Raising a civilized person. I wonder what it means to be a cultured and civilized person

The world does not stand still and develops. However, at any time there were certain limits and restrictions that a person simply had to comply with. That is why now I want to understand what it means to be a cultured and civilized person.

A little about terminology

As you know, you need to start understanding the issue by defining the basic terms. What is the difference, or is there still a commonality between the concepts of “civilized” and It should be noted that there are several versions.

  1. The terms “civilization” and “culture” are considered as synonyms, inseparable concepts. In this context, civilization is determined by the level of development of society and its cultural traditions.
  2. The terms “culture” and “civilization” are opposed to each other. He also liked to talk about this. Thus, according to his opinion, culture is something moral, something that is inherent in a person. And civilization requires from a person only external compliance with generally accepted human rules of coexistence in society.
  3. O. Spengler’s opinion about So, he views culture as something cyclical is very interesting. And when cultural development society reaches its peak, that is, civilization, degradation and extinction occur. And the culture is changing.
  4. N.A. Berdyaev argued that culture is something individual, special, inherent in a certain group of people. But civilization is a ubiquitous and most common phenomenon that can be repeated in many societies.

That is, we can conclude that these terms are precisely interrelated with each other, regardless of the theory that considers them.

About people

A similar situation arises if we need to figure out what it means to be a cultured and civilized person. Again, since no consensus Regarding these terms, it is very difficult to decide on the designation of a cultured or civilized person. Here a lot depends on the society into which the individual is integrated. That is, in one social group some actions and statements may be normal, while in another they are completely unacceptable. This, by the way, often occurs when compared developed countries and African wild tribes.

Human culture

But still: what does it mean to be a cultured and civilized person in ordinary European society? This means adhering to the norms and rules that were previously adopted. By the way, some can go into oblivion, others can arise. For example, today no one says hello by raising their hat. But when you see someone you know, you need to take the headphones out of your ears to say hello.

It should also be noted that the concept of “human culture” is closely related to the term “educated person”. That is, the person must be spiritually rich. These are well-read people who try to develop and learn, regardless of their place of work, social class or higher education. A person may not have a university diploma, but be spiritually rich.

Examples of cultured people

If you ask a group of people the question “what does it mean to be a cultured and civilized person?”, you can hear many different opinions in response. For one cultured person- this is the one who does not litter on the street. The other puts forward broader and deeper demands on the individual. But you can still try to highlight and consider examples of a cultured and civilized person.

  • They are the ones who treat even strangers with respect.
  • A cultured person should also be moderately erudite.
  • Constant learning and learning something new - distinguishing feature cultured person.
  • A cultured person adheres to the rules of cohabitation in society. That is, he does not litter on the streets and maintains order at home and in his hometown.

An uncultured person is someone who does not comply with these rules and is an antisocial person.

History of world civilizations Fortunatov Vladimir Valentinovich

§ 18. Civilized man in a civilized society

Are there criteria according to which it is possible to determine the degree of civilization, the level of civilizational development of a particular country? Is it possible to determine in which country people life is better, and which one is worse? The fact is that in Russia (USSR) the comparative method of studying history was not held in high esteem and was little used. Or it was not used at all if it was assumed that the comparison would not be in favor of Russia (USSR). During the Soviet period, official propaganda, its conscientious or hypocritical servants tried to create an attractive image of their country, which would evoke in the Soviet people a “sense of legitimate pride” (the sixth, special feeling, inherent only to the Soviet people). The general concept looked something like this: in material terms, of course, we still have many unresolved problems, but we are spiritually rich, we are the most reading country in the world, etc.

Meanwhile, over a long period of time, the international community has gradually developed objective criteria for international comparisons. Some of the developed methods and matrices are criticized. Many approaches are beyond doubt and have become generally accepted.

Thus, one of the most important indicators is the production of certain products, volume of services, etc. per capita. According to these indicators, Russia until 1917 chronically lagged behind the most developed countries. Even during periods when the pace economic development(60-90s of the 19th century, 1908–1914) were the highest, Russia’s position did not improve, since other countries also did not stand still. After 1917, especially in the 30s, then in the 50s-60s. XX century there has been some progress in the indicator “production per capita”. But other countries, oddly enough, also continued to develop. There have been crises in the West, from which the USA, Great Britain, Germany, France, Japan and other developed countries ultimately emerged. The USSR, having entered a period of “stagnation”, then “perestroika”, turned into Russia. But embarking on the path of “modernization” after the “reforms” has not yet allowed the country to take any worthy place among developed countries in terms of “production per capita” indicator.

