The book “Former People. "Former people

Gorky Basinsky Pavel Valerievich

« Former people»

"Former People"

Why did the problem of “former people” occupy Gorky so much? After all, the public in in a broad sense, the one that created him unprecedented popularity, especially in youth environment, that’s not what I appreciated in him at all. Gorky precisely marked the end of the era of “Nadsonovism”, Chekhov’s “twilight”, the so-called “timelessness” of the 1890s. “Let the storm blow harder!..”

“Song of the Petrel” was published in 1901 in the magazine “Life” and was immediately banned by censorship along with the closure of the magazine itself. It is noteworthy that for the first time the “Song...” was sung by the little siskin from the story “ Spring melodies", which was distributed illegally and printed hectographically in Nizhny Novgorod and Moscow. What is noteworthy here is not that the siskin is a small bird. It is noteworthy that this siskin migrated to “Spring Melodies” from an earlier story - “About the Siskin, who lied, and about the Woodpecker, a lover of truth.” This story was published in 1893 in the Kazan newspaper “Volzhsky Vestnik” (the same one that once reported in its news department about the suicide attempt of “guild worker Alexei Maximov Peshkov”).

In the story the little siskin sang:

And he launched into a sermon of Christ and Zarathustra at the same time:

“Respect and love each other and, as you march as a proud and brave squad towards victory, do not doubt anything, for what is higher than you?.. Turn back and see what you were before - there, at the dawn of life? All your faith then was not worth one drop of doubt now... Having learned to doubt everything so terribly, the time has come for you to believe in yourself, because only great essence It can reach the level of doubt that you have reached!”

This story is very weak artistically, Vladislav Khodasevich, however, considered key to understanding Gorky’s path. Gorky’s “truth” was on the side of Chizh, “who lied” (including by calling out the storm), and not of Woodpecker, “the lover of truth.” But it is unlikely that the revolutionary youth of the 1890s–1900s paid attention to such subtleties. And it is unlikely that she was at all interested in Gorky as a spiritual person. "Who cares?" There would be a storm!

But at that time Gorky, together with Peshkov, was lost in the desert of new doubts. I was tormented by the question of “ex”.

Quite quickly, criticism discovered in the heroes of early Gorky, along with their expansiveness, traits of a kind of decadence, “decadence.” In Nietzsche's hierarchy "animal - man - superman" they occupied the place after man, But to superman. These are, in Gorky’s words, “former people”: Grigory Orlov (“The Orlov Spouses”), Aristide Kuvalda (“Former People”), the baker Konovalov (“Konovalov”), Promptov (“The Rogue”), Foma Gordeev (“Foma Gordeev”) "), Ilya Lunev ("Three"), Satin ("At the Bottom") and others. In their face, a person begins to recognize himself as a problem. “Formers” have the opportunity to look at a person as if from the outside. Here the absurdity of life in a situation after the “death of God” is experienced as an insoluble tragedy.

Charm by nature and freedom of instincts no longer provide a way out of the spiritual labyrinth. The world reveals its gray tones, which in early stories There is no less bitterness than bright, rich colors. It is not for nothing that the epithet “gray” in Gorky’s prose acquires a special semantic meaning. Thus, in the finale of the story “Twenty-six and one” it does not appear by chance: “And - she left, straight, beautiful, proud. We were left in the middle of the yard, in the dirt, under the rain and a gray sky without the sun...” Before us is not just a faded world, which has lost its bright, rich colors after Tanya’s departure, but also an important image-symbol of the lost last meaning universe in which bakery workers, like collective image of all humanity, are doomed to loneliness and to an existential search for themselves...

“Formers” are, as a rule, hopelessly ill people. But why? After all, they are physically strong men and have names that speak for themselves: Orlov, Kuvalda, Gordeev, Konovalov. But excess vitality suddenly takes on the character of a pathology and leads to a kind of “decadence”, mental breakdown, madness or even suicide.

What prevents Konovalov, with his golden hands and good health, from living and working as a baker? What makes the miller Tikhon from the story “Toska” leave his house, rush into a spree like into a pool? Why doesn't Foma Gordeev want to be a millionaire? Why is Grishka Orlov running away from the “pure life”?

One strange thing can be noticed behind these characters. This is hatred, there is no other way to describe it, towards all social pillars. They have a fatal desire to burn the bridges that connect them to their environment. They do not have a strong and reliable connection with the world and seem to fall into a social precipitate. In the words of Gorky about Foma Gordeev, they are “atypical” as representatives of their classes.

Deprived of an ideal, a person either dies, like Konovalov, or goes crazy, like Foma Gordeev. Ilya Lunev in “Troy” breaks his head against the wall - a symbolic act!

The author's attitude towards these characters was not entirely clear. Gorky, especially in mature years, repelled the spiritual anarchism of which he suspected " underground man» Dostoevsky. Being himself a personality of a “motley” composition, he always admired people of integrity. To a large extent, this explains his sympathy for V.I. Lenin. Hence the lifelong interest in strong “business executives”, millionaire merchants. The image of Vassa Zheleznova from Gorky’s play of the same name is much more interesting than the play of the revolutionary Rachel that exists somewhere on the periphery. But there is an understanding between both Vassa and Rachel. Both are strong-willed and “iron”. At least in public. Both will not fall into spiritual anarchism. It seems that Gorky’s coming to Stalin at the end of his life was not accidental, and the explanation for this also lies somewhere here. And finally, let us recall that perhaps Gorky’s most important lover was and until his last days remained Maria Ignatievna Budberg-Zakrevskaya, about whom Nina Berberova wrote a book called “The Iron Woman.”

