In the novel “Oblomov,” Alexander Goncharov touches on the theme of friendship between people completely different in character and views.
A comparative description of the image of Oblomov and Stolz will help the reader figure out whether it is capable of changing a person for the better.
Childhood and education
Ilya Ilyich Oblomov grew up as a spoiled child. The parents were too protective of their son and did not give him the opportunity to prove himself. Didn't like to study. He believed that science was sent to people as punishment for their sins. As a thirteen-year-old boy, he was enrolled in a boarding school. He often asked his mother for permission to stay at home and not go to school. I did not receive sufficient knowledge at the university due to my own laziness.
Andrey Ivanovich Stolts was a smart boy. He absorbed knowledge like a sponge. His father raised him in strictness. Mother did not encourage “labor education.” When the father sent his son to university, he did not take him to the city. I said goodbye at the gate without unnecessary emotions, put on his cap, and pushed him so hard that he knocked him off his feet.”
Appearance
Ilya has overweight. His “plump arms and soft shoulders” gave his appearance a certain delicacy. “His complexion was not ruddy or dark, he seemed positively pale.” There were always certain thoughts in the gray eyes that quickly disappeared before they had time to settle in their heads.
Andrey he is thin, has no cheeks at all, and has dark skin. “He was made of bones, nerves and muscles, like an English horse.” His face had expressive green eyes. It exudes masculinity and health.
Aspirations and wealth
Ilya Oblomov at thirty-two years old, he had acquired absolutely nothing on his own. He left the service because of a stupid mistake he made, sending important documents not at the address. He couldn't complete a simple assignment. Lives in rented apartments. The property inherited from parents suffers losses and does not bring adequate prosperity. Ilya Ilyich knows nothing about financial matters.
Doesn't try to keep up with anything and create something in life. He lies on the sofa, constantly in a sleepy state.
Stolz“I served, after resigning, I went into business on my own and made a house and money. He is involved in some company that ships goods overseas.” Does not make mistakes in work. He achieved respect in society and material wealth through his own efforts. “He is constantly on the move: if society needs to send an agent to England or Belgium, they send him. Should be created new project or disassemble new idea- Stolz is chosen.”
Love for a woman
Andrey respects opposite sex. In his relationship with Olga Ilyinskaya, he proves himself to be a true gentleman, capable of solving all the concerns of his beloved and making her happy. He achieved his goal - he married the one he loves.
Ilya always tactful in dealing with women. He loved Olga Ilyinskaya, but could not overcome his laziness and reluctance to change. I was afraid of the ordinariness of marriage. He caused his beloved a lot of trouble; she often cried because of his caustic speeches. He married the widow Pshenitsyna, from whom he rented a room. She demanded absolutely nothing from him. Such relationships suited Oblomov.
Attitude to life
Andrey Stolts, full of health, wishes to live many more years. Although he is a realist, phrases are often heard from his lips that he wants to “live two hundred, three hundred years.” Adheres to the goal that everything should be accomplished based on clearly defined tasks. The dream had no place in his soul.
Ilya Oblomov calls himself an “old caftan.” Sometimes he voices thoughts that he would lie down and fall asleep forever. Likes to dream. His imagination often paints imaginary pictures. The images of the future wife and children are especially clearly highlighted.
Ivan Aleksandrovich Goncharov’s novel “Oblomov” rightfully occupies an important place in the heritage of Russian classical literature nineteenth century. A work that reveals the characters of people living at the same time and in the same society cannot but attract attention, and the life stories of two friends, Ilya Oblomov and Andrei Stolts, deserve special attention.
Ilya Ilyich Oblomov is an ambiguous and very curious character. He spends his days on his favorite sofa, being in an eternal half-asleep and some semblance of a state of relaxed apathy. He is not interested in active work, nor in farming, nor in self-development - his whole life is like the sluggish flow of a river, measured and unhurried. It can be noted that Ilya Ilyich’s parents also encouraged this way of life - he was raised in love and tenderness, and sometimes overprotected, which led to the formation of a frankly infantile attitude towards life at a conscious age. Dreams, reveries and memories of a happy childhood - that’s what Oblomov’s world consists of.