On the decline Soviet era the population of the USSR learned that under the conditions of Soviet power it was never possible to achieve scientifically based standards of food consumption, which in the USSR at the beginning of the 80s. XX century The “food problem” persists. After twenty years of regular experiments (“perestroika”, “reforms”), store shelves were filled with food products, but mainly due to imports and to the detriment of the development of their own agriculture. And the “average temperature in the hospital” leaves much to be desired.

Unfortunately, in Russian funds There is very little information available in the media about annual measurements of the civility of most countries of the world, which are carried out according to the methods of the UN and other international organizations.

So, human development index, published by the UN, consists of three parameters:

· life expectancy (by which the level of health care is judged);

level of education (percentage of people with primary, secondary and higher education);

· GDP per capita (by which experts suggest assessing the standard of living).

Innovation. International indices

Indices are relative indicators that allow direct comparison of disproportionate values. For example, price indices, indices of economic development of various countries, indices summarizing information from sociological research.

The level of economic development of a country is a system of indicators that allows international comparisons of the economic development of countries around the world. Modern economics identifies the following groups of indicators of the country's economic development levels: a) GDP/GNP and income per capita; b) industry structure national economy; c) production of main types of products per capita (level of development of individual industries); d) level and quality of life of the population; e) indicator of economic efficiency.

The UN has been calculating the HDI since 1990. Norway, Australia, Canada, Sweden, Belgium, the USA, Iceland, the Netherlands, Great Britain, Japan and others have been in first place for a long time. The UN draws a poverty line at half the average per capita income (GDP - gross domestic product per capita). For the USA in 2001, the average per capita income was 1300, in Russia - 300 dollars per month.

Life expectancy in Europe is 15–20 years higher than in Russia. The pension is 40–60% of earnings (in Russia – 26%). Compared to the US, Russian prices for clothing and household appliances 2 times higher, for food – 70%. The average American pays 12% in taxes, the rich pay 23.5%, and the rich European pays 40% and higher. And in Russia, since 2000, the tax rate of 13% has become the same for everyone. In the US and Europe, mortgage rates have been 3-4% for a long period. IN new Russia these rates are formally determined at 10–11%, but in fact are significantly higher. In Europe, nurseries, kindergartens, and schools are free, but in Russia they are paid. In Sweden and Finland, higher education is free. In the USSR, higher education was free, in modern Russia The share of students studying on a commercial basis is constantly growing. In the USA and France, food self-sufficiency is more than 100%, in Italy - 78%, in Japan - 50%. In Russia, food imports account for over 50%.

In Russia, housing construction has decreased by 3 times compared to the USSR. True, 1/3 of the constructed apartments are distributed free of charge (in rotation from the Soviet period). In 1994, a standard two-room apartment in Russia cost 12.1 times the average annual income, or 26.1 times the annual salary. In the 1970s - 3.4 average annual salaries. The average housing supply in Russia is 19.7 m2 per person. In EU countries - 40 m2; 61% of Russians want to improve their living conditions. 7% rely only on free social housing. There are 4.5 million families in need on the waiting list. To get free housing you have to wait in line for 15–20 years. The need for housing in Russia is 1.6 billion m2. In 2003, 36.3 million m 2 were put into operation, 160 banks issued loans for the purchase of apartments. Interest rates for mortgage loans (including budget subsidies) ranged from 5% in Khabarovsk to 28% in the Kemerovo region. Housing availability in Russian Federation 2–4 times lower than in the USA and developed countries European countries. Russia also lags behind developed countries in terms of thermal efficiency of buildings under construction and in operation. Every year in the Russian Federation, about 20% of all consumed energy resources are spent on heating needs. Modern Russian houses being put into operation require 500 kW for heating 1 m2 of housing. h. In Germany, 250 is enough, and in Sweden and Finland, with a climate similar to Russia, 125 kWh per 1 m 2 is enough. 40 million Russians live in poorly equipped houses, and 2.5 million live in dilapidated and dilapidated housing.