Gorky considered himself a “heretic” and all his life he loved “heretics” who brought anxiety and a thirst for search into life, even at the cost of their own early death. But his mind was on the side of “positive” people, like V.G. Korolenko.

“In general, the Russian tramp is a more terrible phenomenon than I was able to say; this person is terrible first of all and most importantly - by his imperturbable despair, by the fact that he denies himself, casts himself out of life.”

This was said by Gorky in later years. It is not difficult to guess that there is a broader and deeper spiritual problem at stake here. The problem of "former people". Those who consciously “excite” themselves from human society voluntarily rush into the “chandala” (the lowest caste in India, below the “untouchables”, in fact, a person outside of any caste). And Alexey Peshkov himself, when he left Nizhny Novgorod, leaving a fairly “warm” and untroubled position as a clerk with A.I. Lanin, didn’t he do the same?

Gorky experienced this experience himself at the beginning of his journey. However, in an environment of tramping, he turned out to be the same “stranger among his own” as he was in the house of the Kashirins and then the Sergeevs, among the Kazan students and in Semenov’s bakery.

In the wonderful essay “Two Tramps” (1894), which Gorky published in portions in the Samara Gazeta and then (which is significant) did not include it either in his collections or collected works, there is an important episode where Alexey Peshkov (in the essay he bred under the name Maxim) meets with one of the two tramps who walked around Rus' with him. The tramp, his name is Stepok, goes with Maxim to the tavern and there he finds out that his friend has become a journalist.

This made him terribly angry!

“- So!.. So... what? It wasn’t by nature that you were a tramp... but out of curiosity?..

Are you looking? Also curiosity... And now back... didn’t you like it? L-cleverly done!..

I still want to walk around.

W-well... I don’t know... So you just... look like that’s all?..

So what?

Nothing... So I... - he bit his mustache. - Without any task, that means... I went home? On the stove?

No, there was a task. I wanted to know what kind of people...

To know...

Y-yes!.. Nothing more? I just looked and that’s it?

Maybe I’ll describe it... in the newspaper.

In the newspaper?! And who needs... to know about this? Or is this just for the sake of praise - like, how can I?!

He stood up and looked at me with evil narrowed eyes.

Do you know what, Maxim? - he asked.

This is very meanness! - he said expressively, shook his fist at me and, without saying goodbye, left ... "

Gorky's entire spiritual biography, including its negative aspects, unfolds before us only because Gorky himself wanted to build it in a similar way. Find out where it ends real life and the creation of the myth begins, it’s difficult here.

One way or another, by the time he wrote his first major work, the story “Foma Gordeev,” Gorky had already said goodbye to the tramp “ideal” and was looking for a positive ideal, turning over the accumulated rich life and book experience in his head. What was left of the “former” Alyosha Peshkov was lifelong homelessness (Gorky, like Bunin, never had his own home) and a passion for lighting fires, which remained in him until old age and reached the point of ridiculousness: a heavy smoker, he never blew out matches, waited, while they burn in an ashtray watching the fire.

The former wanderer became a fire worshiper for life. In his later years, he lit fires almost every evening - in Sorrento, in Gorki, in Tesseli. In Tesseli, he even came up with a job for himself and his household: clearing away the thorny bushes on the way to the sea, most likely only in order to later make luxurious bonfires out of it.

Near the fire, his soul briefly found peace. At the end of the 1920s in Sorrento, he wrote: “Yesterday, in the garden, I lit a big fire, sat in front of it and thought: this is how I, thirty-five years ago, lit fires in Rus', on the edges of forests, in ravines, and then I had no worries, except for one thing - that the fire would burn well ... "

Otherwise, there was “a huge distance” between the ridiculous brute Grokhalo in a straw hat and multi-colored boots, who came to Samara to scare a decent audience, and the successful writer Gorky.

Perhaps this was precisely the reason for Gorky’s failure with Foma Gordeev, which the author took seriously. Gordeev was conceived as a titan crushing world injustice. He had to find his God in life, which, as the early Gorky believed, is part of the “heart and mind” of a person. He wrote to K.P. Pyatnitsky, already anticipating the failure of his first novel: “Do you know what to write? Two stories: one about a man who walked from top to bottom and below, in the mud, found - God! - another about a person, to<ото>He walked from the bottom up and also found - God! - and this God is one and the same...”

Top-down God - probably Christianity. This is the idea of ​​the God-man, symbolizing the Divine principle in people. God is “bottom-up”, perhaps a “superman” in Gorky’s understanding. In his eyes, not only God goes to people, but man also rises to God. This position of his goes back to the Old Testament tradition: to the book of Job and the legend of Jacob’s struggle with God. The name of Thomas refers to Thomas the Unbeliever, who doubted the reality Christ's Resurrection and demanded material confirmation of this. However, following the logic of the development of the image of Gordeev, Gorky, as a realist writer, eventually realized that Thomas, confused in modern morality, was unable to complete the task assigned to him. As a result, the “master of life” Mayakin turned out to be a more integral type, who calmly defeated Foma. It seems that the writer himself did not expect this outcome of the novel and was dissatisfied.

The growing dissatisfaction with his own brainchild in the process of its creation (which was very painful!) is reflected in Gorky’s correspondence with different people. Here he writes to the publisher S.P. Dorovatovsky: “... I am free for my great job. Wish me success."

Here in the letter to him appears the detailed plan of “Thomas...” and the first worries: “For last days I have swallowed a lot of nasty things from life’s bounty and am in a rather wild mood. I’m afraid this wouldn’t resonate with “Foma.” This story gives me a lot of good moments and a lot of fear and doubts - it should be a broad, meaningful picture of modernity, and at the same time, against the background of it, an energetic, healthy person should be beating furiously, looking for something to do within his strength, looking for space for his energy . He feels cramped, life crushes him, he sees that there is no place for heroes in it, they are knocked down by little things, just as Hercules, who defeated the hydras, would have been knocked down by a cloud of mosquitoes. Will this come out clearly and understandably enough for me? Tell me how you like the beginning, isn’t it drawn out, isn’t it boring, what does the public say about it, do they complain about the abundance of monologues in Ignat (Foma’s father - P.B.).”