Oblomov's childhood friend, Andrei Ivanovich Stolts, is the complete opposite of the main character of the novel. Stolz is hardworking, and this trait was instilled in him from the very beginning. early years life. Andrei Ivanovich’s parents showed the hero by their example how important it is to be an economic and active person, so as not to simply live your life in vain. But, in my opinion, there are a number of misconceptions in Stolz’s lifestyle - the character literally “lives” by work, his whole life is planned out by the hour and minute, there is no place in it for surprises and simple human joys, not overshadowed by the constant oppression of the need to work and banally keep everything is under control.
Despite the fact that Ilya Oblomov and Andrei Stolts are completely different, their friendship lasts for decades. Stolz respects Oblomov for his kindness and honesty, and Oblomov appreciates high moral qualities and decency in his friend. Watching the history of their friendship, you begin to think about how minor character traits can be, life guidelines and goals, if the main thing lives in people’s souls - goodness, justice, openness and willingness to help and support.
In my opinion, in the novel “Oblomov” Goncharov shows readers how important it is to respect and appreciate each other, even if we are talking about people completely different from each other. Neither Stolz nor Oblomov can be called ideal people, however, they are able to demonstrate their best qualities and be true friends, and that costs a lot.
Essay by Oblomov and Stolz
Goncharov, creating a novel called “Oblomov,” showed readers two specific types of people. Such different people. And both are inherently unhappy... Drawing the images of Oblomov and Stolz, the author captured qualities in them that were different from each other. It cannot be argued that the qualities of any of the characters presented are negative. No, these are some kind of shortcomings that sometimes you don’t pay attention to. And often habits are too hard to break...
Ilya Oblomov... A true dreamer, a true romantic. Since childhood, he grew up carefree. The child did not know what commitment and curiosity were. All his life he was away from fame and luxury. The hero grew up at home, completely unprepared for life’s circumstances.
mother in early age She was too protective of her son, which is why Oblomov left the family as a sloppy and inexperienced person. The character loves being in a fantasy world so much that he forgets about reality. That’s why he often spends his time in dreams, and rarely does the hero wander the streets. Oblomov is not able to work; he is too tender and weak for work. However, the character is notable for the fact that in any situation his feelings come first. The priority is not the material, but the spiritual component!
What can I say about Stolz? This character is the complete opposite of Oblomov. He dresses brilliantly, is well educated, and is a hard worker. Since childhood, he showed curiosity about all the oddities in this world. From an early age, his mother managed to introduce art into Stolz’s life and introduce the boy to music and books. The father did not infringe on the freedom of his own child. He knew that if a person is interested, then in no case should this curiosity be excluded. Otherwise, the child will lose all attachment to the world. Therefore, the hero often left home at night in order to explore new areas and outskirts. He himself was responsible for own life. He himself accepted the punishment for disobedience. Already in early period During childhood, the child learned the important qualities of adults. Responsibility, integrity, striving for excellence. That is why Stolz was known as a successful man. He has an excellent job that brings in a huge income. His wardrobe is gorgeous. However, the hero doesn't care family relationships. He is tied up in numbers and calculations. His calling is to work like a machine. But Stolz has nothing behind this... Feelings don’t come out...
Comparing the two heroes of Goncharov’s novel, it should be noted that Stolz and Oblomov are completely different personalities. If the first is a hard worker, then the other is a real dreamer. For Stolz, it is important to set goals and achieve them. For Oblomov to draw in his head heavenly life. But, what is noteworthy, Stolz’s beloved initially longed to be with Oblomov. Why? The answer is simple: Oblomov had real feelings. Sincere smile beautiful eyes, childish sloppiness. All this was attractive. However, due to Ilya's fear, the beloved doves were unable to find each other. But the heroine was not happy with Stolz either. They didn't even have children. So figure out where right choice!
Several interesting essays
- Analysis of the work The Third Son of Platonov
The topic of relations between generations, in particular between parents and children, can safely be called eternal. It is relevant at all times, at all times historical eras. This is a philosophical question that can be discussed and debated endlessly.