In international indices, Russia rarely ranks good places. Thus, in 2005, the international organization Freedom House in its annual report for the first time included Russia among the unfree countries. In 2005, according to the rating international organization Reporters Without Borders Russia ranked 138th out of 167 in terms of press freedom.

But in terms of the level of corruption, Russia is in last decades consistently took “prize” places.

“The reason for the disappointment of Russians is not in bourgeois values ​​or in the European political system, but in the fact that in Russia they have acquired perverted, often anti-people forms. We have not a European, but an oligarchic-bureaucratic quality of capitalism. The centuries-old tools of European democracy (free elections, independent courts, competition, socially responsible distribution of income, free trade unions) have been distorted and discredited in our country.

Television plays a negative role in the perception of Europe. What are they showing us? European bandits, corrupt politicians, prostitutes, drug addicts, homosexuals, rebellious Trotskyists, outcasts. But we don’t know how a Renault factory worker or a Hamburg dock worker lives. We have no idea about life a simple teacher or professor. How does a British recruit feel in the army? In which apartment does the driver, the doctor, or the saleswoman from the supermarket live? This is what needs to be compared! And not the one who has a higher “banner” or a purer moral tear.

We need not to spit in the direction of Europe, not to be afraid of it, but to bring our political system and everyday life in accordance with real European standards,” stated one of the country’s leading newspapers.

A civilized person in a civilized country lives by the rules, constantly works on himself, expands his horizons, sharpens his intellect, leads healthy image life.

In Russia, a huge number of people simply do not know and do not fulfill their constitutional duties, which can be counted on the fingers of one hand. Many people do not pay taxes, preferring to receive wages"black cash" Many unceremoniously, like real vandals, treat native nature. There are many manifestations of barbaric behavior in relation to cultural monuments. Sometimes the relationship between parents and children is very far from constitutional norms. Hundreds of thousands of people die every year as a result of widespread violations of the rules traffic, requirements of instructions on compliance with safety precautions, as a result of abuse of alcohol, tobacco, drug use, due to poor nutrition, etc.

The difference in levels of civilizational development is especially felt by observant Russians when crossing the border of their native fatherland. At the same time, it turns out that the vast majority of Russians are quite capable, once in a truly civilized country, of behaving in a completely civilized manner.

From the book Blockade Ethics. Ideas about morality in Leningrad in 1941 -1942. author Yarov Sergey Viktorovich

Chapter I. Ideas about civilized order: forms

From the book Crusade to the East [“Victims” of World War II] author Mukhin Yuri Ignatievich

From the book Everyday Life of the Nobility of Pushkin's Time. Etiquette author Lavrentieva Elena Vladimirovna

On Good Society (51) “Example is virtue or vice in action; it strikes us with a much stronger impression than cold teaching, and that is why it leaves deep and often indelible traces in our memory. good people inspires us with respect for them

author Katasonov Valentin Yurievich

6.7. “Debt Prosperity”, or “Civilized” Robbery (1) In the first part of the work, we talked about the fact that the Roman aristocracy quite actively participated in lending operations, acting both as creditors (without advertising, however, their usurious activities),

From the book From Slavery to Slavery [From Ancient Rome to modern Capitalism] author Katasonov Valentin Yurievich

6.8. “Debt prosperity”, or “Civilized” robbery (2) Now let’s get acquainted with the statistics of the external debt of Western countries. Data taken from the US CIA directory. In this source, external debt is understood as the amount of public and private debt subject to

From the book The Great Deception. A fictional history of Europe by Topper Uwe

In the best society Another counterfeiter pointed out by Agustin Sales in a letter to Mayans dated July 19, 1741 is Hubert Goltzius. According to this letter, he - "Like Gardouin" - produced numerous coins and medals for Spanish cities. This first professional

From the book The Crown of the Horde Empire, or Tatar yoke there wasn't author Enikeev Gali Rashitovich

Chapter 2 What was called the “Mongol-Tatar invasion of the civilized world”? Let's start the topic of this chapter with a review of the political situation in Central Asia at the end of the 12th century. beginning of XIII V. IN beginning of XII century Yelü Dashi - “Khitan nobleman” - flees to the west from the Jurchens and creates