The story has not yet been written, but has already been published in portions in the magazine “Life”, starting in February 1899. A common practice in those years. Chekhov also published “Drama on the Hunt” in the newspaper “News of the Day,” and then Gorky will publish the story “Childhood” in the newspaper “Childhood.” Russian word" The story was ordered for “5 sheets”, but it is growing, because the author cannot cope with main theme stated in a letter to the publisher. In individual pictures she is magnificent. For example, the scene of Gordeev’s drunken revelry on the Volga.

And what is his father like - Ignat! Gorky felt this merchant type well and, perhaps against his own reason, loved him spiritually. A rude, wild nature, capable of running a million-dollar business and easily blowing thousands in a drunken frenzy. But Foma, Foma... Everything in him is from Ignat - intelligence, strength, business qualities. But it still turned out to be a “decadent” and a weakling!

“My ‘Foma’ is becoming some kind of crocodile for me,” Gorky writes irritably to Chekhov. “I even saw him in a dream last time: lying in the mud, clicking his teeth and fiercely saying: “What are you doing to me, devil?” And what am I doing? I’ll spoil his appearance.” And in a letter to V.S. Mirolyubov again about this: “I am spoiling “Thomas”. Very angry."

S.P. Dorovatovsky: “And with “Foma” I strayed from the true path. Oh-ho-ho! I'll have to rebuild this whole thing from start to finish, and it will cost me dearly! I hurried and stretched it out. Woe! This thing makes me very angry."

To him: ““Thomas”? I ruined it. In the June book (sixth issue of Life magazine - P.B.) he is disgusting. Women fail. There’s a lot of completely unnecessary things, and I don’t know where to put what I need, what’s necessary...”

To A.P. Chekhov: “I’m not happy with myself, because I know I could write better. Foma is still nonsense. This offends me."

Nevertheless, at the end of writing (and publishing in the magazine) this piece, Gorky asked Chekhov for permission to dedicate a separate edition of it to him. And at the same time he admitted: “...Foma is dull. And there is a lot of unnecessary stuff in this story. Apparently, I won’t write anything as harmoniously and beautifully as I wrote “The Old Woman Izergil.”

Noble Chekhov allowed. He generally appreciated Gorky, no matter how much Ivan Bunin later tried to dispute this fact in his memoirs. Chekhov saw great talent in him. But he didn’t like Foma Gordeev. In February 1900 (“Foma” was already published a separate book with dedication: “To Anton Pavlovich Chekhov. - M. Gorky”) Chekhov writes to the publisher and critic V. A. Posse: ““Foma Gordeev” was written monotonously, like a dissertation. All characters they speak the same; and everyone's way of thinking is the same. Everyone speaks not simply, but on purpose; everyone has some kind of ulterior motive; they don’t say something, as if they know something; in fact, they don’t know anything, and this is their fa?on de parler - to talk and not say anything.”

Although Chekhov admitted: “There are wonderful places in Foma. Gorky will become a great writer, if only he does not get tired, grow cold, or become lazy.” But Chekhov highlighted the main internal “flaw” of Gorky’s artistic worldview. In all his major works, starting with “Foma Gordeev” and ending with the main epic canvas, “The Life of Klim Samgin”, and in the speeches of the characters, and in general view the writer has “some kind of ulterior thought” about people, which cannot be grasped and which interferes with a clear perception of the work. It seems that Gorky himself does not know what this thought is, but only feels that it should explain everything, put everything in its place.

Thomas was conceived as a self-sufficient spiritual person, but not like Chudra, Chelkash or Izergil, who rejected the “mental” attitude to life. Thomas had to synthesize in himself mind and will, nature and culture. Instead, with his creator, Thomas became lost in the spiritual wilderness.

Thomas compares himself to an owl that saw the light and went blind. But what kind of light did Thomas see? This is the constant “second thought” of the story. It is she who does not allow the hero to live normally.

Did Gorky himself see this light? It would be more correct to say this: he constantly foresaw. Like Zarathustra, he lived waiting for the sun to rise. Until it rose, his eyes saw twilight.

We are talking about spiritual vision. Because as a realist writer, Gorky undoubtedly grew a lot in Foma Gordeev. This is what Chekhov noted. However, Tolstoy did not admit this.

The memoirs of V. A. Posse tell about Gorky’s meeting with Tolstoy in Khamovniki in 1900.

“Have you read, Lev Nikolaevich, my “Foma Gordeev”? - asked Gorky.

It seems to me that Foma’s childhood was not made up.

No, everything is made up. Forgive me, but I don’t like it..."

The old man was relentless in his assessments.