- Analysis of Aitmatov's story The First Teacher
The story “The First Teacher” by Chingiz Aitmatov was written in 1962. In this fascinating work, the author takes us back to distant 1924, the days of the formation of Soviet power. The time when centuries-old foundations were broken
- The image and characteristics of Gerasim in the story of Mumu Turgenev 5th grade essay
The main character of the story, Gerasim, is a janitor, tall and powerfully built, whom the lady took from the village with her to Moscow.
- Social and philosophical origins of Raskolnikov's rebellion
In the novel by Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky “Crime and Punishment” one of the most important topics touched upon by the author are social problems and philosophical problems
- Chatsky's madness in the comedy Woe from Wit by Griboedov
In principle, according to the text the situation is simple. Chatsky’s beloved (Sophia), almost jokingly, but a little with anger, since she (and everyone around) is already tired of him with his behavior, says that he has gone crazy
So, the main character of the novel is Ilya Ilyich Oblomov. But the author pays no little attention to best friend Oblomov - Stoltz. Both heroes live at the same time, and it would seem that they should be similar, but is this so? Oblomov appears to us as a man “... about thirty-two or three years old, of average height, pleasant appearance, with dark gray eyes, but with the absence of any definite idea, ... an even light of carelessness glowed throughout his face.”
Stolz is the same age as Oblomov, “he is thin, he has almost no cheeks at all, ... his complexion is even, dark and there is no blush; his eyes, although a little greenish, are expressive.” Oblomov's parents were Russian nobles who owned several hundred serfs. Stolz was half German on his father's side, his mother was a Russian noblewoman.
Faith, Andrei Ivanovich, professed Orthodox, spoke Russian. Oblomov and Stolz have known each other since childhood; they studied in a small boarding school located five miles from Oblomovka, in the village of Verkhleve.
Stolz's father was the manager there. “Maybe Ilyusha would have had time to learn something well from him if Oblomovka had been about five hundred miles from Verkhlevo... The charm of Oblomov’s atmosphere, way of life and habits extended to Verkhlevo;...
There, except for Stolz's house, everything breathed the same primitive laziness, simplicity of morals, silence and stillness." But Ivan Bogdanovich raised his son strictly: "From the age of eight he sat with his father behind geographical map, sorted through the warehouses of Herder, Wieland, biblical verses and summed up the illiterate accounts of the peasants, townspeople and factory workers, and with his mother he read sacred history, learned the fables of Krylov and sorted through the warehouses of Telemachus. "As for physical education, then Oblomov was not even allowed out into the street, and Stolz “took up from the pointer and ran to destroy birds’ nests with the boys,” sometimes disappearing from home for a day. From childhood, Oblomov was surrounded by the tender care of his parents and nanny, and Stolz was brought up in an atmosphere of constant mental and physical labor. But both Oblomov and Stoltz are already over thirty, what are they like now?
Ilya Ilyich turned into a lazy gentleman, whose life is spent lying on the sofa: “Ilya Ilyich’s lying down was neither a necessity, like that of a sick person or like a person who wants to sleep, nor an accident, like that of someone who is tired, nor a pleasure, like a lazy person: this was his normal state." Stolz cannot imagine life without movement: “He is constantly on the move: if society needs to send an agent to Belgium or England, they send him; if they need to write some project or adapt a new idea to business, they choose him. Meanwhile, he goes to the world and reads: when he has time - God knows." Comparing Oblomov and Stolz, we see that they are very different, but what unites them?
Yes, undoubtedly, friendship, but what else? It seems to me that they are united by an eternal and uninterrupted sleep. Oblomov sleeps on his sofa, and Stolz sleeps in his stormy and eventful life. “Life: life is good!” says Oblomov, “What to look for there?
Interests of the mind, heart? Look where the center is around which all this revolves: it is not there, there is nothing deep that touches the living. All these are dead people, sleeping people, worse than me, these members of the world and society!... Don’t they sleep sitting all their lives?
Why am I more to blame than them, lying at home and not infecting my head with threes and jacks?" I completely agree with Oblomov and believe that people who live without a specific, lofty goal are simply sleeping in pursuit of satisfying their desires. But who is more needed than Russia? Oblomov or Stolz?
Of course, such progressive people as Stolz are simply necessary, especially at the beginning of the third millennium. But the Oblomovs will never die, there is a piece of Oblomov in each of us, we are all a little Oblomov in our souls.