From the book East - West. Stars of political investigation author Makarevich Eduard Fedorovich

Investigation in society Agranov was confident that in a country torn apart by confrontation between the authorities and some social groups, in a country where powerful political and economic changes are taking place, it is necessary to constantly know the mood of the people. To know him among workers and peasants,

From the book Alexander I - Napoleon's conqueror. 1801–1825 author Team of authors

The mood in society “Arakcheevshchina” caused sharp discontent in many layers of Russian society. Ferment in society began with the officers. Here, unrealized hopes for liberal reforms were discussed especially actively. Secret circles arose

From the book “Crusade to the East.” Hitler's Europe versus Russia author Mukhin Yuri Ignatievich

This “civilized” world As I wrote in the preface, the Second world war claimed the lives of 50 million people and more than half of this number were killed citizens of the USSR. On the shoulders of our fathers and grandfathers lay hardships incommensurable with the hardships of other warring countries. This is necessary

From the book Anti-Semitism as a Law of Nature author Brushtein Mikhail

From the book Articles author Volkov Sergey Vladimirovich

“Civilized patriotism” and modern political consciousness During the political events in Russia in the early 90s, for circles interested in opposing totalitarianism, the question naturally arose of searching for an alternative to communist revenge or the regime

From the book The Leader's Secret Project or Neo-Stalinism author Sidorov Georgy Alekseevich

Once again about society and the state It’s time for our people to realize what society is and what the state is. Who is in charge in this tandem? And who should obey and serve whom. From time immemorial, human society hired specially trained managers,

From the book Empire of Peter the Great (1700-1725) author Team of authors

Reforms in society NOBILITY - the highest class in Russian Empire. At 18 - beginning. 20th centuries it had privileges enshrined in law and inherited. In the 18th century. the dominant position of the Russian nobility in the life of the country was legally formalized. Decree 23

From the book Putin against the liberal swamp. How to save Russia author Kirpichev Vadim Vladimirovich

Fairy tale No. 1. Return to the civilized world Myth is opium for the elite. Before us is the basic myth of the Kremlin ideologists. For a thousand years we have not lived like this. In 988 they converted to Christianity. They fenced themselves off from the West with Orthodoxy and socialism. Dog knights were drowned in Lake Peipsi. They drove

From the book Life and Manners of Tsarist Russia author Anishkin V. G.

What is “civilization”? For the Greek, the word “civilized” means tamed, processed, grafted. A civilized person is a “grafted” person who vaccinates himself in order to bear more nutritious and juicy fruits. Civilization represents a set of inventions and discoveries aimed at protecting human life, to make it less dependent on the forces of nature, to strengthen it in the world physically by learning its laws - destructive for an ignorant person at the lower stages of development, but as they are studied, they become a weapon of his attack on this world. However, in addition to protecting life, civilization is also called upon to decorate it, increase general well-being, increase the joy of life in a society where there is more fair relations are slowly established between people. It must lead to the flowering of this life in the arts, which all people enjoy together, must develop the humanistic service of man in that real and at the same time imaginary world, which is the world of culture, remade and differently interpreted by the sciences and arts and which in turn has become an inexhaustible source further new creativity.

Here is a chain of many inventions - discoveries - conquests. Let's take some of them at random and use them as milestones for a table of contents that is not yet firmly outlined.

The Hellenic tribes that populated the Balkans in successive waves led a nomadic lifestyle. Tents, weapons - first wooden, then bronze - game and goats. The horse, the fastest of all animals domesticated by man, was already domesticated. These wild tribes lived mainly by hunting. Having settled on a peninsula called Hellas, they began to cultivate the stubborn land. This people remained to the end a predominantly rural people, not an urban one: the Greeks are peasants. Even Athens, in the days of its greatness, remains primarily a market for the villages of Attica. The Greeks grow cereals, plant olive trees, fig trees and cultivate vineyards. They very soon learned to exchange their oil and wine for fabrics made by their neighbors in Asia. Then they dare to set sail on the sea and take their beautiful painted pots of oil and wine to the natives of the northern coast of the Black Sea in order to exchange them for barley and wheat, the demand for which is increasing as the population increases in the newly emerging cities. Specialized agriculture, gradually developing, replaced primitive hunting; meat food began to be replaced by vegetarian food, more appropriate to the climate of the new settlement zone; commercial ties developed, very soon reaching significant proportions - all this increased the well-being of the Greek people and led to communication with peoples more ancient culture, while the Greeks themselves were still very uncouth.