From the book General Dima. Career. Jail. Love author Yakubovskaya Irina Pavlovna

Former friends Dima was always surrounded by friends. While he was a successful lawyer, many considered it an honor to communicate with Yakubovsky. Naturally, his circle of close friends included famous people occupying high position in society. But as soon as over Dima

From the book Notes of a Survivor author Golitsyn Sergey Mikhailovich

Former... former... former 1 December 1, 1934 is an important milestone in the history of our country - before the murder of Kirov and after the murder. Came out the very next day new law: those accused of terrorism will be judged quickly, the investigation will be completed within ten days, there will be no cassation appeals

author

Former friends Among the people invited to my farewell were Felix Svetov and Vladimir Kornilov, friendship with whom ended in the same way - complete collapse. Felix, as I learned already in the West, wrote a long essay about me, at the very beginning of which he said about me:

From the book Lubyanka - Ekibastuz. Camp notes author Panin Dmitry Mikhailovich

Prisoners - Former Party Members Among us were prisoners from the 1937-38 imprisonment. Every extermination campaign always has a main purpose. During the first years of Soviet power, officers, nobles, workers, peasants, clergy, Cossacks, merchants, factory owners, homeowners,

From the book Raisins from a Bread author Shenderovich Viktor Anatolievich

Former allies In Uzbekistan at the beginning of the 2000s, the government banned the game of billiards - as contributing to the spread of drug addiction and crime. I tried to restore the logic of the decision and learned it: it turns out that many criminals were caught for

From the book First Meeting - last meeting author Ryazanov Eldar Alexandrovich

“Four wives took me to the hospital, three of them were ex-wives...” Directed by Roger Vadim, née Plemyannikov. Vadim made a French surname from his name. Before talking about the film director Rozhedim, I want to tell you, dear reader, about Brigitte Bardot. These two names

From the book Specialist in Siberia. German architect in the Stalinist USSR author Wolters Rudolf

"Former" Women. Letters. Propaganda. Parting. At the beginning of April, the long winter came to an end, and soon the contracted year of my work would also end. A month before the expiration of the contract, I had to declare its termination, otherwise it was automatically extended for another

From the book Journey to the Land of Ze-Ka author Margolin Yuliy Borisovich

From the book Memoirs. From serfdom to the Bolsheviks author Wrangel Nikolai Egorovich

Former fellow officers Of those officers who served in the Horse Guards at the same time as me, only a few lived to see our sad days. When I fled St. Petersburg at the end of 1918, only the following persons were still alive: Count Fredericks, Adjutant General, former

From Yeltsin's book. Swan. Khasavyurt author Moroz Oleg Pavlovich

Former prime ministers call for negotiations on October 24 in the NTV program “Itogi” three former Russian prime ministers- Chernomyrdin, Kiriyenko and Stepashin (Primakov did not participate in the program, he watched Dorenko’s program on ORT) - the question was asked: “What is the way out of the situation in

From the book This Is Mine author Ukhnalev Evgeniy

People Before I start writing about my life after the camps, I would like to remember some good people, name some names so that their memory remains. For example, from the times of the Secondary Art School - the now living artist Proshkin. He makes good, fresh watercolors,

From the book Tablecloth by Lydia Libedinskaya author Gromova Natalia Alexandrovna

From the book Self-Portrait: The Novel of My Life author Voinovich Vladimir Nikolaevich

Former friends Among the people invited to my farewell were Felix Svetov and Vladimir Kornilov, friendship with whom ended in the same way - complete collapse. Felix, as I learned already in the West, wrote a long essay about me, at the very beginning of which he said about me:

From the book History of Russian Chanson author Kravchinsky Maxim Eduardovich

Former In the last peaceful years before the October Revolution, throughout Russian Empire The cabaret boom began. Having emerged in the domestic field with a huge delay, the French invention found fertile ground for development here. Perhaps the time is right? WITH

From the book Daily life old Russian gymnasium author Shubkin Nikolay Feoktistovich

Former students December 8 Yesterday evening, two former students from my first graduating class visited me. I will always have the warmest memories of this graduation and especially of the company to which these two students belonged. Smart, developed girls,

From the author's book

My former students May 23 My proud former students, now studying in different courses, began to arrive from the university. With most of them I have good relationship, and meeting them is very pleasant. They are divided among themselves, of course, into different circles - according to

M. Gorky

Former people

The entrance street consists of two rows of one-story shacks, closely pressed together, dilapidated, with crooked walls and skewed windows; the leaky roofs of human dwellings, mutilated by time, are covered with patches of splints and overgrown with moss; Here and there high poles with birdhouses stick out above them, they are overshadowed by the dusty greenery of elderberries and gnarled willows - the pitiful flora of the city outskirts inhabited by the poor.

The glass windows of the houses, dull green with age, look at each other with the eyes of cowardly swindlers. In the middle of the street, a winding track crawls uphill, maneuvering between deep ruts washed out by rain. Here and there lie heaps of rubble and various debris overgrown with weeds - these are the remains or beginnings of those structures that were unsuccessfully undertaken by ordinary people in the fight against the streams of rainwater that was rapidly flowing from the city. Above, on the mountain, beautiful stone houses are hidden in the lush greenery of dense gardens, the bell towers of churches rise proudly into the blue sky, their golden crosses sparkle dazzlingly in the sun.

When it rains, the city releases its dirt onto Vezzhaya Street, and when it’s dry, it showers it with dust - and all these ugly houses also seem to have been thrown from there, from above, swept away like garbage by someone’s mighty hand.

Flattened to the ground, they dotted the entire mountain, half-rotten, weak, painted by the sun, dust and rain in that grayish-dirty color that a tree takes on in old age.

At the end of this street, thrown out of the city downhill, stood the long, two-story escheated house of the merchant Petunnikov. He is the last one in order, he is already under the mountain, further behind him there is a wide field, cut off half a mile by a steep cliff to the river.

Big, old house had the gloomiest face among his neighbors. It was all crooked, in two rows of its windows there was not a single one that retained the correct shape, and the glass fragments in the broken frames had the greenish-muddy color of swamp water.

The walls between the windows were dotted with cracks and dark spots of fallen plaster - as if time had written his biography on the walls of the house in hieroglyphs. The roof, sloping towards the street, further increased its deplorable appearance; it seemed as if the house was bent to the ground and was meekly awaiting the final blow from fate, which would turn it into a shapeless pile of half-rotten rubble.

