation.

Posted on Allbest.ru

Similar documents

Eternal images in world literature. Don Juans in literature and art of different nations. The adventures of a heartthrob and a duelist. Don Juan's image Spanish literature. The authors of the novels are Tirso de Molina and Torrente Ballester. True story Juana Tenorio.

course work, added 02/09/2012


The meaning of the term "artistic image", its properties and varieties. Examples of artistic images in the works of Russian writers. Artistic tropes in stylistics and rhetoric are elements of speech figurativeness. Images-symbols, types of allegory.

abstract, added 09/07/2009


Anna Andreevna Akhmatova - greatest poet "silver age", the theme of love in the poetess's work. Analysis love lyrics 1920-1930: subtle grace and hidden tragedy of inner experiences. Artistic Features poem "Requiem", its biographical nature.

abstract, added 11/12/2014


The meaning and features of oral folk art; Russian, Slavic and Latvian folklore, the origin of its characters. Images evil spirits: Baba Yaga, Latvian witch, their characteristics. Study of the popularity of heroes of national folklore.

abstract, added 01/10/2013


The role of myth and symbol in literature at the turn of the 19th–20th centuries. Place in the work of K.D. Balmont texts of folklore stylization, mythological images in the collection "Firebird" and the poetic cycle "Fairy Tales". Types of artistic mythologism and cross-cutting motifs.

thesis, added 10/27/2011


Interpretation folklore images masters of earthly riches in the fairy tales of P.P. Bazhova. A number of attribute functions presented fairy tale images. Functions of magic items. Plot motifs, fantastic images, folk flavor of Bazhov’s works.

course work, added 04/04/2012


general characteristics categories of space and time in the lyrics of I. Brodsky (1940-1996), as well as an analysis of his works through the prism of “spatiality”. Space, thing and time as philosophical and artistic images, their hierarchy in Brodsky’s works.

abstract, added 07/28/2010


The image of the Caucasus in the works of Pushkin A.S. and Tolstoy L.N. The theme of Caucasian nature in the works and paintings of M.Yu. Lermontov. Features of the depiction of the life of the mountaineers. Images of Kazbich, Azamat, Bella, Pechorin and Maxim Maksimych in the novel. The poet's special style.

report, added 04/24/2014


Mythological images used in the chronicle "The Tale of Igor's Campaign", their meaning and role in the work. Pagan and deities and Christian motives"Words…". Mythological interpretation of Yaroslavna's cry. Place folk poetry and folklore in the chronicle.

abstract, added 07/01/2009


Studying the creativity of O.E. Mandelstam, which represents a rare example of the unity of poetry and fate. Cultural and historical images in the poetry of O. Mandelstam, literary analysis poems from the collection "Stone". Artistic aesthetics in the poet’s work.

The history of literature knows many cases when the works of a writer were very popular during his life, but time passed and they were forgotten almost forever. There are other examples: the writer was not recognized by his contemporaries, but true value his works were discovered by subsequent generations.

But there are very few works in literature, the importance of which cannot be overestimated, since they create images that excite every generation of people, images that inspire the creative search of artists of different times. Such images are called “eternal” because they are carriers of traits that are always inherent in a person.

Miguel Cervantes de Saavedra lived out his life in poverty and loneliness, although during his lifetime he was known as the author of the talented, vivid novel “Don Quixote.” Neither the writer himself nor his contemporaries knew that several centuries would pass, and his heroes would not only not be forgotten, but would become “the most popular Spaniards,” and their compatriots would erect a monument to them. That they will come out of the affair and live their own life independent life in the works of prose writers and playwrights, poets, artists, composers. Today it is even difficult to list how many works of art were created under the influence of the images of Don Quixote and Sancho Panza: Goya and Picasso, Massenet and Minkus turned to them.

The immortal book was born from the idea of ​​writing a parody and making fun of the chivalric romances that were so popular in Europe in the 16th century, when Cervantes lived and worked. But the writer’s intention grew, and on the pages of the book his contemporary Spain came to life, and the hero himself changed: from a parody knight he grows into a funny and tragic figure. The conflict of the novel is at the same time historically specific (it reflects contemporary writer Spain) and universal (for it exists in any country at all times). The essence of the conflict: the clash of ideal norms and ideas about reality with reality itself - not ideal, “earthly”.

The image of Don Quixote has also become eternal due to its universality: always and everywhere there are noble idealists, defenders of goodness and justice, who defend their ideals, but are unable to really assess reality. Even the concept of “quixoticism” arose. It combines a humanistic striving for the ideal, enthusiasm, lack of selfishness, on the one hand, and naivety, eccentricity, adherence to dreams and illusions, on the other. Don Quixote's inner nobility is combined with the comedy of her external manifestations (he is able to fall in love with a simple peasant girl, but sees in her only a noble Beautiful Lady.

The second important eternal image of the novel is the witty and down-to-earth Sancho Panza. He is the complete opposite of Don Quixote, but the heroes are inextricably linked, they are similar to each other in their hopes and disappointments. Cervantes shows with his heroes that reality without ideals is impossible, but they must be based on reality.