It seems to me that the problem of the “sleeping man”, raised in the nineteenth century by Goncharov, is still relevant today. Lenin’s words are well known that even after three revolutions “the old Oblomov remained and he had to be washed, cleaned, scuffed and torn for a long time in order for any sense to come out.”
I.A. Goncharov in his novel touches upon very current topic the confrontation between work and laziness, which for centuries remains the most discussed and debatable. Nowadays, this topic is very problematic, since in our modern society Technology progresses and people stop working, laziness develops into the meaning of life.
The heroes of the novel, Oblomov and Stolz, have been friends since early childhood. Their acquaintance occurs while studying in the house of Stolz’s father, who taught the basics of the most important sciences.
Ilya Oblomov comes from a noble family; from early childhood, little Ilya is pampered and cherished. Parents and nannies forbid him to show any independent activity. Ilyusha, seeing this attitude towards himself, immediately realized that he could do nothing, since other people would do it all for him. His education took place in Stolz's house; he did not particularly want to study and his parents indulged him in this. This is how Oblomov’s entire youth passed. Adult life was no different from childhood and adolescence; Oblomov continues to lead a calm and lazy lifestyle. His passivity and idleness are reflected in everyday life. He woke up at lunchtime, slowly climbed out of bed, lazily ate his food and was not interested in any business. Laziness, ingrained from childhood, did not give Oblomov the slightest chance to strive for science, to understand the world around him. Despite all this, his imagination was very well developed, since due to idleness Oblomov’s imaginary world was very rich. Oblomov was also a very trusting person, and the main person Ilya trusted was Andrei Stolts. Shtolz is the complete antipode of Oblomov. From early childhood, Andrei was accustomed to order and to work. His parents raised him strictly but fairly. His father, a German by nationality, instilled in Andrei precision, hard work and punctuality. WITH youth Andrei carried out various assignments for his father, strengthening his character. He studied with Ilya; from his father, unlike Oblomov, Andrei was good at science, and he studied them with curiosity. Stolz's transition from childhood to adulthood happened very early, so Andrei was very active person. He strived for constant replenishment of knowledge, because “learning is light, and ignorance is darkness. He had a sober and practical view of current events, he never did anything hastily without thinking this issue, which he needed to solve. The prudence and punctuality inherent in childhood found a place in Stolz’s adult life. Mobility and energy contributed to him in any endeavors. Considering life positions Oblomov and Stolz in relation to Olga Ilyinskaya, the following conclusions can be drawn: Oblomov, living in his world - “Oblomovshchina”, was a romantic who for a long time decided to take concrete steps in real life. Their acquaintance with Olga Ilyinskaya occurs thanks to Stolz. Their relationship was not strong from the very beginning. Olga, knowing a lot about Oblomov from Stolz’s stories, tries to bring Oblomov back to life through the means of her love, but she fails to do this and “Oblomovism” wins. The relationship between Olga and Andrey develops naturally throughout life, “she laughs at his jokes, and he listens to her singing with pleasure.” They had a lot in common, but the most important thing was that they strived for life, this contributed to their rapprochement and the formation of a family.
Be that as it may, the fates of both heroes turn out relatively well. Stolz finds his happiness with Olga, and Oblomov finds his Oblomovka in the house on Vyborg side and lives out his life there with the woman he always dreamed of. This denouement shows that the author’s position towards both of his heroes is positive.
After reading the novel by I.A. Goncharov “Oblomov”, I am inclined to think that the events described in this work may be applicable to our time, since in modern society there are many people like Stolz and Oblomov. And their confrontation will be eternal.
In I. A. Goncharov’s novel “Oblomov” one of the main techniques for revealing images is the technique of antithesis. Using contrast, the image of the Russian gentleman Ilya Ilyich Oblomov and the image of the practical German Andrei Stolz are compared. Thus, Goncharov shows the similarities and differences between these characters in the novel.