The gate is open - one half of it, torn from its hinges, lies on the ground, and in the gap, between its boards, grass has sprouted, thickly covering the large, deserted courtyard of the house. In the depths of the courtyard there is a low, smoky building with a single-slope iron roof. The house itself is uninhabited, but in this building, formerly a blacksmith shop, there was now a “night shelter” maintained by retired captain Aristide Fomich Kuvalda.

Inside the shelter is a long, gloomy hole, four and six fathoms in size; it was lit - only on one side - by four small windows and a wide door. Its brick, unplastered walls are black with soot, the ceiling, from a baroque bottom, is also smoked black; in the middle of it there was a huge stove, the base of which was a forge, and around the stove and along the walls there were wide bunks with piles of all sorts of junk that served as beds for the night shelters. The walls smelled of smoke, the earthen floor smelled of damp, and the bunks smelled of rotting rags.

The room of the owner of the shelter was located on the stove, the bunks around the stove were a place of honor, and those shelters who enjoyed the favor and friendship of the owner were placed on them.

The captain always spent the day at the door to the lodging house, sitting in some semblance of an armchair, which he himself built from bricks, or in Yegor Vavilov’s tavern, located diagonally from Petunnikov’s house; there the captain dined and drank vodka.

Before renting this premises, Aristide Hammer had an office in the city for the recommendation of servants; going higher into his past, one could find out that he had a printing house, and before the printing house he, in his words, “simply lived! And he lived gloriously, damn it! He lived skillfully, I can say!”

He was a broad-shouldered, tall man of about fifty, with a pockmarked face, swollen from drunkenness, and a wide, dirty yellow beard. His eyes are gray, huge, and boldly cheerful; He spoke in a deep voice, with a rumble in his throat, and almost always a German porcelain pipe with a curved stem stuck out in his teeth. When he was angry, the nostrils of his large, humpbacked, red nose flared wide and his lips quivered, revealing two rows of large, wolf-like yellow teeth. Long-armed, lanky-legged, dressed in a dirty and torn officer's overcoat, in a greasy cap with a red band but without a visor, in thin felt boots that reached his knees - in the morning he was invariably in in serious condition hangover, and in the evening - tipsy. He could not get drunk, no matter how much he drank, and he never lost his cheerful mood.

In the evenings, sitting in his brick chair with a pipe in his mouth, he received guests.

What kind of person? - he asked a ragged and depressed person approaching him, thrown out of the city for drunkenness or for some other good reason who had fallen down.

The man answered.

Provide legal paper to support your lies.

The paper was presented if there was one. The captain put it in his bosom, rarely interested in its contents, and said:

Everything is fine. For a night - two kopecks, for a week - a kopeck, for a month - three kopecks. Go and find a place for yourself, but make sure it’s not someone else’s, otherwise they’ll blow you up. People living with me are strict...

Newcomers asked him:

Don’t you sell tea, bread or anything edible?

I only sell walls and roofs, for which I myself pay the swindler owner of this hole, the merchant of the 2nd guild Judas Petunnikov, five rubles a month,” Kuvald explained in a businesslike tone, “people come to me, unaccustomed to luxury... and if you I’m used to eating every day - there’s a tavern across the street. But it’s better if you, you bastard, unlearn this bad habit. After all, you are not a gentleman - so what do you eat? Eat yourself!

"Former People" is a work created in 1897. It is based on the author’s personal impressions, which he received when he had to live in a rooming house on the outskirts of Kazan. In terms of genre, this work can be defined as an essay, since it is characterized by authenticity of the image, lack of dynamics, attention to everyday life, as well as detailed portrait characteristics. In "Former People" Gorky evaluates the tramp type in a new way. There is no romantic aura, familiar to us from his early works.

"Former people": summary

A significant place in the first part is given to description. First, a suburban street appears before us. She's dirty and sad. The houses located here are nondescript: with skewed windows and crooked walls, leaky roofs. We see piles of garbage and rubble. The following describes the house of the merchant Petunnikov. This is a rickety building with broken windows. Its walls are all riddled with cracks. In this house, which bears little resemblance to housing, there is a rooming house. It resembles a dark, long hole.

Portraits of homeless people

Aristide Kuvalda is the owner of the flophouse, who previously served as a captain. He heads the company of so-called “former people” and represents its “general headquarters”. Gorky describes him as a tall, broad-shouldered man of about 50 years old, with a pockmarked face, swollen from drunkenness. He is dressed in a torn and dirty officer's overcoat, and on his head is a greasy cap.

Below are portraits of other night shelters. One of them is the Teacher. He is a stooped, tall man with a bald skull and a long, pointed nose. Another roommate is Alexey Maksimovich Simtsov, also known as Kubar. This man is a former forester. Gorky notes that he is “thick as a barrel.” He has a small crimson nose, a thick white beard and cynical, watery eyes.

The next inhabitant of the shelter is Luka Antonovich Martyanov, nicknamed The End. He used to work as a prison guard, and now he is one of the "former people." This is a silent and gloomy drunkard.

Pavel Solntsev (Obyedok), a mechanic, also lives here. He is a consumptive, lopsided man of about thirty years of age. Next, the author describes Kiselnikov. This night shelter is a former convict. He is bony and tall, “crooked in one eye.” He was nicknamed One and a Half Taras, since his friend Taras, a former deacon, was one and a half times shorter than him. Next we meet a long-haired “ridiculous” young man “with a stupid, high-cheekbone face.” His nickname is Meteor. Then the author introduces us to the ordinary inhabitants of the shelter, the men. One of them is Tyapa, an old rag picker.