But for this, the Greeks had to undertake another conquest - to conquer the sea, which they began to do at the same time timidly, boldly, and ineptly. They entered their country from the north by land. The Greek tribes roamed the steppes of Asia and Russia for so long, hunting and driving their skinny herds, that they even forgot the name of that vast expanse of water, which is designated by the same word among almost all related peoples of the Indo-European group. For the water space, called in Latin and its derivative languages ​​mare, mer, etc., in the Germanic languages ​​Merr, See, sea and sea, morje in the Slavic languages, the Greeks did not have a word - they did not know what to call it. They had to borrow the name from the tribes that inhabited the territory in which they settled: the newcomers designated the sea with the word thalassa (“thalassa”). It was from these natives, much more civilized than themselves, that the Greeks learned to build ships. Filled at first with a deep fear of the insidious elements, incited by “severe poverty... bitter need and the torment of an empty belly,” as the ancient poets put it, they ventured into the kingdom of waves and winds and led their ships loaded with goods over the depths of the sea. Gradually, at the cost of great effort and losses, they become the most skilled people of antiquity in navigation, surpassing even the Phoenicians themselves.

A people of farmers, a people of seafarers - this is the original appearance and the first steps in the development of civilization of the Greek people.

The conquest of the sea was quickly followed by other conquests. The Greek people master the art of poetically expressing their thoughts and creating images; he explores unexplored areas and opens up vast new things - all this will later be called literary genres. Originally in Greek there is not even a name for them: but even nameless, they bloom in abundance and with unprecedented splendor with incomparable beauty. This language is as living as grass or a spring; it is flexible and capable of expressing the subtlest shades of thought; it can be used to explain the most intimate movements of the heart. It sometimes sounds like bravura music, sometimes like music that delights the ear, sometimes like a mighty organ, sometimes it cries like a thin flute or rings like a village pipe.

All primitive peoples have long worked to the sound of songs or rhythmic phrases, as this makes work easier. Greek poets developed these rhythms extensively, most of which were inherited from ancient folk tunes. At first they created high epic verse, using its noble and varied cadence to glorify the exploits of heroes of the past. Poems of immense size were passed down from generation to generation, the text of which was initially half improvised. These poems were performed in recitative to the simplest accompaniment of the lyre - the delight shared by the listeners contributed to the development of collective feelings of respect for courageous deeds and enterprise. Over time, these vague poems take shape; the completion of this process were those two magnificent works which we still read today are the Iliad and the Odyssey - the bible of the Greek people.

Other poets, linking poetry more closely with music, singing or dancing, drawing inspiration from everyday life people and cities, praising or ridiculing, captivating or teaching, they create satirical, love and civil lyrics. Still others invent theater; in tragedy and comedy they imitate life, but at the same time create it again. Dramatic poets become educators of the Greek people.

While some, with the help of the enchanting sounds of their language, memories of the past, worries and hopes of their present, dreams and seductions of their imagination, created the three main poetic genres of all times - epic, lyricism and drama - others armed themselves with a chisel and carved in wood, and then carved in solid limestone and marble - the best plastic materials on earth - or they cast in bronze images of the human body, that body of incomparable beauty that belonged to both people and gods. These gods, who inhabit the entire world and are hidden in a harsh secret, had to be won over at all costs, made tame. To humanize and civilize them, there was no the best way, how to endow them with the perfect and tangible body of a man or woman. Magnificent temples are erected to the gods, their images are installed in them, but they are given honor under open air. The greatness of the buildings erected for the gods was intended to simultaneously testify to the glory of the cities that built them. Although in all centuries, including the heyday, the Greeks dedicated all the works of their sculpture and architecture to the celestials, these arts, which they adopted from neighboring peoples, nevertheless asserted the ability of man to create beauty from stone and metal.

Simultaneously with the great upsurge that prompted the Greeks in the 7th and 6th centuries BC. e. rush to conquer all the blessings of life, a desire arose to understand the simplest laws of nature. The Greeks want to comprehend the world around us, find out what it is made of and how it is made, and, having unraveled its laws, learn to control them. They invent mathematics and astronomy, lay the foundations of physics and medicine.