Ilya Ilyich Oblomov- a typical representative of the Russian nobility of the 19th century. His social status can be briefly described as follows: “Oblomov, a nobleman by birth, a collegiate secretary by rank, has been living in St. Petersburg for twelve years without a break.” By nature, Oblomov is a gentle and calm person, trying not to disturb his usual way of life. “His movements, even when he was alarmed, were also restrained by gentleness and laziness, not without a kind of grace.” Oblomov spends whole days at home, lying on his sofa and thinking about the necessary transformations in his Oblomovka estate. At the same time, his face often lacked any definite idea. “The thought walked like a free bird across the face, fluttered in the eyes, sat on half-open lips, hid in the folds of the forehead, then completely disappeared, and then an even light of carelessness glowed throughout the whole face.” Even at home, “he was lost in the rush of everyday worries and kept lying there, tossing and turning from side to side.” Oblomov shuns secular society and generally tries not to go out into the street. His serene state is disturbed only by visitors who come to Oblomov only for selfish purposes. Tarantiev, for example, simply robs Oblomov, constantly borrowing money from him and not returning it. Oblomov turns out to be a victim of his visitors, not understanding the real purpose of their visits. Oblomov is so distant from real life that light for him represents eternal vanity without any purpose. “No sincere laughter, no glimmer of sympathy... what kind of life is this?” - Oblomov exclaims, counting communication with secular society a waste of time. But suddenly the calm and measured life of Ilya Ilyich is interrupted. What happened? His friend from his youth, Stolz, arrives, with whom Oblomov pins hopes of improving his situation.
“Stolz is the same age as Oblomov: and he is already over thirty years old. He served, retired, went about his business, and actually made a house and money.” The son of a burgher, Stolz can be considered the antipode to the idle Russian gentleman of the 19th century Oblomov. From early childhood he was brought up in harsh conditions, gradually getting used to the difficulties and hardships of life. His father is German, his mother is Russian, but Stolz inherited practically nothing from her. His father was fully involved in his upbringing, so his son grew up to be just as practical and purposeful. “He is all made up of bones, muscles and nerves, like a blooded English horse.” Unlike Oblomov, Stolz “was afraid of every dream,” “there was no place for the mysterious, the mysterious in his soul.” If for Oblomov the normal state can be called lying down, then for Stolz it is movement. The main task Stolz had a “simple, that is, direct, real view of life.” But what then connects Oblomov and Stolz? Childhood and school are what bound people so different in character and views for the rest of their lives. However, in his youth, Oblomov was just as active and passionate about knowledge as Stolz. They spent long hours together reading books and studying various sciences. But upbringing and a gentle character still played their role, and Oblomov soon moved away from Stolz. Subsequently, Stolz tries to bring his friend back to life, but his attempts are in vain: “Oblomovism” swallowed up Oblomov.
Thus, the technique of antithesis is one of the main techniques in I. A. Goncharov’s novel “Oblomov”. Using antithesis, Goncharov compares not only the images of Oblomov and Stolz, he also compares the objects and reality surrounding them. Using the technique of antithesis, Goncharov continues the tradition of many Russian writers. For example, N.A. Ostrovsky in his work “The Thunderstorm” contrasts Kabanikha and Katerina. If for Kabanikha the ideal of life is “Domostroy”, then for Katerina love, honesty and mutual understanding are above all. A, S. Griboedov in immortal work“Woe from Wit,” using the technique of antithesis, compares Chatsky and Famusov.
- In the novel “Oblomov” the skill of Goncharov as a prose writer was fully demonstrated. Gorky, who called Goncharov “one of the giants of Russian literature,” noted his special, flexible language. Poetic language Goncharov, his talent for figurative reproduction of life, the art of creating typical characters, compositional completeness and enormous artistic power The picture of Oblomovism presented in the novel and the image of Ilya Ilyich - all this contributed to the fact that the novel “Oblomov” took its rightful place among the masterpieces […]
- There is a type of book where the reader is captivated by the story not from the first pages, but gradually. I think that “Oblomov” is just such a book. Reading the first part of the novel, I was inexpressibly bored and did not even imagine that this laziness of Oblomov would lead him to some kind of sublime feeling. Gradually, the boredom began to go away, and the novel captured me, I was already reading with interest. I have always liked books about love, but Goncharov gave it an interpretation unknown to me. It seemed to me that boredom, monotony, laziness, [...]