Characteristics of overnight shelters

Maxim Gorky draws our attention to how indifferent these people are to their fate, as well as to the life and fate of others. They are apathetic and show powerlessness in the face of external circumstances. At the same time, bitterness grows in their souls, which is directed against prosperous people. By the way, the world of “former people” in M. Gorky’s play “At the Lower Depths” is very reminiscent of the one created in the essay that interests us.

Conflict with Petunnikov

In the second part of the work, the discontent of all these characters results in open conflict with Petunnikov, a local merchant. The nature of this conflict is social. The captain noticed that some part of the merchant’s plant was located on Vavilov’s land. He persuades the innkeeper to file a lawsuit against Petunnikov. It should be noted that Aristide Hammer in this case is not driven by the desire to profit. He just wants to annoy Petunnikov, whom he privately calls the hated Judas.

Result of the confrontation

However, the lawsuit, which promised 600 rubles, ends in settlement. The businesslike, educated and cruel son of Petunnikov convinces Vavilov of the need to withdraw the lawsuit from the court. Otherwise, he threatens to close the pub run by the innkeeper. The inhabitants of the shelter understand that now they will need to leave their beloved place, because the merchant, of course, will not forgive them for this offense.

Soon Petunnikov actually demands to leave the “hut” immediately. But the troubles don't end there. Uchiel dies, for whose death Aristide Sledgehammer is blamed. This is how the community of night shelters finally disintegrates. Petunnikov is triumphant.

Psychology of heroes

Maxim Gorky pays great attention not only to the study of the life of the so-called former people. He is also interested in their psychology and inner world. The author believes that life in a shelter gives rise to weak people who are not capable of rebirth and self-realization. They deny everything, including own life. This position (its ideologist is Sledgehammer) is destructive and unpromising. It lacks a creative, positive beginning. And discontent, which is caused by powerlessness, can only give rise to despair and anger.

We can say that he is presented above) in his essay “Former People” pronounces a verdict on the inhabitants of the “bottom”. These are degraded, powerless and inactive characters. Analysis of the essay “Former People” shows that they are not capable of good feelings and actions. In this regard, the episode of the Teacher’s death is indicative. Sledgehammer, who considered this man his friend, could not even find human words for him. Social problems, reflected in the stories of the tramp cycle, will continue to develop in the future in the plays of Maxim Gorky.

The difference between the work and physiological essays

The main subject of the image was social roles heroes, not specific characters. The authors were interested, for example, in the St. Petersburg organ grinder, the St. Petersburg janitor, cab drivers, officials, and merchants. In the artistic essay created by M. Gorky (“Former People”), the main attention is paid to the study of the characters who are united social status. The heroes found themselves in a shelter, at the very bottom of their lives. The shelter is run by Aristide Kuvalda, who himself is a “former” person, because he is a retired captain.

Lack of an autobiographical hero

Some other features of the work can be noted. For example, in Former People there is no autobiographical hero, an image so familiar to Gorky. The narrator in this work seems to want to distance himself from everything and not give away his presence. We can say that his role in the work “Former People” by Maxim Gorky is somewhat different than in the cycle “Across Rus'” or in romantic stories author. The autobiographical hero is not a listener of the characters, their interlocutor. Only the details of the portrait of the young man whom Hammer nicknamed Meteor, and the characteristics of how he treats others, allow us to discern in him an autobiographical hero. True, he is somewhat distanced from the narrator in this work.

The transition from romanticism to realism

The main thing that distinguishes “Former People” from those related to early creativity, is a transition from a romantic interpretation of character to a realistic one. The author still portrays people from the people. However, his appeal to realism allows him to show much more clearly the contrast between dark and light, weak and strengths folk character, its inconsistency. This is precisely the subject of research in the work “Former People”.

It seems that the author, having taken a position of realism, cannot find a way to resolve the conflict between a person’s destiny (his height) and his tragic lack of fulfillment in the lives of “former” people, the low social position that they occupy. The insurmountability of this conflict forces Gorky to return to the worldview characteristic of romanticism in the final landscape. Only in the elements can one find a solution to the insoluble. The author writes that there was something inexorable and tense in the strict gray clouds that completely covered the sky. As if they were about to burst into a downpour and wash away all the dirt from the sad, tormented earth. However, overall the landscape is realistic. It is necessary to say a few words about him.

Scenery

In the early stories of the author, it was intended to emphasize the exclusivity of the characters, and the spirituality and beauty southern night, the horror of a dark forest or the endless free steppe could be the background against which the romantic hero, at the cost of his life, asserting his ideal. Now Gorky Maxim ("Former People") turns to a realistic landscape. He is interested in its anti-aesthetic features. The ugly outskirts of the city appear before us. The cloudiness of colors, dimness, and pallor are needed to create a feeling of abandonment of the environment in which the shelters live.

Conflict

The author tries to understand how great the social and personal potential of the so-called “former people” is. It is important for him to find out whether, finding themselves in difficult everyday and social conditions, they can preserve spiritual, intangible values ​​that can be opposed to a world that is so unfair to them. The uniqueness of the conflict is determined by this aspect of the problem. The conflict in the work is of a social nature. After all, the night shelters, led by Kuvalda, are opposed to the merchant Petunnikov, as well as his son - a cold, strong, intelligent and educated representative of the Russian bourgeoisie.

The author is interested in to a greater extent Not social aspect of this confrontation, but the unwillingness of the heroes to comprehend their own position, possible prospects, and their needs. It’s not someone else’s land that interests them, or even money. This is only a manifestation of the hatred of a poor drunkard towards a hard-working and rich man.

Gorky reveals the complete absence in “former people” creativity, internal growth, activity, self-improvement. But these qualities are very important for the author. They are presented in the novel "Mother", as well as in its hero autobiographical trilogy. The inhabitants of the shelter cannot resist anything surrounding reality except for anger. This brings them to the very bottom. Their anger turns against themselves. The “former people” achieved nothing by their opposition to the merchant.