A completely different eternal image appears before us in Shakespeare’s tragedy “Hamlet”. It's deep tragic image. Hamlet understands reality well, soberly assesses everything that happens around him, and firmly stands on the side of good against evil. But his tragedy is that he cannot take decisive action and punish evil. His indecisiveness is not a sign of cowardice; he is a brave, outspoken person. His hesitation is the result of deep thoughts about the nature of evil. Circumstances require him to kill his father's killer. He hesitates because he perceives this revenge as a manifestation of evil: murder will always remain murder, even when a villain is killed. The image of Hamlet is the image of a person who understands his responsibility in resolving the conflict between good and evil, who stands on the side of good, but his internal moral laws do not allow him to take decisive action. It is no coincidence that this image acquired a special resonance in the 20th century - an era of social upheaval, when each person solved for himself the eternal “Hamlet question”.

We can give several more examples of “eternal” images: Faust, Mephistopheles, Othello, Romeo and Juliet - they all reveal eternal human feelings and aspirations. And each reader learns from these images to understand not only the past, but also the present.

According to the modern illustrated encyclopedia "Literature and Language":

“Eternal images” are mythological, biblical, folklore and literary characters who clearly expressed moral and ideological content that is significant for all mankind and have been repeatedly embodied in the literature of different countries and eras (Prometheus, Odysseus, Cain, Faust, Mephistopheles, Hamlet, Don Juan , Don Quixote, etc.). Each era and each writer puts its own meaning into the interpretation of one or another eternal image, which is due to their multicolored and multi-valued nature, the wealth of possibilities inherent in them (for example, Cain was interpreted both as an envious fratricide and as a brave fighter against God; Faust - as a magician and a miracle worker, as a lover of pleasures, as a scientist, possessed by a passion for knowledge, and as a seeker of meaning human life; Don Quixote - as a comic and tragic figure, etc.). Often in literature, characters are created as variations of eternal images, which are given different nationalities. features, or they are placed in a different time (as a rule, closer to the author of the new work) and/or in an unusual situation (“Hamlet of the Shchigrovsky district” by I.S. Turgenev, “Antigone” by J. Anouilh), sometimes they are ironically reduced or parodied (satirical story by N. Elin and V. Kashaev “Mephistopheles’ Mistake”, 1981). Characters whose names have become household names in the world and national world are also close to eternal images. literature: Tartuffe and Jourdain (“Tartuffe” and “The Bourgeois in the Nobility” by J.B. Molière), Carmen (the short story of the same name by P. Merimee), Molchalin (“Woe from Wit” by A.S. Griboyedov), Khlestakov, Plyushkin (“ The Inspector" and "Dead Souls" by N.V. Gogol), etc.

Unlike the archetype, which primarily reflects the “genetic”, original characteristics of the human psyche, eternal images are always a product of conscious activity, have their own “nationality”, time of occurrence and, therefore, reflect not only the specifics of the universal human perception of the world, but also a certain historical and cultural experience embodied in an artistic image.

Directory literary terms gives the following definition:

“Eternal images” are artistic images of works of world literature, in which the writer, based on the vital material of his time, was able to create a lasting generalization applicable in the life of subsequent generations. These images acquire a nominal meaning and retain artistic significance right up to our time.

Thus, Prometheus summarizes the features of a person who is ready to give his life for the good of the people; Antea embodies the inexhaustible strength that an inextricable connection with his native land, with his people gives a person; in Faust - man’s indomitable desire to understand the world. This determines the meaning of the images of Prometheus, Antaeus and Faust and the appeal to them by advanced representatives of social thought. The image of Prometheus, for example, was extremely highly valued by K. Marx.

The image of Don Quixote, created by the famous Spanish writer Miguel Cervantes (XVI - XVII centuries), personifies a noble, but devoid of vital soil, dreaming; Hamlet, the hero of Shakespeare's tragedy (XVI - early XVII centuries), is a common image of a divided person, torn by contradictions. Tartuffe, Khlestakov, Plyushkin, Don Juan and similar images live long years in the consciousness of a number of human generations, since they summarize the typical shortcomings of a person of the past, stable traits of human character, brought up by feudal and capitalist society.

“Eternal images” are created in a certain historical setting and only in connection with it can they be fully understood. They are “eternal,” that is, applicable in other eras, to the extent that the human character traits generalized in these images are stable. In the works of the classics of Marxism-Leninism, there are often references to such images for their application in a new historical situation (for example, the images of Prometheus, Don Quixote, etc.).

In the context of this course work The definition of “eternal images” from the reference book of literary terms is much closer in meaning than the similar definition of a modern illustrated encyclopedia, and I will take it as a basis.

So, “eternal images” are artistic images of works of world literature in which the writer, based on the vital material of his time, was able to create a lasting generalization applicable in the life of subsequent generations.

If only people could meet different centuries and talk about literature or simply about life, then the names of Hamlet, Faust, Don Juan would unite the interlocutors. These heroes seem to come out of the works and live their own independent lives; painters and sculptors, composers, playwrights, and poets try to create their portraits; they dedicate their works to them. There are many monuments in the world to heroes who have left the pages of books.

The tragic Hamlet, the dissolute Don Juan, the mysterious Faust, the dreamy Don Quixote - these are the images I explored in my work.

“Eternal” images of world literature

"Eternal" images- artistic images of works of world literature, in which the writer, based on the vital material of his time, managed to create a lasting generalization applicable in the life of subsequent generations. These images acquire a nominal meaning and retain artistic significance right up to our time. They are ambiguous and multifaceted. In each of them lie great passions, which, under the influence of certain events, sharpen one or another character trait to the extreme.

"Eternal" images should not be mixed with common noun images , which do not have such a generalizing, universal meaning ( Mitrofanushka, Khlestakov, Oblomov, Manilov and etc.)