- The second wonderful Russian prose writer half of the 19th century century Ivan Aleksandrovich Goncharov in the novel “Oblomov” reflected difficult time transition from one era of Russian life to another. Feudal relations and the estate type of economy were replaced by a bourgeois way of life. People's long-established views on life were crumbling. The fate of Ilya Ilyich Oblomov can be called an “ordinary story,” typical of landowners who lived serenely off the labor of serfs. Their environment and upbringing made them weak-willed, apathetic people, not […]
- Despite the significant volume of the work, there are relatively few characters in the novel. This allows Goncharov to give detailed characteristics of each of them, to compose detailed psychological portraits. They were no exception female images in the novel. In addition to psychologism, the author widely uses the technique of oppositions and the system of antipodes. Such couples can be called “Oblomov and Stolz” and “Olga Ilyinskaya and Agafya Matveevna Pshenitsyna.” The last two images are complete opposites of each other, their […]
- Andrei Stolts is Oblomov’s closest friend; they grew up together and carried their friendship through life. It remains a mystery how such dissimilar people, with such different views on life, could maintain deep affection. Initially, the image of Stolz was conceived as a complete antipode to Oblomov. The author wanted to combine German prudence and the breadth of the Russian soul, but this plan was not destined to come true. As the novel developed, Goncharov realized more and more clearly that in these conditions it was simply [...]
- Introduction. Some people find Goncharov's novel “Oblomov” boring. Yes, it’s true that Oblomov lies on the sofa for the entire first part, receiving guests, but here we get to know the hero. In general, the novel contains few intriguing actions and events that are so interesting to the reader. But Oblomov is “our people's type,” and it is he who is the bright representative of the Russian people. That's why the novel interested me. In the main character, I saw a piece of myself. You should not think that Oblomov is a representative only of Goncharov’s time. And now they live [...]
- Olga Sergeevna Ilyinskaya Agafya Matveevna Pshenitsyna Character qualities Captivating, delightful, promising, good-natured, warm-hearted and unfeigned, special, innocent, proud. Good-natured, open, trusting, sweet and reserved, caring, thrifty, neat, independent, constant, stands her ground. Appearance Tall, fair face, delicate thin neck, gray-blue eyes, fluffy eyebrows, long braid, small compressed lips. Grey-eyed; nice face; well-fed; […]
- The image of Oblomov in Russian literature closes the series of “superfluous” people. An inactive contemplator, incapable of active action, at first glance really seems incapable of a great and bright feeling, but is this really so? In the life of Ilya Ilyich Oblomov there is no place for global and dramatic changes. Olga Ilyinskaya, extraordinary and beautiful woman, a strong and strong-willed nature undoubtedly attracts the attention of men. For Ilya Ilyich, an indecisive and timid person, Olga becomes an object [...]
- The novel by I.A. Goncharov is permeated with various opposites. The technique of antithesis, on which the novel is built, helps to better understand the character of the characters and the author's intention. Oblomov and Stolz are two completely different personalities, but, as they say, opposites converge. They are connected by childhood and school, which you can learn about in the chapter “Oblomov’s Dream.” From it it becomes clear that everyone loved little Ilya, caressed him, and did not let him do anything on his own, although at first he was eager to do everything himself, but then they […]
- Oblomov's personality is far from ordinary, although other characters treat him with slight disrespect. For some reason, they read him as almost inferior in comparison to them. This was precisely the task of Olga Ilyinskaya - to awaken Oblomov, to force him to show himself as an active person. The girl believed that love would push him to great achievements. But she was deeply mistaken. It is impossible to awaken in a person what he does not have. Because of this misunderstanding, people’s hearts were broken, heroes suffered and […]
- Oblomov Stolz comes from a wealthy background noble family with patriarchal traditions. his parents, like his grandfathers, did nothing: serfs from a poor family worked for them: his father (a Russified German) was the manager of a rich estate, his mother was an impoverished Russian noblewoman. pour water for yourself) labor in the oblomovka was a punishment; it was believed that it bore the mark of slavery. there was a cult of food in the family, and [...]