M. Gorky

Former people

The entrance street consists of two rows of one-story shacks, closely pressed together, dilapidated, with crooked walls and skewed windows; the leaky roofs of human dwellings, mutilated by time, are covered with patches of splints and overgrown with moss; Here and there high poles with birdhouses stick out above them, they are overshadowed by the dusty greenery of elderberries and gnarled willows - the pitiful flora of the city outskirts inhabited by the poor.

The glass windows of the houses, dull green with age, look at each other with the eyes of cowardly swindlers. In the middle of the street, a winding track crawls uphill, maneuvering between deep ruts washed out by rain. Here and there lie heaps of rubble and various debris overgrown with weeds - these are the remains or beginnings of those structures that were unsuccessfully undertaken by ordinary people in the fight against the streams of rainwater that was rapidly flowing from the city. Above, on the mountain, beautiful stone houses are hidden in the lush greenery of dense gardens, the bell towers of churches proudly rise into the blue sky, their golden crosses sparkle dazzlingly in the sun.

When it rains, the city releases its dirt onto Vezzhaya Street, and when it’s dry, it showers it with dust - and all these ugly houses also seem to have been thrown from there, from above, swept away like garbage by someone’s mighty hand.

Flattened to the ground, they dotted the entire mountain, half-rotten, weak, painted by the sun, dust and rain in that grayish-dirty color that a tree takes on in old age.

At the end of this street, thrown out of the city downhill, stood the long, two-story escheated house of the merchant Petunnikov. He is the last one in order, he is already under the mountain, further behind him there is a wide field, cut off half a mile by a steep cliff to the river.

The large, old house had the gloomiest face among its neighbors. It was all crooked, in two rows of its windows there was not a single one that retained the correct shape, and the glass fragments in the broken frames had the greenish-muddy color of swamp water.

The walls between the windows were dotted with cracks and dark spots of fallen plaster - as if time had written his biography on the walls of the house in hieroglyphs. The roof, sloping towards the street, further increased its deplorable appearance; it seemed as if the house was bent to the ground and was meekly awaiting the final blow from fate, which would turn it into a shapeless pile of half-rotten rubble.

The gate is open - one half of it, torn from its hinges, lies on the ground, and in the gap, between its boards, grass has sprouted, thickly covering the large, deserted courtyard of the house. In the depths of the courtyard there is a low, smoky building with a single-slope iron roof. The house itself is uninhabited, but in this building, formerly a blacksmith shop, there was now a “night shelter” maintained by retired captain Aristide Fomich Kuvalda.

Inside the shelter is a long, gloomy hole, four and six fathoms in size; it was lit - only on one side - by four small windows and a wide door. Its brick, unplastered walls are black with soot, the ceiling, from a baroque bottom, is also smoked black; in the middle of it there was a huge stove, the base of which was a forge, and around the stove and along the walls there were wide bunks with piles of all sorts of junk that served as beds for the night shelters. The walls smelled of smoke, the earthen floor smelled of damp, and the bunks smelled of rotting rags.

The room of the owner of the shelter was located on the stove, the bunks around the stove were a place of honor, and those shelters who enjoyed the favor and friendship of the owner were placed on them.

The captain always spent the day at the door to the lodging house, sitting in some semblance of an armchair, which he himself built from bricks, or in Yegor Vavilov’s tavern, located diagonally from Petunnikov’s house; there the captain dined and drank vodka.

Before renting this premises, Aristide Hammer had an office in the city for the recommendation of servants; going higher into his past, one could find out that he had a printing house, and before the printing house he, in his words, “simply lived! And he lived gloriously, damn it! He lived skillfully, I can say!”

He was a broad-shouldered, tall man of about fifty, with a pockmarked face, swollen from drunkenness, and a wide, dirty yellow beard. His eyes are gray, huge, and boldly cheerful; He spoke in a deep voice, with a rumble in his throat, and almost always a German porcelain pipe with a curved stem stuck out in his teeth. When he was angry, the nostrils of his large, humpbacked, red nose flared wide and his lips quivered, revealing two rows of large, wolf-like yellow teeth. Long-armed, lanky-legged, dressed in a dirty and torn officer's overcoat, in a greasy cap with a red band but without a visor, in thin felt boots that reached his knees - in the morning he was invariably in a severe state of hangover, and in the evening he was tipsy. He could not get drunk, no matter how much he drank, and he never lost his cheerful mood.

In the evenings, sitting in his brick chair with a pipe in his mouth, he received guests.

What kind of person? - he asked a ragged and depressed person approaching him, thrown out of the city for drunkenness or for some other good reason who had fallen down.

The man answered.

Provide legal paper to support your lies.

The paper was presented if there was one. The captain put it in his bosom, rarely interested in its contents, and said:

Everything is fine. For a night - two kopecks, for a week - a kopeck, for a month - three kopecks. Go and find a place for yourself, but make sure it’s not someone else’s, otherwise they’ll blow you up. People living with me are strict...

Newcomers asked him:

Don’t you sell tea, bread or anything edible?

I only sell walls and roofs, for which I myself pay the swindler owner of this hole, the merchant of the 2nd guild Judas Petunnikov, five rubles a month,” Kuvald explained in a businesslike tone, “people come to me, unaccustomed to luxury... and if you I’m used to eating every day - there’s a tavern across the street. But it’s better if you, you bastard, unlearn this bad habit. After all, you are not a gentleman - so what do you eat? Eat yourself!