For whom are all these discoveries and inventions being made? For other people, for their benefit and pleasure, but not yet for all of humanity. First of all, for residents of the policy, which should be understood as a community of citizens living in one district (several villages with an administrative center) of Greek territory. Within these frameworks, which are still very limited, the Greeks want to create a society that gravitates towards freedom and equalizes its members in political rights. In the most developed Greek city policies, this society is based on the principle of democracy. Thus, the Greeks created the first, still very imperfect, form of democracy.

We have mentioned all the most important conquests, the totality of which determines Greek civilization. They are all aimed at one goal: to increase man’s power over nature, to affirm and strengthen his human essence. That is why very often - and with good reason - Greek civilization is called humanism. The Greek people sought to improve human nature and improve his life.

Since we continue to strive for this even now, the example of the Greeks who did not complete their work, and even their collapse, is worth thinking about for the people of our era.

In the tragedy of Prometheus, the poet Aeschylus divided into several stages the long path of the Greek people from a state of savagery to civilization. He, of course, does not know why or how these helpless and ignorant ancestors could rise to the first stage of knowledge that brought them deliverance. Aeschylus shares with them some of their superstitions: he believes in oracles, like a savage believes in a sorcerer. Aeschylus attributes to Prometheus, the god whom he calls the Lover of Mankind, all the inventions wrested from nature by human efforts.

However, the Benefactor of Humanity and people along with him are not spared from the hatred of Zeus - the “tyrant” of earth and sky, who planned to destroy the proud human race and who did not succeed in this only because Prometheus interfered with him; by this, Aeschylus turns the thinking and acting Friend of People into a daring bearer of that energy with which the human mind constantly struggles, striving to overcome our eternal poverty and helplessness.

27.10.08

From the point of view of a theoretically grounded development strategy for Russia and the whole world, it is extremely important to comprehend and solve fundamental, including very specific, pressing problems such as general questions modern civilization in general and as special, but specifically civilizational problems of a particular country.

Let me give you one example. In the portrayal of a number of influential theorists and in practical activities a considerable number of European institutions modern problems democracies look like this: there are centers modern democracy, where democratic procedures and values ​​have the character of already fully defined, clear models, paradigms, which only require transfer to other, not yet democratized countries; mission of "civilized" countries, their ruling circles, relevant international authorities - simply implement these samples.

It is unnecessary to prove that this position is purely ideological, stubbornly and not always deftly defending the interests, views, approaches of very specific “centers of power” and influence, and in fact - not even of certain countries, but of specific ruling groups. Not to mention the fact that the means, methods, and ways of “implementing” and spreading democracy in practice turn out to be far from democratic and civilized; in the light of the civilizational process, the whole matter looks different. For both in specialized literature and in truly democratic discourse it has already been recognized: democratic practices, forms, procedures are experiencing today, everywhere, including in the so-called civilized countries, a deep and precisely civilizational crisis.

This means, in particular, that modern civilization no longer resigns itself to simply following the formalisms of democracy, to the very widespread and fairly easy emasculation democratic forms, and often with their transformation into a cover, a front sign for an anti-democratic reality.

What has been said, of course, does not imply a rejection of the best traditions and the very forms and procedures of democracy, but only that the agenda modern development the question is raised about a significant, paradigmatic transformation of democracy, its processes, procedures, its values, common to the entire civilization, and - accordingly - about the improvement, in accordance with modern needs and requirements, of the theory of democracy, including its general philosophical premises.

Or another example, from domestic social practice. When strategic or tactical, general or specific, topical problems and tasks are formulated and solved in our country, their understanding and solution are almost never translated into civilizational approaches. And failures, which so often occur in their practical solution and stem precisely from the country’s civilizational backwardness, are almost never comprehended, not assessed in this plane, much less outlined in their systematicity and integrity. Meanwhile, in the case of putting forward any serious all-Russian or regional program, it would be necessary to calculate in advance some “civilization coefficients”, both facilitating and, in particular, hindering the implementation and execution of the planned programs (in the country as a whole, in individual regions or locally level). For the sum of civilizational prerequisites and factors must be determined, “calculated” even in the first place.