- TO mid-19th V. under the influence of the realistic school of Pushkin and Gogol, a new remarkable generation of Russian writers grew up and was formed. The brilliant critic Belinsky already in the 40s noted the emergence of a whole group of talented young authors: Turgenev, Ostrovsky, Nekrasov, Herzen, Dostoevsky, Grigorovich, Ogarev, etc. Among these promising writers was Goncharov, future author"Oblomov", whose first novel " An ordinary story"Aroused high praise from Belinsky. LIFE AND CREATIVITY I. […]
- Created eight centuries ago by the genius of the Russian people, “The Lay” retains the significance of an unfading example for the present, for the future - both with its powerful patriotic sound, and the inexhaustible richness of content, and the unique poetry of all its elements. For Ancient Rus' The dynamic style is very characteristic. He finds himself in architecture, painting and literature. This is a style within which everything that is most significant and beautiful appears majestic. Chroniclers, authors of lives, church words […]
- Literary fate Feta is not quite ordinary. His poems written in the 40s. XIX century, were received very favorably; they were reprinted in anthologies, some of them were set to music and made the name Fet very popular. And indeed, the lyrical poems, imbued with spontaneity, liveliness, and sincerity, could not help but attract attention. In the early 50s. Fet was published in Sovremennik. His poems were highly appreciated by the editor of the magazine Nekrasov. He wrote about Fet: “Something strong and fresh, pure [...]
- Sonya Marmeladova is for Dostoevsky the same as Tatyana Larina is for Pushkin. We see the author's love for his heroine everywhere. We see how he admires her, speaks to God and in some cases even protects her from misfortune, no matter how strange it sounds. Sonya is a symbol, a divine ideal, a sacrifice in the name of saving humanity. She is like a guiding thread, like a moral example, despite her occupation. Sonya Marmeladova is the antagonist of Raskolnikov. And if we divide the heroes into positive and negative, then Raskolnikov will be [...]
- This is not an easy question. The path that must be followed to find the answer to it is painful and long. And will you find it? Sometimes it seems that this is impossible. Truth is not only a good thing, but also a stubborn thing. The further you go in search of an answer, the more questions you face. And it’s not too late, but who will turn back halfway? And there is still time, but who knows, maybe the answer is two steps away from you? The truth is tempting and many-sided, but its essence is always the same. Sometimes a person thinks that he has already found the answer, but it turns out that this is a mirage. […]
- The theme of St. Petersburg was set in Russian literature by Pushkin. It is in his Bronze Horseman", in "The Queen of Spades" we are faced with a two-faced city: beautiful, mighty St. Petersburg, the creation of Peter, and the city of poor Eugene, a city whose very existence turns into a tragedy for little man. In the same way, Gogol’s Petersburg is two-faced: a brilliant fantastic city is sometimes hostile to a person whose fate can be broken on the streets of the northern capital. Nekrasov’s Petersburg is sad – Petersburg of ceremonial […]
- Among the best students, I had the opportunity to go to Moscow. The next day after our arrival, we were taken on an excursion to the State Tretyakov Gallery. I entered a huge hall. I was surrounded by a “society” of paintings. I walked slowly through the hall, carefully looking at each work of the greats, famous artists, and suddenly stopped for some reason near what, in my opinion, was the most ordinary painting. It depicted a landscape of a Russian village. Looking at it carefully, I finally found the creator of this […]
- In general, the history of the creation and concept of the play “The Thunderstorm” is very interesting. For some time there was an assumption that this work was based on real events that occurred in the Russian city of Kostroma in 1859. “In the early morning of November 10, 1859, Kostroma bourgeois Alexandra Pavlovna Klykova disappeared from her home and either rushed into the Volga herself, or was strangled and thrown there. The investigation revealed the silent drama that played out in an unsociable family living narrowly with commercial interests: […]
- Nekrasov’s poem “Who Lives Well in Rus'” occupies a special place both in the history of Russian classical literature and in the poet’s creative heritage. It represents a synthesis of Nekrasov’s poetic activity, the completion of many years creative work revolutionary poet. Everything that Nekrasov developed in individual works for thirty years, collected here in a single plan, grandiose in content, scope and courage. It merged all the main lines of his poetic quest, most fully [...]