For such speeches, pronounced in an artificially stern tone, but always with laughing eyes, for attentive attitude To his guests, the captain enjoyed wide popularity among the city residents. It often happened that the captain's former client came to his yard, no longer torn and depressed, but in more or less decent shape and with a cheerful face.

Hello, your honor! How are you doing?

Didn't you recognize it?

I didn't recognize it.

Do you remember that I lived with you for about a month in the winter... when there was a raid and three people were taken away?

Well, brother, the police are under my hospitable roof every now and then!

Oh, my God! Back then you showed the private bailiff a fig!

Wait, you spit on memories and just say what you need?

Would you like to accept a small treat from me? How I lived with you at that time, and you told me...

Gratitude should be encouraged, my friend, because it is rare among people. You must be a nice fellow, and although I don’t remember you at all, I will go to the tavern with you with pleasure and drink to your successes in life with pleasure.

Are you still the same - are you still joking?

What else can you do while living among you Goryunov?

They were walking. Sometimes the captain's former client, all unhinged and shaken by the treat, returned to the lodging house; the next day they treated themselves again, and one fine morning the former client woke up with the consciousness that he had drunk himself to the ground again.

Your honor! That's it! Am I on your team again? What now?

A position that cannot be boasted about, but, being in it, one should not whine,” the captain resonated. “It is necessary, my friend, to be indifferent to everything, without spoiling one’s life with philosophy and without raising any questions.” Philosophizing is always stupid, philosophizing with a hangover is inexpressibly stupid. A hangover requires vodka, not remorse and gnashing of teeth... take care of your teeth, otherwise there will be nothing to hit you with. Here's two kopecks for you - go and bring a box of vodka, a patch of hot tripe or lung, a pound of bread and two cucumbers. When we are hungover, then we will weigh the situation...

“Former People” (1897), This work was based on the writer’s personal impressions when he was forced to live in a rooming house on one of the outskirts of Kazan. In terms of genre, this work can be called an essay, since it is distinguished by the authenticity of the image, special attention to the details of everyday life, lack of a dynamic plot, detailed portrait characteristics. In this work, Gorky already evaluates the type of tramp differently (there is no romantic aura).

In the first part significant place devoted to the description: first of a dirty, dull, outlying street (with crooked walls and skewed windows of houses, “leaky roofs,” “cloudy-green window glass from old age,” heaps of rubble and various garbage), then “the escheated house of the merchant Petunnikov” (crooked , with broken glass, with walls riddled with cracks), where the “night shelter” is located. The shelter itself resembles a “long, gloomy hole” that bears little resemblance to human habitation. “The walls smelled of smoke, the earthen floor smelled of damp, and the bunks smelled of rotting rags.” From a description of the interior, Gorky moves on to detailed portrait characteristics of the shelters. Heads the company.former people", "general staff" Aristide Kuvalda (former captain, owner of the flophouse), "broad-shouldered tall man about fifty years old, with a pockmarked face, swollen from drunkenness,” dressed in “a dirty and torn officer’s overcoat, in a greasy cap with a red band.” This is followed by portrait characteristics of other shelters. This is the Teacher, “tall, stooped, with a long sharp nose and a bald skull”; and Alexey Maksimovich Simtsov, nicknamed Kubar (former forester), “thick as a barrel”, with a white thick beard, with a small crimson nose and watery, cynical eyes,” and Luka Antonovich Martyanov, nicknamed Konets (former prison guard), “a gloomy, silent, black drunkard, and mechanic Pavel Solntsev (aka Obedok), a lopsided consumptive man of about thirty, and “ tall and bony, crooked in one eye” Kiselnikov, a former convict, nicknamed One and a Half Taras, since his inseparable friend, the former deacon Taras, was half a height shorter than him. There was also a “ridiculous”, long-haired, “with a stupid, high-cheekboned face” young man, nicknamed Meteor, and ordinary homeless men, for example, the old rag picker Tyapa. Gorky draws the reader's attention to the indifference of these people to life, to their own and others' fate, to apathy, powerlessness in the face of circumstances and at the same time to the growing bitterness in their souls: directed against prosperous people.

The dissatisfaction of former people with their lives results in the second part of the essay into an open conflict with the merchant Petunnikov. This conflict has a pronounced social character. The captain, who noticed that part of Petunnikov’s factory stands on Vavilov’s land, persuades the innkeeper to file a lawsuit against the merchant. Aristide Kuvalda is driven not at all by the desire to profit, but simply to annoy the hated Judas (as Petunnikova Kuvalda calls himself). But the lawsuit, which promised six hundred rubles, ends in a settlement. Petunnikov’s son, an educated, businesslike and cruel man, convinces Vavilov to withdraw the lawsuit from the court, threatening to completely close the innkeeper’s drinking establishment. The shelters understand that they will have to leave their homes, since Petunnikov will not forgive them for their offense. And, indeed, Petunnikov demands to immediately “free the shack.” To top it all off, the Teacher dies, and Aristide Sledgehammer is blamed for his death. The community of homeless shelters finally disintegrates, and Petuniikov feels like a winner. Gorky pays great attention research not only into the life of “former people”, but also into their inner world, psychology. He notes that the shelter gives rise to weak people, incapable of self-realization, of rebirth; people who deny everything, even their own lives. This position (and its ideologist is Aristide Kuvalda) is unpromising and destructive, there is absolutely no positive, creative principle in it. And discontent caused by powerlessness only gives rise to anger and despair. In fact, in the essay “Former People ~ Gorky pronounces a verdict on people of the bottom, inactive, powerless, degraded, incapable of actions, of good human feelings (indicative in this regard is the episode with the death of the Teacher, when Sledgehammer, who considered him his friend, had no even human words). The stories of the tramp cycle reflect those social topics and problems that will later find their solution in Gorky's plays.