I’ll explain why using a very simple and clear example. It is possible - and it is very necessary! – supply new ambulances to villages or small towns, as, thank God, is being done in accordance with the national health care program. But if new cars cannot drive on rural off-road roads, if they break down every now and then due to potholes on the typical streets of Russian small towns, if they are served by half-drunk drivers driving mainly to patients who have been poisoned by burnt vodka, then it is unlikely the much-needed program will achieve its important goals.

In my works, I try to consider more specifically those aspects of the life structure, way of life, and the consciousness of people, which, in my opinion, should be included in the concept of the “civilization coefficient”, and we are talking about both its main, core components, and about the “trifles of civilization”, which in fact are not trifles at all, because the most important thing often depends on them. On them - for example, on bad roads (often literally) - the engine of the most significant, hard-won government reforms and transformations stalls.

What kind of person can be called civilized as opposed to uncivilized creatures, barbarians?

A civilized person is necessarily a hard worker and a creator. The barbarian not only neglects creative work, but at any moment is ready to destroy and spoil what has been created by nature and accumulated by history. A civilized person strives to master the latest means, achievements of labor, its organization, the most effective work skills and knowledge, thus adopting the experience of other people. He thinks, designs, forecasts, critically reflects and constantly improves his activities. Even if he does not have his own scientific and higher technical knowledge, he has interest and respect for them. The barbarian is at least indifferent to all this: if he works, it is in the old fashioned way, at the level of a plow and a sledgehammer.

So, good, effective, creative, intelligent, skilled work, respect for work and proud self-respect for oneself as a worker, an owner - the first group of signs that distinguish a civilized individual. Such an individual cannot afford, neglecting the fundamental principles of civilization, to produce goods that no one needs or are harmful; cannot, is organically incapable of squandering, throwing into the wind what was created not only by his own labor, but also by the efforts of other people. For he respects and protects other people’s labor and property no less than the fruits of his labor and his property.

The second group of characteristics that distinguish a civilized person from a barbarian is associated with the attitude towards freedom, dignity, responsibility - both one’s own and other individuals, countries, and peoples. A person who is an owner is a concept that has long been used with a negative connotation. But the same experience of history teaches that a civilized person is an owner, endowed with freedom, common sense, the ability to make decisions and be responsible for them. The civilized individual, especially in modern conditions, gravitates towards being a democratic individual and a member of a democratic, civil society, because his civic activity is an organic continuation, as well as a prerequisite for free and initiative labor activity.

A civilized person is characterized by natural pride in his nation, people, country, and the desire to serve them with work and talent. At the same time, true civilization is incompatible with an uncritical attitude towards their history and modern life, with the humiliation of other nations and peoples, with nationalist aggressiveness. A civilized person carefully and responsibly chooses the groups, associations, and associations he joins; he categorically and resolutely opposes bloodshed, violence, and destructive conflicts. The barbarian is quite tolerant of the fact that property, freedom, and responsibility have been taken away from him and other people. He experiences a constant desire to take something from other individuals, groups, peoples - only to eat, squander, destroy what he has taken; he willingly joins the aggressive crowd, ready for bloodshed. Dictatorship, totalitarian regimes, and nationalist Black Hundred movements rely on barbarians.

The third group of characteristics that distinguish a civilized person can be attributed to the conditions in which he works and rests, communicates with other people, as well as to the style of his behavior. What distinguishes him from a barbarian, including the modern barbarian mired in savagery, is also his desire and ability to organize his daily life: cleanliness, convenience, the comfort of everyday life, he needs like air. Of course, a civilized individual is a human being and nothing human is alien to him, including emotions.

It is no coincidence that the ancient Greeks so exalted the value of moderation of needs and wisdom of behavior. “Measure is excellent in everything,” said the “Golden Verses” of the Pythagoreans. There is a kind of paradox here. The needs of a civilized person are developed, rich, subtle, and varied. But he at least strives to moderate them, to make them reasonably sufficient. The barbarian, on the other hand, has limited and crude needs. But if he has the opportunity to satisfy them, he knows no measure.

Motroshilova Nelly Vasilievna, Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, Head of Department of the Institute

The editors of "United Fatherland" thanks Artur Kryzhanovsky for providing the material and preparing it for publication